RISS 학술연구정보서비스

검색
다국어 입력

http://chineseinput.net/에서 pinyin(병음)방식으로 중국어를 변환할 수 있습니다.

변환된 중국어를 복사하여 사용하시면 됩니다.

예시)
  • 中文 을 입력하시려면 zhongwen을 입력하시고 space를누르시면됩니다.
  • 北京 을 입력하시려면 beijing을 입력하시고 space를 누르시면 됩니다.
닫기
    인기검색어 순위 펼치기

    RISS 인기검색어

      검색결과 좁혀 보기

      선택해제

      오늘 본 자료

      • 오늘 본 자료가 없습니다.
      더보기
      • 무료
      • 기관 내 무료
      • 유료
      • KCI등재

        중국에서의 백제연구

        馮立君 충남대학교 백제연구소 2020 百濟硏究 Vol.71 No.-

        The history of Baekje in Han-Tang Period reflects East Asia. During this period, communities of civilization with Baekje as their national title existed in the neighboring world, which indicates the historical significance of Baekje as a regional hub rather than a marginal region in Han-Tang Period. Baekje’s historical writing includes the historical records of the other,referring to the systems of China, Japan and Silla-Koryo, and the historical relics of Baekje people, including archaeological materials and inscriptions on stones, bearing certain meanings of self-preservation. A comprehensive interpretation of these historical materials scattered throughout East Asia today now is identified as the fundamental way to deepen the study on Baekje. If taken the end of WWII as a watershed, the academic history of Baekje studies can be divided into two parts: the time before 1945 in which Japanese scholars studies prevailed in terms of investigating and excavating; and the time after the war when systematic Archaeology and detailed research by Peninsula scholars gradually took the main position. In recent years, Chinese scholars carefully interpreted the Chinese cemeteries and searched for new historical materials through the intersection of the history of Han-Tang Period and the history of East Asia, thus, established a new pattern of Chinese style in regional history research. At present, Chinese scholars have carried out preliminary historical data sorting and chronological work, and held the first nationwide symposium on the history of Baekje, which are new starting points for the study of Baekje in Chinese academic circles. Chinese Baekje researchers, though not self-conscious, are self-existent research groups, but their research on Baekje history is of great significance. We hope that through our efforts, we can make great progress in our peer-to-peer exchanges with Japan and South Korea, and truly achieve common academic progress and mutual learning of civilizations. 한당시대 백제의 역사에서 동아시아를 발견할 수 있다. 백제를 국호로 삼은 인간 공동체와 그 문명은 이웃 세계와의 다원적이고 밀접한 관계 속에서 활약했으며, 이는 백제가 주변부가 아닌 한당동아시아의 중추로서의 역사를 내포하고 있음을 보여준다. 백제의 역사는 첫째, 중국과 일본, 신라-고구려계통이 기록한 ‘타자’의 역사적 기록, 다른 하나는 고고자료와 금석문 등을 포함하는 ‘自我作古’의 의미를 갖는 백제인들의 역사유적이다. 이러한 자료들은 동아시아 각지 산포되어 있으며 오늘날 전면적으로 해독되고 있어 백제와 동아시아 연구를 심화시키는 본질적인 방법이 되고 있다. 제2차 세계대전의 종전을 기점으로 하면 한당시대 백제연구의 학술연구사는 두 부분으로 나눌 수있다. 1945년 이전 중국학자들의 연구는 초기단계였고, 일본학자들의 발굴조사와 연구가 주가 되었으며, 제2차 세계대전 이후 남ᆞ북한학자들의 체계적인 고고학과 세밀한 연구가 점점 주가 되었다. 근래에 와서 중국학자들은 한당사와 동아시아사를 교차하여 사료를 세밀히 살피고 새롭게 확인되는 사료를연구하고 있으며, 중국 스타일의 지역사 연구의 새로운 구도를 초보적으로 확립했다. 중국학자들은 현재 이미 초보적인 백제사료의 정리와 편년작업을 진행했으며, 『第一次 全國範圍的百 濟史專題研討會』가 개최되었다. 이러한 활동들은 중국학계에서의 백제연구의 새로운 기점이 되고 있다. 중국의 백제연구자들은 비록 자의적으로 모인 연구집단은 아니지만, 그들이 이룬 백제사연구의 의미는 특별하다. 우리들은 노력을 통해 한국·일본과 함께 연구하여 빠르게 나아갈 수 있으며, 진정으로 학술적인 공동의 진보, 문명의 교류로 서로에게 귀감이 될 수 있을 것으로 기대한다.

      • KCI등재
      • KCI등재

        사학부(史學部) : 당조롱우감목설치고(唐朝?右監牧設置考) - 以≪천성령(天聖令),의질령(醫疾令)≫ 唐15條「기롱우감목(其?右監牧)」구위중심(句爲中心)

        풍립군 ( Li Jun Feng ) 한국중국학회 2016 中國學報 Vol.75 No.-

        The Longyou Meadowlands (Longyou Jianmu 롱右監牧) was the Horse Policy``s management agency of Tang Empire. On this issue, there are a lot of research papers before the discovery of the Tiansheng Statutes in 1998. This paper has carried on the research on the problem of Longyou Meadowlands involved in the Tang Medical Statutes of Tiansheng Statutes. The Longyou Jianmu in Tang Medical Statutes ofTiansheng Statutes refers to the Longyou Meadowlands, Which contains the West Officer (西使), the South Officer (南使), and other Officers, such as the North Officer. The West Officer and the South Officer not only have more Jian (監) and Troops farmlands (屯田) than the other Officers, but also more physicians.The Longyou Meadowlands General Officer (Longyou zhu Mujian shi 롱右諸牧監使) has many Meadowlands Officers (監牧使) under its command. Both of the West Officer and the South Officer are the Meadowlands Officers belong to Longyou Meadowlands. The grade status of the Longyou zhu Mujianshi (Longyou Meadowlands General Officer) is higher than the West Officer and the South Officer. From the three angles of history, language, logic, the West and South Officers are not likely to be as same to Longyou Jianmu (Longyou Meadowlands Officer). The punctuation marks of the sentence in Tang Medical Statutes should be 「其롱右監牧,西使、南使各給二人,餘使各一人。」. Both of the similar sentence``s punctuation marks in Tang Liudian (唐六典) and Jiu Tang Shu (舊唐書) are wrong.

      • KCI등재

        試論高句麗與慕容鮮卑對遼東地區的爭奪

        李宗勳(Lee, Jong-Hoon),馮立君 백산학회 2009 白山學報 Vol.- No.83

        This paper discusses these questions: the historical background and the process of the Competition between Koguryo and Murong Xianbei from the last of the 3th century to the beginning of the 5th century, the evolution of the balance of the two powers in the process, the cognition of Koguryo occupying Liaodong region. First, introduce the changes in the situation in East Asia and the rise of Murong Xianbei and Koguryo. From the last of the 3th century to the beginning of the 5th century, Western Jin Dynasty empire forces gradually withdrew from most regions north of the Changjiang River, so all ethnic groups in northern China competed in the long-term chaos rule the roost, but the south of China unified by Eastern Jin Dynasty empire. Murong Xianbei and Koguryo bounded roughly by the Liao River,Side-by-side on the north of East Asian mainland. Murong Xianbei had ruled the Liao River area and the middle and lower reaches of Yellow River regions. In the 4th century, Koguryo who occupied Hunjiang River and Yalu Riverregions started to expand to the Datong River region. For Murong Xianbei and Koguryo, Liaodong region in economic development, military and strategic aspects had great significance. Second, according to the Chinese and Korean ancient literature, I sort out a historical process of the Competition between Murong Xianbei and Koguryo, Put focus on Liaodong issue between Murong Xianbei and Koguryo's balance of power changes in a three-stage process. Stage 1 was two ethnic groups in the overall balance of power. Stage 2, Murong Xianbei increased significantly in strength, weakened the strength of Koguryo, Koguryo was forced to concede defeat. Stage 3, after recovery period Koguryo took advantage of potential failure of Murong Xianbei, eventually won the Liaodong region and made western boundaries of the expansion reached its peak. Third, contrary to generally positive assessment of Koguryo occupying Liaodong region, I agree that occupying Liaodong was a very favorable conditions of Koguryo, but at this premise, I emphasized that occupying Liaodong was not conducive to the Koguryo national defense. There are two reasons for that, one is that the China Empire attacked Koguryo in the 6th and 7th century, the other is that Koguryo occupied Liaodong region and Set up a lot of military fortress in Liaodong contained its Southward advance policy. The both reasons were proposed based on real military and diplomatic evidences.

      연관 검색어 추천

      이 검색어로 많이 본 자료

      활용도 높은 자료

      해외이동버튼