http://chineseinput.net/에서 pinyin(병음)방식으로 중국어를 변환할 수 있습니다.
변환된 중국어를 복사하여 사용하시면 됩니다.
비농업인의 농지소유와 「농지법」 상예외적 농지소유 실태 분석* - 지대별 사례지역 조사를 중심으로 -
채광석(Chae, Gwangseok),김홍상(Kim, Hongsang),김부영(Kim, Booyoung),정주협(Jung, Juhyub) 한국농식품정책학회 2019 농업경영정책연구 Vol.46 No.3
While the Constitution and the Farmland Act stress compliance with the land-to-the-tiller principle, in reality the ownership and lease of farmland by non-farmers have expanded, resulting in failure of this fundamental ideology and principle. The Agricultural Area Survey and Agricultural Corporation Survey show that the percentage of farmland owned by farmers plummeted from 67.0% in 1995 to 56.2% in 2015, and that the ratio of leased farms increased from 42.2% to 50.9% over the same period. As of 2015, over half of the total farmland area is being used through leasing arrangements. However, the legitimacy of these leased farms remains unknown, and it is also hard to identify the size of exceptions for non- farmers who happen to own farmland due to inheritance or leaving the farming profession, etc. As a result, it is not easy to specify ways to improve the farmland ownership and use system. This study aims to analyze the current state of ownership and use of farmland and then discuss the major and pending issues pertaining to farmland. First, although there is a farmland register to keep track of current state of ownership and use of farmland, the registration rate is only around 70%, which makes it difficult to find out precise state of ownership and use of farmland. Second, the regional case studies reveal that about two-thirds of the total farmland is not regulated by lease provisions under the Farmland Act. Furthermore, approximately 42% of farmlands affected by lease provisions are illegal, which amount to only 15.5% of the total farmland in the case studies.
채광석(Gwang-seok Chae),김홍상(Hongsang Kim) 한국농촌경제연구원 2011 한국농촌경제연구원 기본연구보고서 Vol.- No.-
Although there is a reasonable system for preservation of farmland, the operation of the system has the characteristic of focusing on controlling the non-agricultural supply of farmland to secure farmland in terms of size. The farmland classified as ‘superior’ is still conversed in large scale and there are many unplanned developments. Farmland conversion is initiated by the local government, but the local government’s concept and objective of farmland preservation are not clearly defined, and farmland management on an aggregate basis becomes difficult. In preserving and managing farmland, problems arise not because of an erroneous design of the farmland management system but because of the invariable perception of changing circumstances. Although the current system aims to preserve farmland centering around ‘superior’ farmland within an agriculture promotion area(conservation area), there is a limitation in that the concept as to what is the appropriate level of preservation is not properly established. This research reviewed changes in the total amount of farmland and the actual state of management, derived differences and implications concerning domestic and overseas farmland preservation and management through a survey of cases in major advanced countries, and analyzed the demand outlook and the possibility of introducing a management system on an aggregate basis from technical, systematic, financial and legal aspects. The major findings of this research are as follows: First, the current size of the ‘agricultural promotion area,’ which can be categorized as the farmland for preservation, is 810,000ha out of the total farmland, and we should accomplish the target rate of food self-sufficiency with the agricultural promotion area only. Therefore, in order to implement a new policy objective, we need to prepare a method of securing farmland on a total amount basis and prepare a legal and systematic action plan. Second, we need to understand farmland management as a concept which includes investment and financing for efficient use of farmland beyond the scope of management of ownership and use (lease and rent). When such a legal system and change in the perception are complete, the effectiveness of the plan for farmland use will be improved. Third, up until now a control-oriented preservation policy has constituted the main pillar of farmland preservation in our country. But in order to accomplish the crucial national objective of securing food when there is continuous pressure to convert farmland and mitigate regulations, preserving farmland through incentives should be contemplated. For example, adopting a taxation system providing tax benefits to those who participate in farmland preservation projects should be considered positively.