http://chineseinput.net/에서 pinyin(병음)방식으로 중국어를 변환할 수 있습니다.
변환된 중국어를 복사하여 사용하시면 됩니다.
수도권 규제완화정책에 대한 정책 네트워크 모형 적용 연구
유병권 ( Byeong Kwon You ) 한국도시지리학회 2013 한국도시지리학회지 Vol.16 No.1
This research focuses on analyzing changes in policy network and policy output by using Seoul Metropolitan Area policy, one of the key policies in territorial space management of Korea, as policy network. The study was carried out for a year form around October, 2008, when the deregulation policy in the Seoul Metropolitan Area was announced by the Lee Myung Bak Administration, through documentary survey and participatory observation. It found out that, before a policy was announced, policy-making was led by the closed policy network within the government. In this process, the Presidential Council on National Competitiveness, which was supported and authorized by President Lee Myung Bak and entrepreneurs, showed leadership and played an important role in decision-making, At that time, the key issue in policy output was to amend the Presidential Decree that prescribes significant deregulation to the extent that the government is allowed to do without facing resistance form the National Assembly. After the policy was announced, approving and opposition groups to the policy debate within the government, but they formed an issue network to respond to the government policy. Especially, the opposition group raised strong resistance through a strategic alliance between political factions, which made the government draw up a more comprehensive regional development policy. It prevented radical deregulation and bought about a more consolidated opposition group. Also, members of the National Assembly, who were included in the issue network, helped submit legislation for policy changes. This study can be differentiated form other precedent researches by analyzing policy decision making process form the policy network perspective with more open and dynamic views. However, in the case of the closed policy community, it was difficult to identify significant differences between the previous studies that focused on bureaucratic or cooperative analyses.