참여행정과 행정절차 -대한민국에 있어서의 행정현실과 공법이론을 중심으로-

오준근(OH Jun-Gen) 한국공법학회 2002 공법연구 Vol.30 No.5

행정심판에 있어서의 부당판단에 관한 사례 연구

오준근(Oh, Jun-Gen) 한국비교공법학회 2013 공법학연구 Vol.14 No.4

방송위원회의 주의ㆍ경고 및 권고에 관한 행정법적 연구

오준근(Oh Jun-Gen) 한국방송학회 2004 방송통신연구 Vol.- No.59

대덕연구단지관련 법제의 정비방안에 관한 공법적 고찰

오준근(Oh Jun-Gen) 한국토지공법학회 2004 土地公法硏究 Vol.22 No.-

The purpose of this article is to present the direction of legislative reform necessary for developing the Korean Daedeok Science Town into a key Northeast Asian cluster. The Daedeok Science Town, which is located in Yuseong-gu, Daejeon Metropolitan City, the Republic of Korea, is expected to be developed into a model town standing comparison with foreign successful clusters. The reason is that the Daedeok Science Town has grown to play a key role of creating and popularizing science and technology knowledge, including core source technology, as well as training science and technology manpower through educational institutions installed in the Town, has contributed to the supplement and reinforcement of the core capability for industrial renovation, and has served to build science and technology infrastructures in Korea by furnishing abundant science and technology information databases. On the other hand, the Daedeok Science Town has its problems and limits. For example, it has no efficient means to put the accomplishments of research to commercial use and to activate a joint network between industrial circles, academia, and research institutes, has no foreign enterprises and foreign R&D centers, and lacks an effective system to provide necessary support to enterprises and a leading group to systematically push up with the cluster strategies. Such problems on the Daedeok Science Town leads directly to the defects in the legal system governing the Daedeok Science Town. The Daedeok Science Town Management Act is enacted and now in force. This Act, however, has its limit in that it just governs the Daedeok Science Town developed into industrial complex in view of the management of its site. In detail, it does not have the essential part of a law governing a special development zone for regional innovation, the legal basis for a management body to lead the innovation of the Daedeok Science Town, and the legal means to actualize dynamic factors specific to the Daedeok Science Town. To resolve the aforesaid problems, it is needed to enact a special Act to be substituted for the existing Daedeok Science Town Management Act. Such a new law must provide the legal basis for the main group to lead the development of the Daedeok Science Town as an innovation cluster, adopt the merits of a legal system related to a special development zone for regional innovation, and satisfy the requisites for a special law related to the development of science and technology beyond support provided under the Framework Act on Science and Technology and other related laws. It is expected that the enactment of new law, the establishment of necessary organizations and funds, and the building of a support system for the special development zone will enable the Daedeok Science Town to be developed into a core cluster in the Northeast Asia by making it possible to conduct efficient research and development and put the results to practical use.

부동산 개발사업 허가의 부관과 개발협약에 관한 한국과 미국의 비교법적 고찰

오준근(Oh Jun-Gen) 한국토지공법학회 2008 土地公法硏究 Vol.40 No.-

Land Development requires a variety of public facilities - roads, water, parks, schools - to support it. States and local governments expanded developer funded public facility provisions by means of required exactions, dedications and fees and land development conditions. The major legal issue with respect with these conditions is the connection to the land development. The cases and laws of the Republic of Korea and the United States about these land development conditions were compared in this article. It dealt with the cases of the Korean Supreme Court - the Reconstruction of old Apartment Housing Complex in Seoul and the Development of New Collective Housing Area in Yongin and the cases of the United States Supreme Court - Nollan v. California Coastal Commission and Dolan v. City of Tigard. The Results of the analysis were summarized as follows. First, the government agencies of the Republic of Korea and the United States imposed various conditions accompanied by land development permissions. Second, the standards of the legitimacy of these conditions were developed through the decisions of the courts. The Korean Supreme Court used ""Proper Connection Doctrine."" The necessity and usefulness of the conditions and mutual consent beforehand were the major contents of this doctrine. According to the decisions of the Supreme Court of the United States land development conditions must seek to promote a legitimate state interest, had to be related to the land development project and must be proportional to the needs or problems which the land development projects were expected to cause. Because both developers and agencies face difficult problems in the land development approval process, the system of ""Development Agreement"" has been used in the United States. Some specific statutory authorization were established to make clear that the agreements effectuate a public purpose recognized by the state. There had been no legal foundation for the introducing of this system in Korea. But the Korean agencies made actual consent with the developers about the conditions before they gave approvals of the land development projects. The Korean Supreme Court made the confirmity between the contents of the consents and land development conditions as major standard of decision of the legitimacy. This article indicated these problems and discussed the possibility of the introducing the development agreement system.

영국법상 사회기반시설에 대한 민간투자사업과 공공계약규정의 관계에 관한 연구

오준근(Jun, Gen Oh) 한국토지공법학회 2008 土地公法硏究 Vol.42 No.-

This article aims a scientific analysis about the relationship between the Public-Private-Partnership and the Public Contract Regulations in the United Kingdom. First, the meaning, the legal foundation and the model of Public-Private- Partnership (PPP) in Great Britain were put in order. Second, the structure and main contents of the Public Contract Regulations(PCR) were adjusted. The relationship between the PPP and the PCR in the United Kingdom was analysed on this basis. Followings are the results of this analysis. The PPP is widely used in the United Kingdom, but there is no special regulation only for the PPP. The PCR specify the procedures to be followed in relation to the award of public works contract, public supply contracts and public services contract. The contracting authorities are listed in regulation 3 of the PCR. The contracting authorities for the PPP contracts have to be one of the authorities in regulation 3 of the PCR. The PCR apply whenever a contracting authority seeks offers in relation to proposed public works contract, public supply contracts, public services contract, framework agreement or dynamic purchasing system according to the regulation 5 of the PCR. But the PPP contracts are such a complex situation as to choose one of the contract type regulated in the PCR. For the purpose of seeking offers in relation to a proposed public contracts, a contracting authority shall use the open procedure or the restricted procedure in all circumstances, except where it may use the negotiated procedure or the competitive dialogue procedure. This principle of contracting procedures have to be applied in PPP contracts. A checklist about how to select a contract award procedure in PPP contracts was formed in this article.

국민권익위원회 개편 방안에 관한 입법정책적 고찰

오준근(Oh, Jun-Gen) 경희법학연구소 2017 경희법학 Vol.52 No.1

This Study aimed to analyze the legislative policy on the reorganization of the Korean Anti-Corruption and Civil Rights Commission(ACRC). The ACRC was launched on February 2008 by the integration of the Ombudsman of Korea, the Korea Independent Commission against Corruption and the Administrative Appeals Commission. With the consolidation of these three organizations, planned to provide with one-stop service of addressing public complaints, filing administrative appeals and fighting corruption by a single organization in a speedier and more convenient manner. But after the 10 years of the operation of this organization, the consolidation of these functions in ACRC did not create the effect of multiplication but became on obstacle of the effective functioning of these three organizations as their own characters. This study suggested the legislation of the separation of the ACRC into following two independent organizations : Anti-Corruption Commission and Administrative Appeals Tribunals. First, The Republic of Korea need a legislation of an independent organization against the corruption. This legislation should vest the Anti-Corruption Commission (ACC) a comprehensive power to establish and operate the anti-corruption policy and to investigate the corrupt public servant. Second, The Korean Administrative Appeals Tribunal(AAT) should become an independent organization. There are more than 27 organizations for the management of the administrative appeals cases. These organizations should be integrated to the comprehensive AAT. 이 논문은 2017년 대통령 선거에 따라 새로운 정부가 출범하여 정부조직개편 입법을 하고자 할 경우 국민권익위원회의 바람직한 개편방향을 제시하고자 기획되었다. “국민권익위원회”는 이명박 정부의 정부조직 개편과정에서 “국민고충처리위원회”, “국무총리행정심판위원회” 및 “국가청렴위원회” 세 기관이 통합되어 2008년 2월 29일 새롭게 출범한 기관이다. 입법내용 및 운용현실을 검토한 결과 고충민원, 행정심판과 부패방지를 한 기관에서 수행하도록 한 국민권익위원회의 행정조직은 통합으로 인한 상승효과를 발휘하기 보다는 각각의기능에장애요소로작용하기때문에국민권익위원회는“부패방지위원회”와“행정심판원”이라는 두 독립한 기구로 분리 개편되어야 한다. 첫째, 부패방지는 “부패방지위원회”와 같이 이 기능만을 전담하는 전문적 독립기구에서수행하도록 개편되어야 한다. 정치적으로 중립적인 위원의 복합체인 합의제 행정기구를 법률에 의하여 설치하고 이 기구에 강력한 독립성을 부여하는 것이 바람직하다. 공직자의 부패문제를 근원적으로 해결하려면 부패의 예방과 부패문화의 청산을 위한 정책의 수립 및집행, 공직자와유관단체 및 국민에대한 교육 및홍보, 비리를 저지른공직자에 대한 수사권의 부여 등 부패의 청산과 관련한 제반 권한이 전담기관에 빠짐없이 부여될 수 있어야한다. 둘째, 행정심판은독립한준사법기구로서의“행정심판원”을설치하고 이기구에서전담하도록 개편되어야 한다. 이 경우 소청심사위원회, 조세심판원, 중앙토지수용위원회 등 27개이상에달하는전형적인특별행정심판위원회를최대한행정심판원으로통합 이관하여야한다. 고충민원은 대안적분쟁해결기능에속하지만, 현재권고이상을 할수없게 제도화되어있고, 행정심판을 제기한 경우 반드시 각하하도록 하여 제도적으로 분리된 상태이다. 고충민원과행정심판의실질적인통합이이룩되어야한다. 이논문은그조화적통합을위한대안을 제시하였다. 국민권익위원회를 “부패방지위원회”와 “행정심판원”으로 분리하고 각각의 기관에 전문성과 독립성을 부여할 경우 부패방지와 행정심판은 보다 합목적적으로 수행될 수 있을 것이다. 기관의수가 증가하는 것처럼보일 수 있지만, 여러 기관에 분산되어있는 부패방지 행정조직과 수십개에 달하는 행정심판조직을 통합할 경우 30개가 넘는 행정조직을 두 개의통합된 기관으로 이관하는 것이어서 그 통합의 효과를 극대화할 수 있을 것이라 생각한다. 정부조직의 개편을논의하는입법과정에서국민권익위원회의 개편이보다합리적이며바람직한 방향으로 이루어질 수 있기를 기대한다.

서울시 뉴타운 개발의 법적 문제점

오준근(Jun-Gen Oh) 한국토지공법학회 2006 土地公法硏究 Vol.30 No.-

  The "Special Act on Promotion of Urban Area Readjustment" is passed by the National Assembly in December 2005 and promulgated in January 2006. This Act is expected to help provide special legal supports for the development of new towns. However, it remains at issue whether such legislation is proper in the light of the whole system of public law governing the development and utilization of national land. In such context, this study handles the following.   First, it includes legal analysis on whether such legislation undermines ① the principles of integrated legal application due to enactment of the Special Act, ② the Seoul Metropolitan Area Readjustment Planning Act, or ③ the ranking structure of laws, although it is required to perform new town projects,   Secondly, it contains reviews on the provisions governing the new town projects including issues as to ① whether the new town projects are compatible with the national land and urban planning system in the designation of readjustment promotion zones, ② whether decisions on readjustment promotion plans can be made in a systematized and unified way, ③ problems in legal logic such as the establishment of unreasonable exceptions to assessment of impacts on environment, traffic, disasters, etc., and ④ problems in legal policies such as incomplete integration of readjustment promotion projects.   Lastly, it includes reviews on operators of the new town projects, including issues regarding ① the unbalance of persons in charge of the establishment of the plans concerned, ② the excess undertakers of the readjustment promotion projects, ③ the weakness of institutional foundations for project operators related to the expansion of infrastructures, and ④ the unreasonableness of the provisions governing the supervisors of project operators.   Some critics may say that this paper is focused on research into the demerits of both the new town projects and the Special Act on Promotion of Urban Area Readjustment applicable to such projects, rather than their merits. However, I think such research is indispensable taking into consideration the functions of jurisprudence as a science. The stressing of positive points may be necessary for public relations, but discussion and the raising of problems are essential in the area of scientific research. I expect that this study will help perform new town projects in a more reasonable way by encouraging further study on such development projects.

단독주택단지 재건축 정비 사업에 관한 공법적 쟁점 연구

오준근(Oh, Jun-Gen) 한국토지공법학회 2015 土地公法硏究 Vol.71 No.-

“주택재건축사업”은 기본적으로 노후화된 아파트 단지를 철거하고 새로운 아파트단지로 건축하는 사업을 근간으로 하지만, 단지형으로 형성되어 정비기반시설이 양호한 단독주택 및 다세대주택이 복합된 단지를 철거하고 아파트형 공동주택단지를 건축하는 사업을 모두 포괄한다. 단독주택단지의 재건축을 놓고 많은 분쟁이 발생하고 있다. 이 논문은 분쟁을 구체적으로 드러내는 표준적 사례를 하나 설정하여 이에 대한 법률적 쟁점을 정리하고 문제점을 지적하며 그 개선방안을 제시하기 위하여 기획되었다. 먼저 단독주택단지가 근본적으로 재건축 정비사업의 대상이 될 수 있는가의 여부를 분석하였다. 결론적으로 말하면 법률상으로는 가능하지만 시행령을 개정하여 불가능하게 되었고, 예외적으로 기본계획에 포함된 경우 예정된 절차를 계속하여 진행할 수 있도록 되어 있어서 법 현실이 헌법 원리에 위배되는가의 여부가 문제된다. 다음으로 단독주택단지를 재건축의 대상으로 편입시키기 위한 계획체계를 분석하였다. 재건축에 관한 행정계획은 2단계로 수립된다. 먼저 10년을 단위로 하는 재건축 기본계획이 수립되며, 이 기본계획을 발전시켜서 재건축 구역지정을 수반하는 재건축 정비계획이 수립된다. 이들 계획의 법적 성격과 쟁송 가능성을 분석하였다. 마지막으로 단독주택단지를 놓고 주민들 간의 갈등이 첨예화되어 있는 상황에서 법률상 어느 정도 주민 참여가 가능한가에 관하여 분석하였다. 이 논문을 계기로 단독주택단지 주민들의 행복추구권을 최대한 보장할 수 있는 방향으로 입법과 행정현실이 개선될 수 있기를 기대한다. Housing reconstruction projects implemented to improve residential environments in the area wherein rearrangement basis facilities are good, but the worn-out and inferior structures are concentrated. This project aimed to construct new apartment complexes. It is based on the removal of existing worn-out apartment complex structures, but includes removal of detached houses and multi-family houses. There happened so many legal disputes surrounding the detached house complex reconstruction projects in the Republic of Korea. This paper is planned to set a typical case in this matter, to arrange the legal problems and to suggest the measures of legislative improvement. The first discussion point in this paper was the fundamental question whether the detached house complex could be the object of the housing reconstruction project according to the Korean administrative law; Act on the Maintenance and Improvement Of Urban Areas and Dwelling Conditions For Residents. Because the basic condition for the housing reconstruction project was not regulated in this act and it is comprehensively delegated to the enforcement decree, it is not in harmony with the Korean constitutional principle. The next discussion point was the urban planning system about the housing reconstruction project of the detached house complex. A master plan for urban and residential environment rearrangement should formulate every ten years. A rearrangement plan should be formulated to the extent compatible with a master plan. The legal character of the mater plan and the rearrangement plan and the lawsuit measures against them was analysed in this paper. The last discussion point was the possibility of the participation of the detached house owners to the planning process. The Act on the Maintenance and Improvement Of Urban Areas and Dwelling Conditions For Residents regulated that the head of the city shall hold an explanatory meeting for residents after giving written notice to residents thereof, make the rearrangement plan available for the residents for at least 30 days and gave the owners of detached house the right of the proposal of a rearrangement plan and of a cancellation of the designation of rearrangement zone. These regulations were targeted to maintain the basic frame of the master plan and rearrangement plan, to develop successively and to change the worn-out structure to the new constructed apartment complex. There are few room for the minor opinion for the maintenance of the detached houses. The legal problems of the regulations of the participation was arranged, and the measures of legislative improvement was suggested in this paper.

공용물에 관한 법제개선을 위한 비교법적 연구

오준근(Oh Jun Gen) 한국토지공법학회 2010 土地公法硏究 Vol.48 No.-

“공용물”은 “행정기관이 스스로 사용하기 위하여 특정한 물건”을 총칭하며, 행정기관의 행정업무 수행에 있어 필수적인 행정수단에 해당한다. 공용물은 행정법학상 매우 중요한 의미를 지닌다. 우리나라의 경우 공용물의 설치와 관리에 관한 법률적 근거는 마련되어 있지 아니하며, 대통령령인 「정부청사관리규정」이 법적 근거를 형성하고 있다. 본 연구는 현행 행정법체계의 문제점을 지적하고, 이를 다른 나라의 입법례를 통하여 비교·검토하며, 입법론적 대안을 제시함을 목적으로 기획되었다. 본 연구에서는 우리나라의 법제와 독일 및 일본의 법제를 비교·분석하였다. 독일의 공물법제는 공공용물 법제와 공용물 법제가 엄격하게 구분되어 있다. 독일의 공공용물의 경우 도로법, 수자원법등이 독자적인 행정법의 영역으로 발전되어 있으며, 각각의 실정법체계와 법이론체계가 확립되어 있다. 그 반면에 공용물법제는 독자적인 법체계를 갖추고 있는 것이 아니라 재정행정법 체계의 일부로 편입되어 관리되고 있다. 그 반면에 일본의 공용물법제의 특징은 국유재산법제와 분리하여 “공물”로서의 청사를 독립적으로 관리하는 법률을 제정하여 시행하고 있다는 점을 들 수 있다. 일본의 경우 청사와 관사의 관리와 관련하여 분야별로 나누어 「국가의 청사등의 사용조정에 관한 특별조치법」, 「국가공무원숙사법」, 「관공청 시설의 건설등에 관한 법률」 등이 제정·시행되고 있다. 이 논문에서는 위와 같은 분석결과를 기초로 하여 공용물에 관한 법제 개선방향을 설정하고 그 대안을 제시하고자 시도하였다. 공용물에 관한 법제개선을 하고자 할 경우 공용물 법제를 어떠한 체계에 편입시킬 것인가에 대한 선택이 필요하다. 독일과 일본의 사례에서 살펴본 바와 같이, 공용물은 국유재산의 관점에서 법제화하거나, “공물”로서의 “공용물”의 특성을 존중하고 “공물법”의 일부로서 “공용물”의 행정법적 체계의 특수성을 인정하여 법제화할 것인가에 대한 검토가 필요하다. 검토결과 우리나라의 경우 국유재산법 등의 체계에 비추어 볼 때, 따라서 “공용물”을 행정청의 고유한 사용에 제공하도록 하기 위하여 필요한 구체적인 법적 규율과는 상당한 거리가 있어서 공물행정법으로서의 공용물 법제정비를 대안으로 제시하였다. 특히 현행 정부조직법이 “국유재산”과 “공물”을 분리하여 그 관할 주체를 달리하고 있다는 점도 논거 중의 하나로 채용하였다. 결론적으로 “공용물”에 관한 법률은 “공용물”에 관한 행정목적을 달성하기 위한 “공물행정법”의 체계로 정비되어야 할 필요가 있다할 것이다. Public buildings are one of the most essential administrative resources of the public agencies. The regal foundation for the management of the public buildings in Korea is 「Government Buildings Management Regulation」. This Regulation is not an act of the National Assembly, but a presidential decree. This article is prepared to discuss the direction of the reform of Korean legal system on the management of the public buildings. The korean, japanese and german legal system on this matter are compared in this article. The laws on the administrative resources are divided in german legal system. The public goods as the street, water are regulated in the separate legal system as street law, water law etc. Legal theory of the street law and water law are highly developed as a part of the german administrative law. On the contrary the public buildings are managed as a part of the legal system of public property law. The legal system of the public buildings are developed as a separated part of the administrative law in Japan. There are 「Law on the Special Measures for the Regulation of the Use of the Governmental Buildings」, 「Law on the Housing of the Government Employees」 and 「Law on the Construction of the Governmental Buildings」. There are typical two alternatives for the reform of the korean legal system on the public buildings according to the results of the analysis of the korean, german and japanese legal system. One is the way of reform as a part of public property law and the other a part of the administrative law on public resources. Because the public building are one of the essential resources of the administrative agencies, there are many critical point for the management of these according to the 「The National Government Organization Act」, the special treatment of the public buildings is indispensible as an object of special administrative law. The Direction of the legislation is suggested according to this viewpoint in this article