http://chineseinput.net/에서 pinyin(병음)방식으로 중국어를 변환할 수 있습니다.
변환된 중국어를 복사하여 사용하시면 됩니다.
金尙浩(Kim, Sang Ho) 동아인문학회 2015 동아인문학 Vol.30 No.-
Chinese literature studies in Korea have received attention from Korean academia with Taiwanese literature and cultural studies among the various academic fields, and most researchers have devoted themselves to study and translation since the 1990s. It became a motive to push ahead with Taiwan studies. Historically, there are many similarities between Korea and Taiwan such as colonial and post-colonial period. They look similar but different. These historical backgrounds become conditions and characteristics of mutual exchange between Korea and Taiwan in various academic fields. The purpose and the significance of the translation of Taiwanese literature are in accurate translation, and to certainly introduce its excellence to Korean Academia and the readers. It is down to the effect of Taiwanese literature on the contemporary Korean literature. In addition, it is not only a beneficial role model for the development of cross-cultural communication of the millennium and translation of literature, but also provides experience to them. Recently, the study on Taiwanese literature in Korea is focus on researching writers. According to the amount of translation in various fields, it is getting achieved the expected level. This is expected to bring positive future, and it will be the driving force of a bright future between two countries.
예디(葉笛) 시집『불과 바다』에 나타난 역사적 증명과 서정성
金尙浩(Kim Sang Ho) 한국외국어대학교 대만연구센터 2017 대만연구 Vol.- No.10
Having played multiple roles with versatile talent, Ye Di was a poet as well as a critic, prose writer, and Chinese-Japanese translator. Perhaps it was because he wrote diverse genres that his role as a poet was not as famous as other Taiwanese poets of the same era nor did he gain much attention from people. This lack of fame could be attributed to Ye Di’s self-identification as a reclusive literary author, indulging only in themes or methods he adored. In the 1950s, he barely had any contact with the literary world. Ye Di’s poetry contains deep pain and sorrow. His poems presented the voice of the agonized Taiwanese people who led a weary life with a painful history. Ye Di transformed this pain into the sublime images of literature and art. In his two poem collections Purple Songs (1954) and Fire and Sea (1990), he constantly displayed the entanglement and harmony between history and lyricism, or art and narrative, or mitigated and intensified tension. It was a fact that poets who wrote about Taiwan localism were stifled or neglected by the authoritarian government. The mitigation by Ye Di’s dialectics and his intensified efforts could naturally manifest the intrinsic meanings that accompanied such an era. The present study used Ye Di’s collection Fire and Sea, published in 1990, as the basis to explore the significance of the era reflected by the history and lyricism displayed in the poems. The present study discusses the poems from two aspects: Book of Revelation that surpasses death and the aesthetics of thinking in daily life.
金聖浩(Kim Sung Ho) 숭실대학교 법학연구소 2011 法學論叢 Vol.25 No.-
노동법은 근로자의 근로조건을 보호하고 근로3권을 보장하기 위한 법으로서 노동과 자본의 대립을 전제로 근로자에게는 권리를, 사용자에게는 의무를 부과하고 있다. 그러나, 산업사회의 발전에 따라 기업조직의 분화, 고용형태의 다양화 등으로 근로계약의 당사자로서 사용자 개념만으로는 이러한 노동법의 역할을 다하지 못하는 상황이 되었다. 이에 따라 사용자 개념을 확대하려는 시도가 판례와 학설을 통해 지속적으로 이루어져 왔다. 판례는 묵시적 근로계약관계 이론의 도입하고 최근에는 부당노동행위에 있어서 근로조건의 지배 · 결정권에 근거하여 사용자 범위를 확대한 바 있다. 이에 대해 학설은 집단적 노사관계에 있어서는 근로조건의 지배 · 결정권에 기해 근로계약의 당사자를 넘어서 사용자 범위를 확대해야 한다고 하고 있다. 판례는 근로조건의 지배 · 결정권에 기하여 부당노동행위의 사용자 범위를 확대하면서 아직까지 단체교섭 의무가 있는 사용자로 인정하지는 않고 있다. 판례의 이러한 법리는 논리적 모순을 가지고 있으므로 근로 조건의 지배 · 결정권에 기한 사용자 범위를 일관되게 확대하거나 근로계약 당사자로서 사용자 개념을 고수하려면 공범 이론을 통한 부당노동행위 주체의 확대가 필요하다고 할 것이다. 한편, 외환위기 이후 급격히 증가하고 있는 간접고용에 대응하여 파견과 도급과의 구별이 사용자책임과 관련된 중요한 법적 과제로 대두되고 있다. 최근 현대자동차 사건에서 사내하도급에 대해 실질적인 불법파견을 인정한 바 있다. 대법원은 사내하도급 근로자에 대한 작업지시권이 현대자동차에게 있다는 점과 하청업체가 독자적인 기술이나 자본 투입이 없었다는 점을 강조하면서 사실상 근로자파견을 한 것으로 판단하였다. 정부의 구별기준은 전통적인 사업경영의 독립성과 노무관리의 독립성을 가지고 파견 해당 여부를 판단하고 있는데, 두 가지 독립성은 상호 배타적인 것이 아니라 서로 연관되어있다. 대법원의 현대자동차 판례와 독일의 사례에서도 이러한 해석방법론을 취하고 있으며 정부의 구별기준은 이러한 방향에서 보완이 요구된다 할 것이다. 다만, 체계적이고 일관된 사용자성 확대 이론은 앞으로 더 많은 연구가 필요하다고 본다. The identity of labor Law is to protect working conditions and to guarantee fundamental labor rights, which gives rights to employees and imposes duties to employers. But as industrial society is developed and hence diversification of corporate organization and employment types has been spread, labor law based upon the definition of employer which is confined to one party of employment contract cannot take the appropriate role indicated above. Therefore case law and scholars have tried to extend the scope of employers continuously. The court introduced so called 'implicit employment theory' and recently extended the scope of employers on the basis of the power of dominance and decision to working conditions with respect to unfair labor practice. Scholars propose that based upon the power of dominance and decision the scope of employers must be widened particularly in the area of collective labor relationship. The court extended the scope of employers on the basis of power of dominance and decision but does not impose the duty of collective bargaining on the employers. Such attitude of the court has contradiction. Therefore I think that it must extend the scope of employers consistently according to the 'dominance power scrutiny' or if it must extend the scope of persons who can be liable for the unfair labor practice through accomplice theory. And the distinction between temporary agency employment and outsourcing has been more important with respect to employer's responsibility responding to increasing so called indirect employment since economic crisis caused by foreign currency in Korea. Recently the court decided illegal temporary agency employment in the case of Hyundai Automobile Corporation. It emphasized that the power of direction to the employees of subcontractors lied on Hyundai and the subcontractors did not put any its own technology or capital, thus it decided that Hyundai actually practiced illegal temporary agency employment. The scrutiny of the government for such distinction uses traditional criteria of independence of management and independence of business and personnel management. The both independences are not reciprocally exclusive but closely related each other. The case of Hyundai and the German cases also take this kind of interpretation method theory, so the scrutiny of the government needs to be revised according to such direction. But It needs more research to achieve a systematic and consistent theory for extention of the scope of employers.