입법원칙을 기초로 바라본 전자상거래법 전부개정안의 의미와 한계

서종희 한국소비자법학회 2021 소비자법연구 Vol.7 No.-

Compared to the early periods, today’s e-commerce platform is not just about the role of the market. It is involved in many areas of transaction relations, such as conclusion of contracts, payments, fulfilling contracts and refunding. It also creates a great deal of trust in the customer, creating an appearance that guarantees the safety and quality of the goods or services. This paper analyzes the limitations of the amendment to the E-Commerce Act in 2021 based on the legislative principles of the principle of excessive prohibition, the principle of clarity, and the principle of systematic synthesis. It can be roughly divided into three categories. First, the types of platform operators classified by the amendment (Article 2, Paragraph 5, etc.) only increase the complexity of the legal system by inducing chaos due to heterogeneity with the conventional classification method. This may not actually contribute significantly to consumer protection. Excessive expansion and reinforcement of the responsibility of the e-commerce platform may be more disadvantageous to consumers. Finally, the E-Commerce Law is the basis for invasive administrative disposition, and some of the provisions of this amendment (Amendment Article 12, Paragraph 2, Amendment Article 16, Amendment Articles 20 and 31, etc.) is ambiguous. 현행 전자상거래법이 가지는 한계를 고민하면서 창의적인 해석에 기초를 마련하려고 시도하였던 판결이나 해석을 한계를 인정하면서 입법의 필요성을 간접적으로 시사한 판결은 전자상거래법의 전부개정안이라는 결단을 이끌어 내는 계기를 마련하였다. 그러나 입법자는 현행법에 대한 진지한 고민과 반성, 학계에서 제기된 주장들, 수범자 사이의 이익균형 등을 종합적으로 고려하여 입법자는 결단을 통해 법을 제정하거나 개정해야 한다. 그러한 의미에서 입법자의 결단은 새로운 시도가 아니라 종래 제기된 문제점을 개선하고 향후에 있을 변화에 대응하기 위한 것이라 할 수 있다. 이를 전제로 본고에서는 과잉금지원칙, 명확성의 원칙, 그리고 체계적합성의 원칙이라는 입법의 원칙을 기준으로 2021년 전자상거래법 개정안이 가지는 한계를 분석하였다. 크게 세 가지로 요약할 수 있다. 첫째, 개정안(제2조 제5항 등)이 분류하는 플랫폼 사업자의 유형, 즉 정보교환 매개 플랫폼 사업자, 연결수단 제공 플랫폼 사업자, 거래중개 플랫폼 사업자 유형 등은 수범자들 입장에서는 종래의 구분방법과의 이질성으로 인한 혼돈(Chaos)을 유도하여 법체계의 복잡성을 증가시킬 뿐 실질적으로 소비자 보호에 크게 기여하지 못할 수 있다. 둘째, 외관책임의 지나친 확대 및 강화(개정안 제25조)는 소비자에게 오히려 더 불리해질 수 있다. 특히 개정안 제25조 제3항과 관련하여 거래중개 플랫폼 운영사업자가 온라인 플랫폼 이용사업자와 연대책임을 부담할 가능성이 높아질수록 거래중개 플랫폼 운영사업자로서는 일정 규모 이상의 온라인 플랫폼 이용사업자와의 거래를 선호하고 상대적으로 규모가 작은 신규 시장 진입자나 중소 플랫폼 이용사업자 등과의 거래를 회피하도록 한다. 마지막으로, 전자상거래법은 침익적 행정처분의 근거가 되는데, 이번 개정안의 일부조항(개정안 제12조 제2항, 개정안 제16조, 개정안 제20조 및 제31조 등)은 규정이 가지는 의미가 모호하거나 대통령령 등으로 위임하고 있어 플랫폼 사업자의 기본권을 침해할 여지가 있다. 이는 종국적으로 소비자 보호에도 영향을 미칠 수 있다는 점에서 재고가 필요하다.

유행지역에서 온 외국인 노동자에서 진단된 폐포충낭종 –1예 보고-

서종희,김용환 대한흉부외과학회 2008 Journal of Chest Surgery (J Chest Surg) Vol.41 No.4

Hydatid disease is a parasitic infection that is caused by the larval stage of Echinococcus granulosus. This disease is distributed worldwide, but it is rare in Korea. A 34-year old foreign male worker from Mongolia presented with cough and chest discomfort. Computed tomography of the chest showed a cystic mass in the upper lobe of the right lung. The cyst was surgically resected, and the pathological study confirmed a hydatid cyst. The patient was given albendazole postoperatively to prevent a relapse. We report here on a surgical case of pulmonary hydatid disease along with a review of the literature.

확률형아이템과 게임이용자 보호 - 비교법적 고찰과 함께 -

서종희 한국소비자법학회 2022 소비자법연구 Vol.8 No.4

뇌졸증을 병발한 선천성 심낭내 좌심방이류 −1예 보고−

서종희,김용환,전희경 대한흉부외과학회 2008 Journal of Chest Surgery (J Chest Surg) Vol.41 No.5

Congenital intrapericardial left atrial appendage aneurysms (LAAA) are very rare. Most cases are asymptomatic and this malady is generally incidentally diagnosed in older patients. LAAAs are usually accompanied with supraventricular arrhythmias and life-threatening systemic embolism. Complete surgical correction is recommended immediately after the diagnosis to prevent significant complications, and even for the asymptomatic patients. We report here on the case of a 45-year-old man who presented with cerebral embolism due to LAAA. The patient was successfully treated with a resection of the aneurysm.

분수 및 함수표기를 허용하는 결정에 대한 리뷰

서종희 한국게임정책자율기구 2019 게임이용자보호와 자율규제 Vol.- No.3

단독관상동맥우회로술 후 발생한 심방세동

서종희,박찬범,문미형,권종범,진웅,문석환,김치경,김영두 대한흉부외과학회 2009 Journal of Chest Surgery (J Chest Surg) Vol.42 No.1

Background: Postoperative atrial fibrillation (AF) is a common complication after coronary artery bypass graft (CABG) surgery. Although postoperative AF is regarded as benign, transient and self-limited, it has been associated with increased morbidity, thromboembolic events and an increased duration and cost of hospitalization. Material and Method: From January 1994 to December 2007, 190 patients that had isolated CABG surgery were divided into two groups. Group 1 (n=139) involved those who had postoperative atrial fibrillation, and group 2 (n=51) did not have any such events. We reviewed the medical records retrospectively including the incidence of postoperative AF, patient characteristics, surgery related factors and the outcome of the patients with postoperative AF. Result: The frequency of postoperative AF was 26.8%, the conversion rate to regular sinus rhythm before discharge was 82.4%; 82.4% of the AF developed within the first three postoperative days. Although the postoperative AF group was significantly older and had a prolonged postoperative Intensive care unit (ICU) stay, there was no difference in the aortic crossclamp time or duration of hospitalization. No spontaneous defibrillation at declamping, and longer duration of cardiopulmonary bypass were significantly related to the development of postoperative AF. However, postoperative treatment with a beta blocker was associated with a decreased incidence of postoperative AF. The multivariate analysis showed that age and ICU stay were significantly associated with the development of POAF. Spontaneous defibrillation and postoperative beta blocker treatment were significantly associated with a decreased frequency of POAF. Conclusion: AF after CABG surgery is a common complication associated with increased morbidity and a longer ICU stay. Therefore, various strategies aimed at reducing AF, and its complications, such as postoperative treatment with a beta blocker should be considered. 배경: 심방세동은 관상동맥우회로술후 흔히 발생하는 합병증으로, 대부분 일시적이고 양호한 경과를 보이나, 혈전색전증의 위험성을 증가시키며, 유병률의 증가와 재원기간의 증가로 인하여 의료비용의 증가를 초래할 수 있다. 대상 및 방법: 1994년 1월 1일부터 2007년 12월 31일까지 단독관상동맥우회술을 시행한 190명의 환자 중 수술 후 심방세동이 발생한 군(1군: n=139)과 발생하지 않은 군(2군: n=51)을 나누어 수술 후 심방세동 발생율, 환자의 특성, 수술관련 인자 및 수술 후 심방세동 발생으로 인한 결과를 의무기록을 토대로 후향적으로 분석하였다. 결과: 수술 후 심방세동의 발생율은 26.8%였으며, 퇴원전까지 정상동방결절리듬으로 회복된 경우는 82.4%였고, 심방세동 발생 환자의 82.4%는 수술 후 3일 이내에 발생하였다. 술후 심방세동군에서는 나이가 유의하게 많았으며, 대동맥겸자 차단시간의 차이는 없었으나, 대동맥 겸차차단 해제시 자발적으로 정상 심전도를 회복하지 못한 경우가 많았으며, 체외순환시간이 더 긴 것으로 나타났다. 수술후 베타차단제의 사용이 심방세동의 발생을 감소시키는 것으로 나타났으며, 재원기간의 차이는 없었으나, 중환자실 체류기간은 심방세동군에서 유의하게 길었다. 다변량 분석에서는 연령, 대동맥겸차 해제후 자발적 심박동 회복여부, 중환자실 재원기간 및 술후 베타 차단제의 사용이 유의한 인자로 분석되었다. 결론: 관상동맥우회로술후 심방세동은 매우 흔한 합병증으로 유병률이 증가되며, 중환자실 재원기간의 증가를 초래한다. 따라서, 술후 심방세동의 발생을 예방하기 위한 조치들이 필요할 것으로 생각되며, 특별한 금기사항이 없다면, 술후 베타 차단제를 적극적으로 사용하는 것이 좋을 것으로 생각된다.

부당사무관리 및 부진정(準)사무관리와 부당이득과의 관계 -부당이득 성립요건 및 반환범위에 관한 재고찰과 함께-

서종희 한국민사법학회 2013 民事法學 Vol.63 No.1

Demjenigen, der gemäß §§ 734 ff. KBGB “ein Geschäft für einenanderen besorgt, ohne von ihm beauftragt oder ihm gegenübersonst dazuberechtigt zu sein”, der darüber hinausgehende Gewinn aus derGeschäftsbesorgung steht wegen deren fremdnütziger Zwecksetzung alswirtschaftlich Vertretung allein dem Geschäftsherrn zu(§§ 738, 684KBGB). Liegen die Voraussetzungen des § 734 KBGB nicht vor(berechtigte Geschäftsführung), kann der berechtigte Geschäftsführers vomGeschäftsherrn nach § 741 KBGB herausverlangen, was dieser durch dieGeschäftsführung erlangt hat, und zwar nach den Vorschschriften über dieHerausgabe einer ungerechtfertigte Bereicherung(condictio ob rem). Behandelt jemand ein fremdes Geschäf als sein eignes, obwohl er weiß, daßer nicht dazu berechtigtist(unechte Geschäftsführung: Geschäftsanmassung), sokann der Geschäftsherr die sich nicht als Geschäftsführung, sondern alsUngerechtfertigte Bereicherung Ansprüche. estützt wird der UngerechtfertigteBereicherung Zweck durch die klar geäußerte Absicht der Gesetzesverfasser, diejedenfalls von einer vollständigen Bereicherungsabschöpfung ausgingen. Eineunechte Geschäftsführung (Geschäftsanmassung) ist nämlich regelmäßigeFolge der condictio ob rem. Aus dem bisher Dargelegten ergibt sich auch,dass die Auffassung, nach der Anspruch des Geschäftsherrn nicht auf vollständigen Bereicherungsabschöpfung, sondern nur auf einen dieBereicherung des Geschäftsherren begrenzten Schadens geht, nicht zuhalten ist.

Identification of Genomic Aberrations by Array Comparative Genomic Hybridization in Patients with Aortic Dissections

서종희,윤정섭,권종범,김환욱,왕영필 대한흉부외과학회 2011 Journal of Chest Surgery (J Chest Surg) Vol.44 No.2

Background: The aim of the present study was to identify chromosomal loci that contribute to the pathogenesis of aortic dissection (AD) in a Korean population using array comparative genomic hybridization (CGH) and to confirm the results using real-time polymerase chain reaction (PCR). Materials and Methods: Eighteen patients with ADs were enrolled in this study. Genomic DNA was extracted from individual blood samples, and array CGH analyses were performed. Four corresponding genes with obvious genomic changes were analyzed using real-time PCR in order to assess the level of genomic imbalance identified by array CGH. Results: Genomic gains were most frequently detected at 8q24.3 (56%), followed by regions 7q35, 11q12.2, and 15q25.2 (50%). Genomic losses were most frequently observed at 4q35.2 (56%). Real-time PCR confirmed the results of the array CGH studies of the COL6A2, DGCR14, PCSK6, and SDHA genes. Conclusion: This is the first study to identify candidate regions by array CGH in patients with ADs. The identification of genes that may predispose an individual to AD may lead to a better understanding of the mechanism of AD formation. Further multicenter studies comparing cohorts of patients of different ethnicities are warranted.

유치권자와 경매절차에서의 유치목적물 매수인의 법적 관계

서종희 건국대학교 법학연구소 2019 일감부동산법학 Vol.- No.18

There are currently some criticisms about harmful side effects of retention right, arguing that it delays auction process of real property and hinders righteous debt collection by creditors. In academia and administrative circles, quite a few interpretations and legislative suggestions have been offered in order to minimize these harmful side effects of retention right. The Supreme Court also takes the position that, if a debtor transfers possession of a real property to a third party and lets the third party acquire the right to retain it after attachment of the real property has already come into effect, such transfer of possession should be regarded as an act of disposition which runs counter to the effect of attachment which prohibits disposition and therefore the holder of the retention right cannot claim its preference over the buyer in a real-property auction process. Also, The Supreme Court judged that the possessory lien in auction of security rights execution does not become extinct because the principle of takeover is legal auction condition in accordance with the provision of Article 91 section 5 of Civil Execution Act which takes the principle of takeover. Meanwhile The Supreme Court judged that buyer in the auction procedure following the attachment only pays material liability to the lien holder. If the buyer takes over the debt, it will have more favorable effect than granting preferential payment right to lien holer. Therefore, the buyer should not be regarded as taking over the debt. As a general rule, a set-off is the rule which helps the settlement of both parties with conflict of interests. So it is impermissible to allow the 3rd party set-off rights if it infringes the legal relations of related parties. The 3rd party set-off right is allowed only when it solves legal relations of all parties in a easy way and there is no infringement of other parties. For the same reason, the Supreme Court don’t allow the rights of set-off to 3rd party who does not have the Claim in same species with conflict of interest. Thus, because the recognition of the set - off can infringe the rights of creditors of the lien, buyer in the auction cannot claim set – off from the lien holer. 경매절차에서의 유치목적물의 매수인은 민사집행법 제91조 제5항에 의하여 유치권을 인수하여 유치권자에게 “변제할 책임”을 지게 된다. 이는 매수인 뿐만 아니라 유치목적물에 대하여 저당권 등을 가지고있는 자에게도 불이익한 결과를 가져온다. 이러한 문제점을 고려하여판례는 압류의 효력이 발생한 이후에 유치권을 취득한 자는 매수인에게 대항할 수 없도록 하여 양자 사이의 이해관계를 조정하고 있다. 더 나아가 판례는 매수인이 인적책임을 부담하는 것으로 보는 경우에발생하는 불합리한 결과를 막기 위하여 매수인은 유치권자에게 물적책임을 부담할 뿐이라고 본다. 이에 매수인은 유치권자에게 채무자가 아닌 (이해관계 있는) 제3자의 지위에 놓이게 되었다. 한편 제3자인 매수인이 유치권자에게 가지는 채권을 자동채권으로 하여 유치권자의 피담보채권을 상계할 수 있을 것인지에 대해 판례는 채권간의 상호대립성이라는 상계의 요건을 엄격히 해석하여 매수인에 의한 상계를 부정한다. 본고는 이러한 판례의 입장에 찬동하는 입장이며 그 근거를 간단하게 정리하면 다음과 같다. 먼저 매수인의 법적책임을 인적책임으로 이해하면 매수인이 유치권자에게 채무를 부담하므로 유치권자는 집행권원을 얻어 유치목적물 이외의 매수인의 다른 재산에 대해서도 강제집행을 할 수 있게 되는데, 이는 유치권자에게 우선변제권을 인정한 것보다 유치권자에게 유리하게 된다는 점에서 입법취지에 부합하지 않다. 다음으로 제3자인 매수인의 상계를 인정하게 되면, 아무런 법적근거없이 유치권자(채권자)의 이익(기대) 및 유치권자의 채권자들의 이익을 침해할 수 있다는 점에서 타당하지 않다.

심장수술 대상자에서 선별 검사로서 두경부 MRA

서종희,최시영,김용환 대한흉부외과학회 2008 Journal of Chest Surgery (J Chest Surg) Vol.41 No.6

Background: The advances in surgical techniques, anesthesia management, perfusion methodology and postoperative intensive care have markedly decreased the mortality and cardiac morbidity of patients who undergo heart surgery over the past 2 decades. Nevertheless, it is well recognized that cardiac surgery carries a substantial risk for central nervous system complications. This study was conducted to evaluate the prevalence of subclinical cerebrovascular lesions in the head and neck by performing magnetic resonance angiography (MRA), and we investigated the clinical course of patients who had abnormal lesion seen on head and neck MRA. Material and Method: The subjects were 107 patients (71 men and 36 women ranging in age from 21 to 83 years) who were scheduled for cardiac surgery under nonemergency conditions between October 2005 and June 2008. Informed consent was obtained before the MRA. The carotid arteries, intracranial arteries and brain parenchyme were examined for subclinical cerebrovascular lesions by performing MRA. We reviewed the patients’ medical records and MR findings to evaluate the prevalence of neurologically high risk patients and their clinical course. Result: The overall prevalence of neurologically high risk patients was 15.7% (17 patients). Among these patients, 11 patients had ischemic heart disease and 6 patients had valvular heart disease. Only 2 patients had a history of cerebrovascular disease. The clinical courses of 14 patients (13.1%) were changed according to their MRI findings. Conclusion: The prevalence of subclinical cerebrovascular disease in patients who were scheduled for cardiac surgery was higher than was expected. MR angiography was of value to identify these patients.