http://chineseinput.net/에서 pinyin(병음)방식으로 중국어를 변환할 수 있습니다.
변환된 중국어를 복사하여 사용하시면 됩니다.
D. H. Lawrence and German Culture: Frieda, Fascist Charge, and Cultural Identity
오영진 한국영어영문학회 2008 영어 영문학 Vol.54 No.6
Lawrence received much from German culture for his development as a writer. His German spouse Frieda provided him with an insight into the problems of modern society through her mediation between him and counterculture of Munich-Schwabing. They shared rebellious spirit against the moral, religious, and political authorities in the cause of liberation of individual and culture. But the truths about the impact of Lawrence’s personal ties to Frieda have been largely neglected or distorted. Bertrand Russell erroneously intimated involvement of psychoanalysis and Frieda in Lawrence’s alleged fascist inclination. Contrary to this, Frieda and psychoanalysis worked to keep Lawrence’s authoritarian tendency in check. If Russell wanted to associate Lawrence with Frieda, F. R. Leavis did the opposite by trying to separate the writer from her influence, and reduced her presence to “an amoral German aristocrat.” But thanks to her support, Lawrence could experience the potency of eros to liberate psyche and culture from the burden of religious, moral, and political dogma, and maintain his belief in it all his life. Lawrence’s idea was closely woven into the community of Europe, particularly the German critique of modernization and materialism. To understand this context, we need to revaluate the vital role Frieda had. Lawrence received much from German culture for his development as a writer. His German spouse Frieda provided him with an insight into the problems of modern society through her mediation between him and counterculture of Munich-Schwabing. They shared rebellious spirit against the moral, religious, and political authorities in the cause of liberation of individual and culture. But the truths about the impact of Lawrence’s personal ties to Frieda have been largely neglected or distorted. Bertrand Russell erroneously intimated involvement of psychoanalysis and Frieda in Lawrence’s alleged fascist inclination. Contrary to this, Frieda and psychoanalysis worked to keep Lawrence’s authoritarian tendency in check. If Russell wanted to associate Lawrence with Frieda, F. R. Leavis did the opposite by trying to separate the writer from her influence, and reduced her presence to “an amoral German aristocrat.” But thanks to her support, Lawrence could experience the potency of eros to liberate psyche and culture from the burden of religious, moral, and political dogma, and maintain his belief in it all his life. Lawrence’s idea was closely woven into the community of Europe, particularly the German critique of modernization and materialism. To understand this context, we need to revaluate the vital role Frieda had.
D. H. Lawrence and the Cambridge-Bloomsbury Circle: the Class Issue
오영진 한국영미어문학회 2014 영미어문학 Vol.- No.113
Lawrence and the Cambridge-Bloomsbury circle represent contrasting approaches to life and culture, art and society. Their positions are interlocked with the different sensibility which reflects distinct social backgrounds. Lawrence found facile self-complacency and shallow intellectualism in the bourgeois Enlightenment and individualism championed by the circle. The encounter of Lawrence and the circle was a mirror of a society riddled with the chronic problem of social separation. Leavis’s criticism of the intellectual flippancy and self-conceit of the privileged coterie overlooks the homosexual issue involved in the skirmish of Lawrence and the circle and confines Lawrence’s sexual theme to heterosexual relationship. Yet, unlike the claim of Quentin Bell and Rosenbaum, Leavis’s evaluation of the ethos of the Keynes group and its cultural implications was not wide of the mark. The pretensions of the circle to the guardianship of civilisation, their alleged rebellion against conventional values, and their advocacy of individual freedom are significantly offset by the fact that ultimately, they served the empire and was a part of the status quo. In this sense, Raymond Williams’s critical view of the limitations of the bourgeois ideology the circle stood for is still relevant. The class issue is a central theme in Lawrence’s writings throughout his life.
Eros, Religion, and Civilisation in Lawrence and Freud
오영진 신영어영문학회 2007 신영어영문학 Vol.38 No.-
Lawrence’s preoccupation with the liberating potential of sexuality focused on the primacy of the ‘religious’ urge, whereas Freud dismissed religion as a regressive ‘illusion’. Lawrence could not accept Freud’s scientific language following the Enlightenment tradition. However, by expressing a fundamental doubt over civilisation and its rational legacies, Freud paradoxically confirmed Lawrence’s critique of humanist ideals. Although Freud distrusted the possibility of an emancipated libido, his theory contributed to the libertarian dialogue about sexual issues. In this sense, Lawrence’s religious eroticism and Freud’s rigorous scientism converge together to testify to the seminal necessity of inquiry into the non-rational and libidinal. Regardless of his intentions, Freud contributed to contemporary intellectuals’ glorification of instinct and the unconscious, and their appraisal of all things primordial.
나물콩 신품종 - 극소립.조숙 고수율 나물용 콩 신품종 '호서'
오영진,O, Yeong-Jin 대한두채협회 2008 물만 먹고 자라요 Vol.21 No.-
성숙기가 빠르고, 100립중이 매우 작으며, 콩나물 특성이 매우 우수한 '호서콩'의 육성경위와 주요 특성을 소개한다.