언어 지식의 교수 학습 방법 연구 - 교수 학습의 활동 단계를 중심으로

송현정 ( Hyun Jung Song ) 한국어교육학회(구-한국국어교육연구학회) 1997 韓國國語敎育硏究會 論文集 Vol.63 No.-

학교 민주시민교육의 개념과 목표에 대한 델파이 조사 연구

송현정 ( Song Hyun-jung ),윤노아 ( Yoon Noah ) 한국사회과교육학회 2021 시민교육연구 Vol.53 No.3

The purpose of this study is to clarify the concept and goals of democratic citizenship education in school. In a situation where interest in democratic citizenship education in schools is increasing and there is a lot of confusion about its concept and meaning, through an expert Delphi survey, we tried to reach a consensus by collecting various opinions on the status and meaning, basic concepts and goals, civic values and competencies, and educational principles and content elements of democratic citizenship education in school. The Delphi survey results are as follows. The purpose of school education should be toward democratic citizenship education based on the constitution, and that the subjects curriculum and extra-curricular activities, student self-governing activities and school culture, and linkage with the community outside the school are all about democratic citizenship. In addition, respect, autonomy, solidarity as civic values, social empathy competency, social decision-making competency, social participation competency, critical reflection competency as civic competencies, enhancing students’ autonomy, representing controversial issues, structuring every student’s participation, minimizing the evaluation of students’ values and attitude as an educational principle are suggested. Based on the research results, it was suggested: the meaning and principle of democratic citizenship education as the purpose of school education should be clearly stated in the general curriculum and subject curriculum of 2022 revised curriculum, all subject curricula and creative experience activities should reflect democratic citizenship education, and the research on curriculum development for democratic citizenship education should be conducted as a follow-up study.

사법부의 소수자 보호 역할론 - 미국 연방대법원의 소수자 보호 법리 발전과정을 중심으로 -

송현정(Song, Hyun Jung) 미국헌법학회 2020 美國憲法硏究 Vol.31 No.3

It is no easy matter to protect the rights of minorities because to eliminate discrimination equates to defeat the unduly generalized stereotype or prejudice that has been ingrained into the commonsense of the age. Because of the anti-majoritarian characteristics, issues concerning the protection of minorities would most likely arouse controversy in social and political arenas, especially in a democratic society resting upon the principles of majority rule. Yet, the concept of liberal democracy does not merely mean compliance with majority rule. The majority rule without the protection of minority rights is nothing more than formal democracy and tyranny of the majority alike. The protection of minorities, of course, had best be made by legislative and executive bodies with democratic legitimacy, but due to the nature of the principles of democracy which include the majority rule, governmental decisions are likely to be made by the will of the majority, and the opinion of minorities tends to be marginalized by and large in the decision-making process. In this regard, an independent judiciary, as a power not elected by the people, that is, not affected by the majority rule, needs to be the “last resort” to protect the minority against majoritarianism. The United States Supreme Court has long been consolidated the primary duty of the judiciary to protect minorities by establishing judgments and legal principles aiming at social integration based on diversity. Under the Due Process Clause and Equal Protection Clause, the Court has struck down laws that discriminate based on race, alienage, national origin, illegitimacy, gender, sexual orientation, etc., holding the tone of judicial activism. The experience of the United States Supreme Court, which has taken the lead in minority rights protection, implicates the importance of the Korean judiciary’s role in realizing the social integration in a multicultural society, and in eliminating aversion and irrational discrimination against minorities. Therefore, as evidenced in the United States Supreme Court cases, this paper acquaints the people with the importance of the judiciary’s role in the protection of minorities and suggests that the Korean judiciary plays a key role to protect minorities through an active interpretation of (constitutional) law, proactively influencing important governmental decision-making and social changes for minority issues.

미국의 증거배제신청(Motion in Limine) 절차 분석 및 시사점

송현정(Song, Hyun Jung) 미국헌법학회 2018 美國憲法硏究 Vol.29 No.1

In United States criminal proceedings, the prosecution and the defendant frequently employ motions to ask the court to determine the admissibility of certain evidence which is deemed irrelevant or prejudicial before a trial begins. Upon the motion, the court makes an evidentiary ruling admitting or excluding the evidence. Such motions to exclude evidence before trial enable the court to minimize unnecessary trial interruptions by holding separate evidentiary hearings. A motion in limine is a request that the court rule on the admissibility of evidence in advance so as to bar presentation of prejudicial evidence which may cause the jury to make irrational or emotional decisions. A motion in limine should preferably be raised prior to a trial, but can be brought up at any time during trial. As for an interlocutory appeal of a trial court’s ruling on a motion in limine, since this ruling is preliminary in nature and subject to change during the trial, it is not appealable. Thus, where the court grants or denies a motion in limine to exclude evidence and indicates willingness to reconsider its ruling, the mover must renew its objection if the evidence is offered during trial and make an offer of proof to preserve the issue for appeal. This paper focuses on motions in limine with particular emphasis on their procedural aspects in order to suggest improvement measures for sound practices of the Korean judiciary in the course of trial, especially at the evidentiary stage.

사회과 법 교육과정 개발을 위한 기초 연구

송현정 ( Hyun Jung Song ) 한국사회과교육학회 2005 시민교육연구 Vol.37 No.3

교육과정 개정 시안 문법 영역의 개정 방향과 과제

송현정 ( Hyun Jung Song ) 한국문법교육학회 2006 문법 교육 Vol.5 No.-

This study aims to contribute to improving the Korean grammar curriculum. Since the 7th National Curriculum took on, research related to the Korean curriculum has pointed out the problems of the curriculum. To meet emerging national and social needs, Korean curriculum of the tentative plan have been studied and published in 2006 year. This study makes examination tentative Korean curriculum(specially, grammar domain), makes suggestions focus of revision and a problem awaiting solution. The main points of the study are as follows: First, it is a title problems of domain. It suggest to change from Korean knowledge to Grammar in accordance with grammar education viewpoint. Second, it has focus on the contents system. We know that new curriculum put emphasis on the knowledge and activities. Third, it suggests `evel and limit` To make textbooks, we can receive help from suggestion these things. Forth, it reduced learning quantity in comparison with 7th national curriculum.

미국 연방사법센터(FJC)에 관한 연구

송현정 ( Song Hyun Jung ) 사법정책연구원 2022 연구보고서 Vol.2022 No.13

Judicial administration, such as staff appointment and dismissal and work division within the court, is required for the court to run its organization, personnel, budget, accounting, and facility management. Education and research functions are also important parts of judicial administration because they provide judges with a wide range of information while they are dealing with heavy trial workloads. These functions assist judges in conducting proceedings in a more faithful and efficient manner.  The Federal Judicial Center, an independent institution primarily responsible for education and research functions related to federal court administration, was established in the United States in 1967 so that the federal judiciary could respond quickly to changes in social conditions and ensure a continuous and efficient justice system for the people. The Center’s main divisions are Education, Research, Federal Judicial History, and International Judicial Relations. Each division advances the development and implementation of better judicial administration in federal courts. The Education division, for example, develops and implements education programs for court personnel, including judges, and the Research division conducts research projects to improve the efficiency of federal courts. Because of the staff’s professionalism and independence in carrying out their mandate, its work is highly regarded by federal judges as well as other branches or agencies, including Congress.  Given the scope of the Center’s work, it could be considered a hybrid institution that com- bines Korea’s Judicial Research and Training Institute, Judicial Policy Research Institute, Training Institute for Court Officials, and Supreme Court Library (compilation of judicial history materials). Indeed, the Center is a significant institution, having served as the primary reference for the establishment of the Judicial Policy Research Institute, an independent research institute under the Supreme Court of Korea, as well as having a close relationship with the Judicial Research and Training Institute, a Korean judiciary educational institution.  This study examines in depth the Center’s background and establishment process, purpose and function, organizational composition, specific tasks of each division, and method of performance, with the goal of deriving implications that help Korean institutions that perform educational and research functions improve the efficiency and quality of work performance, develop various educational programs or research projects, or utilize internal and external resources. Furthermore, because the Center is an institution with integrated educational and research functions, this study suggests ways to strengthen mutual cooperation between educational institutions, such as the Judicial Research and Training Institute and the Judicial Policy Research Institute, which is in charge of research functions within the Korean judiciary, by examining the organic cooperative relationship between the education division and the research division of the Center.  Hopefully, this study would help to continue improving and activate the education and research functions of the Korean judiciary.

다문화 사회의 국어과 교육 내용 분석 연구

송현정 ( Hyun Jung Song ) 영주어문학회 2014 영주어문 Vol.28 No.-

The purpose of this study is to find out and analyze Korean educational contents in multi-cultural society. For this purpose, we studied the multicultural education paradigm in Korea and analyzed Korean curriculum. Korean Education Contents in Multi-Cultural Society is pluralistic value, variety, communication and consideration and so on. We found that a desirable human character and goal of Korean education has changed from emphasis on nationalism to focus on a global and pluralistic society. And Korean Education Contents in Multi-Cultural Society are not made up organically between subjects because they have goals and contents of multicultural education depending on characteristic of subjects. We figured out that 2011 Korean curriculum explains contents of multicultural education indirectly and 2009’s shows them directly and concretely. With these research findings, we suggest that it needs to emphases educational perspective for multiculutral students and non-multicutural students’s interaction, to internalize contents of multicultural education in Korean curriculum naturally, to change educational expression toward multicultural goals and contents in Korean curriculum gradually, to add new information included goals and contents of multicultural education, and to consider Korean language ability as tools of communication and cooperation.

미국 특허쟁송실무에 관한 연구 - 연방순회항소법원(CAFC), 연방지방법원, 국제무역위원회(ITC), 특허청(USPTO)을 중심으로 -

송현정 ( Song Hyun Jung ) 사법정책연구원 2016 연구보고서 Vol.2016 No.18

In the twenty-first century, ever more Korean corporations are tapping into foreign markets, exploiting intangible assets with the advent of a knowledge based information society. In doing so, international disputes over patents between domestic and foreign corporations are on the increase. Especially, the patent battle between Apple and Samsung Electronics adds to the increasingly tough environment for Korean companies in the United States. Under such circumstances, it is significant to have a solid grasp of the patent trial proceedings of the United States so as to establish effective confrontation strategies when engaging in patent trials in the United States. The types of patent trials in the United States appear to divide into two categories according to their strategic objectives: infringement and invalidity. A patent trial generally begins with the filing of a complaint alleging patent infringement by a patent owner, and an accused infringer then asserts the defense of invalidity of the patent at stake to avoid liability. The patent owner who believes that his patent is being infringed has two venues for relief. The patent owner may seek relief in a federal district court, the International Trade Commission, or both. Yet, an allegedly infringing article has to be imported into the United States to bring an action before the International Trade Commission. Furthermore, parties seeking monetary relief must resort to the district court since remedies available at the International Trade Commission are limited to prohibition from committing specific unfair trade practices. On the other hand, the accused infringer has several ways to escape liability. Where the proceeding is initiated before the district court or the International Trade Commission, the accused infringer may assert counterclaims of invalidity, or raise an affirmative defense of invalidity. Alternatively, he may challenge the patent’s validity through post grant proceedings at the United States Patent and Trade Office, i.e., post grant review, covered business method review, inter partes review, and ex parte reexamination, to defend against patent infringement trials. If the party remains dissatisfied with the outcome of the trial, he may further file an appeal to the United States Court of Appeals for the Federal Circuit since it is the sole appellate court having nationwide jurisdiction over patent appeals. The United States Court of Appeals for the Federal Circuit has long established case law doctrines and unified rules for patent trials. This research articulates the procedural aspects of the aforementioned institutions resolving patent disputes, with special emphasis on the individual practices of judges. By doing so, hopefully this research can contribute to the advancement of sound practices for the Korean judiciary in the field of patent litigations.

문법교육의 개선 방안 연구

송현정 ( Hyun Jung Song ) 한국문법교육학회 2004 문법 교육 Vol.1 No.-