http://chineseinput.net/에서 pinyin(병음)방식으로 중국어를 변환할 수 있습니다.
변환된 중국어를 복사하여 사용하시면 됩니다.
오늘 본 자료
김병로 통일연구원 2020 統一 政策 硏究 Vol.29 No.1
The purpose of this paper is to discuss the issue of the name of the unified Korea, which is expected to be fierce conflict between the two Koreas in the process of unification, and to propose the name of the unified nation. North Korea has proposed the name of the unified country with Koryo, while South Korea does not have suggested a specific name in unification proposals. At the beginning of the post-cold war, a third alternative was suggested in the sense that naming either South’ Han or North’s Chosun should be avoided. For the past 75 years, however, the two Koreas have developed their own system and national identity, and as a result, their consciousness in two Koreas has changed significantly. Above all, considering that Korea’s status has risen in the international community, it is practically difficult to give up the heritage of Han Korea in a unified country name. For the reasons, it is suggested to use Han-Chosun Korea, which encompasses Han Korea and Chosun Korea, in order to utilize Han Korea’s assets and also to lead Chosun Korea to be integrated to unified nation. 본 논문은 통일과정에서 남북한 간에 치열한 갈등이예상되는 국호문제를 다각도로 논의하고 통일국가의 명칭을 제안하는 것을 목적으로 한다. 남북의 통일논의에서는 북한이 통일국가의 국호를 고려로 제안한데 반해남한은 구체적 명칭을 제시하지 않고 있다. 탈냉전 초기에는 남북 어느 한쪽을 표상하는 것으로서의 국호는 피해야 한다는 입장에서 통일국가의 명칭을 제3의 대안인고려로 제안하는 방식이 통용되었다. 그러나 지난 75년동안 남북한은 자기체제 중심의 민족‧국가 정체성을 발전시켜 왔고 그 결과 구성원들의 의식구조가 확연히 달라졌다. 무엇보다 국제사회에서 한국의 위상이 향상된 것을 감안하면 통일국가의 국호로 대한민국을 포기하기는 현실적으로 어렵다. 이런 달라진 상황에서 한국이라는 자산을 활용하고 동시에 조선을 통합으로 유도하는 차원에서 한국과 조선을 아우르는 대한조선을 통일국호로 사용하는 것이 타당할 것이다.
김병로,김진홍 대한운동학회 2018 아시아 운동학 학술지 Vol.20 No.4
[OBJECTIVES] This study was to investigate the change of inflammatory markers and fatigue substance of muscle damage on different resistance exercise intensities. [METHODS] The subjects were 7 students (age, 21.0 ± 1.56) in physical education department C University in Gyeongnam. The same amount of exercise was applied to each subject by low and high intensity resistance exercise. Inflammatory and muscle damage markers were based on IL-6, CRP, Myoglobin, CK and LDH. The changes of inflammatory and muscle damage markers on different exercise intensities were measured pre and immediately post exercise and during recovery periods. Blood was collected at each time and analyzed. [RESULTS] The IL-6 level was significantly lower (0.526) after 24 hours than before exercise in the high intensity exercise. Regardless of the difference in exercise intensities, the change was significantly higher(p <.001) after exercise than immediately post exercise and recovery periods(3 hours, 24 hours later). CRP was lower at 3 hours post recovery than at pre - exercise, but there was no significant difference between the intensities of resistance and the time of pre and post exercise. Myoglobin was found to be low (3.19ng/ml) at 24 hours post exercise in high intensity exercise, but it was not related different in resistance intensities and was influenced by time (p <.01). CK was not related to exercise intensities. Regardless of the high or low intensities of exercise, there was a significant change after exercise (p <.01). LDH was not related to the difference in exercise intensity. After 24 hours of both intensity resistance exercise, LDH was lower than before exercise, but the time-period change was high(p <.001). [CONCLUSIONS] Inflammatory and muscle damage markers were not related to exercise intensity. Regardless of the intensity of exercise, Without CRP were changed at the time periods.