http://chineseinput.net/에서 pinyin(병음)방식으로 중국어를 변환할 수 있습니다.
변환된 중국어를 복사하여 사용하시면 됩니다.
마이크로티칭에서 예비수학교사들의 동기유발에 대한수업 행동과 변화
심상길 ( Sang Kil Shim ) 한국수학교육학회 2015 수학교육논문집 Vol.29 No.4
본 연구에서는 마이크로티칭에서 예비수학교사들의 동기유발에 대한 수업 행동과 변화를 알아보기 위해 두 차례의 마이크로티칭을 실시하고, 녹화된 자료와 수업 분석보고서를 분석하였다. 예비수학교사들은 동기유발을 위해 다양한전략을 사용하였으나 사용하지 못하는 전략들도 있었다. 또한, 동기유발에 대한 행동 변화에서 긍정적인 측면도 있지만, 그렇지 못한 경우도 있다. 이는 두 차례의 마이크로티칭의 경험만으로 모든 동기유발 전략에 관련된 수업 개선의 효과를 기대하기 힘들다는 것이다. 그러나 마이크로티칭을 통해 예비수학교사들은 반성에 의한 행동 변화와 미래 수업에 대한 개선의 의지를 보였다. 따라서 예비수학교사들이 자신의 수업에 대한 반성을 통해 수업을 개선할 수 있도록 체계적인 교육 프로그램의 개발과 이를 교원 양성기관인 대학에서 효율적으로 활용하는 방안에 대한 연구가 필요하다. 아울러, 예비수학교사들의 동기유발에 대한 수업 행동의 개선을 위해 마이크로티칭과 같은 다양한 교육 프로그램을 예비수학교사들에게 더 많이 제공할 필요가 있다. This study investigated how pre-service mathematics teaches`` experience in microteaching influences their motivations toward teaching behaviors and changes by analyzing their teaching records and class reports. Although respondents planned to conduct various strategies pertaining to motivations, some of them were not used. Also, motivations toward their teaching behavioral changes leaded to positive aspects, but also leaded to negative ones. These findings imply that only two times microteaching experiences would not be sufficient to lead to positive teaching behavioral changes through their motivations. However, pre-service mathematics reported a high level of intention to change their teaching behavior through a comprehensive review process regarding their teaching. Therefore, teacher eduction institutions should develop well structured educational programs and apply them to pre-service mathematics teachers for a better understanding of their teaching and its review through motivations. In addition, providing opportunities for pre-service mathematics teachers to experience various educational programs including microteaching would be necessary for improving their teaching behavior through motivations.
심상도(Shim, Sang Do) 한국문화관광학회 2002 문화관광연구 Vol.4 No.2
Founded in the 15th year of the reign of Shilla Queen Sondok (646 C.E.) by Vinaya Master Jajang, Tongdosa Monastery and Temple is the first of Korea’s three Jewel temples, representing the Buddha. The temple is famous for it’s most beautiful landscape as follows : Mupunghansong (Pine tree dancing in the winter breeze), Anyangdong-dae (Eastern peak commanding wide panorama), Chajangdong-cheon (Beauty spot), Keuknak youngji (paradise pond), Biro falls & Danseong setting sun. The Seounam, small temple at the Tongdosa(temple), is located at Jisan-ri, Habuk-myeon, Yansan(city) Gyeongsangnam-do, S. KOREA. It was built by noble monk Chunghyun in 1326(During King Chungmok’s era of Koryo Dynasty), remodeled by Saint Nambonggwonseong in 1859(the tenth year of the King Cheoljong’s era of Chosun Dynasty), and extensively mended by the former chief priest Seongpa of Tongdosa(temple). During his 5-year ceramic works(1985 to 1989), Seongpa baked 3,000 Buddhist statues; moreover, completed the invincible Buddhist project of completing canon of Buddhist scriptures on the surface of 160,000 ceramics almost for 9 years(Jun, 19991 to September, 2000). In addition, the man got the temple capital through the persimmon field cultivated by him. And on the basis of the fund, he opened Muwiseonwon (Buddhist principle center for the spiritual concentration) and restored the procedures of the traditional skills of natural dyeing. Much more respectable one is his exemplary life; linking Zen and laboring to his life, His three years of studying enabled to restored the Korean-traditional soybean paste fermented and soy sauce with natural herbs. Thereafter, they are now on the market at lower price. Recently, he has cultivated wild flower field of ten thousands of wild flowers about one hundred species over 200,000-pyong hill surrounding Seounam(small temple) to let people know almost extinct ones, and held the wild flower festivals. What’s more his amazing plan is he is willing to open it for nature studies. In his painful trials, the temple has been attracting many tourists, people to worship, and customers to purchase the traditional commodities and harvests on.
심상복(Shim Sang-Bok) 부산대학교 법학연구소 2002 법학연구 Vol.43 No.1
According to the article 29① of Constitution of the Republic Of Korea, it provides that the public official concerned shall not be immune from liabilities. And this constitutional article was concreted by the article 2② of State Compensation Act. Therefore, the public official who committed tort in official act is responsible to the State etc. when the State etc. compensated to the citizen who is injured by unlawful act committed by a public official in the excercise of public office by the Constitution and the Act. And the article of State Compensation Act which provides the right of the State etc. for compensation to a public official is an institutional system to secure legality of administration and serious official action. But it should be never forgotten that the tight of the State etc. for compensation must be exercised in the limit. And the limit means that the tight should be not to offend active exercise and efficiency of official duty. That is why legislators stipulated a phrase of 'intention or gross negligence’ in the article 2② of State Compensation Act. At first, what the meaning and the character of the tight of the State etc. are is studied by theories and cases concerning institution of the State compensation in this paper. Especially, this paper aims to find out what the duty of care is in a public official's issuance of certificate of seal. Though recent cases concerned with that consent to the meaning of the tight, it may be thought that those cases are rigorous to a public official in judging a public official’s liability. In case of issuing certificate of seal, a public official’ gross negligence should be judged restrictedly, Especially, if a public official issued the certificate of seal by the third party’s unlawful act, it could be said that there is no gross negligence to the public official. Therefore, in that case, the court should have judged a public official no gross negligence. Also, This paper involve the problems caused by the discretionary character of the tight in the Act, and examine the rationality in dividing liability between the State etc. and a public official who committed tort.