http://chineseinput.net/에서 pinyin(병음)방식으로 중국어를 변환할 수 있습니다.
변환된 중국어를 복사하여 사용하시면 됩니다.
安根碩 충남대학교 인문과학연구소 1982 인문학연구 Vol.9 No.2
How should we think of the relation between individuals and groups? If we accept the assumption that individuals and groups are both important social relaties, we can then ask a pair of important questions. What kind of effects do groups have on the emotional security and creative productivity of the individual? What kind of effects do individuals have on the morale and creative productivity of the groups? In this study these questions it is important to be alerted to both good and bad effects. Although the systematic evidence from research does not begin to provide full answers to these question, I have found evidence which tends to support the following general statements. 1. Acceptance of these conformity pressures, toward uniformity or heterogeneity, may satisfy the emotional needs of some members and some mambers and inhibit that of others. 2. From their experiences of multiple membership and their personal synthesis of these experiences, individuals do have opportunities to achieve significant bases of individuality. 3. Because each group is made up of members who are loyal members of other groups and who have clnique individual interests, each group must continuosly cope with deviancy tendencies of the improvement in the life of the group or source of destructive disruption. 4. The resolution of these conflicting interests does not seem to be the strengthening of individuals and the weakening of groups, or the strengthening of groups and the weakening of individuals, but rather a strengthening of both by qualitative improvements in the nature of interdependence between integrated individuals and cohesive groups.