FDM 3D 프린팅 웨어러블 센싱 스마트 글러브 개발 및 성능 평가

오영찬(Y. C. Oh),강선호(S. H. Kang),윤성준(S. J. Yoon),최태식(T. S. Choi),최준희(J. H. Choi),지성엽(S. Y. Ji),정대용(D. Y. Jeong),이선곤(S. K. Lee) 한국기계가공학회 2019 한국기계가공학회 춘추계학술대회 논문집 Vol.2019 No.10

2007·2009 개정 교육과정 중학교 역사(상)의 삼국시대 문화사 분석

吳永贊(Oh,Young-Chan) 歷史敎育硏究會 2011 역사교육 Vol.119 No.-

This article analyses the cultural history of Korean Three Kingdoms narrated by the history textbooks of the middle school, which have passed the certification by 2007(09) revised curriculum. The 2007(09) revised curriculum integrates the divided subjects of Korean History and World History- in middle school and highschool history by the 7th national curriculum- into 'History.' The contents of the 2007 certified textbooks are examined, focusing on three aspects, which are: the cultivation of the history researching and thinking skills, the connection of the Korea and the world, and the offered plentiful visual reference; this is attempt to connect the research works of the academia of ancient Korean history. In the description of textbooks, there are some fragments of facts and informations on the tombs and the buddhist art of the three kingdoms, such as inaccurate understandings and insufficient description on the historic context. Certain perspectives taken upon by the textbook authors; in order to emphasize the international mind set and openness, weight is given to what extent the Three Kingdoms influenced Japan in the matters of external cultural exchange and had direct exchange with the west asia. In addition, the exchange between Korea and China at that time is purposefully unmentioned. Last, the certified textbooks present plenty of visual references, but there are some inexact images and captions. There still remains the need to make the informations more precise.

19세기 말 윌리엄 고우랜드의 한국 고고학 탐구

吳永贊(Oh, Youngchan) 한국상고사학회 2012 한국상고사학보 Vol.76 No.-

본고는 1884년 한국을 여행하면서 지석묘를 조사하고 삼국시대 토기를 수집한 윌리엄 고우랜드(William Gowland, 1842–1922)라는 인물에 대하여 살펴보았다. 1842년 영국 더람에서 태어난 윌리엄 고우랜드는 1872년 明治政府의 초빙을 받아 化學冶金方兼造幣長官 고문으로 활약하면서, 1888년까지 16년간의 일본에 체재하면서 406기의 횡혈식 석실분을 조사하고 140기의 약측도를 남겼다. 그의 과학적이고 실증적인 조사와 연구는 당시 수준으로서는 높이 평가할만한 것이었다. 고우랜드는 1876년 출간된 헨리 지볼트(Henry von Siebold)의 저서에서 일본 민족의 기원과 고대 문화가 한국과 직접 관련되었을 가능성을 주장한 데 영향을 받아, 1884년 한국으로 조사 여행을 오게 된다. 고우랜드의 주된 관심은 일본 고대 문화와 연관된 한국의 고고학 유적과 유물에 있었는데, 경기도 포천에서‘솔모로(Tsolmorro)’라는 곳에 소재한 지석묘를 조사하고 도면과 기록을 남기고 있다. 고우랜드는 1884년 여행 전후에 다수의 한국 유물, 특히 신라 토기를 수집하였으며, 이 유물들은 1889년 자신이 수집한 일본 유물들과 함께 브리티시박물관으로 들어가게 된다. 고대 한국 문화와 일본 문화의 관련성을 탐구하는 연구의 일환으로, 고우랜드는 須惠器와 유사한 토기에 가장 많은 관심을 기울였으며, 그의 한국 컬렉션 중 상당 부분은 일본 고분시대의 스에키 토기와 유사한 고분 출토 신라·가야 토기가 차지하고 있다. 그가 수집한 토기들은 주로 5~6세기 부산 인근의 고분에서 출토된 토기들로, 한국 토기의 수집 역사에서 뿐 아니라 원초적인 고고학 조사 작업이라는 점에서 나름의 의미를 지닌다. 이는 더욱이 한국에서 고고학 조사가 공식적으로 시작되기 이전 시기에, 외국인에 의해 수행되었다는 점을 주목할 만하다. This article will examine William Gowland(1842~1922) and his survey on the Korean Archaeology in late 19th century. Gowland was born in Sunderland of Durham County in 1842. He studied chemistry, mining, and metallurgy at the Royal College of Chemistry and the Royal School of Mines, and in 1870 he worked as a chemist and metallurgist at Broughton Copper Works. At the age of thirty, he was invited by the Japanese Meiji government in 1872 to be the foreign technical consultant at the Imperial Japanese Mint in Osaka. His passion for East Asia, mainly Japan stemmed from his sixteen-year stay in Japan. Especially he devoted most of his interest to Japanese archaeology, especially the survey of ancient tombs. Since his first on-site survey of ancient tombs in 1876 he investigated 406 corridor-style stone burial chambers and produced 140 survey drawings of them. He was not only interested in the ancient culture of Japan, especially the tumuli, but also interested in Korea. He embarked on a special trip there in 1884 in order to research connections between the ancient cultures of Korea and Japan, especially focusing on ancient tombs. Before the trip, he had already heard information about three dolmens that were not ancient chamber stone tumuli but real dolmens of the Korean Bronze Age. He visited and produced detailed descriptions and sketches of the dolmen in Tsolmorro, Pocheon county in Gyeonggi Province. The Gowland collection at the British Museum consists of some three hundred Japanese and about fifty Korean artefacts. The Korean ceramics collected by Gowland in the late 19th century were intended by him to incite serious investigation into the relationship between the ancient cultures of Korea and Japan. His holdings mostly included funeral objects from Gaya tombs in the 5th-6th centuries, and stands as a significant monument, not only in the history of creating collections of Korean ceramics for study and appreciation, but it is remarkable because it represents a protoarchaeological survey. This is all the more remarkable when it is recognized that it was undertaken by a visiting foreigner before archaeological research began in Korea.

조선 후기 고대사 연구와 漢四郡

오영찬(Oh Young-chan) 호서사학회 2012 역사와 담론 Vol.0 No.64

사업장에서의 외국인근로자 안전보건관리 현황에 관한 연구

오영찬(Young-Chan Oh),박재희(Jae-Hee Park) 대한인간공학회 2021 대한인간공학회 학술대회논문집 Vol.2021 No.6

낙랑군 출토 봉니의 진위에 대한 기초적 검토

오영찬(Youngchan Oh) 한국상고사학회 2015 한국상고사학보 Vol.88 No.-

낙랑군 유적에서 출토된 봉니는 조선총독부박물관의 수집품으로 현재 국립중앙박물관에서 소장된 99건 197점, 1935년 낙랑토성 발굴 조사에서 출토된 후 도쿄대학에 남겨진 15점, 그리고 1937년과 1938년 두 차례에서 걸쳐 도쿄국립박물관에서 구입한 9점이 전해진다. 낙랑 봉니는 1919년 최초 확인되었는데, 발굴 조사에서 출토된 정식 발굴품이 아니라 식민사학의 불순한 의도 하에 조선총독부박물관 주도로 수집되었기 때문에 진위에 대한 의심이 끊이지 않았다. 이후 계속적으로 확인된 봉니들도 대다수가 발견품으로 신고되어 입수되었거나 고미술상을 통해 구입된 발견품이어서 진위의 논란은 계속되었다. 이러한 연유로 1930년대 위당 정인보는 '낙랑 봉니 위조설'을 제기하였고, 해방 이후 고조선의 재요녕성설에 입각한 북한 학계에서도 '낙랑 봉니 위조설'을 다시 주장하였으며, 1980년대 일본 학계의 반론이 이어지게 되었다. 일반적으로 봉니의 진위는 印文의 내용과 印式의 시대적 특징, 인문의 관명과 印制, 봉니의 형태적 특징 등을 통해 판별이 가능한데, 본고에서는 먼저 봉니의 후면과 측면에 있는 세부 흔적으로 통해 봉함 방식을 복원하고, 이를 진위 판별의 단서로 삼았다. 이 과정에서 1935년 낙랑토성에서 정식 발굴된 봉니들과 그 이전 조선총독부박물관에서 수집한 봉니를 상호 비교하였다. 현재까지 확인된 대부분의 낙랑 봉니는 檢위에 부착된 것이었다. 낙랑 봉니는 형태에 따라 크게 凹式檢과 箱式檢에서 나온 두 종류로 구분 가능하다. 다음으로는 검 바닥면의 홈이나 돌대의 유무를 두었으며, 마지막으로 끈을 돌리는 방식에 따라 다시 분류하였다. 이러한 낙랑토성 출토품 봉니의 제 형식을 조선총독부박물관에서 수집한 다수의 봉니에서 확인할 수 있었다. 이와 함께 낙랑토성에서 출토된 봉니와 그 이전 시점에 조선총독부박물관에서 입수한 봉니의 인문 字體를 상호 비교하여 낙랑 봉니의 진위 문제에 접근해 보고자 한다. 낙랑토성 발굴품과 1935년 이전 입수된 조선총독부박물관 구입품 사이에 동일한 군명을 공유하고 있는 사례를 파악하여 상호 비교함으로써 진위 여부를 검 토하였다. 그 결과 다수의 수집품 낙랑 봉니들이 진품임이 밝혀졌으며, 일부 진위가 의심스러운 봉니들도 확인되었다.따라서 정인보와 북한학계의 주장처럼 낙랑 봉니가 전부 위조품은 아니었으며, 藤田겮策의 주장대로 조선총독부박물관에서 구입한 낙랑 봉니에 대해 진위를 의심할 필요가 없는 것도 아니었다. 따라서 낙랑 봉니의 전체에 대한 일방적인 진위 주장을 근거로 낙랑군의 실재나 군현 지배에 대한 논의를 전개하는 것은 적절하지 않음을 알 수 있다. 낙랑 봉니의 경우 개별 유물에 대한 진위 검증을 전제로 역사 자료로 활용되어야 하며, 앞으로 본고에서 제기한 방법론 뿐 아니라 이를 검증할 수 있는 다양한 방법론이 개발될 필요가 있다. The clay seals from Lelang Commandery sites has been stored in three institutions; 197 pieces in National Museum of Korea which were turn over from The Museum of the Japanese Government-General of Korea in 1945, 15 pieces in Tokyo National University of Japan that were excavated in 1935, 9 pieces in Tokyo National Museum of Japan which were purchased in 1937 and 1938. The clay seals in Lelang were first found in 1919, of which the authenticity had been suspected continuously, because these were not excavated by the archaeologists but discovered, and collected by the Museum of the Japanese Government-General of Korea as the evidence of the existence of Lelang commandery in the northwestern part of Korea, which was the one of intentions of reconstructing Korean history in view of colonial perspective. Jeong Inbo, the famous nationalist historian insisted that the clay seals collected by the Museum of the Japanese Government-General of Korea were all forgeries, which was an attempt to deny the existence of Lelang commandery in the northwestern Korea. The scholars in North Korea since 1950s followed Jeong’s opinion, which was linked with the discussion on the capital of Old Joseon, but some Japanese scholars argued back in 1980s. In this article, I try to restore the sealing method with clay seals by looking into the details of the back side and sides of the clay seals in Lelang. Then I compared the clay seals in National Museum of Korea acquired in Japanese colonial period with the clay seals excavated at the Lelang fortress in 1935 which have not been suspected forgeries, in terms of the details of the back and sides, the character shapes and the names of the commanderies and prefectures imprinted in the clay seals. These surveys are all utilized as the clues to determine the authenticity.

論文(론문) : 위만조선 및 낙랑군과 진변한지역의 교섭

오영찬 ( Young Chan Oh ) 이화사학연구소 2013 梨花史學硏究 Vol.0 No.47

This paper is a new review that aims to examine early material culture of Korea related with Wiman Joseon and Nangnang(Ch. Lelang) commandery, which is based on what was unearthed in the southeastern part of the Korean peninsula, the areas of Jinhan-Byeonhan. Headed by the artefacts founded at Yeongcheon Eoeundong site in 1918, Japanese scholars in the colonial period considered the Han Chinese style artefacts in Jinhan-Byeonhan as decisive evidence of the advanced Han Chinese culture being disseminated abroad its territories to reach both the southeastern part of Korean peninsula and Japanese archipelago. Then, Since 1980s, a lot of Han Chinese style artefacts were excavated in other areas, including Dahori site in Changwon, Joyangdong site in Gyeongju, and Neukdo island site in Sacheon etc., which attracted the attention of academia. The possibility of the interaction between Wiman Joseon, Jinhan-Byoenhan may be inferred from the sheath of the Korean bronze dagger and the bronze bell excavated in the sites of Jinhan-Byoenhan, whose origins precede the establishment of Nangnang commandery. We assumed that Nangnang commandery involved the native people when interacting Janhan-Byeonhan, and utilized its network with the Wiman Joseon; and this opinion is supported by artefacts from the areas of Jinhan-Byeonhan, which collectively share styles that reflect those of the Han Chinese and those of Old Joseon― proof that North nomadic style had coexisted in areas of Jinhan-Byeonhan. By the mid and the late first century CE, it appears to be that the Old Joseon and Han Chinese style artefacts were rarely found in the Jinhan-Byeonhan areas, as indicated by the sharp decline of artefacts discovered from this time frame. It may be attributed to the fact that the controllability of Nangnang commandery was reinforced, following the suppression of the Wangjo`s rebellion, which would have dissolved the power of the native people. Perhaps, it may be an ahistroical approach to apply the medieval or even modern concepts of trade or tribute to the interaction amongst the Wiman Joseon, Nangnang commandery and Jinhan-Byeonhan areas. Instead, the interaction between Wiman Joseon and Jinhan-Byeonhan can be described as the following: the undifferentiation between the political negotiation and the economic trade, unestablishment of the unitary foreign negotiation, the internal redistribution system in Jinhan and Byeon, and the absence of the market exchange.

조선총독부박물관 초기 소장품의 형성과 성격

오영찬(Oh, Youngchan) 역사학회 2020 역사학보 Vol.0 No.246

This paper examines the process of acquiring the collection at the Museum of Joseon Governor-General in 1915-1916. The early collections can be divided into four categories; The first is artifacts from the outside institution such as Japanese Military Command at Joseon. The second is what has been stored along with the works having been performed by some sections in Joseon Governor-General. The third is the outputs of the academic research projects of relics by some sections which were given to the museum. The fourth is the donated collections from powerful individuals. The early collection was not only the by-products of the colonial ruling system but the outputs of the academic research projects for the colony, which illustrated its character as the colonial museum. Another accession path of the early collection was donations. The major donors were the Governor Terauchi Masatake and Kuhara Husanoske who were at or near the peak of the colonial power in the colony. The museum seems to have initially collected its collection by referring to the classification and criteria of the Tokyo imperial Museum which was based on the one of ‘past and old antiques’ in early modern Japan. The museum acquired large collections in a short time when opened, which led to the problem of poor registration and management of them. Since August 1916, the Museum has systematically acquired its collection through excavation and discovery as well as donation, purchase.

樂浪 金銀製?具의 제작과 성격

오영찬(Oh, Youngchan) 한국상고사학회 2011 한국상고사학보 Vol.72 No.-

본고는 平壞 石岩里 9호분에서 출토된 金製?具를 비롯한 樂浪古墳에서 출토된 금은제교구의 성격과 의미를 여타 지역에서 출토 및 수집된 금은제교구와의 비교를 통해 살펴보았다. 첫째, 금제교구 중 대표적인 유물인 평양 石岩里 9호분 출토 金製?具에 대한 미시적인 관찰을 통해 유물의 특징을 파악해 보았다. 金製?具는 워낙 미세한 金粒을 붙여 제작되었기 때문에 근접한 실물 관찰이 아니면 세부 상태나 제작기법을 파악하기가 어렵다. 실물 관찰을 통해 조형 구성과 제작기법에 대한 특징을 파악하였다. 둘째, 1990년대 이후 발표된 金製?具 자료인 日本 미호뮤지엄 소장품과 大連 營城子 M9호분 出土品, 雲南 羊甫頭遺蹟 採集品과, 뉴욕 개인 소장품, 그리고 미공개 자료인 貞柏里 17호분 出土 銀製?具를 검토대상에 추가하였다. 이를 통해 石岩里 9호분 출토품을 포함한 金銀?具에 대한 지견을 넓힐 수 있었다. 셋째, 中原의 工房에서 제작된 점, 邊方 지배세력에 대한 政治的 賜與品이라는 金銀製?具에 대한 기존의 해석을 재검토하고 대안의 방향을 모색하였다. 기존 연구에서는 中原에서 제작되어 邊方 지배세력에게 賜與된 물품으로 보는 것이 일반적인 견해였으나, 金銀製?具 문양적 특징이나, 馬蹄型과 嵌玉技法 등을 들어 제작지에 대한 보완적인 논증의 필요성을 제기하였다. 그리고 中原 漢 왕조에서 전형적인 中原製 物品을 사여하지 않고, 북방적 성격을 지닌 모호한 성격의 물품을 왜 政治的 目的으로 賜與하는지에 대한 의문에서 출발하여, 金銀製?具의 분포를 邊郡이나 郡縣制, 屬國 등 정치적 복속과 직접 연결시키기는 어렵다는 점도 지적하였다. 변방 지역에 대해 중원의 구심력과政治的 賜與라는 관점과 동시에, 변방의 원심력과 經濟的 交易이라는 또 다른 축들도 충분히 고려되어야 할 것이며, 동북아시아를 포괄하는 보다 거시적 시야에서 문화적 현상을 이해해야 할 것이다. 본고는 향후 金銀製?具에 대한 보다 심도 있는 연구를 위한 계기가 될 것으로 생각한다. This paper will study the nature and meaning of the gold buckle of the Seogam-ri No.9 tomb, which was excavated from one of the ancient Nangnang tombs, in Pyeongyang of the Northeastem part of the Korean Peninsula. First, micro-analysis of the gold buckle led to defining the charactelistics of this paJticular relic, the gold buckle from Seogam-ri No.9. Since this gold buckle was decorated with such fine gold granules, it is difficult to study its conditions or techniques in detail, without a close observation of the actual aJtifact. Thus, an up-close study of the actual artifact led to grasping an understanding of its moulding configuration and manufacturing techniques. Second, this study’s scope includes the several gold buckles disclosed after the 1990s. This will be inclusive of the following: the buckle in the Miho Museum collection in Japan, the buckle from Dalian Yingchengzi tomb No. M9 in Laioning province of China, the buckle collected from Yangfudou in Yunnan province, the buckle in a private collection in New York, and the silver buckle including the one found in Jeongbang-ri No.17 tomb. Third, the one of the leading views on these buckles is that they were crafted by workshops in the Han royal court and then presented as political gifts to the ruling power of the peripheral regions. This prevailing view will be reconsidered for alternative possibilities within this paper. Conventional research generally accepts that these artifacts were made in the Han royal court to be later presented as gifts to the ruling powers of the peripheral regions. However, when the buckle’s pattern, horseshoe shape and gem stones embedding techniques are examined, certain questions are raised about the possible need of supplementary evidence about the actual place of making. This paper first questions why the Han Dynasty would have decided to use an item of ambiguous identity associated with strong Northern flavors instead of resorting to the more typical Han Chinese item; furthermore, this paper points out the difficulty in directly linking the location of the buckles to political subjugation, such as peripheral commandery, commandery systems or vassal states. Meanwhile, sufficient attention must be given to exploring alternative premises such as the centrifugal force of the nearby areas and the possibility of commercial trade. Ultimately, a cultural phenomenon should be understood from a more macro perspective that encompasses the entire East Asia. In such light, this paper has been prepared with the hope of triggering further in-depth researches on these gold and silver buckles in the future.

문화유산과 박물관, 그리고 역사교육 : 慶州博物館學校를 중심으로

吳永贊(OH Youngchan) 호서사학회 2009 역사와 담론 Vol.0 No.53

This article aimed to study the background of the establishment and the primary cause of the success in the long term and the educational significance of the Gyeongju Museum School. The Gyeongju Museum School was established in 1954 by Mr. Hongsup Chin who was the director of Gyeongju National Museum and Mr. Gyeongyeol Yoon who was an nonprofessional historian. Although the cultural heritage combined with the museum in Gyeongju by the establishment of the society for the preservation of historic relics of Gyeongju and Gyeongju Museum of the Joseon government-general, it related with the making of the colonial historical view and the development of the tourist attractions and the collection of the antiques. After liberation in 1945, Korean has to overcome the limitations of the Japanese colonial period. The pioneers were Mr. Hongsup Chin and Mr. Gyeongyeol Yoon. As they were inflowed from the external territory and the younger generation, many native people in Gyeongju was stubborn and did not sympathize with their opinion. They noticed the new generation,the children to preserve the cultural heritage in Gyeongju and established the Gyeongju Museum School and educated the children the significance of the cultural heritage. Especially Mr. Yoon had been much influenced by Mr. Jeonghwan Bang who was the most famous children movement leader in 1920s. They made an attempt the various educational method to explain efficiently the relics, for example the lecture in classroom, the making an on-the-spot survey, and the orally narrated fairy tale which was influenced by Mr. Bang. Gyeongju Museum School took leave from the Gyeongju National Museum in 1959 because of the discord in museum, but rejoined together in 1975. Now it was successfully managed together by Gyeongju National Museum and the Society of Silla Culture in Gyeongju. The first main factor on which it was continued for 50 years is the making much of the field of the relics, they always emphasized on the relics and teach the meaning and significant of the relics in everyday life. And the teachers developed the education methods and considered the incentive to attract the concerns of the children. Lastly we cannot forget the passion and the endeavor which the pioneers, Mr. Chin and Yoon and many teachers related with the management of the school devoted. With the consequence that the children grew up and have been on the cutting edge to preserve the cultural heritage in Gyeongju.