압연 제어 기술의 제어 알고리듬에 대한 동향조사

원상철,김상우,이상철 ( Sang Chul Won,Sang Woo Kim,Sang Cheol Lee ) 대한금속재료학회 1996 압연기술의 현재와 미래 Vol.- No.-

기업윤리와 소비자계약

원상철 원광대학교 법학연구소 2007 圓光法學 Vol.23 No.1

Business enterprise is a subject of economic for making of a profit with personal and material facilities. In Korea, social corruptions caused by unlawful political fund reflected business management. From now on the business enterprise should recover its trust by keeping business ethics. The business should respect both for the dignity and creativity of their employees and customers and demands of the common good. Business managers should fulfill the social responsibility by putting a priority of 'being' over 'having' and by managing their firms on the basis of laws and principles. We should not accept or ignore the unlawful category between policy and business any longer that has been the major reason for social corruption so far. All member of our society as well as all business firms should keep the laws and principles and raise our ethical standards in the days of high technology and information society. Otherwise, we cannot avoid the social disaster that may be caused by the corrupted behavior and unlawful competition. The achievement of high business ethics is pending on the strong will not only from managers but also from shareholders. For a successful ethical management, a nation should try to improve its business environments and both managers and employees are willing to keep the ethical principles and take full responsibility for their actions.

共同不法行爲者에 대한 基礎論

元相喆 圓光大學校 附設 法學硏究所 1992 法學硏究 Vol.12 No.-

A tort is always composed of by the act of only one man but may be made up of the act of several persons, with is called "cotort" and prescribed in Article 760 of the Civil Code. Here in this provision are included three kinds of types. That is to say, in the paragraph Ⅰ of the Article 760, when plural persons inflict demages on others by cotort, they have the responsibility to compensate the damages. In the paragraph Ⅱ of ths Article760, when we cannot identify who any one who inflicited the damages which committed by the behavior of plural persons not jointed, the same shall applied. In the paragraph Ⅲ of the Article 760, the inciters and helpers shall be considered as joint actors. Nontheless, the concept itself of a cotort is not clear now. Modern factors such as development of the traffic and communication, concertration of entrprise and constant urbanization have brought us much more opportunity for social contact than any other period. Thersfore, in order to solve this question, writer observed about the behavioural patterns of cotort, the effectual conditions of cotort, the concrete examples of cotort, and the legal nature and the effect of cotort. Further, this study is wanted to be become with the basic raw materials on the theory of cotort.

상가권리금보호를 위한 입법적 해결방안 검토

원상철(Won, Sang-Chul) 한국재산법학회 2011 재산법연구 Vol.28 No.3

현재 상가건물임대차계약 해지 시 임차인이 임대인이나 전임차인에게, 또는 임차권의 양수인이 양도인에게 임차보증금을 지급하는 것 외에 별도로 권리금이라는 명목으로 보증금보다 많은 금전을 지급하는 경우가 있다. 이러한 권리금의 지급은 상가건물임대차에서 관행적으로 이루어지고 있음에도 불구하고 이에 대한 법적ㆍ제도적 보장이 미흡하여 이를 둘러싼 분쟁이 날이 갈수록 증대하고 있어 이에 대한 문제해결이 시급한 사항이다. 이러한 상가건물의 임대차와 관련하여 임차인이 임차보증금 이외에 권리금이라는 명목으로 임대인에게 지급되는 금전의 성격이나 반환의무의 효력이 대부분 당해 임대차계약의 당사자의의 상가건물임대차계약의 내용에 의하거나 관행에 의하여 처리되고 있는것이 우리의 현실이다. 우리나라의 판례는 임대인이 그 임대차 종료 후에도 상가건물이 그 재산적 가치를 가지고 있는 경우에 양수하거나, 또한 권리금을 수수한 후에 일정기간 그 임대차관계를 유지시켜 그 재산적 가치를 이용하게 하도록 약정하였음에도 불구하고 임대인의 사정으로 그 임대차계약이 중도에 해지되어 약정기간동안 그 재산적 가치를 이용하게 해 주지 못한 경우에는 그 임대인은 그 임차건물의 권리금의 전부 또는 일부를 반환해야 한다고 하고 있다. 그러나 상가건물임대차에 있어서 권리금을 계약당사자간의 계약자유나 판례의 불완전한 보호로 해결하는 것보다 이를 근본적 해결방법을 강구할 필요가 있으며, 그리하여 법과 현실의 괴리를 보완할 수 있도록 하여야 한다. 특히 상가건물임대차계약에 있어서 권리금문제는 당사자간의 형평성을 고려하여 신중하게 처리되어야 할 것이므로, 계약자유이든 입법적이든 어떤 해결방안을 모색하는 것도 중요하지 않을 수 없다. 본고는 상가건물임대차의 경우 경제적 약자인 임차인의 권리금을 보호하고 바람직한 입법적 해결방안을 모색하기 위하여 그 대안을 제시하고자 한다. Commonly, around a contract of commercial building lease, in addition to a lease deposit, a premium paid by the lessee to lessor, lessee to prior lessee, or sub-lessee to original lessee, assignee of lease right to assignor. If Both parties terminates the contract of commercial building lease, Lessee will have to pay to lessor more the premium then the lease deposit. Though this premium is being paid customarily in the commercial building lease, We lacks legal and institutional guarantee on the premium. Because these disputes is growing, we should resolve this issue. Actually, even though the payment of the premium is a general practice in a contract of commercial building lease, the lessee is not protected by a lease dispute involved premium. It has a great importance. In relation to these commercial building leases, The effects of the characteristics of the premium and the obligations of the premium return that is called the premium in the contract of commercial building lease that be paid to the lessor except for a lease deposit, is decided by the customs or the contents of the contract. It is our reality. Our case can not charge the re-claim of the premium in principle. But even after the lease relationships is terminated, If the commercial buildings have a property value or the lease contract is terminated by the lessor’s errors, lessor should give some or all of premium back. However, upon the case reviewed, some commentators argued that the gap between the actual practice and legal principle is needed to be removed by the enactment of rules rather than solved by the self-governing principle between the parties. The issue of premium in the commercial building lease contract, should be handled carefully. Thus, considering both parties equal treatment of the legal position, seeking to the solution either legislation or self-governing is significant job for researcher and I presented somewhat serious proposal in this piece. This paper is that the resolution would like to present to the legalization of premium in the commercial building lease.

自然法思想史

원상철 圓光大學校 法學硏究所 2004 法學硏究 Vol.20 No.-

The Constitutionalism constitution in modern ages was established on basis of freedom natural-law idea in modern times. It made inherent right principle in natural-law idea a idea of constitution and its guiding principle. Therefore it can be said that constitutionalism constitution in modern ages was formalized by making nation's natural right idea like norm of positive constitution. But constitutionalism constitution in modern ages on the basic of this natural law idea neglected national basic rights of natural law or legal justification by social and economical in equality, which is brought about by big gulf between rich and poor in the course of indusrial capitalism developing, and emerging of law positivsm loving dictatorial authority and totalitarianism national authority. In addition, its idea and value could not help being hurt greatly be increasing civil right violation from through government power displaying rightfulness of positive law. Civil right violation from the criminal investigation course of a suspected person, human negligence and alienation phenominon from the climate of agoisrn and epicurism in the present ages, negligence treatment of nation's sovereignty through the counting of taking political power, and other phenomena is raising self-awakening that the natural law matters should be treated newly in the present ages.

共同不法行爲者의 責任論

元相喆 원광대학교 법학연구소 1992 圓光法學 Vol.12 No.-

民事留置權과 商事留置權의 比較檢討

원상철 원광대학교 법학연구소 1995 圓光法學 Vol.13 No.-

프랑스法상 人工受精子의 法的地位

元相喆 圓光大學校 附設 法學硏究所 1998 法學硏究 Vol.15 No.-

정부의 상가권리금 법제화 방안에 대한 타당성 검토

원상철(Won, Sang-Chul) 한국법이론실무학회 2015 법률실무연구 Vol.3 No.1

상가임대차인 경우 주택임대차와 달리 권리금에 대한 문제가 발생하며, 현실에서 권리금 수수계약은 기존의 상가임대차계약의 성립에 중요한 요소가 되고 있다. 임차인 측면에서 거액의 권리금을 지급하고 임대차를 체결한 후 임대차관계가 종료와 더불어 이를 반환받지 못함으로 임차인의 피해는 심각한 문제로 대두된다. 현실에서 권리금은 증가하면서 임차인의 피해사례 또한 꾸준히 증가하고 있는 실정이다. 기존의 상가임대차와 관련하여 현행 「상가임대차보호법」이 지난 2002년부터 제정 운용되어 임차인의 생존권을 보호하고 있으나, 임차인의 상가권리금과 관련된 사항이 제외되어 있다. 그리하여 정부는 법의 사각지대에 놓여 있는 상가권리금을 법적으로 보장하기 위하여 상가권리금에 대한 보호 대책을 내놓았다. 현행법상 상가권리금에 대한 직접적인 규정은 아직 보이지 않기 때문에 임차인이 상가권리금을 회수하는데 미흡하다. 따라서 정부는 상가임대차제도를 개선하여 5년간의 임대차계약기간을 보장하고, 임대인에게 권리금 회수에 협력의무를 부과하고, 임대인이 권리금 회수를 방해하면 손해배상책임을 부담하도록 명시하고, 전국 17개 시도에 분쟁조정위원회를 설치하도록 하고 있다. 그러나 정부의 개선안은 상가권리금 보호에 미흡하고 현실적 괴리가 발생하고 있어 이에 대한 개선방안을 마련할 필요가 있다. 즉 정부의 개정안은 주로 상가건물임대차 보호법의 개정을 통해 처리하려고 하나, 상가권리금과 관련 있는 민법의 개정을 통해서 임차인의 상가권리금을 강화시킬 필요가 있다. 따라서 임차인의 상가권리금을 보호하기 위하여 새로운 입법 작업과 동시에 상가권리금과 관련된 현행법상 권리를 강화시키는 방법을 강구하는 것이 바람직 할 것으로 보인다. The shops lease occurs a key money problem unlike the housing lease. The problem that is given and taken the key money, is an important factor of shops lease in the formation. These days, The guaranteed of the key money, in addition to security deposit, is set to be a problem with regard to shops lease. After paying a large amount of key money, It is a serious problem to do not return this. So the government has introduced a protective measure in order to solve this problem in the blind spot of the law. Because there is no direct regulations on current law, It is difficult for lessee to recover the shops key money. Therefore the government had presented the improvement of shops lease program; a guaranteed of lease period for five-year, cooperation obligations on the key money recovery of lessor, the lessor’s damages if you disturb the key money recovery etc. However, Because the government’s improvement is insufficient to protect the shops key money, This is necessary to provide for improving plan. The government’s amendments is to process through the Shops Building Lease Protection Act, but there is a need to strengthen the lessee’s shops key money by Revising the Civil Law.

부진정연대채무와 공동불법행위

원상철 圓光大學校 法學硏究所 2006 法學硏究 Vol.22 No.2

In rescent years, the enormous economic and social changes have been accmpanied by corresponding chang in our legal system of torts. Under these circumstances, cotort is involved in significant issuse in the area of Law of Torts today. A tort is always composed of by the aet of only one man be made up of by the act of several persons, with is called "cotort" ant prescribed in Article 760 of the Civil Code. Here in this provision are included three kinds of types. That is to say, in the paragraph I of the Article 760, when plural persons inflict demages on others by cotort, they have the responsibility to compensate the damages. In the paragraph II of the Article 760, when we cannpt identify who anyone inflicted the damages which committed by the behavior of plural persons not jointed, the same shall applied. In the paragraph III of the Article 760, the inciters and helpers shall be considered as joint actors. Nontheless, the concept itself of a cotort is not clear now. Modem factors such as development of the traffic and communication, conoertration of entrprises and constant urbanization have brought us much more op-portunity for social contact than any othor period. Therefore, in order to solve this question, writer observed about the behavioural patterns of cotort, the effectual conditiors of cotort, the concrete examples of cotort. Further, this paper is wanted to be become with the basic raw materials on the theory of cotort.