http://chineseinput.net/에서 pinyin(병음)방식으로 중국어를 변환할 수 있습니다.
변환된 중국어를 복사하여 사용하시면 됩니다.
한국 근현대 과학사 연구의 성과와 과제: ‘한국 과학’에서 ‘과학 한국’까지
문만용 ( Moon Manyong ),신향숙 ( Shin Hyangsuk ) 한국과학사학회 2020 한국과학사학회지 Vol.42 No.3
This paper reviews the achievements of Korea’s modern and contemporary history of science research and presents some tasks to be solved. First, the English abstracts of 106 modern and contemporary papers published in The Korean Journal for the History of Science are categorized into five topics through text mining. It also examines the central themes of the literatures in five periods: the late 19th century, the Japanese colonial era, liberation to the 1950s, the 1960s to the 1970s, after the 1980s, and North Korea’s science and technology. In particular, it introduces recently published articles and books. We argue that an understanding of the times should be fully reflected upon, and that comparative studies are necessary to overcome a mononational perspective. Furthermore, we propose expanding the scope of research by increasing contacts with adjacent areas and introducing quantitative methodologies that can handle vast amounts of data. In addition, while studies so far have focused on the formation and identity of ‘Korean science’, future research should clarify the ‘scientific Korea’ created by such science.
김태호,신동원 한국과학사학회 2023 한국과학사학회지 Vol.45 No.3
This article examines how foreigners’ perceptions of the history of Korean science were formed and how they were endorsed and internalized by Korean historians. The interest in Korea’s scientific and technological heritage began with the works of missionaries and oriental scholars in Europe and the United States in the late 19th century. During the Japanese colonial Era, Japanese scientists, as well as American orientalists, conducted further historical and scientific research on well-known scientific heritage. It resulted in the list of “world-first” or “world-best” discoveries and inventions by Koreans. The list was not only widely acknowledged by Westerners, but also endorsed by Korean historians. By the 1970s, there emerged a virtuous cycle, in which Korean historian’s works, initiated by the list of “world-first,” facilitated Western researcher’s understanding of the history of Korean science. The intellectual exchange between Joseph Needham and Jeon Sang-woon is an example. In addition, as a result of the exchange, the history of Korean science became acknowledged as a legitimate subfield of history within Korean academia.