http://chineseinput.net/에서 pinyin(병음)방식으로 중국어를 변환할 수 있습니다.
변환된 중국어를 복사하여 사용하시면 됩니다.
President Kim Dae-jung and the Sunshine Policy -Recasting His Legacies for Peace and Prosperity-
문정인 ( Chung In Moon ),부승찬 ( Seung Chan Boo ) 연세대학교 통일연구원 2013 통일연구 Vol.17 No.1
This study attempts to examine the philosophical foundation of Kim Dae-jung`s sunshine policy and to draw implications for managing the current crisis of peace. After he became president in 1998, President Kim began to systemize his thoughts on Korean unification into the sunshine policy or the policy of reconciliation and cooperation and laid out its three principle: non-toleration of North Korea`s military provocation, no pursuit of unification by absorption, and the realization of de facto unification through the promotion of exchange and cooperation. It was strategic and holistic approach that aimed at genuine, long-term improvements in inter-Korean relations through the promotion of exchanges and cooperation, trust-building, and peaceful co-existence. Although the implementation of sunshine policy encountered numerous challenges and obstacles of domestic and foreign politics, President Kim Dae-jung did not abandon his sunshine policy. But a major setback arose with the advent of the Lee Myung-bak government which discarded the engagement policy as a failed policy. However, sunshine policy produced impressive results for reconciliation, co-operation, change and peace in a short time. Two Korean summits, the Kaesong Industrial Complex, the Mt. Geumgang tourist project, a large number of family reunions and South Korean visits to North Korea as well as visible change in the North toward opening all underscore the power and relevance of the sunshine policy. In other words, for the engagement policy framed around mutual recognition and respect, exchange and cooperation, trust-building, peaceful co-existence, and de facto unification is the only way to ensure stable peace and common prosperity on the Korean peninsula.
에 감염된 소화성 궤양 환자에서 1 주간의 Ranitidine Bismuth Citrate , Amoxicillin , Clarithromycin 삼제요법의 치료 효과
이강문(Kang Moon Lee),이동수(Dong Soo Lee),안병민(Byung Min Ahn),송호진(Ho Jin Song),김상우(Sang Woo Kim),한석원(Seok Won Han),정인식(In Sik Chung),선희식(Hee Sik Sun),박두호(Doo Ho Park) 대한소화기학회 2001 대한소화기학회지 Vol.37 No.6
Background/Aims: We performed this study to investigate the efficacy and safety of one-week triple therapy consisted of ranitidine bismuth citrate (RBC), amoxicillin and clarithromycin in the treatment of H. pylori-related peptic ulcers. Methods: Fifty patients with peptic ulcer and H. pylori infection were randomly divided into two groups. One group was administered with RBC 400 mg, amoxicillin 1 g, clarithromycin 500 mg twice daily (RAC group). The other group was administered with or omeprazole 20 mg, amoxicillin 1 g, clarithromycin 500 mg twice daily (OAC group). Four weeks after eradication therapy, H. pylori status, ulcer healing, histological improvement and side effects were assessed. Results: In the RAC group, the eradication rate was 80% (20/25) in the intention-to-treat (ITT) analysis and 95.2% (20/21) in the per protocol (PP) analysis. In the OAC group, the eradication rates in the ITT and PP analysis were 76% (19/25) and 86.4% (19/22), respectively. Ulcer healing rate of the RAC group was 94.7% in the PP analysis. The grade of gastritis was improved after treatment. No significant side effects were noticed in both groups. Conclusions: One-week triple therapy of RBC, amoxicillin, clarithromycin is effective and well tolerated in eradicating H. pylori and healing peptic ulcers. The efficacy is comparable to one-week course of omeprazole-based triple therapy. (Korean J Gastroenterol 2001;37:412-417)
정규원(Kyu Won Chung),정환국(Whan Kook Chung),정인식(In Sik Chung),이완국(Wan Kook Lee),최재철(Jae Chul Choi),문한림(Han Lim Moon),이창돈(Chang Don Lee),최규용(Kyu Yong Choi),이안기(An Kee Lee) 대한소화기학회 1985 대한소화기학회지 Vol.17 No.2
We report a case with mesenteric metastasis of hepatocellular carcinoma after hepatic resection. A 54-years-old female was received the right hepatic segmentectomy due to hepatocellular carcinoma without evidence of metastasis. Exploratory laparotomy confirmed the mesenteric metastasis of primary hepatocellular carcinoma six months after the operation and we reviewed the literature.
Helicobacter pylori 제균요법 적용의 실태 분석: 단일 기관 연구
정우철 ( Woo Chul Chung ),이강문 ( Kang Moon Lee ),백창렬 ( Chang Nyol Paik ),이정록 ( Jeong Rok Lee ),정성훈 ( Sung Hoon Jung ),김진동 ( Jin Dong Kim ),한석원 ( Sok Won Han ),정인식 ( In Sik Chung ) 대한소화기학회 2009 대한소화기학회지 Vol.53 No.4
목적: 현재 H. pylori 제균치료는 소화성 궤양 환자에서만 인정을 받고, 위암이나 위염 환자를 대상으로 적용 범위를 확대 적용하는 것에는 아직 논란의 여지가 있다. 최근 들어 표준 삼제요법의 제균율이 점차 감소하는 경향을 보이며, 이는 항생제 내성의 증가 및 환자의 순응도 감소와 가장 큰 연관이 있으나, 다른 여러 요인들도 제균율에 영향을 미치는 것으로 알려져 있다. 저자들은 진료과에 따른 제균율의 차이가 있는지 알아보기 위해 진료과별 제균치료 현황과 제균율, 그리고 내시경적인 궤양에 대한 적용 빈도를 조사하였다. 대상 및 방법: 2003년 1월부터 2007년 6월까지 가톨릭대학교 성빈센트병원에서 H. pylori 제균요법을 시행했던 환자를 대상으로 소화기내과, 일반내과, 가정의학과별로 제균율의 차이를 후향 조사하였다. 대상 환자는 2,050명으로 의료영상 저장 전송 체계(PACS)를 이용하여 3명의 내시경전문의가 각각의 내시경 소견을 다시 판독하여 내시경적인 미란과 궤양을 구분하였다. 결과: 일차 삼제요법에 대한 제균율은 82.5%였고, 이차 사제요법에 대한 제균율은 71.2%였다. 일차 진료를 담당하는 가정의학과와 내과 일반에서 소화기내과에 비해 내시경적인 미란에 대해 제균요법을 시행하는 빈도가 의미 있게 높았고, 전체 제균율과 내시경적인 궤양에 대한 제균율은 유의하게 낮았다. 결론: 일차 진료과에서 적용한 H. pylori 제균요법은 미란 등 부적절한 제균대상이 많았다. 전체적인 제균율이나 내시경적인 궤양에 대한 제균율은 소화기내과가 일차 진료과에 비해 의미 있게 높았고, 이것은 여러 가지 복합적인 요인이 작용하고 있을 것이며, 그 중에서도 복약에 대한 환자의 순응도가 중요한 역할을 할 것으로 본다. Background/Aims: Eradication rates of Helicobacter pylori (H. pylori) tend to decrease over the last few years. Apart from the antibiotic resistance and patient`s compliance, various factors have an influence on the efficacy of eradication therapy. We analyzed the inter-departmental differences in the eradication therapy for H. pylori infection. Methods: Between January 2003 and June 2007, total 3,072 eradication regimens were prescribed to patients. Eradication rates according to departments-gastroenterology (GE), general internal medicine (IM) and family medicine (FM)-were analyzed retrospectively. Results: The overall eradication rate of first-line triple therapy was 82.5% and second-line quadruple therapy was 71.2%. In the department of IM and FM, the eradication therapy was applied more frequently to the patients with erosion only, not ulcer. Overall eradication rates according to the departments were 87.0% in GE, 81.1% in IM and 77.2% in FM (p=0.02 GE vs. IM and p<0.01 GE vs. FM, respectively). Eradication rate in patients with peptic ulcer was also significantly higher in GE compared with IM or FM. Conclusions: In primary clinic (IM and FM), the eradication therapy was frequently applied to erosion. The eradication rates of H. pylori in GE department were significantly higher than those of IM or FM. Inter-departmental differences of the eradication rate might be caused by patients` compliance to prescribed medication. (Korean J Gastroenterol 2009;53:221-227)
박영실 ( Young Sil Park ),정우철 ( Woo Chul Chung ),이강문 ( Kang Moon Lee ),이보인 ( Bo In Lee ),천지성 ( Ji Sung Chun ),장우임 ( U Im Chang ),양진모 ( Jin Mo Yang ),최규용 ( Kyu Yong Choi ),정인식 ( In Sik Chung ) 대한소화기학회 2006 대한소화기학회지 Vol.48 No.3
Gastric ulcer bleeding in neonatal period, mainly in preterm newborn babies or in neonates treated in intensive care units, is relatively frequent, However the occurrence of significant gastric ulcer bleeding in healthy full term infants is unusual. We experienced a case of massive upper gastrointestinal (GI) bleeding in a 3-day-old healthy full term infant. Endoscopic examination confirmed the presence of gastric ulcerations. Treatment was initiated with transfusion and histamine 2 receptor antagonist, and the clinical signs resolved. Mother`s serum antibody to Helicobacter pylori (H. pylori) was positive. We collected stool of the patient including other 17 infants in the intensive care unit. A highly sensitive semi-nested PCR for H. pylori DNA was performed, but all infants including the patient revealed negative. H. pylori infection is not related with upper GI bleeding in healthy full term infants. In conclusion, the diagnosis of upper GI bleeding in infant can be easily made by means of pediatric endoscopy, which is a simple and a well tolerated examination. (Korean J Gastroenterol 2006;48:210-214)