http://chineseinput.net/에서 pinyin(병음)방식으로 중국어를 변환할 수 있습니다.
변환된 중국어를 복사하여 사용하시면 됩니다.
한국과 미국의 원전 중대사고 시 소외 사고결말평가 시스템 비교 연구
윤상혁,김민성,김광표 (사)한국방사선산업학회 2022 방사선산업학회지 Vol.16 No.3
Having experienced the TMI, the Chernobyl, and the Fukushima accident, NPPs are beingforced to follow stricter safety procedures. Korea and the US are using S-REDAP and RASCAL offsiteconsequence assessment systems based on relevant laws. In accordance with the Act on PhysicalProtection and Radiological Emergency, domestic NPP operators use the assessment system to determineemergency resident protection measures. For accurate resident protection measures, high reliability ofthe domestic consequence assessment system and methodology is important. The purpose of this studyis to compare methodologies of consequence assessment systems in Korea and US and to compare andanalyze assessment results. In this case, the result comparison analysis used an assessment code thatuses the domestic consequence assessment methodology. To achieve this, first, the methodologies of thetwo countries were compared. Second, a simulation scenario was established. Finally, assessment wasconducted based on the simulated scenario. It was found that there are differences in the source termassessment in the inventory and radioactive decay method, the core emission fraction applied unit, and thecore damage input method. In the atmospheric diffusion assessment, the diffusion model was the same asthe Gaussian model, but the domestic assessment models were AERMOD and CALPUFF, and the US wasTADPLUME and TADPUFF. In the dose assessment, there were differences in the duration of the derivedresults and the dose conversion factor. The simulation scenario was set as a scenario in which radioactivematerial was released outside the NPP, and the leakage rate at the time of release was set at 5% hr-1, andthe core damage was set at 5% of the core melt. As a result of the total emission amount, assessment codewas evaluated 1.8 times more conservatively than RASCAL. The initial dose was evaluated 5 to 9 times moreconservatively on assessment code, and 2 to 4 times more conservatively on RASCAL for the mid- to longtermdose. The initial dose was due to the difference between the emission amount and the assessmentperiod, and the mid- to long-term dose was considered to be due to the difference in the terrain effect. The results of this study are expected to prove the reliability of domestic accident assessment system andmethodologies and to be used in the prediction of doses in case of severe accidents.
윤상혁,김교선 한국공업화학회 2019 Journal of Industrial and Engineering Chemistry Vol.73 No.-
Flame vapor deposition (FVD) process is the fast and effective method to prepare high quality 1-Dnanostructured tungsten oxide thinfilm, which has several advantages in photoelectrochemical (PEC)water splitting such as more sunlight absorption, straight electron path and short diffusion length ofelectron hole. The precursor concentration in FVD process is the most important process variable todetermine the morphology of prepared nanostructures. In this study, the precursor concentration in FVDprocess was controlled precisely andflexibly by adjusting the tungsten feed rate with the wire feedingdevice which we developed. Several interesting nanostructures were prepared in FVD process bymodulating the precursor concentration with time and the reasonable growth mechanisms fordevelopments of those nanostructures are also proposed. The narrower and longer 1-D tungsten oxidenanostructure could be prepared by controlling the precursor feed rate and deposition time in FVDprocess, which is desirable for efficient PEC water splitting.