http://chineseinput.net/에서 pinyin(병음)방식으로 중국어를 변환할 수 있습니다.
변환된 중국어를 복사하여 사용하시면 됩니다.
- 中文 을 입력하시려면 zhongwen을 입력하시고 space를누르시면됩니다.
- 北京 을 입력하시려면 beijing을 입력하시고 space를 누르시면 됩니다.
RISS 인기검색어
- 검색키워드
- 저자 : 임지룡 (검색결과 132 건)
- 무료
- 기관 내 무료
- 유료
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
임지룡 국립국어연구원 1997 국어학 연감 Vol.1997 No.-
1. 어휘론 연구에 있어서 어원을 비롯하여, 고유어의 인명 및 지명, 어휘변천, 어휘체계, 차용어, 명칭어, 어휘조사, 남부한 어휘, 어휘지도 및 사용에 대한 다양한 논의가 이루어졌다. 2. 의미론의 연구에 있어서는 의미론의 흐름과 현황을 비롯하여 어휘의미론, 문장의미론, 담화의미론에 관한 다양한 논의가 진행되었다. 3. 사전 편찬학의 경우, 기존의 사전에 대한 검토, 그리고 특수사전편찬의 성격과 방향에 대한 논의가 아루어졌으며, 4종류의 사전이 출간되었다. 4. 한 해 동안의 어휘론 의미론 사전편찬학에 관한 논의를 검토하는 과정에서 그 내용을 제대로 정리하지 못하였거나 손이 미치지못하여 본의 아니게 소개하지 몬한 논저에 대해서는 다시 한번 해당 논저의 필자들께 양해를 구한다.
-
-
임지룡 慶北大學校 東洋文化硏究所 1982 東洋文化硏究 Vol.9 No.-
This study is intended to analyse Korean contradictory conjunctive suffixes and to make a smallcontribution toward a better understanding of conjunctive sentences. Few studies have been about conjunctive suffixes that connect 'ante-proposition' and 'post-proposition' having a contradictory value. So, it is written to clarify the reason of establishing connective suffixes and to show the characteristics of them by syntactic constraints, semantic functions and contrasts of expression. The summary which has been argued so far is as follows: 1. The status of contradictory connective suffixes (1) Connective suffixes which bear a character of connectives don't have any meaning in themselves but all of them functions as a representation of the relation between p and q. (2) The class, '-(??)na', '-ato', -'ciman' which shows the contradictory relation between p and q is defined as contradictory connective suffixes. Then their status relative to lexical dimension is as follows: ◁그림 삽입▷(원문을 참조하세요) (3) Whether contradictory connective suffixes can be differentiated from delimiters, and whether an identical formative is a delimiter or a contradictory connective suffixes are dependent on whether the split of the fromative can change the grammatical category. 2. Syntactic characteristics (1) Connective suffixes '-(??)na', '-ato', '-ciman' are restricted either simultaneously or respectively by the preceding sentence. (2) Connective suffixes '-(??)na', '-ato', '-ciman' shows a difference in the restriction and the scope of accompanying elements by the following sentence. (3) Relatively, '-ato' is less restricted than '-(??)na', '-ciman' in (1) and (2). And there are two kinds of '-ato'. One is in a cooccurrence restriction relation to '-(??)na', '-ciman' and the other is not. If we say the former '-ato_1', and the latter '-ato_2', '-ato_2' is regarded as another form of '-t??lato' which represents 'concession'. 3. Semantic function (1) The common semantic functions of contradictory connective suffixes are 'contrast' when the topic between S_1 and S_2 is different, and 'denial of expectation' when they are not. And the structure is 'full sentence -c- full sentence.' (2) The respective semantic functions of '-(??)na', '-ato', '-ciman' is are follows: '-(??)na' means choice, and in '-(??)na∼(??)n' it puts emphasis. '-Ato' represents concession, and condition to make an idiomatic phrase in 'Nman v(a)to', and it performs a function of qualifying the degree of a following adverb. '-Ciman' functions as an element of honorification. And the structure is 'minor sentence(or idiomatic sentence)-c- full sentence.' 4. Contrasts of expression (1) The representation of connective suffixes and connectives is not always in accord. And in 'contrast' and 'denial of expectation,' it can be classified as connectives. But in the respective semantic functions it cannot be. (2) While connective suffix '-ko' is used for representing the speaker's objectivity, contradictory connective suffixes are used for representing the speaker's subjectivity. And the focus is on q. p{ko} q......speaker's objective utterance p{(??)na, ato, ciman} q......speaker's subjective utterance (3) Contradictory connective suffixes are in contrast with what we clal 'restrictive suffixes.' '-Ato' (-telato) contrasts with '-myen', and '-nikka', '-ase' '-m??lo' have a deep reciprocality like '-(??)na' '-ato' '-ciman'. The relation of opposition is summarized as follows: ◁그림 삽입▷(원문을 참조하세요)
-
임지룡 한국어의미학회 2006 한국어 의미학 Vol.20 No.-
Lim Ji-ryong. 2006 On Conceptual Metaphor. Korean semantics 20. The purpose of this paper is to explore the basic concept, types, and working principles of conceptual metaphor on the basis of conceptual metaphor theories. The conclusions are as follows. First, our thoughts and ideas are essentially metaphoric according to conceptual theories. Conceptual metaphor is a cognitive strategy that structures and conceptualizes a new and abstract target domain by using a familiar and concrete source domain. Metaphoric expressions are linguistic expressions of conceptual metaphor. Second, conceptual metaphor is classified as structural, ontological, and orientational, according to the fidelity of the conceptual structure to the target domain. This fidelity is ‘structural metaphor>ontological metaphor> orientational metaphor.’ Third, the working principle behind conceptual metaphors can be explained as a mapping relationship between a source domain and a target domain, and the cognitive ability of this mapping structure to activate a new and abstract domain. In this case, the mapping is characterized by the maintenance of a unilateral, partial, and basic skeleton between conceptual domains. Lower level mappings inherit higher level ones. Fourth, conceptual metaphor theory provides higher explanatory adequacy for the motivation of metaphor use, the tool of inference and meaning extension, and empirical correlation, whereas it has problems with over-concentration on conceptual metaphor, and with its conceptual and methodological foundations. Conceptual metaphor theory also has limits and problems that cannot be explained by the mapping between conceptual domains.
스콜라연관 검색어 추천
이 검색어로 많이 본 자료
활용도 높은 자료
