http://chineseinput.net/에서 pinyin(병음)방식으로 중국어를 변환할 수 있습니다.
변환된 중국어를 복사하여 사용하시면 됩니다.
鄭京燮 서경대학교 1984 論文集 Vol.12 No.-
This is an attempt to analyze various theoretical and practices of leadership. The classic research studies on leadership set the stage for the theoretical development of leadership. The trait theories concentrate on the leader themselves but, with the possible exception of intelligence, really do not come up with any agreed traits of leader. The group theories emphasize the importance of the followers, but these are also only partial theories. The conclusion to be drawn from the studies of leadership style or behavior is that there is no one universal style. There is some evidence that the various styles are of two kinds: concern for people and concern for task. Additionally, because investigations of leadership style have failed to consider significant factors such as the task, the group, and the organizational effectiveness. Today, the widely recognized theories of leadership are situationally based. In particular, Fiedler's contingency model makes a significant contribution to leadership theory and potentially to the practice of human resource management. The path-goal approach is also an important contribution to leadership theory. It incorporates expectancy motivation concepts. Both the Fiedler and path-goal approaches have generated a growing body of research on leadership dimensions, but there are still problems. A social learning approach that incorporates the leader, the situation, and the behavior itself is proposed as a possible alternative. This approach emphasizes the importance of behavior and the continuous, interacting nature of all the variables in leadership. In conclusion, all of these approaches to leadership style need more and better research in order to make meaningful contributions to the actual practice of human resource management in the future.