QGVA급 LCD Driver IC의 Source Driver부 설계

유충호(Chung-Ho Yu),김학윤(Hak-Yun Kim),권하영(Ha-Young Kwon),서상조(Sang-Jo Seo),신봉조(Bong-Jo Shin),박근형(Keun-Hyung Park),최호용(Ho-Yong Choi) 대한전자공학회 2006 대한전자공학회 학술대회 Vol.2006 No.11

In this paper. we design a source driver block for QVGA (240RGB*320)-scale LCD Driver IC (LDI) avaliable 262k-color for display. The source driver block is designed using a channeled amplifier scheme in which an unit-gain amplifier is drived to channel and γ-correction is executed to improve image view. The block consists of source drivers block, reference voltage generator block and grayscale voltage generator block. A circuit for the source driver block has been designed in transistor level using 0.35㎛ CMOS technology library and verified using Hspice.

새로운 인격권으로서 잊힐 권리의 보장에 관한 고찰

유충호 ( Chung Ho Yu ) 홍익대학교 법학연구소 2014 홍익법학 Vol.15 No.1

Rapid growth of data communication technology created new data storage techniques and internet civil society, creating a paradigm shift of information flow. In addition, the appearance of Web 2.0 and habituated daily use of smartphone recently made it possible to create information with ease, and similarly leading to the convenience of information acquisition in daily life. However, it brought not only advantages but problems such as invasion of privacy, defamation of character, or personal information protection because of circulating personal information on the Internet. In particular, once personal information is exposed to the Internet, it is not easy to be deleted due to internet characteristics, which is prone to make ill use of that like arbitrarily releasing one identity or witch-hunts using the profiling process of the Internet search engine. Therefore, the necessity of the right to be forgotten, the right of erasure of all the personal information on-line, arose and the EU tried to legalize it in January 2012, then further adopted all over the world. Accordingly, the right to be forgotten by the EU is worthy of notice in that data subjects are given the right to have their personal information deleted or prevented from diffusion in case of qualified data subjects, including their personal information which a manager of personal information saves under an agreement, which an information subject voluntarily provides while using Internet services and which is copied or linked by others. In this regard, it is hard to make a request to delete any information a data subject voluntarily gives or personal information copied or linked by others in reality because personal information protection laws in Korea are supposed to manage personal information only for business purposes. But the right to be forgotten championed by the EU also has problems such as information limit or technical limits, so its realistic possibility is uncertain. Thus, to establish the feasible limit of erasure, a manager of personal information should only delete data shadow within amenable personal information limits by using realizable techniques, and a data subject and a manager of personal information need to have the right to be forgotten rationally through the enactment of an Act such as the request to the right of blocking information searches or the expiration of statute of limitations. On the basis of the above explanation, when the right to be forgotten is introduced and established in Korea, it should be considered rationally.

퍼블리시티권의 법적 쟁점과 보호방안에 관한 고찰

유충호(Yu Chung Ho) 중앙대학교 법학연구원 2015 法學論文集 Vol.39 No.2

The rights of publicity can be understood as a form of rights that controls or prohibits the acts of using and earning economic benefit by commercializing a person's identity such as one's name or portrait. As advertisement and media industry grew, the power of celebrities' names, images, and voices that attract customers has been estimated to have valuable property. This has led to cases that use this power commercially. At the same time, controversies regarding the rights of publicity are rising in many forms. Currently, Korea neither has any regulations regarding the rights of publicity nor shows any precedent made by the supreme court. Due to this, there is a need to evaluate the rights of publicity with analytical theories. When considering legal issues of the rights of publicity, legal character of the rights of publicity shows that, when only its character regarding property rights is permitted, the subject cannot be properly protected. Also, as it cannot be regarded separately from personal rights as well, the rights of publicity can be regarded as a form of rights that needs to be controlled first, as its personal rights-type of character comes first before its property rights-type of character. Hence, the alienation of the rights of publicity cannot be permitted; it should be regarded as something that should be used with permission. In addition, even though the alienation is not acknowledged, partial usage and the term of using the rights of publicity could be selectively chosen and used commercially; this satisfies the necessity required from the market due to its economic values. Moreover, if the subject dies, the rights of publicity no longer get controlled by personal factors, which indicates that it loses its character regarding personal rights; in this case, only the property rights-type of character remains for the rights of publicity, which then allows its inheritance. If violations of the rights of publicity occur, those acts are deemed to be illegal. The amount of damages should be judged as the payment which a user should pay when the rights of publicity is acknowledged. In addition, if violations occur to the person who has been allowed to monopolize the rights of publicity, it should be cleared out by approaching the problem under the title of violating receivables caused by the third party. Yet our civil law only states the liability of compensation which is only limited to a mental suffering, it is possible to state that there should be a proper regulations that guarantees rights of personal images, which includes names and portraits, that have property values. Hence the proper protection of the rights of publicity should be made by introducing explicit regulations through legislation that could relieve legal uncertainties.

잊힐 권리의 민사법적 쟁점과 입법론적 연구

유충호(Yu, Chung-Ho) 중앙대학교 법학연구원 2018 法學論文集 Vol.42 No.1

정보통신기술(ICT)과 인공지능(AI) 기술이 발달되고 융합되면서 4차 산업 혁명을 탄생시켰고, 이러한 지능정보화 시대에서 개인정보보호문제는 현대 사회의 새로운 패러다임을 불러올 것으로 예상된다. 지능정보사회에서는 개인정보 의 이용이 비약적으로 증대됨에 따라 그 침해의 위험성이 그 어느 때보다도 높아지게 될 것이기 때문이다. 즉, 인터넷 환경이 참여와 공유를 기반으로 하는 Web 2.0시대로 변화하면서 SNS를 통하여 자신에 관한 많은 정보를 인터넷상에 스스로 노출시켰고, 진화된 검색엔진들로 인하여 추적 및 프로파일링(profiling)되면서 개인의 프라이버시 침해, 나아가 취업이나 가정생활에도 영향을 미치게 된 것이다. 이와 같은 문제의 심각성을 깨닫고 정보주체가 온라인상 자신과 관련된 정보에 대한 삭제 및 확산 방지를 요구할 수 있는 권리의 필요성이 사회적으로 논의되기 시작하였으며, 이러한 논의는 유럽연합에서 ‘잊힐 권리(Right to be forgotten)’라는 명칭으로 법제화 하려는 움직임을 통해 전 세계적으로 가속화되고 있다. 우리나라에서도 잊힐 권리에 관하여 다루고 있지만, 공법적인 연구에 집중되어 있어, 본고에서는 상대적으로 연구가 미흡한 민사법적 측면의 검토를 하였다. 현재 잊힐 권리의 개념이 명확하게 정립되지 않은 시점에서 그 청구대상을 ①정보주체의 동의하에 인터넷서비스제공자가 수집한 개인신상정보, ②정보주체가 게시한 정보, ③제3자에 의해 게시된 정보주체의 정보로 나누어 민법상 금지청구권의 적용가능성을 고찰하였다. 하지만 잊힐 권리가 민법상 금지청구권의 해석을 통해 실현이 가능하더라도, 잊힐 권리는 청구대상이 개인에 관한 정보이고 정보통신망에서 발생하는 권리침해이며 청구의 상대방으로 인터넷서비스제공자도 포함하고 있다. 그리고 그 판단은 법원이 해야 하므로 정보가 삭제되기까지 절차가 복잡하고 상당한 시간이 소요된다. 따라서 법적 명확성 확보와 법률의 체계를 고려해볼 때 본고에서 살펴본 내용을 바탕으로 개인정보보호법제에 명시하는 것이 정보주체가 잊힐 권리를 실현하는 데 있어 효과적인 방안이라 할 것이다. 잊힐 권리의 법제도를 마련하고자 하는 이 시점에서 공·사법의 법률문제가 함께 검토되어야 한다. 이에 따라 본 연구가 잊힐 권리가 합리적이고 균형 있는방안으로 정립되어 법제화를 추진하는 데 참고자료가 될 수 있기를 기대해본다. In the contemporary society, any information can be saved as the digital, furthermore it is possible to copy and to spread out with no elimination of the information, and it can be remained in somewhere on the Internet eternally. This phenomenon has caused unexpected disadvantage by not only the information which a user has created on the Internet in the past but also spreading out the information which is related with a certain event on the Internet without the user’s intention after a long time. In other words, it has a high possibility to be abused as ‘Identity Disclosure’ or ‘Witch-hunt’ by profiling private information which is remained on the Internet through search-engines, because the information is hard to be deleted on the characteristic of the Internet if it is exposed to the public. Thus, it has come up for the necessary of the right to be forgotten which people can ask the prevention of diffusion and elimination of the information about themselves on the Internet, and it is accelerated through UN tried to enact it under the name of ‘the right to be forgotten’ in January 2012. Korea Communications Commission try to prepare the guideline to guarantee the autonomy of private data of the user at least in the scope which is needed for accepting the right to be forgotten in Korea. After they operate the guideline and examine the effectiveness of it, they plan to enact the right to be forgotten by reforming the Information Network Law in the National Assembly. The academic circles deal with the right to be forgotten, but it focuses on the legal procedures. Thus this research paper will investigate the aspect of civil law which is insufficient for the study relatively. Now, the definition of the right to be forgotten is still unclear, thus this research paper concerns the target of anspruch of the right to be forgotten as three parts. The first is the private data which the Internet service provider collects under the permission from the subject of that information. The second is the information which the subject of that information posts. The third is the information about the subject by the third person. This research paper investigates the private legal realization plans by the three targets of ansprunch of the right to be forgotten. The information which Internet service provider collects under the permission of the subject of the information can be realized the right to be forgotten base on the general data protection regulation because it is legally private data as the closed information. The information which the subject of information posts by themselves should be recognized in accordance with the policy statement based on the autonomy of private data of the subject as the part of the policy which is the contract of Internet service provide. Also, the information which the third person posts can be deleted partially through the elimination of works which comes from the copyright law as the method of realization of the right to be forgotten, and it can be claimed the elimination of the information based on the Information Network Law if Privacy Invasion is recognized. Furthermore, it is necessary to apply to civil legal injunctive relief to relax the application condition and standard when it concerns the characteristic of Internet, because the concept of personal right and the degree of invasion can be flexible by depending on the period even if the personal invasion is not existed now. Even if, however, the right to be forgotten can be realized through the construction of civil legal injunctive relief, the target of anspruch of the right to be forgotten is the private information and violation of personal right which is occurred in the information network including Internet service provider. Because the court should make a decision, it should have a complicated process and take a long time until the information would be deleted. Thus, specifying in the Information Network Law based on th

부동산 이중양도의 반사회성에 대한 판단 기준

황경웅(Hwang, Kwong-woong),유충호(yu, Chung-Ho) 중앙대학교 법학연구원 2010 法學論文集 Vol.34 No.2

부동산이중양도에서 바탕이 되고 기초적으로 해결을 해야 하는 이중양도의 반사회성의 판단기준에 대하여 알아보았다. 연구목적이 되었던 이중양도의 인정여부와 반사회성의 판단기준에 대하여 지금까지의 판례들을 분석하여 그 기준을 명확히 하고자 하였다. 우선 부동산이중양도의 인정여부에 대해서는 사적자치에 의한 계약자유의 원칙에 따라 자유로운 경쟁을 인정하여야 하지만, 그 범위는 건전한 사회질서를 해하지 않는 범위 내에서, 즉 제3자에게 악의적으로 피해를 주지 않아야 한다는 범위 내에서 이루어져야만 할 것이다. 그러므로 부동산이중양도를 원칙적으로 인정하되 건전한 사회질서에 반한다는 예외적인 상황 하에서는 인정할 수 없다고 할 것이다. 이중양도의 반사회성에 대한 판단기준으로서 언제부터 이중양도를 하여야 반사회적인 행위로서 무효로 되는가와 관련하여서는, 양도인이 자기의 임의대로 제1매매계약을 해제할 수 없는 단계에 이르게 되면 양수인을 위하여 매매계약에 따른 구속을 받아야 하는 입장에 있기 때문에, 해약금으로 해제를 할 수 없는 단계 즉 중도금이 지급된 때나 혹은 제1양수인이 계약의 이행에 착수한 때 이후에는 이중양도를 하게되면 반사회적 행위로서 무효로 될 수 있다고 할 것이다. 다음으로 판단기준이 되는 적극가담론에 대하여는 행위자를 중심으로 하여 양도인과 제2양수인간의 충분하고 명백한 이유가 인정된 경우와 제2양수인의 적극가담이 인정된 경우를 나누어 좀 더 그 기준을 명확히 하고자 하였다. 즉, 양도인과 제2양수인이 모두 제1양도계약의 인식사실을 넘어서 가장채권에 기한 강제경매나 양도금액이 부적합한 경우, 매매계약 시 현장답사로 인한 이중양도의 인식가능성 그리고 양도인과 제2양수인이 특수한 관계인 경우 등의 제1양도계약에 따른 제1양수인의 채권을 침해하려는 해의를 가지고 통모한 것으로 볼 수 있거나 또는 통모의 간접증거로 볼수 있다면 반사회적 행위로서 민법 제103조 위반으로 무효로 볼 수 있다고 할 것이다.하지만 피상속인의 제1양도사실을 모르는 상속인이 이중양도를 한 경우처럼 양도인과 제2양수인 중 일방만이 제1양도계약에 따른 의무를 회피하려는 의사가 있는 것으로 위에서 언급한 통모에는 해당되지 않는다고 보는 경우에는 양도인은 제1양도계약에 따른 의무가 있다는 것을 몰랐다고 하더라도 제2양수인이 그런 사실을 잘 알면서도 그 의무를 면탈시키려는 의도로 계약에 임하였다는 예외적인 경우에 한하여 민법 제103조 위반이 된다. 제2양수인의 적극가담한 경우는 양도인이 초기 의사가 이중양도를 의욕하지 않았다는 전제하에서 제2양수인이 양도인을 기망하거나, 궁박한 사정을 이용한 경우, 양도인에게 양수받을 수 없어 양도인과 관련된 제3자를 사주하여 양도 받은 경우, 그리고 양수인에 게 선행(先行)의 양도사실이 없는 것처럼 오신하게 만든 경우에는 이중양도계약이 있기전에 양도인이 이중양도를 할 의사가 없었음에도 불구하고 제2양수인의 적극가담행위로서 이중양도계약이 체결된 것이기 때문에 그 법률행위는 무효라고 할 것이다. 따라서 종래의 반사회적 무효론의 문제점과 거래질서의 안정, 제1양수인의 합리적인 보호 등을 고려해봤을 때 이중양도의 반사회성에 대한 판단은 위에서 언급한 요건들을 기준으로 엄격히 판단하여야 할 것으로 생각한다. I have looked into antisocial standards of judgment which are basic and should be fundamentally solved in the duplication transfer of real estate. I wanted to clarify if it is admitted as duplication transfer or not as antisocial standard of judgment which is my research's goal by analyzing precedents. Regarding whether the duplication transfer of real estate is approved or not, we should accept free competition according to a liberal contract principle conducted by private autonomy. However, the scope should be in a sound social norm, in other words, not causing damage to anybody on purpose. Concerning when the duplication transfer is done in order that an antisocial action should be invalid as an antisocial standard of judgment, when a transferor can't cancel the positive conspiracy, because the transferor should be restrained by a grantee, when the contract can't be canceled by a cancellation fee, that is to say, an intermediate payment is already paid or the first grantee undertakes the contract, it is said the duplication transfer can be invalid as an antisocial act. Next, about active participation which is a standard for duplication transfer of real estate, I intend to establish clear -cut lines of that by dividing cases into two : the sufficient and evident reason is allowed and the second grantee is accepted as active participation. Although both the transferor and the second grantee recognize the positive conspiracy, when they do a compulsory sale by fake bonds or dealing money is not suitable and there is possibility that the duplication transfer is recognized at the time the trade agreement is done on field work and the transferor and the second grantee have special relationship, if having malicious intent and working in concert can be considered or indirect evidence of acting in league can be seen, they are regarded as violating article 103 of the Civil Law as an antisocial action. However, like a legal heir who doesn't know an ancestor's transfer does the duplication transfer of the real estate, when either transferor the second grantee has intention of avoiding the duty according to the positive conspiracy and it doesn't belong to the working in collusion mentioned above, it violates the article 103 of the Civil Law only if the second grantee knowing the fact well undertakes the contract to avoid legal obligation even though the transferor doesn't know there are duties according to the positive conspiracy. In the case that the second grantee has active participation, under the precondition that a transferor doesn't have any purpose of the duplication transfer when the second grantee deceives the transferor, takes advantage of urgent situation, incites the third person related to the transferor so as to get the transfer because of impossibility to get the transfer from the transferor, or leads to misbelieve that the transferor has no positive conspiracy, the legal action is invalid because the duplication transfer is agreed as the second grantee's active participation even if the transferor has no intention of the duplication transfer before the duplication transfer. Therefore, regarding the problems of antisocial nullity and transaction safety, and the first grantee's reasonable protection, antisocial standards of judgment about the duplication transfer of real estate should be strictly acted by the factors mentioned above.

밀의 도정 및 발효 균주에 따른 우리밀 메주의 품질특성

이경란 ( Gyeong Ran Lee ),고유진 ( Yu Jin Ko ),김은정 ( Eun Jung Kim ),설희경 ( Hui Gyeong Seol ),김은자 ( Eun Ja Kim ),김일훈 ( Il Hun Kim ),심기환 ( Ki Hwan Shim ),김영기 ( Young Gi Kim ),유충호 ( Chung Ho Ryu ) 한국식품저장유통학회(구 한국농산물저장유통학회) 2012 한국식품저장유통학회지 Vol.19 No.6

본 연구는 표준화된 밀 메주를 제조하기 위해 원료밀의 도정에 따른 수침 및 증숙조건과 품질특성을 조사하였다 수침시간에 따른 2분도 밀, 5분도 밀, 통밀, 밀가루의 물리적 특성변화를 조사하기 위해 무게 부피, 수분 함량, 수분 흡수 량을 살펴 본 결과, 대부분의 밀에서 수침4시간 이후에는 평형상태에 도달하였다. 원료밀 종류에 따른 증숙시간을 조사한 결과, 통밀을 제외한 밀원료의 증숙시간은 100℃에서 10분이 적합하였다. 최적 수침 및 증숙조건으로, 가공한 2분도 밀과 5분도 밀을 각각 A. oryzae와 B. subtilis Ml으로 발효하여 우리밀 메주를 제조한 후 일반 성분 및 효소역가를 비교한 결과, 황국균을 사용한 경우 발효 효율이 더 우수하게 나타났다. 또한 2분도 밀도다 5분도 밀에서 총당, 환원당 및 a-amylase 역가가 높게 나타나, 우수한 밀 메주의 제조를 위해 5분도 밀을 A. oryzae로 발효하는 것이 효율적이라 사료된다. In this research, the soaking and steaming conditions of Korean wheat meju according to the degree of milling were investigated, and the quality characteristic was analyzed, for the manufacture of the standardized Korean wheat meju. As a result of the changes in weight, volume, moisture content, and moisture absorption amount, which indicate the physical properties of Korean wheat meju using 20% polished wheat, 50% polished wheat, whole wheat, and whole wheat flour, most of the wheat materials reached the equilibrium state after 4 hours of soaking. Also, the appropriate steaming time to complete the cooking of the wheat materials was found to be 10 min at 100℃, except for whole wheat. The 20 and 50% polished wheat materials were selected for Korean wheat meju based on the soaking and steaming results. The selected wheat materials were fermented using Aspergillus oryzae and Bacillus subtilis M1, respectively, and the quality properties and enzyme activities showed that A. oryzae would be effective for the manufacture of Korean wheat meju. Also, the 50% polished wheat showed higher total sugar content, reducing sugar content, and α-amylase activity than the 20% polished wheat. Therefore, it is supposed that the fermentation of 50% polished wheat by A. oryzae would be appropriate for manufacturing superior Korean wheat meju.