http://chineseinput.net/에서 pinyin(병음)방식으로 중국어를 변환할 수 있습니다.
변환된 중국어를 복사하여 사용하시면 됩니다.
오늘 본 자료
‘이중의 탈제도화’압력과 한국 시민운동의 대응 : 참여연대의‘소통적 제도화’전략 검토
홍일표 민주화운동기념사업회 2009 기억과 전망 Vol.0 No.21
This paper aims to identify the character of pressure of ‘dual deinstitutionalization’ which Korean civil movements are facing currently in 2009, and analyze the possibilities and limits of strategical choice of movement groups. ‘Institutionalization of social movement’ has been an important theoretical and practical issues of Korean civil movements in the aftermath of democratization. Especially during Roh Mu Hyun government, many people criticized and worried about the ‘over-institutionalization’ of civil movements, but the situation has been changed rapidly under Lee Myung Bak government. Pressure of ‘de-institutionalization from the above’ is weakening institutionalized outcomes, bases, and tools which civil movements have built. And pressure of ‘de-institutionalization from the below’ which started from 2008 candle demonstration is strongly asking the innovation of movement issues, communication, repertoires. But this situation is not just a ‘threatening’ toward Korean civil movements, but also an ‘opportunity.’ One-sided de-institutionalization would be very hard, because two kinds of pressure are conflicting together. The strategies which were chosen by Korean civil movements, can be divided as four types. In this paper, I analyzed the strategy of ‘communicative institutionalization’ of People’s Solidarity for Participatory Democracy(PSPD). PSPD is trying to protect the existing institutionalized outcomes, base, and tools, and at the same time, is responding against structural change, through maximizing communication with citizens. The case of ‘Revision movement of Seoul Square Ordinance’ shows well the possibilities and limits of the strategy of communicative institutionalization of PSPD.