RISS 학술연구정보서비스

검색
다국어 입력

http://chineseinput.net/에서 pinyin(병음)방식으로 중국어를 변환할 수 있습니다.

변환된 중국어를 복사하여 사용하시면 됩니다.

예시)
  • 中文 을 입력하시려면 zhongwen을 입력하시고 space를누르시면됩니다.
  • 北京 을 입력하시려면 beijing을 입력하시고 space를 누르시면 됩니다.
닫기
    인기검색어 순위 펼치기

    RISS 인기검색어

      검색결과 좁혀 보기

      선택해제
      • 좁혀본 항목 보기순서

        • 원문유무
        • 원문제공처
          펼치기
        • 등재정보
          펼치기
        • 학술지명
          펼치기
        • 주제분류
          펼치기
        • 발행연도
          펼치기
        • 작성언어
        • 저자
          펼치기

      오늘 본 자료

      • 오늘 본 자료가 없습니다.
      더보기
      • 무료
      • 기관 내 무료
      • 유료
      • KCI등재

        ICC 중재에서 중재법원의 역할이 KCAB 국제중재규칙에 주는 시사점 - 사무국, 중재판정부, 국제중재위원회의 업무분장을 중심으로

        안건형(Ahn Keon Hyung) 한국무역상무학회 2008 貿易商務硏究 Vol.39 No.-

          The notion of the "court" is most unique to ICC arbitration. This paper focuses on what the court is and how it works and what the role and the duties of the Court under the ICC arbitration imply for the KCAB International Arbitration Rules.<BR>  The Court is an administrative body that administers arbitrations taking place under the ICC Rules of Arbitration. The Court consists of 126 members from 88 countries around the world. Court members participate in decision-making process by way of attending the committee sessions and plenary sessions.<BR>  At the Court"s committee sessions, the Court fixes advance on costs; reviews the prima facie existence of arbitration agreements; fixes the place and language of arbitration, and the number of arbitrator(s): confirms and approves arbitrators; scrutinizes draft awards, determines the costs of arbitration; decides on extensions related to Terms of Reference, draft awards and correction and interpretation of the awards.<BR>  At the Court"s plenary sessions, the Court performs only two responsibilities: the challenge or replacement of arbitrators or the scrutiny of draft awards. The Court is required to scrutinize draft awards involving states or state entities, drafts with huge amounts in dispute or complex technical or legal questions, and as well as draft awards to which a dissenting opinion has been attached.<BR>  Turning to the KCAB International Arbitration Rules, Article 1(3) provides that the KCAB shall establish an International Arbitration Committee. Further, it is provided that the KCAB shall consult with the said Committee with respect to challenge and replacement/removal of arbitrators pursuant to Article 1(3).<BR>  The notion and role of the International Arbitration Committee was originally adapted from the Court to ICC arbitration, but its role was quite reduced in the process of enactment of its Rules.<BR>  Accordingly, I examined the detailed roles of the Court to ICC arbitration in this paper and hereby suggest that the KCAB International Arbitration Rules shall be amended in the following ways:<BR>  The Secretariat of the KCAB shall: fix advance on costs at the first stage and the costs of arbitration at the final stage of the proceedings; determine the number of arbitrators; review the prima facie of existence of arbitration agreement; confirm arbitrators; decide extensions related to time table, draft awards and correction and interpretation of the awards.<BR>  I, also, suggest that the arbitral tribunals shall fix the place of arbitration and the language of arbitration and make a final decision on the validity of arbitration agreement. With regard to the International Arbitration Committee, it is desirable for its Rules to empower the Committee to recommend any prospective arbitrator and to review and decide challenge and replacement/removal of arbitrators.

      • KCI등재

        기후변화에 따른 전라남도 신안군의 재난재해 취약성 평가와 대응방안

        안건상 ( Kun Sang Ahn ) 한국도서(섬)학회 2011 韓國島嶼硏究 Vol.23 No.4

        This paper outlines to evaluate susceptibility to potential threats and identify corrective actions that can reduce the risk of serious disaster from climate change in the Shinan-gun, Jeonnam. The process of vulnerability assessment from changing climate (flood, drought, scorching heat, heavy snowfall, strong wind, setup sea level) is based on such sources of Ministry of Land, Transport and Maritime Affairs(MLTM), and use CCGIS program(ver. 3.1) to analyze the graphs. The biggest disastrous risk in shinan-gun is the damage from storm and flood. The amount of precipitation and snow cover along with the cold temperature are lower than any other city in Jeonnam. However, it has wind velocity cause by the typhoon which is the biggest among any other cites. Sea level will setup continuously. In fact, problems caused by heavy rain with typhoon arise very often. In the resent 3years, Shinan-gun has been heavily damaged or destroyed. During the last 20years, the heavy rain damaged many official structures and vessels. In 2009, High climate change destroyed official structure and the arable land of Jaeun-myun located in Shinan-gun. In the Analysis of A1B(climate change scenario), although the current flood risk will reduce, we must consider low areas along with the setup sea level in 2020. In conclusion, Shinan-gun will have to manage the risks of extreme disasters caused by continuous climate change like damage from storm and flood or setup sea level.

      • KCI등재

        국제투자중재에서 제3자 자금조달 제도의 주요 법적 쟁점

        안건,김성룡,조인호 한국중재학회 2013 중재연구 Vol.23 No.2

        As arbitration becomes an increasingly popular mode of resolving disputes,neighboring industries begin to take notice. This interest is reflected in the increasing utilization of third party funding in international arbitration claims. In this regard, the third party funding industry appears particularly interested in investor-state arbitration claims because they typically involve considerable claim amounts and substantial legal fees. To examine this trend more closely, this paper, firstly, examines the investor-state arbitration more precisely in Chapter II. In Chapter III, this study continues to examine some legal issues which can arise as a result of a conflict of interest between the parties to the funding agreement including, inter alia, 1)a dispute in which the funder terminates the agreement during the arbitration proceedings, 2) a dispute in relation to a funder's intervention in arbitration proceedings, and 3) a dispute on the responsibility for adverse costs orders, if any. This paper further identifies major legal issues which can arise in relation to 1)disclosure of existence of the funding agreement, 2) attorney-client privilege. Lastly, in Chapter IV, this paper provides some lessons from an in-depth case study on third party funding agreements and solutions to avoid and to solve prospective disputes in the future.

      • KCI등재

        캄보디아와 미얀마 중재법규의 주요내용과 시사점

        안건 한국무역금융보험학회(구 한국무역보험학회) 2018 무역금융보험연구 Vol.19 No.2

        본 연구는 중재산업에 대한 정부의 체계적 지원을 주된 내용으로 하는 「중재산업 진흥에 관한 법률」의 발효와 대한상사중재원의 3대 비전 및 7대 전략과제 발표 이후, 우리의 중재제도를 산업으로 육성하고 국가경쟁력을 강화하기 위한 방안으로서 우리 정부와 중재기관이 ASEAN 중재시장, 그 중에서도 캄보디아와 미얀마에 대해 관심을 가지고 중재시장 진출을 위한 전략들을 수립할 수 있도록 한국에 있어 ASEAN의 중요성에 대해 살펴보고, 또한 기초자료 조사로서 캄보디아와 미얀마의 중재법제의 주요내용을 검토하여 유의사항을 제시하고, 마지막으로 위의 논의들을 정리하면서 한국 정부와 중재기관에 주는 시사점을 도출하고 이에 대하여 제언하고 있다. The importance of trade and investment between Korea and ASEAN has been growing exponentially to achieve mutually beneficial economic development. In particular, ASEAN is Korea’s second largest trading partner and second largest investment region. ASEAN Member States are competitively catering to foreign investor’s preference for arbitration as a dispute resolution scheme to encourage foreign direct investment. Meanwhile, the Korean government enacted 「Arbitration Industry Promotion Act」 on 27 December 2016 which entered into force on 28 June 2017. The purpose of this Act is to promote arbitration as a means of resolution of domestic and international disputes by determining matters necessary for promoting the arbitration industry, and to contribute to developing the national economy by laying foundations for promoting the arbitration industry in Korea so as to be developed into a hub of arbitration. Under these circumstances, this paper ⅰ) examines the current status and major issues of a) importance of ASEAN arbitration market to Korea, b) 「2006 Commercial Arbitration Law」 and NCAC’s Arbitration Rules of Cambodia and c) 「2016 Arbitration Law」 of Myanmar, and ⅱ) draws implications for the Korean government and the KCAB against ASEAN Arbitration Market, in particular, Cambodia and Myanmar inter alia.

      • KCI등재

        2011 프랑스 개정 민사소송법의 주요 내용과 시사점 – 국제중재법을 중심으로 –

        안건,유병욱 한국민사소송법학회 2011 민사소송 Vol.15 No.2

        It has been passed thirty and thirty one years since domestic and international arbitration decrees in French Civil Procedure Code were passed, respectively. For decades, France has been considered the most arbitration-friendly jurisdiction throughout the world. On 13 January, 2011, France issued a new decree revising the provisions of the French Civil Procedure Code pertaining to arbitration (hereinafter the “Decree”) which entered into force on 1 May, 2011. This paper principally discuss the major revised contents, focusing on French International Arbitration Law in the Decree and the lessons which the Decree holds for the Arbitration Act of Korea. It was found that the purpose of the Decree was primarily designed to capture the well-established pro-arbitration case law the French courts have developed over decades and enshrine them in the Decree. Furthermore, the Decree also introduces significant innovative provisions which aim at attracting parties to international arbitration to French seats even if the there is no connection between the case and France. The Decree also minimizes intervention of the national courts and increases the freedom to tailor the arbitral proceedings to parties' wishes. In-depth examination of these classical and innovative position of the Decree will certainly serve as a source of inspiration for the revision of the Arbitration Act of Korea in the near future.

      • 지질온도계와 지질압력계를 통해 해석한 경기육괴의 변성진화

        안건,김희남,신인현,박천영 조선대학교 기초과학연구소 2000 自然科學硏究 Vol.23 No.1

        This study discusses the various geothermo-barometers and estimated results for the metamorphic rocks of the Gyeonggy massif. The Gyeonggy massif, which lies between the so-called Imjingang belt to the north and the Ogcheon belt to the south, is an important part of the Precambrian basement in the Korean peninsular. The massif consists of Archaean to Proterozoic metamorphic complexes which are composed mainly of gneiss, together with schist, quartzite and amphibolite. Many geothermo-barometers have been proposed, those are based on the distribution of cations between coexisting phases(e.g. garnet, biotite, plagioclase, cordierite, amphiboles). Because the composition of biotite and/or plagioclase in equilibrium with core of garnet is unknown, calculated temperatures and pressures using the core compositions of both phases are subject to large uncertainties. In recent years considerable attention has been devoted to the metamorphic conditions of the massif with relation to the tectonic settings of the Asia. We review reported metamorphic temperatures and pressures for the four area of the massif, Hwacheon - Chuncheon - Hongcheon - Gapyeong - Cheongpyeong, Odeasan, Paju - Kimpo, Seosan - Anyang - Hongseong, in order to constrain its metamorphic conditions and evolution. Metamorphic pressures and temperatures compiled from previous estimation(rim to rim between coexisting phases) suggest the clockwise P-T-t evolution, and two event(prograssive path is from 500℃ 6kb to 750℃ 9kb, retrograssive path is 800℃ 9.5kb to 500℃ 2kb).

      • KCI등재

        2019년 개정 ICC 중재 진행에 관한 당사자 및 중재판정부 지침의 주요내용과 시사점:ICC의 중재판정부 정보 공개 및 중재판정의발간 정책을 중심으로

        안건 한국중재학회 2019 중재연구 Vol.29 No.2

        The ICC International Court of Arbitration (‘the ICC’) has published the Note to Parties and Arbitral Tribunals on the Conduct of the Arbitration under the ICC Rules of Arbitration (‘2019 Revised Note) which came into force on the 1st of January 2019. The 2019 Revised Note is aimed at providing parties and arbitral tribunals with practical guidance regarding the conduct of arbitrations pursuant to the ICC Arbitration Rules as well as the practices of the ICC. Unless otherwise stipulated, the 2019 Revised Note applies to all ICC arbitration cases, regardless of the version of the ICC Arbitration Rules, in accordance with which they are conducted. The most noteworthy amendment is the introduction of provisions on a new mandatory transparency system by setting forth the publication of the arbitration case data and arbitral awards, maintaining the rule stipulating the provision of information regarding arbitral tribunal under the ICC 2016 Note. Among others, the 2019 Revised Note provides that parties and arbitrators in ICC arbitrations accept that ICC awards made as of the 1st of January 2019 may be published, excluding some exceptions. Under this circumstance, this paper ⅰ) explains five amendments of the 2019 ICC Revised Note, ⅱ) examines major issues regarding the publication of information of arbitral tribunal and awards, ⅲ) makes a comparative analysis of that attitude of 11 international arbitration institutions, and lastly ⅳ) suggests recommendations for the Korean arbitration community. 역사적으로 국제상사중재에서 기밀성(confidentiality)은 당연한 것으로 여겨져 왔고 그의 범위와 효과성에 대한 의문의 제기는 매우 희소하였다. 그러나 1990년대 부터 중재의 기밀성은 내재적(inherent) 성격을 가지고 있다는 의견과 중재가 그 자체로 기밀성을 갖는 것은 아니며 당사자들이 합의한 경우에만 비밀 유지가 이루어 진다는 의견으로 논쟁이 이루어 지고 있다. 이런 와중에, ICC 국제중제법원은 2019. 1. 1.부터 발효된 “ICC 중재규칙하의 중재 진행에 관한 당사자 및 중재판정부 지침”에서 ICC 중재의 당사자들과 중재인들은 2019년 1월 1일부터 내려지는 모든 중재판정에 대해 당사자들의 명시적인 반대 의사표시가 없는 경우 판정문 송달일로부터 늦어도 2년 이내에 출판하는 것을 기본규칙(default rule)으로 운영할 것임을 공표하였다. 이에 본 연구에서는 아직 국내에 소개된 적이 없는 ICC의 중재판정부 관련 정보 공개 및 중재판정 발간 정책 시행에 따른 국내의 중재 실무자 및 중재기관에 대한 시사점 및 유의사항을 도출하여 제공하고자 한다. 이를 위해, Ⅱ장에서 2019년 개정 ICC 지침의 주요내용에 대해 살펴보고, Ⅲ장에서는 ICC의 중재판정부 정보 공개 및 중재판정 발간 정책의 내용에 대해 검토하며, Ⅳ장에서는 중재판정 발간에 대한 주요 국제중재기관들의 중재규칙의 관련 규정들을 비교·분석하고, 마지막으로, V장에서는 앞의 논의들을 정리하면서 국내 중재 관련 실무자들 및 중재기관에 대한 시사점을 종합적으로 제시하고 있다.

      • KCI우수등재

      연관 검색어 추천

      이 검색어로 많이 본 자료

      활용도 높은 자료

      해외이동버튼