영어의 진행형 연구

허종회 한국강원영어영문학회 1984 영어영문학 Vol.5 No.1

Langacker says that predicates are classified into content predicates (main verbs) and auxiliaries, and according to their characteristics of time content predicates are classified into perfectives, imperfectives and statives. Perfective has a feature that agent, participating in action of predicate, is limited temporally and changes spatially. Imperfective, in course of time, can be viewed as not being limited temporally and not being changed spatially. And statives can be described as only one point in the axis of time and space. Also, he gives a meaning to `BE' and 'ING.' Then he analyses the character when each element of English progressive form are matched synthetically. In this paper, I have applied this Langacker's analysis to the studies of progressive form of some traditional grammarians; Jespersen, Poutsma and Hornby. As a result, I am convinced that the characteristics of perfective are applied very well in the examples used in the traditional studies of progressive form. That is, the content predicates which can be used as progressive form have characteristics of perfective. Also, in the case of content predicates which can not be used as progressive form generally the content predicates have characteristics of perfective when progressive form is possible. But the content predicates have characteristics of imperfective when progressive form is impossible. Therefore, Langack~r's analysis can explain the reasons for the progressive form of the descriptive traditional grammar.

英語否定極語의 分析方法

許鍾會 尙志大學校 1990 論文集 Vol.11 No.-

對話에 있어서의 妨害

許鐘會 尙志大學校 1995 論文集 Vol.16 No.-

In this paper I have considered the interruption in the conversation in the various aspects. As a result, I can summarize the subject of the interruption in the conversation in the organization of turn-taking, the interruption and interpretation, a model of interruption and sex role in the interruption as follows. First, the organization of turn-taking in the conversation is characterized by context-free and context-sensitive. As a reason of reality(substance) of a organization, conversation(discourse) contains the various situations. And the systems of this turn-taking are consist of the series of the rules dominating turn-construction which it adjust the transition of conversations involving the turn- constructional components and turn-allocation components. Second, in the interruption and interpretation, the interruption of a situation can be seen as either trivial matter or even cooperative one. Therefore, in another situations we can accept the same things as they are even war-like. That is to say, the subject of interrupion in the conversation is not recognition but interpretation. Third, in the consideration for a model of the interruption, the speakers want to judge the intentions of their counterparts because they think the interruption as a wrong part in the mutual talks. Consequently, to continue the talk each other in the congenial atmospheres or to understand the mistakes for mutual talks I think that we require the complete understanding for the contexts rather than syllable-counting approach. Lastly, because we have to consider the sex of roles of interruption in conversation in relation to setting of the data, contexts (the various changes of backgrounds), special character of the societies, customs and habits, level of the speakers and hearers, and so on. I think that it is difficult to support or criticize the one side when we consider the conflicting opinions for the sex role.

타동성과 수동태의 모형

許鍾會 尙志大學校 1992 論文集 Vol.13 No.-

전이성과 미완료 동사구문

허종회,Huh, Jong-Hoi 한국영어어문교육학회 2003 영어어문교육 Vol.9 No.S

Transitive relation and its directionality constitute the precondition for passivization, and the present study purports 10 unearth the true properties of transitivity in connection with the passive phenomena. The bottom line it drives at is this transitivity is a notion that can be best explained in 'cognitive' terms. The original direction of transitivity that is predicated by a verb can be reversed depending on the speaker's intention or the discourse situation. In the imperfective verb constructions transitivity can not be derived from only the content of the sentence itself and the predicate objectionally. That depends on the subjective interpretation of speaker considering the cognitive prototype of human to the various complicated situations.

함의에 함축에 대한 연구

許鐘會 尙志大學校 1989 論文集 Vol.10 No.-

In this paper I have studied that the semantic aspect of the so-called presupposition is so complex that they can not be explained in a uniform phenomenon. Therefore, presupposition must be divided into the semantic and pragmatic aspect and explained with such two aspects. Also, we have known that the notion of semantic entailment rather than semantic presupposition is adequate in the explanation to the presupposition. Meanwhile, in the pragmatic aspect, presupposition depends upon the discourse contexts and must be explained with the notion of implication. According to Karttunen and Peter this notion is equivalent for the conversational implicature. And in the complex sentenses, the entire presupposition is influenced by the semantic feature of the sentences. then we have seen that felicity condition and conversational maxims are required to the explanation of the complex sentences. Finally, implication can be divided into the conversational and conventional one. Then presupposition must be decomposed into entailment implicature. Here, conventional implicature is absorbed in the notion of entailment and implicature is just word for the conversational one. As a result, so-called presupposition must be decomposed into two parts which can be explained in the semantics and pragmetics. Then the semantic aspect including the conventional implicature which can be solved by truth condition must be explained by entailment. And conversational implicature must be explained by pragmatics.

Politeness 에 대한 연구

허종회 한국강원영어영문학회 1996 영어영문학 Vol.15 No.1

In the previous chapters I have surveyed the various kinds of views for politeness and considered the validity of face-saving view. And I can summarize the followings in an example of Korean TV talk show. First, in the talk show MC takes strongly the conversational posture for the frequent use of 'turn-taking';he plays an accelerating part of conversation exciting GT's interests. This fact plays an important part of maintaining of politeness. Second, MC save GT's face through the positive evaluation of GT's utterance. Therefore, MC adopts the effective politeness strategy sending a message of politeness to MT. Third, MC transmits the polite attitude to GT using the successive 'continuers'. This, in outstanding conversational attitude, expresses the intimacy to GT. Finally, the conversational contents to MC's politeness are decided by GT's character in utterances.

전이성과 미완료 동사구문

허종회 한국영어어문교육학회 2003 영어어문교육 Vol.9 No.2

加味六味地黃湯이 Streptozotocin 白鼠의 血糖量에 미치는 影響

許鍾會,柳基遠 慶熙大學校韓醫科大學韓醫學硏究所 1984 慶熙韓醫大論文集 Vol.7 No.-

표현과 의미에 관한 연구

허종회 한국강원영어영문학회 1998 영어영문학 Vol.17 No.2

In this paper, I have discussed the expression and meaning of sentence in view of construction grammar. A large amount of information is contributed by individual lexical items. However, to understand the full meaning of sentences particular semantic structures together with their associated formal expression must be recognized as constructions indepedent of the lexical items. Construction grammar has advantages as follows. First, the constructional approach avoids the problems of positing implausible verb senses. Second, it avoids a certain circularity of analysis resulting from the claim that syntax is a projection of lexical requirement. Third, another important advantage of construction-based approach is semantic parsimony. Fourth, in this constructional point of view compositionality is preserved. Meanwhile rich frame-semantic knowledge associated with verbs is neccessary for felicitous use of adverbs and adjuncts, interpretation and translation, process of preemption, and making correct inferences. Also, with the notion of constructional polysemy we can naturally capture a set of systematically related senses in the ditransitive form. In particular, this polysemous analysis helps us to understand the central sense of the construction. The central sense involve transfer between a volitional agent and a willing recipient. There is a particular semantic constraint in the ditransitive construction. This constraint appears in general systematic metaphor. To recognize this constraint we must consider that each of the verbs used independently selects for a volitional subject argument. This generalization can be captured by assgning a constraint on the nature of the subject argument.