http://chineseinput.net/에서 pinyin(병음)방식으로 중국어를 변환할 수 있습니다.
변환된 중국어를 복사하여 사용하시면 됩니다.
丁一 한국언어연구학회 2021 언어학연구 Vol.26 No.3
“Passive” not only appears in the predicate part of the sentence, but also combines with adnominal endings to modify nouns. The performance methods of “passive” in Korean language relatively complicated, and Chinese and Korean languages have different thinking mode, grammatical application and expression habits. Therefore, Chinese learners studying for Korean as a Foreign Language have a very big problem in the use of “passives in the adnominal clauses”. To solve this problem, this study comprehensively adopts the research methods of literature review and corpus analysis to analyze the six structural types between the passive adnominal clauses and the nouns they modify. In addition, this study investigated the mastery of this issue by Chinese learners studying for Korean through a questionnaire survey, and finally proposed teaching methods. Through this study, it will improve the research related to the passive in the Korean adnominal clause. On the other hand, it can provide systematic teaching contents for the teaching of this problem, and improve the Chinese Korean learners’ mastery of this problem.
정일 고려대학교 한국언어문화학술확산연구소 2023 Journal of Korean Culture Vol.60 No.-
78년의 역사를 가진 중국 대학의 한국어 교육은 오늘날 교육의 질 향상을 핵심으로 하는 새로운 발전의 시기를 맞이하고 있다. 교재가 외국어 교육에 있어서 중요한 역할을 함으로써 중국 대학 한국어 전공에 있어 새로운 발전 시기인 오늘날에 시대적 요구에 맞는 한국어 교재를 개발하는 게 중요한 과제다. 본 연구는 중국 대학의 한국어 전공 핵심 강의인 ‘기초 한국어’의 부교재 개발 문제에 초점을 맞췄다. 부교재는 주교재의 내용을 잘 보완할 수 있어 학생들의 언어지식에 유익한 보탬이 될 수 있기 때문에 학생들에게 참 중요한 학습 자료다. 본 논문은 우선 중국의 한국어 교재 및 부교재 출판 상황을 고찰하였고 부교재의 유형, 개발 필요성, 편찬 원칙에 대해 분석하였다. 그리고 주교재 분석 결과와 주교재를 사용하는 학생들을 대상으로 하는 설문 조사 결과를 기초로 부교재 내용 구성의 틀을 구축하였다. 마지막으로 구체적인 예시를 통하여 부교재 중의 언어 지식 설명 방식을 서술하였다.
정일,쉬야홍 충남대학교 경영경제연구소 2022 경영경제연구 Vol.44 No.2
This paper used the latest WIOD(2016) input-output table data, combined with the export production decomposition model (WWZ) proposed by Wang et al. and accordingly conducts a comparative analysis of the global value chain participation and manufacturing international competitiveness of a total of six countries in developed (America, German and Japan) and developing (China, Brazil and India) countries from 2000-2014, the results show that: (1) The degree of a country's participation in GVCs is not directly related to the type of country, but is closely related to the country's industrial structure; (2) GVC forward participation is generally higher in developed countries than in developing countries, indicating that the industrial structure of developed countries is more oriented towards trade in intermediate goods; (3) The level of GVC backward participation is also not directly related to the type of country, developed countries with manufacturing as the backbone and developing countries with primary industry as the base is much higher; (4) Developed countries generally have a revealed comparative advantage in Mid-High technology types of manufacturing, and developing countries generally have a revealed comparative advantage in low technology types of manufacturing; (5) The export decomposition model has obvious limitations when dealing with countries with a large number of outsourcing factories (China) and countries with serious industrial hollowing out (the United States), where the value added that actually belongs to the U.S. is wrongly added to the final producer China, leading to common sense problems in the results. The production decomposition model is recommended in future studies to calculate the new revealed comparative advantage index for the above countries