산업기술유출 사건에서 산업기술의 개념과 형사책임에 관한 소고 -2011헌바39 결정을 중심으로-

하지현 ( Ji Hyeon Ha ),이헌희 ( Heon Hui Lee ) 단국대학교 법학연구소 2013 법학논총 Vol.37 No.4

With the evolution of technology, the society is witnessing increasing number of cases where domestic industrial technology is being leaked overseas. Such technology leak causes severe damage to the domestic industry, leading to an obstacle in the economic development of the country. Something important such as the protection of industrial technology is for sure facing tremendous limits if security is only left to a self regulated measure by individual businesses. Therefore, today it is essential for the government to intervene for industrial technology protection and a systematic legislation would be necessary in contributing for the improvement of the country`s competitive edge. Among the legislation regarding industrial technology protection, the definition of ‘industrial technology’ as described in the Industrial Technology Outflow Prevention and Protection Act has been rendered unconstitutional by the Constitutional Court of Korea. Such judgment was a confirmation that the penalty clause in accordance to the definition of industrial technology which is the very fundamental concept in the Industrial Technology Outflow Prevention and Protection Act is unconstitutional. The judgment rendered by the Constitution Court is a rule rendered regarding Act 36 Phrase 2 and Act 14 Phrase 1 of the pre-revised version of the Industrial Technology Outflow Prevention and Protection Law. The Constitution Court ruled that the provisions of the law are too abstract and indefinite where the concept could change easily due to the broad relativity of the valuation of the phrases. In other words, the current definition can`t give a definite boundary clear enough for the word ‘industrial technology’ to become a component of a criminal penalty. This means the boundary to define industrial technology becomes arbitrary which comes in direct violation with the principle of legality, the nulla poena sine lege. In accordance to such judgment, the clause lost effect, and it became impossible to bring criminal penalty against those accused of selling out domestic industrial technology. Therefore, this paper will study the concept of industrial technology and the related criminal penalty measures by discussing several cases that have been declared unconstitutional. It is in hopes that this paper could ring an alert to the importance of technology outflow.

산업보안법 분류 체계현황과 개선방안에 관한 연구

남기연,박정인 한국산업보안연구학회 2022 한국산업보안연구 Vol.12 No.1

This study was intended to provide implications by examining how effective the system of the current Industrial Security Act is in protecting technology, which is the purpose of the law and system. The current Industrial Security Act system was operated centered on the government's work without integration among ministries such as the Ministry of Trade, Industry and Energy, the Korean Intellectual Property Office, the Ministry of SMEs and Startups, and the Defense Acquisition Program Administration. Therefore, laws and regulations were examined separately by technology type, such as the Unfair Competition Prevention and Trade Secret Protection Act, the Industrial Technology Leak Prevention and Protection Act, the Small and Medium Business Technology Protection Act, and the Defense Technology Protection Act. In particular, with regard to protection guidelines, the reality is that government guidelines for each field, such as the industrial technology protection guidelines of the Ministry of Trade, Industry and Energy and the defense technology protection guidelines of the Defense Acquisition Program Administration, continue to be created in the same way, without showing any specificity for each technical field. In other words, the current Industrial Security Act system has an Industrial Security Act system that selects a different legal response method depending on the type of technology. However, the actual industrial security law research system classifies technologies and responds mainly to the government's legal system, which raises doubts whether it is effectively responding to industrial security incidents. come. The Act on Prevention and Protection of Industrial Technology is the object of protection for industrial technology and national core technology, and the protection of technical information and business information in the Unfair Competition Act and Trade Secret Protection Act, and the Invention Promotion Act. The invention of employees is the subject of protection, and the Act on the Promotion of Coexistence of Small and Medium Enterprises protects technical and managerial information, the Foreign Trade Act protects strategic materials, and the Defense Technology Protection Act protects the defense industry technology. there is. As such, the current Industrial Security Act establishes a technology-oriented classification system for the Industrial Security Act and adopts a method in which the application of laws and regulations varies depending on the type of technology. will be. Thus, in industrial security, safety is concerned with efforts to prevent, detect, and respond to accidental damage, whereas security is claimed to prevent, detect, and respond to malicious damage. Therefore, in industrial security management, it can be said that it is a more efficient approach to analyze the cause of industrial technology leakage and remove it. A new legal response system was proposed in the Industrial Security Act as a response to the Industrial Security Act against technology leaks by unauthorized persons due to and illegal acts. There are three reasons why the industrial security law system should be established in response to illegal acts and the legal relationship behind intentional actions to access technology by further subdividing risks. First, it is more efficient to establish a security system in a way that eliminates problems by analyzing what kind of situation a person is in, and research on establishing a detailed security system suitable for each person's position is possible. In the case of those with the right to access industrial technology, if they attempt to leak various technologies, such as breach of trust and embezzlement, after accessing them through labor contracts, technology transfer contracts, joint ventures, and mergers and acquisitions contracts, which are legally related, tight security measures in the contract A detailed security plan for each contract, such as clarifying the person... 본 연구는 산업보안법 지원체계에 있어 효율적인 분류방안을 탐색하는 것을 그 목표로 하였다. 기존의 산업보안법 지원체계는 정부 부처의 행정주체 중심으로 접근하는 방법이 주요 흐름을 이루었다. 즉, 산업보안법은 정부부처의 행정주체에 따라 산업기술유출방지 및 보호법, 부정경쟁방지 및 영업비밀 보호법, 발명진흥법, 상생협력법, 대외무역법, 중소기업기술보호법, 방위산업기술보호법 순으로 체계화하였다. 그러나 실제 산업보안 사고를 예방하거나 보호하는 체계는 지식재산권과 기술보호의무(비밀유지의무, 경업금지의무) 중심의 대응체계가 필요하다는 비판을 피하기 어려워 기술유출에 대해 신속하고 효율적이며 전문성 있는 법제 대응은 아니라는비판을 받아왔다. 그리하여 본 논문에서는 현재 정부부처 행정주체 중심으로 체계화되어 있는 산업보안법 현황을 살펴보고 이에 대한 한계점을 제시한 뒤, 지식재산권과 기술보호의무를 중심으로 한 산업보안법 체계를 제안하여 보다 기술유출을 예방하는 효율적인 법적 대응체계를 마련 할 수 있도록하는 것을 목표로 한다.

『산업기술보호법』상 산업기술 범위의 재정립

송동수,최영우 동아대학교 법학연구소 2022 東亞法學 Vol.- No.95

As technology advances and accelerates its advancement, industrial technologies become more recognized as an important assets of a nation for both economy and national security. Nowadays, obtaining industrial technologies has direct impact on nation power. As a result, nations put a lot of efforts to acquire industrial technologies, at times, aggressively. Countries have been attempting to, or been victims of, technology leakage through illegal means. And Republic of Korea was not an exception. In 2006, in order to protect industrial technologies from the leakage and exploitation, the ‘Act on Prevention of Divulgence and Protection of Industrial Technology’ was enacted. The law seeks to protect industrial technology from the illegal activities by punishing offenders of such crimes, putting regulations on exports, company acquisition and merges, and providing financial support for technology protection. The Industrial Technologies, that are eligible to be protected by the Act on Prevention of Divulgence and Protection of Industrial Technology, are listed in the law. However several problems could be found regarding the scope of industrial technology. For example, technologies that has no legal effects since 5 years ago is still on the list of industrial technology, even though there was a major change to national core technology, the law has not been amended and etc. This means that detailed management has not been carried out. To achieve the goal of the ‘Act on Prevention of Divulgence and Protection of Industrial Technology’, the first step would be establishing the scope of legal term ‘industrial technology’ properly. Therefore, in order to protect the interests of the nation, problems arising from the establishment of the scope of industrial technology shall be prioritized. The paper analyzes each industrial technology listed in the law and propose reformations that should be done in order to eliminate issues present in the current system. Such as broadening scope of industrial technology for certain articles and giving the Minister of Trade, Industry and Energy the obligation to regularly check the scope of industrial technology. 기술의 발전이 가속화되고 고도화됨에 따라서 산업기술은 국가의 경제와 안보에 중요한 자산으로 인식되고 있다. 오늘날 산업기술의 확보는 곧 국가의 경쟁력이 되기 때문에 각 국가는 이를 위하여 큰 노력을 기울이고 있다. 때로는 산업기술의 불법 유출 등과 같이 공격적인 방법을 통한 기술의 탈취도 이루어지고 있는데, 이러한 기술의 탈취와 유출로부터 산업기술을 보호하기 위하여 우리나라는 2006년 「산업기술보호법」을 제정하였다. 「산업기술보호법」은 산업기술 유출자를 처벌하고, 국가의 경제와 안보에 밀접한 관련이 있는 산업기술에 대해 수출 및 해외 인수․합병을 제한하는 등 엄격한 규제에 관한 내용뿐만 아니라 기술의 보호를 위한 금전적 지원 등과 같은 다양한 보호 규정을 마련하고 있다. 「산업기술보호법」에서는 이러한 규제와 보호의 대상이 되는 산업기술의 범위를 열거형식을 통해 규정하고 있다. 그러나 위헌적인 요소를 제거하기 위하여 개정된 산업기술의 범위는 오히려 산업기술의 보호 대상을 축소시키는 문제점을 야기하고 있다. 본 논문은 「산업기술보호법」에 열거된 산업기술을 분석하고 관련된 문제를 파악한 후, 이를 개선하기 위하여 산업기술의 범위를 규범의 특징에 따라 이원화시키고, 산업기술 범위의 타당성을 산업통상자원부장관이 정기적으로 검토하도록 하는 등과 같은 해결책을 제시하고 있다.

부산지역 제조업 산업기술인력 현황분석 및 노동수요 전망

박성익(Sungik Park),류장수(Jangsoo Ryu),전현중(Hyunjoong Jun),김종한(Jonghan Kim) 한국고용노사관계학회 2008 産業關係硏究 Vol.18 No.1

인적자본의 중요성이 강조되는 21세기 신경제 시대에서 과학 및 산업기술 분야에서 역량을 갖춘 산업기술인력이 기술혁신의 주체자로서 국가 및 기업의 경쟁력을 향상시키는 핵심 성공요소라는 인식 하에, 본 논문에서는 부산의 제조업에서 산업기술인력의 실태를 파악한 후, 부산의 산업구조 변화에 부응하는 산업기술인력의 수요를 추정함으로써 정책적 시사점을 도출하였다. 본 논문의 주요 결과는 다음과 같다. 첫째, 산업자원부의 『산업기술인력 수급동향 실태보고서』에 의하면, 부산은 우리나라의 주력 기간산업 중에서 기계, 자동차, 조선산업(기계부품소재산업)에는 비교적 강점이 있으나, 우리나라에서 가장 큰 비중을 차지하는 IT산업에는 취약하다는 것을 알 수 있다. 둘째, 부산지역 산업기술인력 수요전망을 시나리오별로 분석한 결과에 따르면, 시나리오에 따라 상이한 결과가 도출되었다. 부산 제조업이 향후에 부산의 성장률을 지속할 경우에는 2020년의 산업기술인력 수요가 현재의 산업기술인력 수보다 클 것으로 전망되었지만, 그 밖의 경우에는 오히려 소폭이나마 작을 것으로 전망되었다. 그러나 부산의 전략산업이 포함되어 있는 주요 제조업에서 산업기술인력의 수요는 모든 시나리오에서 현재의 산업기술인력 종사자 수보다 클 것으로 전망되었다. 특히, 산업기술인력 종사자 중에서도 과학공학 전문가와 과학공학 종사자의 수요는 높은 비율로 늘어나는 반면에, 기능원의 수요는 감소할 것으로 예측되고 있다. 따라서 산업기술인력 내에서 산업별 구조조정과 고부가가치화가 시급하다는 결론을 내릴 수가 있다. It is widely acknowledged that industrial technology labor competitive in the field of science and industrial engineering plays a key role in enhancing national and firm competitiveness. This paper develops policy implication by analysing current status and forecasting the labor demand on the industrial technology labor in the Busan manufacturing sector. Major findings of the paper are as follows: First, according to 'The report on the demand and supply of the industrial technology labor', Busan is comparatively well endowed with industrial technology labor within the machinery, automobile and ship-building industries. In contrast, Busan's industrial technology labor is poorly endowed in the IT industry. Second, the demand forecast on industrial technology labor by several scenarios reveal that the results are sensitive to the scenarios adopted. For example, the demand for industrial technology labor in year 2020 is forecast to be bigger than the current number of the industrial technology labor if Busan manufacturing industries continue to grow at the current growth rate. However, in other scenarios it is found that the demand for the industrial technology labor is slightly smaller than the current number of the industrial technology labor. Nevertheless, in all scenarios, in Busan's major manufacturing industries including Busan's strategic industries, the demand for the industrial technology labor is forecast to be bigger than the current number of the industrial technology labor. In particular, it is expected that the demands for the experts and the employee in science and engineering areas increase at the higher rates, while the demand for mechanics shrinks. Therefore, it can be concluded that the industrial restructuring of industrial technology labor and transforming of simple labor to the human capital who can create high value-added is desirable.

연구논문 : 산업기술유출의 개념과 형사책임 -헌법재판소 2013.7.25. 자 2011헌바39 결정-

선종수 ( Jong Soo Sun ) 한남대학교 과학기술법연구원 2014 과학기술법연구 Vol.20 No.2

산업기술유출범죄를 적발하는 것이 어려운 현실에서 2013년 7월 25일 헌법재판소는 산업기술유출범죄의 근거법률이라 할 수 있는 산업기술유출방지법의 처벌규정에 대한 위헌 결정을 하였다. 산업기술유출방지법 제36조에서 산업기술을 국외 또는 국내에 유출하는 경우 처벌할 수 있도록 하고 있다. 산업기술유출방지법 제36조는 같은 법 제14조의 침해행위, 즉 산업기술 또는 국가핵심기술에 해당되어야 한다. 하지만 여기에서 무엇이 산업기술에 해당하는지 또한 누구에게 그것을 문의해야 명확하게 확인할 수 있는지가 분명하지 않다는 죄형법정주의의 명확성원칙에 반한다는 것이다. 헌법재판소의 위헌 결정을 받은 형사처벌규정은 산업기술이 외국으로 유출되는 경우를 제외하고 대부분의 산업기술유출 사건에서 적용되는 만큼 매우 중요한 규정이다. 그리고 2011년 7월 25일 개정된 현행 산업기술유출방지법은 대상 결정과 유사한 측면이 있으므로 향후 위헌소송이 제기될 가능성이 남아있다. 이러한 여지는 헌법재판소의 결정에서도 확인할 수 있으며, 문제를 제기한 규정에 대해서는 개정이 필요하다. 산업기술유출방지법은 제1조에서 산업기술의 부정한 유출을 방지하고 산업기술을 보호함으로써 국내산업의 경쟁력을 강화하고 국가의 안전보장과 국민경제의 발전에 이바지함을 목적으로 한다고 밝히고 있다. 이처럼 산업기술유출방지법은 기술보호와 기술유출 처벌에 관한 근간을 이루는 기본법으로서 역할을 기대하기 어려워 보인다. 이러한 상황이 지속된다면 국가의 산업경쟁력은 약화될 것이며, 수사 및 재판 실무에서도 여러 가지 혼란이 초래될 수 있을 것이다. 따라서 이와 같은 혼란을 최소화할 수 있도록 관련 법률을 재정비하여 산업기술유출을 근원적으로 봉쇄할 수 있는 구체적인 방안이 수립되길 기대해 본다. In the reality where it``s difficult to expose the crime of the outflow of industrial technology, the Constitutional Court made the judgment that the rules of punishment of the industrial technology outflow prevention law, the legal ground for the crime of technology outflow, were unconstitutional on July 25, 2013. The act of out flowing industrial technology domestically or overseas can be punished under Article 36 of the rules of punishment of the industrial technology outflow prevention law. It should conform to the unlawful act of Article 14 of the same law, that is, industrial technology or national key technology. However, what means industrial technology and who can confirm it here are not clear, which violates the principle of definiteness of that of legality. The rules of criminal punishment, which was found unconstitutional by the Constitutional Court, is a crucial code because it is applied to almost all cases of industrial outflow except for the cases where industrial technology is leaked to other countries. In addition, as the current industrial technology outflow prevention law revised on July 25, 2011, is similar to the judgment in question, so there is the chance for future unconstitutionality suit. This possibility can be found in the judgment by the Constitutional Court, too, and the regulation a question has been raised about needs to be revised. Article 1 of the industrial technology outflow prevention law illuminates its purpose as the prevention of illegal outflow of industrial technology, protection of industrial technology, consolidation of competitive power of national industries, and contribution to the security assurance of the nation and the development of national economy. As it shows, it seems difficult that the industrial technology outflow prevention law plays the role of the basic law as the ground for technology prevention and punishment of technology outflow. If this situation continues, national industrial competitive power will become weak, and various kinds of confusion can occur during working-level investigation and trials. Therefore, in order to minimize this chaos, specific methods are expected to be established so that related laws are re-organized and industrial technology outflow can be fundamentally prevented.

산업스파이에 의한 국가핵심기술 유출 방지를 위한 법제적 개선방안

김선욱(Kim, Seon-Wook) 원광대학교 법학연구소 2021 圓光法學 Vol.37 No.2

4차 산업혁명의 도래로 한 기업의 기술력이 곧 국가의 미래경쟁력에 영향을 미칠 정도로 중요성이 커지게 되었다. 이에 각국은 산업기술 및 국가핵심기술의 부정한 유출을 방지하고 보호하기 위하여 산업스파이범죄에 대한 법적 제재 및 처벌 규정을 강화하고 있다. 그럼에도 불구하고 산업기술 유출로 얻게 되는 이익이 처벌에 따른 형량에 비하여 훨씬 크기 때문에 산업스파이범죄는 매년 증가하고 있다. 최근 6년 간 산업기술 해외유출 및 유출 시도 적발건수는 총 121건, 이 중 국가핵심기술은 총 29건으로 나타났다. 기술탈취 90% 이상이 반도체와 조선‧자동차 등 대한민국 주요 산업분야에 집중되고 있다. 산업스파이범죄는 이제 한 국가와 한 기업의 경제권 침해행위를 넘어서 국가 간 영향을 미치는 초국가적인 문제가 되었다. 이에 산업스파이에 의한 국가핵심기술 유출 방지를 위한 법제적 개선방안으로 첫째, 대법원 2018. 7. 12. 선고 2015도464 판결은 ‘외국에서 사용하거나 사용되게 할 목적’ 및 ‘부정한 이익을 얻거나 기업에 손해를 입힐 목적’에 관한 증명이 부족하다고 보아 무죄를 확정한 바, 국가핵심기술 및 산업기술을 외부에 유출한 그 자체가 침해행위이며 대상기관에 손해를 끼치는 행위이다. 이에 목적 여부와 상관없이 해외에 유출된 자체를 침해행위로 보아 목적범 요건 삭제 등 처벌 조건의 완화를 제시하였다. 둘째, 현행 양형기준은 국가핵심기술에 대한 양형기준이 마련되어 있지 않아 법관이 형을 정함에 참고할 수 있는 기준이 없는 실정이다. 이에 국가핵심기술에 대한 양형기준을 설정해야 할 것이다. 셋째, 탐정업은 우리나라를 제외한 OECD가입국에서 직업으로 인정하고 있으며, 현재의 국가공권력만으로 시간적․물리적으로 한정되어 있어 산업기술 대응에 역부족이다. 이에 공인된 탐정을 특히 산업기술 분야에 도입하여 산업기술재산보호를 위한 조사활동을 수행 방안을 제시하였다. 넷째, 산업기술의 유출 및 보호는 주무부처인 산업통상자원부를 비롯하여 중소벤처기업부, 특허청, 경찰청, 검찰청 등 다양한 부처 및 소속 기관들이 담당하고 있다. 이에 각 기관 간 입장을 신속하게 조율하고 종합적으로 판단하여 대응할 수 있는 정부 차원의 산업보안 컨트롤타워 역할을 담당할 체계를 마련할 것을 제시하였다. With the advent of the 4th Industrial Revolution, the technological prowess of a company has become so important that it has an impact on the future competitiveness of the country. Accordingly, each country is strengthening legal sanctions and penalties for industrial spy crimes in order to prevent and protect the illegal leakage of industrial technology and national core technology. Nevertheless, industrial spy crimes are increasing every year because the benefits of industrial technology leakage are far greater than those of punishment. Over the past six years, a total of 121 cases of industrial technology outflow and attempts to leak out were detected, of which a total of 29 cases were national core technologies. More than 90% of technology takeovers are concentrated in major industries in Korea such as semiconductors, shipbuilding and automobiles. Industrial spy crimes have now become a transnational problem that affects countries beyond the act of infringing on the economic rights of one country and one company. Therefore, as a legal improvement plan to prevent the leakage of national core technology due to industrial spy, first, Supreme Court 2018.7.12. The sentence of 2015 also 464 was found to be innocent because of the lack of proofs of ‘the purpose of being used or made to be used abroad’ and ‘the purpose of obtaining unfair profits or causing damage to companies’. The outflow to the outside itself is an infringing act and an act that causes damage to the target institution. Therefore, regardless of the purpose, the leaked abroad was regarded as an infringing act, and the conditions for punishment such as the deletion of the target criminal requirement were suggested. Second, as the current sentencing standards do not have guidelines for national core technologies, there is no standard that judges can refer to in determining the sentence. Accordingly, it is necessary to establish guidelines for national core technologies. Third, the detective business is recognized as a job in OECD member countries, excluding Korea, and is limited in time and physically only by the current state public authority, which is insufficient in responding to industrial technology. Accordingly, a plan was proposed to conduct investigation activities for the protection of industrial and technological property by introducing a certified detective, especially in the industrial technology field. Fourth, the leakage and protection of industrial technology is handled by various ministries and affiliated agencies, including the Ministry of Trade, Industry and Energy, the Ministry of Trade, Industry and Energy, the Ministry of Small and Medium Venture Business, the Intellectual Property Office, the National Police Agency, and the Prosecutor s Office. Accordingly, it was proposed to establish a system to play the role of the industrial security control tower at the government level that can quickly adjust the positions of each agency and respond comprehensively.

특별기고 : 산업기술보호에 관한 연구개발 및 지원방안 연구

권정인 ( Jung In Kwon ),안성진 ( Seong Jin Ahn ),신혁 ( Hyuk Shin ) 단국대학교 법학연구소 2014 법학논총 Vol.38 No.3

Today, The Economy and National Security is affected by the intellectual property of high value-added according to high-tech industry technology directly or indirectly. Industrial technology and protection of intellectual property is an integral part of the national competitiveness than ever. Therefore, research and development project for the current status of the industrial technology leakage on the basis of survey is issued. It is proposed that the following results. First, create a national certification system for Industrial Technology Security and Industrial Security. Second, to improve the management system of the National Core Technology. Third, makes the industry security certification system for the protection of Industrial Technology. Fourth, establish a policy to Industrial Technology Security about support training and workforce. The research propose joint improvement response system for the national key technologies leaking. This will become basis on not only preemptive response system of illegal disclosure of national core technologies in the future, but also research for future-oriented new technologies and Convergence Security technologies.

산업기술보호 관련 법체계 정비에 관한 소고 -「산업기술유출방지 및 보호에 관한 법률」을 중심으로-

손승우 ( Seung Woo Son ),박장혁 ( Jang Hyouk Park ) 단국대학교 법학연구소 2013 법학논총 Vol.37 No.4

The national economy of the Republic of Korea has been developed rapidly around the industrial technology, and the government has striven to prevent the outflow of national core technology and industrial technology for Korean enterprises to predominate in global competition. The representative laws to protect the current industry technology include “Industrial Technology Drain Prevention Act” and “Trade Secret Act” as major laws, and there are various other laws such as “Invention Promotion Act”, “Big·Small & Medium Mutual Developing Cooperation Promotion Act”, “Patent Act”, and “Criminal Law” etc. However, recently there has been significant changes in relevant legal environment. For examples, unconstitutional decision by the Constitutional Court on the obscure definition provision of “Industrial Technology” and the legislation notice of the revised bill including a transfer the Industrial Technology Protection Committee, the Prime Minister affiliated organization to the Ministry of Trade, Industry & Energy. In addition, a recent revise of Trade Secret Act extends the scope of the subject matters of trade secret protection to include personal business and non-profit organizations. The Small and Medium Business Administration prepares a bill related to small and medium business` technology protection. These changes may induce inefficiencies and redundancy in enforcement of laws, and need the control tower for reconciliation. This paper examines the recent changes in the legal environment surrounding industrial technology protection, and also the necessity of a framework act on technology protection. It also suggests the regulatory legal nature of the Industrial Technology Drain Prevention Act moves to the supportive nature for technology protection; the scope of the subject matters of the law should extend to include general technology protection; and it also need to reduce the subject matters of punishment, which applies to the National Core Technology only. Finally, it emphasizes the role of the Committee as a control tower for technology protection along with enactment of the Technology Protection Basic Act.

첨단산업과 산업단지 조성

박종안 조선대학교 지역사회발전연구원 2003 地域發展硏究 Vol.8 No.1

Industrial crowd and specialization by the regional high technology industrial complex can maximize the synergy effect by economical effect and value chain in a dominant position, support the appropriate industrial environment that the industrial technology development by region technology renovation system construction and the product system of the flexible speciality. There are three common points to be found in the general selecting standards for upbringing high technology industrial business in Gwangju. First the growth motive power of the globe promising high technology industry are, information technology industries, confrontation of industries due to advanced age, global environmental allied industries, and the undeveloped allied industries(such as new materials, mechatronics, space aeronautics, traffic industries, etc). Second, Nation wide promising high technology industry should be; industries based on 5-year plan with industrial technology development, industries based on national vision and development of the strategies, promising industry based on technology. Third, the regionally located industries and the specialized industries such as optical industries. The successful reasons of upbringing high technology industrial are supporting with high qualified human resources, good condition on circulating capital, perfect infra system, developing the consumer market, reliable circulation system, economical network system construction based on renovation, convenient shipping system construction, various tax benefits, neighboring districts civilization, etc. Thus, regional industry accumulating complex upbring the technology renovation high technology industries can increase the industries of international competitiveness, national industrial economic promotion, the consummation of provincial promotion and territorial balanced development, and right to appropriate the government's budget based on the investment plan on concentrated industrial complex. They can strengthen the national competitiveness.

첨단산업과 산업단지 조성

박종안(Park Jong-An) 조선대학교 지식경영연구원 2003 지역개발연구 Vol.8 No.1

Industrial crowd and specialization by the regional high technology industrial complex can maximize the synergy effect by economical effect and value chain in a dominant position, support the appropriate industrial environment that the industrial technology development by region technology renovation system construction and the product system of the flexible speciality. There are three common points to be found in the general selecting standards for upbringing high technology industrial business in Gwangju. First, the growth motive power of the globe promising high technology industry are; information technology industries, confrontation of industries due to advanced age, global environmental allied industries, and the undeveloped allied industries(such as new materials, mechatronics, space aeronautics, traffic industries, etc). Second, Nation wide promising high technology industry should be; industries based on 5-year plan with industrial technology development. industries based on national vision and development of the strategies. promising industry based on technology. Third, the regionally located industries and the specialized industries such as optical industries. The successful reasons of upbringing high technology industrial are supporting with high qualified human resources, good condition on circulating capital, perfect infra system, developing the consumer market. reliable circulation system, economical network system construction based on renovation, convenient shipping system construction, various tax benefits, neighboring districts civilization, etc. Thus, regional industry accumulating complex upbring the technology renovation high technology industries can increase the industries of international competitiveness, national industrial economic promotion, the consummation of provincial promotion and territorial balanced development, and right to appropriate the government's budget based on the investment plan on concentrated industrial complex. They can strengthen the national competitiveness.