RISS 학술연구정보서비스

검색
다국어 입력

http://chineseinput.net/에서 pinyin(병음)방식으로 중국어를 변환할 수 있습니다.

변환된 중국어를 복사하여 사용하시면 됩니다.

예시)
  • 中文 을 입력하시려면 zhongwen을 입력하시고 space를누르시면됩니다.
  • 北京 을 입력하시려면 beijing을 입력하시고 space를 누르시면 됩니다.
닫기
    인기검색어 순위 펼치기

    RISS 인기검색어

      검색결과 좁혀 보기

      선택해제
      • 좁혀본 항목 보기순서

        • 원문유무
        • 원문제공처
        • 등재정보
        • 학술지명
          펼치기
        • 주제분류
          펼치기
        • 발행연도
          펼치기
        • 작성언어
        • 저자
          펼치기

      오늘 본 자료

      • 오늘 본 자료가 없습니다.
      더보기
      • 무료
      • 기관 내 무료
      • 유료
      • KCI등재

        華夷觀과 ‘중국의식’의 시각에서 본 ≪水滸傳≫

        金曉民 ( Kim¸ Hyomin ) 중국어문연구회 2021 中國語文論叢 Vol.- No.106

        Using the 120-chapter edition Water Margin as the main research object, this paper studied the ‘Perspectives of Chinese and Barbarian’ and ‘China consciousness’ shown in Water Margin, and examined the characteristics of the text and the contexts of forming it. The traditional idea of Chinese and Barbarian including the Chinese order of the all-under-the-heaven system is revealed in Water Margin, but ‘China consciousness’ of the nationalistic features as a ‘nation’ is more clearly emphasized. The Song Jiang group described as loyal heroes can also be a result to reflect contemporary context in several layers in the long process that the relevant stories were created and novelized. The country’s safety was dangerous in the late Northern Song Dynasty itself, the background of the story. The Southern Song Dynasty that Shuihu’s heroic tale began to be in fashion was the period right after the ruin of the Northern Song Dynasty by the Jin Dynasty. The Yuan Dynasty, when Shuihu hero-related plays were prevalent, was ruled by Mongolia. The period that it was created as the novel was around the late Yuan and early Ming Dynasty which was overflowing with the anti-Yuan feeling. In the late Ming Dynasty that it began to be in fashion as the novel, when nationalistic sentiment was rising again due to the invasion of Japanese pirates, the rise of the Manchus, and furthermore the invasion of the ‘Western barbarians’. In the context which can be a perceptual change in the civilization map from ‘the all-under-the-heaven system’ to ‘a nation’ like this, the story of Song Jiang group had difficulties in escaping from the framework of the nationalistic idea to be again born and widely welcomed as a hero in the novel, and on the contrary, such appearance was more required. ‘Loyalty’ of ‘defense of the fatherland’ was put up as the primary value in Water Margin as a natural consequence. In addition, the point that they became the greatest hero that ever lived in the tragic ending and the value of loyalty and righteousness which is paradoxically more emphasized through this tragic also can be regarded products in this framework after all. Like this, Water Margin is in a pivotal position in terms of Chinese nationalistic hero narratives and made a considerable contribution to expansive reproduction of the Chinese nationalistic feeling as it was in fashion as very popular reading. And the meanings and values of the Song Jiang group’s tragic which could not be sublimated into the more universal level leave somewhat to be desired, but this should be seen as the basic limit resulting from the story of Water Margin and the historical context of forming it.

      • KCI등재

        시민의 참여가 만든 K-방역, K-방역이 만든 시민의 미덕

        김효민(Kim, Hyomin) 참여연대 참여사회연구소 2021 시민과세계 Vol.- No.39

        신종 코로나바이러스 감염증에 대한 한국의 비교적 효율적인 방역에는 마스크 착용, 확진자 동선공개, 사회적 거리두기 단계에 따르는 집합금지 및 영업제한 조치가 주효했던 것으로 이해된다. 이 논문은 이상의 세 가지 수행이 널리 이루어질 수 있었던 배경과 맥락이 어떻게 형성되어 왔는지 살펴본다. 이들이 팬데믹의 위험을 정상범위 이내로 유지시키는 최적의 방침이며, 성공적인 한국의 방역 모델을 구성하는 요소라는 인식은 어떤 과정을 거쳐 광범위하게 공유될 수 있었던 것인가? 이 과정에서 발생하였던 저항과 비판의 움직임은 무엇이었는가? 그러한 반작용들은 어떠한 장치의 배열을 거치며 사실상 무효화되었던 것인가? 논문은 K-방역에 협력하고 참여하였던 시민들이 방역, 경제, 궁극적으로는 자유의 증진에까지 기여하였다는 이해가 한국에서 사회적 가시성을 획득하는 과정에서 평균적 행동 양식을 널리 공유하는 한국 “시민 전체”에 대한 상상이 나타났음을 논의한다. Mask wearing, disclosure of confirmed patients" moving routes, and bans on gatherings in accordance with social distancing levels are understood to constitute South Korea"s strategies to prevent COVID-19 transmission, which have been promoted as the K-quarantine model. This paper examines the contexts in which the aforementioned three practices have been formed and widely practiced as essential means to establish the relative success of the K-quarantine. Through what process was it possible for Korean society to broadly share the recognition that these are the optimal policies to keep the risk of a pandemic within the normal range? What resistance and criticism occurred during the formation of shared understanding? What arrangements of knowledge claims, instruments, and narratives effectively silenced criticism against the recognized status of the K-quarantine as a success? Representation of citizens as active and responsible participants in the K-Quarantine model, who contributed to the promotion of quarantine, economy, and ultimately freedom gained social traction in Korea. The paper discusses that imagination of a population normally distributed around the average individual was important in the co-production of K-Quarantine model as a success and responsible citizenship as widely recognized social phenomena.

      • KCI등재

        공대생의 "진정"한 즐거움

        김효민(Kim, Hyomin),조희수(Cho, Heesoo) 한국과학기술학회 2017 과학기술학연구 Vol.17 No.2

        이공계 대학생, 이른바 공대생은 한국 대학생의 절반에 가까운 비율을 차지하고 있다. 청년 세대에 대한 기존의 연구는 외환위기 이후 청년 세대를 "평범한 안정"을 추구하기 위해 "열정노동"을 수행하는 "진정"한 생존주의자로서 문제화하였다. 이들은 "자신을 초월한 더 큰 존재와 관련 속에서 자신의 삶의 행로를 위치지우지" 못하고 있는 것으로 진단된다. 그런데 오늘날 한국의 청년 세대, 특히 공대생들이 수행하고 서사화하는 것이 가능한, 당장 눈앞의 생존 가치를 대체할 만한 가치란 있는 것인가? 생존 가치에 붙잡히지 않는 가치는 (만약 있다면), 어떤 기제와 과정을 통해 공대생들이 쉽게 활용할 수 있는/없는 것이 되는가? 우리는 한 지방광역시의 과학기술특성화대학의 학부생을 대상으로 수행한 인터뷰들을 소개하겠다. 이들은 아직 본격적인 과학기술 연구자로서의 삶을 시작한 것은 아니지만, 모두 연구자로서의 미래를 진지하게 고려하고 있으며, 이와 관련된 기대, 두려움, 혼란, 욕구, 선(the good)에 대한 지향을 표현하는 과정에서 2017년 한국이라는 특정한 시공간에서 역사적으로 형성된 "가용한 재고 지식"을 활용할 것으로 예상되었다. 우리는 인터뷰들에서 공통적으로 나타난 세 가지 주제—그다지 나쁘지 않은 삶, "진정"한 즐거움, 개발민족주의에 대한 반감—에 관해 분석할 것이다. 결론적으로 우리는 자신이 "진정"으로 하고 싶어 하는 연구를 행하고 그러한 연구의 비의도적 부산물을 통해 국가의 발전에 기여하는 변형된 개발민족주의가, 공대생의 자기답게 되기와 선(selfhood and the good)을 연결 짓는 서사 형성에 강력하게 작용하고 있음을 지적한다. Science and engineering college students, so-called engineering students, account for nearly half of Korean university students. Existing research on younger generations poses a question of young generation after the financial crisis as a "genuine" survivalist who carries out "passionate labor" to pursue "ordinary lifeʼ and ʻbanal stability". They are diagnosed as failing to "locate the course of their lives in relation to a larger being that transcends self". But is there a value that can replace the survival value in front of us today, which is possible to be practiced and narrated by the young generation of Korea, especially the engineering students? What value (if any) is not captured by survival value, and what mechanisms and processes can and can easily be used by engineering students? Our research uses interviews conducted at one research-centered science and engineering university in a local metropolitan city, Korea. In conclusion, we emphasize that a transformed version of developmental nationalism, in which individual scientists/engineers pursue their ʻauthenticʼ passion and unintentionally contribute to the development of the nation through byproducts of their research, exerts strong influence upon the formation of young engineering studentsʼ narratives linking their selfhood and the good.

      • KCI등재

        호스피스 말기암환자의 섬망 증상에 영향을 미치는 요인

        김효민(Hyomin Kim),김경민(Kyungmin Kim),장서영(Seoyoung Jang),이상원(Sang Won Lee) 대한생물치료정신의학회 2020 생물치료정신의학 Vol.26 No.3

        Objectives:Hyperactive delirium is a state of acute mental confusion including aggressive and impulsive behavior and it is burdensome for the family and caregivers of terminal cancer patients. Therefore, predicting the symptoms of hyperactive delirium can provide benefits to care terminal cancer patients. In this study, several risk factors were evaluated during hospitalization for predicting delirious symptom in terminal cancer patients. Methods:Patients who died of cancer in a palliative care unit from January 2011 to September 2012 were investigated by retrospective chart review. Clinical and laboratory data were collected to identify the factors associated with hyperactive delirium. Univariate and multivariate analysis by logistic regression were applied. Additional survival analysis was conducted to measure the onset of delirium symptoms after pneumonia. Results:During hospitalization, 49 of 201 patients showed the symptoms of hyperactive delirium (24.4%). Developing a delirious symptom was associated with male (OR=3.36, p=0.002), bone metastasis (OR=3.70, p=0.002), pneumonia during hospitalization (OR=3.17, p=0.02) and depressive mood (OR=2.53, p80.011). In additional survival analysis, half of patients developed symptoms of delirium within 3 days after pneumonia. Conclusion:Our results suggest that male, bone metastasis, depressive mood, and pneumonia are risk factors that can affect hyperactive delirium in terminally ill cancer patients. In addition, many patients with pneumonia abruptly developed the symptoms of hyperactive delirium within 3 days. Our finding may provide clues for predicting hyperactive delirium, and it can be helpful to manage delirium symptoms.

      • KCI등재후보

        유전자변형식품에 관한 세 가지 논의

        김효민(Kim Hyomin),여재룡(Yeo Jaeryong),유수형(Yoo Soohyung) 한국과학기술학회 2011 과학기술학연구 Vol.11 No.2

        우리나라의 유전자변형식품에 관련된 사회 운동은 그동안 주로 표시제를 통해 소비자가 알권리와 선택할 권리를 보장해주어야 할 정부의 책임을 사회운동의 전면에 강조하는 방향으로 진행되었다. 실질적 동등성 개념에 기반을 두고 유전자 변형식품의 안전성을 평가하는 현행의 규제 방식에 대항적 전문성을 통하여 맞서고 비판하는 활동은 사회적으로 크게 확산되지 못하였다. 이 연구는 인터뷰와 문헌 조사를 통해 우리나라의 유전자변형식품에 관련된 논의에 참가한 세 그룹-규제 과학자, 시민단체, 대항 전문가-의 활동이 각각 현행 유전자변형식품 규제의 방식과 어떤 연관을 맺고 있는지 알아보았다. 대항 전문가들은 ‘국제기준 순응의 담론’의 생산자인 규제 과학자들과 충돌하면서 규제 형성의 과정에서 배제되었다. 이 연구는 우리나라의 유전자변형식품을 둘러싼 논란의 지형을 이해하기 위하여, 대항적 전문지식을 가진 행위자들이 다른 집단과 폭넓은 연대를 형성하지 못했던 과정과 맥락을 분석해 볼 필요가 있음을 제안한다. The main issue in Korean debates over genetically modified (GM) foods have been government’s responsibility to guarantee consumers’ right-to-know and make informed choice. Counter-experts’ critique over the current regulatory processes based upon substantial equivalence have not been widely publicized. Through interviews and textual analysis, this paper explored three groups’ performances in Korean GM food controversies-regulatory scientists, civil society organizations, and counter-experts. Analytic focus was made upon how each of the groups interact with current GM food regulations. While making conflicts with regulatory scientists and their ‘discourse of compliance with global standards,’ counter-experts were excluded from regulatory processes. This article suggests that the processes and contexts in which counter-experts failed to form strong alliance with other groups need to be examined in order to further understand the specific contours of Korean GM food controversies.

      • KCI등재후보

        참여적 과학기술 거버넌스의 전개와 전망

        김효민(Hyomin Kim),조승희(Seung Hee Cho),송성수(Sungsoo Song) 한국과학기술학회 2016 과학기술학연구 Vol.16 No.2

        이 논문에서는 과학기술학에서 공중의 과학기술 관여가 논의되어온 방식이 갖는 유용성과 한계를 정당화와 실질적 수용의 측면에서 살펴보고자 한다. 이를 위해 우선 과학기술 전문가의 지식 체계가 포함하는 불확실성과 비전문가의 일반인 지식에 관한 STS의 통찰이 왜 그동안 참여적 거버넌스의 양적, 질적확산으로 충분히 이어지지 못했는지의 문제를 이론적, 실질적 층위에서 논의하였다. 이어서 어떤 전문성이 참여적 거버넌스의 구성과 지속을 지지할 수 있는 것인가에 대한 답을 찾기 위한 예비적인 시도로서 한 사례—제주도 풍력 발전시설 개발과 제도 정비 과정에서 나타난 비전문가의 활동—에 주목하였다. 논문의 주장은 다음과 같이 요약된다. 첫째, 참여적 거버넌스를 정당화할 수 있는 근거는 시민/비전문가라는 사회 집단이 갖는 어떤 본질적 특성에서 도출할 수 없다. 둘째, 참여의 정당한 조건으로 수용될 수 있는 전문성의 형식과 내용은 사실 진술과 가치 판단의 경계를 재구성하는 수행의 결과로서 사후적으로 부여된다. 셋째, 제주도 풍력자원 공유화 과정에서 복잡한 사회-기술 체제의 실질적 재구성에 기여했던 것은 새롭게 유통될 수 있는 사물-사람의 관계를 만드는 ‘연계적 전문성’이었다. 넷째, 시민과 전문가의 전문성은 모두 대체가 아닌 보완을 필요로 한다. 궁극적으로 이 논문은 참여적 거버넌스에 대한 STS 논의가 실제로 갈등이 발생하고 결정이 이루어지고 있는 현장에 주목하여, 과거와 현재, 사실과 가치, 과학기술과 사회의 경계를 재구성하는 행위자들의 구체적 수행을 분석하는 작업으로 확장되어야 할 필요성을 강조한다. This paper critically reviews the previous discussion over public engagement with science and technology by Science and Technology Studies literatures with a focus on justification and acceptance. Recent studies pointed out that the “participatory turn” after the late 1990s was followed by confusion and disagreement over the meaning and agency of public engagement. Their discussion over the reproduction of the ever-present boundary between science and society along with so-called late modernity and post-normal science and sometimes through the very processes of public engagement draws fresh attention to the old problem: how can lay participation in decision-making be justified, even if we agree that privileging the position of experts in governance of science and technology is no longer justified? So far STS have focused on two conditions for participatory turn—1) uncertainties inherent in experts’ ways of knowing and 2) practicability of lay knowledge. This paper first explicated why such discussion has not been logically sufficient nor successful in promoting a wide and well-thought-out acceptance of public engagement. Then the paper made a preliminary attempt to explain what new types of expertise can support the construction and sustainment of participatory governance in science and technology by focusing on one case of lay participation. The particular case discussed by the paper revolves around the actions of a civil organization and an activist who led legal and regulatory changes in wind power development in Jeju Special Self-governing Province. The paper analyzed the types of expertise constructed to be effective and legitimate during the constitution of participatory energy governance and the local society’s support for it. The arguments of this paper can be summarized as follows. First, an appropriate basis of the normative claim that science and technology governance should make participatory turn cannot be drawn from the essential characteristics of lay publics—as little as of experts. Second, the type of ‘expertise’ which can justify participatory governance can only be constructed a posteriori as a result of the practices to re-construct the boundaries between factual statements and value judgment. Third, an intermediary expertise, which this paper defines as a type of expertise in forming human-nonhuman associations and their new pathways for circulations, made significant contribution in laying out the legal and regulatory foundation for revenue sharing in Jeju wind power development. Fourth, experts’ conventional ways of knowing need to be supplemented, not supplanted, by lay expertise. Ultimately, the paper calls for the necessity to extend STS discussion over governance toward following the actors. What needs more thorough analysis is such actors’ narratives and practices to re-construct the boundaries between the past and present, facts and values, science and society. STS needs a renewed focus on the actual sites of conflicts and decision-making in discussing participatory governance.

      • SCOPUSKCI등재

        Variable Admittance Control Strategy for the Control Stability of Power Assist Robot according to Load Weight

        김효민(Hyomin Kim),박현석(Hyunseok Park),양우성(Woosung Yang) Korean Society for Precision Engineering 2021 한국정밀공학회지 Vol.38 No.3

        The controller for the power assist robot that is in constant contact with the user requires to be sensitively controlled as per the users intention and maintain control stability to ensure the users safety. Admittance control is generally used for human intention-based force control. By setting the parameters of the admittance control at a low level it is possible to sensitively control according to the users intention. However, too sensitive settings make the system unstable. Therefore, it is difficult to set a fixed admittance parameter in a power assist robot in which dynamics change with an increase in load mass. Consequently, we propose a variable admittance control strategy according to the load mass. The proposed method responds sensitively to the users intention by setting the admittance parameters at low during no-load action and ensures stability by setting the admittance parameter high when transmitting high loads. In simulation with a carrying load of 30 kg, the proposed method requires half the interaction force compared with a fixed admittance control when decelerating and has twice faster settling time when stopped. In addition, through experimental verifications, the variable admittance control was proven to reduce the users load by 70% compared to load mass.

      • KCI등재

      연관 검색어 추천

      이 검색어로 많이 본 자료

      활용도 높은 자료

      해외이동버튼