RISS 학술연구정보서비스

검색
다국어 입력

http://chineseinput.net/에서 pinyin(병음)방식으로 중국어를 변환할 수 있습니다.

변환된 중국어를 복사하여 사용하시면 됩니다.

예시)
  • 中文 을 입력하시려면 zhongwen을 입력하시고 space를누르시면됩니다.
  • 北京 을 입력하시려면 beijing을 입력하시고 space를 누르시면 됩니다.
닫기
    인기검색어 순위 펼치기

    RISS 인기검색어

      검색결과 좁혀 보기

      선택해제
      • 좁혀본 항목 보기순서

        • 원문유무
        • 음성지원유무
        • 원문제공처
          펼치기
        • 등재정보
          펼치기
        • 학술지명
          펼치기
        • 주제분류
          펼치기
        • 발행연도
          펼치기
        • 작성언어
        • 저자
          펼치기

      오늘 본 자료

      • 오늘 본 자료가 없습니다.
      더보기
      • 무료
      • 기관 내 무료
      • 유료
      • KCI등재후보

        新羅 宮闕構造에 대한 試論

        梁正錫(Yang Jeong-Seok) 한국사연구회 2002 한국사연구 Vol.119 No.-

        There are diverse methods to understand a nation systematically. And study about the palace that can be mentioned of the core part of capital city, providing basic data for understanding characteristics of the nation obviously, has a deep meaning. Not excepting the case of Silla Kingdom. but study about that may be so rare. Woel-Seong(月城), which we think is the palace, has not yet excavated and there's a limit to restore the palace. Thus we've understood 'Front Reign-Back Sleep(前朝後寢)' and 'Three Reign Systernf(三朝制)' as basic formation of palace disposition of Sui and Tang periods(隋唐代) without obvious reason. Of course, this is reasonable basically with the flow of East Asian capital rule. But in the case of Silla Kingdom, we can see capital rule before Sui and Tang periods and we need to verify the other parts rather than Sui and Tang's palace disposition itself. Embossed thing is West Vice-Pavilion(西堂) of Silla's palace, In fact, the case of China West Vice-Pavilion has totally disappeared after Sui and Tang. The problem is whether Silla have Taeguk-Pavilion(太極殿) which is essential to West Vice-Pavilion. We cannot find the data tells directly Taeguk-Pavilion's existence. Of course we can see there was the center palace by the case of Main Pavilion(正殿) of King Jinpyong(眞平王) and Jowonjun(朝元殿) of King Jindeok(眞德王). And terms of Linae(裏內) and Dang(堂) in stone monument of King Jinhung(眞興王巡狩碑) tell us existence of palace have Naeli(內裏) and Jodang(朝堂) that already was in Japanese palace. But it's difficult that clear up the existence of Taeguk-Pavilion by only this. So we examine comparison with Hwangryongsa(黃龍寺), the biggest temple of Silla's capital. Because 9 cells(間) in front side (including blind 11 cells) Golden Shriner (金堂) that constructed in Hwangryongsa was the scale that cannot be compared in Korea. But we can find same Golden Shrines in North Wei(北魏) Yongningsi(永寧寺), that has close relation with capital rule, and Taikanaiji(大官大寺) in Japan. And Golden Shrianes in Yongningsi and Taikantaji have the same disposition with each of Taeguk-Pavilion, In case of Hwangryongsa, because Golden Shrine have same scale with Takguk-Pavilion we can imagine the existence of Main Pavilion that have same scale with Takguk-Pavilion, That is, Taeguk-Pavilion duplication system is operated in middle-oldUpiJ) Silla's palace. Anyway Hwanryongsa has building left and right side of Golden Shrine contrary to other temples. We think this as West Vice-Pavilion beside of Taeguk-Pavilion of Silla's palace. And this is so different with existing view that see disposition of Hwangryongsa as Three Golden Shrines(三金堂) simply. Taeguk-Pavilion and East-West Vice-Pavilion of palace have obvious relation of major and minor. We can see that in Hwangryongsa s Recreation, left and right side builing of Golden Shrine have same disposition with West Vice-Pavilion of palace in parallel disposition and scale of front side 7 cells. So we can see West Vice-Pavilion of Silla s palace have deep relation with Hwangryongsa's reconstruction in middle-old time(中古期). In this way. we look into some characteristics of Silla's palace focusing on West Vice-Pavilion of Samguksagi(三國史記)'. I hope that Silla's palace can restore more clearly through a study like this.

      • KCI등재

        ‘늣씨’ 개념의 재고찰

        양정호(Jeong-ho Yang) 어문연구학회 2006 어문연구 Vol.51 No.-

          A brief literature review shows an argument of "neus-ssi"(늣씨) has long been made, failing to reach an agreement on whether "neus-ssi" is morpheme. Despite various arguments, we should admit that either side fails to submit proofs that are strong enough to put a punctuation mark to this argument. An analysis of "neus-ssi" in the text of Malui Sori (『말의 소리』) also leads us to a conclusion that it is difficult to categorize "neus-ssi" as morpheme. Malui Sori is not aiming at explaining "neus-ssi," and thus, the term "neus-ssi" is mentioned only once at the end of Ssinanui Teul (‘씨난의 틀’), i.e. a chapter in Malui Sori. Furthermore, the focus is placed on "beol-is" (벌잇), not on "neus-ssi" itself in the text.<BR>  A better understanding of "neus-ssi" could be achieved with a text analysis of "beol-is" in Ssinanui Teul, although still we will be given a half the picture. Accordingly, we need to expand our research to the whole text of Malui Sori. A combined study of "ugwonjeom"(우권점) and "junggwonjeom"(중권점), which constitute a boundary of "neus-ssi", will surely provide us with a better understanding of "neus-ssi".<BR>  Above mentioned suggestions, however, would not conclude a history-long debate of whether "neus-ssi" is morpheme. This study suggests that a discrepancy in the various results of analyses should not be regarded as a conceptual gap between "neus-ssi" and<BR>morpheme. We must understand that the concept of "neus-ssi" has remained unproved as it was in the early twenty"s century, while western concept of morpheme has been refined during last decades. In this context, we must also understand the concept of "neus-ssi" may have some flaws, and demands further studies.<BR>  Researchers may have different ideas on what could be the meaningful minimal unit. I would like to maintain that a difference in denotation between "neus-ssi" and morpheme does not necessarily indicate conceptual difference between the two.<BR>  In this study, an emphasis is placed on the conceptual exploration of "neus-ssi" and morpheme. The result of analysis shows that "neus-ssi" and morpheme are very similar with only small differences. Accordingly, an argument that "neus-ssi" is a form of morpheme should be avoided as it could exaggerate the conceptual difference.<BR>  This study also suggests that conceptual improvement should have been made to "neus-ssi". The concept of morpheme was invented in 1933 and incessant revisions have been made to develop the concept. Further studies of "neus-si" is required to mould a refined concept.

      • KCI등재
      • KCI등재

        조건 구문과 양보 구문의 통사의미론

        양정석 ( Yang Jeong-seok ) 배달말학회 2020 배달말 Vol.67 No.-

        표준적인 형식의미론에서의 의미 형식은 단언 부분과 전제 부분을 가진다. ‘-으면, -어야, -거든, -었더라면, -었던들’의 조건 연결어미들은 단언 부분에서 가능세계들에 대한 양화로 표시되는 양상의 영향권 안에 실질함언의 조건 형식(구체적인 양상기반, 순서근거 함수가 항상 선택되므로 실제로는 엄밀함언이 된다)으로 기술되는 점에서 공통된다. ‘-어도, -더라도, -을지라도, -을망정, -을지언정, -기로서니, -은들’의 양보 연결어미들은 단언 부분보다 그 정의 성립 조건 부분에서 전제 의미(선행절의 가정에서 후행절의 귀결이 성립되는 것이 성립되지 않는 것보다 기대됨에 있어서의 부합도가 낮다)를 표현한다는 공통의 특징이 있다. 양보 연결어미들은 그 전제 의미 안에도 양상 의미 형식을 포함한다. 선행절 ‘p’나 후행절 ‘q’에 대한 전제 내용의 차이에 따른 조건 연결어미, 양보 연결어미 각각의 의미를 서로 구별하여 형식화하고, 각 연결어미의 의미 정의와 각 연결어미가 형성하는 문장의 통사구조를 바탕으로, 그 문장 의미를 표준적 형식의미론의 방법으로 기술할 수 있음을 보였다. A formal semantic analysis of 5 conditional conjunctive endings and 7 concessive conjunctive endings in Korean is proceeded. Their lexical semantic descriptions basically contain modal semantic forms in terms of Kratzer’s theory of modality. Each conditional ending is characterized by the modal base or ordering source function it has. Each concessive ending is characterized by the difference of the way its presupposition is encoded, i.e., the semantic forms of ‘-eto, -telato, -ulcilato’ have a presupposition form with a comparison of “alternatives” in terms of Rooth’s(1985, 1996) Alternative Semantics, while the semantic forms of ‘-ulmangceng, -ulcienceng’ have a presupposition form with a comparison of just two conditional forms, which are the affirmative and the denial of the consequence, and further, the semantic forms of ‘-kiloseni, -untul’ have a presupposition form which has an extreme on a scale but the format of exhibiting alternative is different with each other.

      • KCI등재

        중학교 사회 교과서의 텍스트언어학적 이해 -정치 영역을 중심으로-

        양정호 ( Jeong Ho Yang ) 한국텍스트언어학회 2011 텍스트언어학 Vol.31 No.-

        This paper analyzes the social science textbook, especially politics text in middle school synchronically from the perspective of the textuality, that is, cohesion, coherence, intentionality, acceptability, informativity, situationality, and intertextuality. To put it concretely, this study investigates how to realize each textuality in all kinds of texts and suggested a couple of points that are better be considered to improve the text on the viewpoint of textuality. However, I must admit that a depth study is to be made to find further meaningful findings. Nevertheress, I hope that this a general review into the textbook will make a contribution to further studies of this theme.

      • KCI등재

        뇌심혈관질환에 대한 업무상 질병 판정에 관한 의사결정연구: 판단분석 기법의 활용

        양정호 ( Jeong-ho Yang ),심준섭 ( Jun Seop Shim ) 중앙대학교 국가정책연구소 2017 국가정책연구 Vol.31 No.2

        본 논문의 목적은 뇌심혈관질환에 대한 업무상 질병 재해여부 판단시 업무프로세스에서 제시하는 모든 판단요인을 종합적으로 고려하는지 판단자의 의사결정행태를 알아보는데 있다. 연구의 분석도구는 판단분석 기법을 사용하였다. 뇌심혈관질환의 업무상 재해여부의 의사결정행위에 대한 분석결과는 다음과 같다. 첫째, 업무상 질병 판단의 여러 요인 중에 전문가들이 가장 중요하게 고려하는 판단요인은 과로와 이상사태였다. 둘째, 업무상 질병판단을 하는 전문가들의 판단요인(단서)들을 활용하는 정도가 낮은 것으로 확인되었다. 판단분석에서 사용한 6개의 판단요인 중 2개에서 3개만을 응답하는 응답자가 75%를 차지하였다. 셋째, 판단분석은 응답자 개별적으로 고려한 단서와 활용 개수를 비교할 수 있는 응답자의 판단정책을 비교할 수 있다. 예를 들어, 전문가 A는 6개의 단서를 모두 활용하였다면, 전문가 B는 특정 단서 하나만을 고려한 극단적인 판단정책을 확인할 수 있었다. 또한, 이렇게 특정 소수의 판단요인만을 고려하여 업무상 질병판단을 하였음에도 일관성을 보여주는 인지적 통제력(R<sup>2</sup>)의 평균점수는 0.66으로 비교적 높은 편이었다. 이 결과 역시 업무상 질병판단은 적은 수의 단서들을 고려하여 의사결정을 수행하고 있음을 알 수 있다. 분석결과를 살펴보면, 특정 소수의 판단요인만을 고려하여 판단을 하는 이러한 의사결정행태를 통하여 업무상 질병판단의 행정적 절차적 단계를 보다 간소화할 수 있음을 함축하고 있다. This study is about decision making on work-related Cerebrovascular and Cardiac disease and how to make a decision on approval of occupational disease among decision elements. To investigate the above aim, Judgment Analysis is performed. The results of this study are summarized as follows. First, when experts make a judgment as to whether they give claimants approval of work-related Cerebrovascular and Cardiac disease benefits or not, overwork and abnormal(unexpected) situation among decision elements are considered as top priorities. Second, the characteristic of experts shows they make a decision with limited information. Individual experts have a tendency to judge with limited decision elements such as overwork, unexpected situation. Third, this study showed us judgment policy which can compare respondents` judgment behavior through Judgment Analysis. For example, expert A makes use of all of six decision elements, whereas, expert B make a decision with only one decision element(one Cue). Though experts make a decision regarding worker`s compensation with limited decision elements(overwork, abnormal situation), experts` judgment policies are high consistency in that mean R<sup>2</sup> indicates high(0.66).

      • KCI등재
      • KCI등재

        중국의 지부티 군사보급기지 건설의 전략적 함의

        양정학(梁正學)(YANG, Jeong Hak),김순수(金淳洙)(KIM, Soon Soo) 신아시아연구소(구 신아세아질서연구회) 2017 신아세아 Vol.24 No.2

        2012년 11월 중국공산당은 ‘해양강국’ 건설을 당의 주요방침으로 확정하였다. 당의 공식적인 지지에 힘입어 중국정부는 보다 공세적인 해양정책을 추진하고 있다. 그 일환으로 볼 수 있는 중국의 지부티 군사보급기지 건설 계획 발표는 전세계의 이목을 집중시켰다. 특히, 미국을 비롯한 서방국가들과 일본 등 국가는 중국의 지부티 군사보급기지 건설에 대해 경계의 목소리를 높이고 있다. 또한 중국의 지부티 군사보급기지 건설은 ‘해양강국’ 건설을 위한 시작에 불과하다는 견해도 적지 않다. 그런데 중국은 왜 아프리카 북동부에 위치한 소국 지부티에 중국 최초의 해외 군사보급기지를 건설하려고 하는가? 지부티를 군사보급기지 건설부지로 선정한 이유는 무엇인가? 지부티 군사보급기지가 중국에게 가져다주는 이익은 무엇인가? 이에 대한 대답을 위해 이 글은 다음 세 가지 요인을 제시하였다. 첫째, 현재 소말리아 해역에서 활동 중인 중국 호송함대의 원활한 작전지원을 위한 것이다. 둘째, 나날이 증대되고 있는 중국의 해외이익을 보다 적극적으로 보호하기 위한 조치이다. 셋째, ‘해양강국’ 건설과 ‘일대일로’ 전략 추진을 위한 전략적 포석이다. 이 같은 세 가지 요인을 증명하기 위해 이 글은 중국 정부의 공식발표 자료 및 전문가 인터뷰, 중국 지도자의 발언 및 행보, 그리고 국내외 언론매체의 보도자료 등을 종합분석하였다. 한국도 중국과 마찬가지로 ‘경제영토’의 확장, 국민과 기업의 해외진출 확대로 인해 보호해야할 해외이익이 나날이 증가하고 있다. 이러한 현실에 비춰보았을 때, 중국의 ‘해양강국’ 실현을 위한 행보가 한국에게 주는 도전과 의미는 무엇인지 여러 영역에서 다층적인 연구가 필요하다 In November 2012, the goal of becoming a maritime power was established as a policy of the Communist Party of China (CPC). As a result, the Chinese government is pursuing maritime policies more aggressively. International attention has been focused on the construction plan of a military supply base in Djibouti, which can be seen as part of China’s aggressive maritime policies. Countries such as Japan and the United States are raising concerns about the construction plan. Many experts insist that the plan is only the beginning of the development of China’s maritime power. Why is China building its first overseas military supply base in the tiny east African country of Djibouti? Will a military supply base in Djibouti benefit China? This paper posits three factors to answer these questions. First, the plan supports efficient operations of the Chinese naval escort fleet in the Gulf of Aden and the Somali sea area. Second, the plan actively protects China s growing overseas interests. Third, it is strategic groundwork for the development of its maritime power and the “Belt and Road Initiative.” To support this assessment, this paper analyzes official announcements of the Chinese government, experts’ interviews, Chinese leaders’ speeches and actions, and press releases of national and international media. As with China, ROK overseas interests are growing daily. Given this reality, China’s maritime power development plan provides challenges and has numerous implications, which require multilayered research as soon as possible.

      연관 검색어 추천

      이 검색어로 많이 본 자료

      활용도 높은 자료

      해외이동버튼