http://chineseinput.net/에서 pinyin(병음)방식으로 중국어를 변환할 수 있습니다.
변환된 중국어를 복사하여 사용하시면 됩니다.
- 中文 을 입력하시려면 zhongwen을 입력하시고 space를누르시면됩니다.
- 北京 을 입력하시려면 beijing을 입력하시고 space를 누르시면 됩니다.
RISS 인기검색어
- 검색키워드
- 저자 : 이초식(Lee Cho-Sik) (검색결과 24 건)
- 무료
- 기관 내 무료
- 유료
-
-
이초식(Lee Cho-Sik) 한국과학기술학회 2001 과학기술학연구 Vol.1 No.2
Let us critique the common. notion that ethical 'examination retards the development of science and technology. First, I shall reformulate such a notion in the following statements: To survive the competitive society, we must develop science and technology before others do. It will cost too much time to examine ethically the influence of developing science and technology. Therefore, we cannot but suspend the ethical matters until we have developed science and technology. I will then show that even if we reconstruct the above argument in a deductively valid form, the second premise is not necessarily true and that we cannot accept the conclusion because the meaning of 'competing for better lives', in the first premise, is diverse. Especially if we are to take into account all the areas of ethics and base them upon the autonomous ethics of democratic societies, it cannot be concluded that ethics is an enemy of developing science and technology. In addition, I will argue that our moral considerations must be based upon autonomous ethics in order to make the development of science and technology contribute to enhancing the desirable science culture. In the midst of making the above argument, it is proposed that the title of the law of bio-ethics be changed, for it has a mistaken implication that acting against ethics results in legal punishments.
-
-
-
-
이초식(Lee Cho-Sik) 한국과학기술학회 2002 과학기술학연구 Vol.2 No.1
Recently KISTEP(Korea Institute of Science and Technology Evaluation and Planning) held an open forum for examining 'the Manuscript of National Science and Technology Standard Taxonomic System.' I submitted my opinion letter to the forum because I thought that the matter of setting the standard taxonomic system for Science and Technology is so closely related to the research concern of STS that it needs checking from the viewpoint of STS. This paper primarily focuses on making a criticism of and constructing an alternative to the mamuscript, but it goes so far as to ground the matter upon the STS viewpoint. I propose that we interpret an open forum related to science and technology as an example case of the community of inquiry. Further I try, standing in the context of learning, to form a model of doing STS interdisciplinary research. In the context of decision I point out the problem with the 'scale' principle involved in categrizing criteria of the taxonomic system and argue that the problem leads to omitting STS from National Science and Technology Standard Taxonomic System although STS takes up science and technology themselves as its research concern proper. In the context of learning I seek to set up a typical case study of STS. One of the typical STS research tasks is trying to construct a positive alternative to as well as make a criticism of a given suggestion, for clearer alternatives will, in tum, provoke sharper criticisms or safer acceptances. I hope that the model in this paper will exemplify such an alternating procedure of criticism and acceptance.
-
이초식(Lee Cho-Sik) 한국과학기술학회 2001 과학기술학연구 Vol.1 No.1
This paper makes a preparatory attempt to reconstruct 'the Korean Science Culture' toward which I think the Koreans should direct and orient themselves rather than describe the history of the science culture in Korea. This task requires us to define 'science culture.' So I propose, based on the definitions of science culture so far made, to consider the model of Humanized Science Culture as a regulating ideal of the Korean Science Culture. To support the model, analyzing the concept of science literacy of the 2061 Project, I posit the model of KDSC (Korean Designer of Science Culture) as the Koreans who will actually come to design the Korean Science Culture. KDSC refers to a reasonable man who will represent a desirable Korean, rather than to a natural Korean. Then I spell out the conditions of becoming a KDSC and scrutinize the philosophical backbones of those conditions. Finally, I make a few suggestions for developing a program of designing and implementing the Korean Science Culture from the viewpoint of a model of KDSC.
-
이초식 ( Cho-sik Lee ) 한국과학철학회 2016 과학철학 Vol.19 No.3
This paper is to propose a group epistemic agent of Bayesian philosophy in Korea by means of Young E. Rhee`s book Bayesianism (2015) review from the point of social epistemology. For this purpose, three approaches to book review are considered in terms of Goldman`s a three-part taxonomy for social epistemology. The proposed collective doxastic agent is expected to contribute to develop doing philosophy by using computer simulations for the division of cognitive labor.
-
-
ScienceON연관 검색어 추천
이 검색어로 많이 본 자료
활용도 높은 자료
