출력에 민감한 경제성에 관한 연구

최숙희,김성헌 한국현대언어학회 2001 언어연구 Vol.17 No.2

최숙희·김성헌. 2001. 출력에 민감한 경제성에 관한 연구, 언어연구 17-2, 227-244. 최근 Chomsky(1998)에 의해서 통사이론의 이동에 의한 도출적 접근방식을 지지해 줄 수 있는 강력한 증거가 제기되고 있다. 최소주의 체계 하에서 이동 현상의 근본적 원동력이 확대투사원리(Extended Projection Principle: EPP)라고 보며, 나아가 일반화 EPP로 모든 언어의 이동 현상을 포착하게 된다. 본 연구에서는 이러한 EPP를 외견상 비완벽성의 견지에서 고찰하면서 T의 EPP 자질은 의무적인 반면 C나 υ의 EPP 자질은 수의적이라는 일반화를 살펴본다. EPP 자질이 아무런 정보구조 효과 없이도 만족된다는 사실을 정당화하기 위해 핵, 의미적 내용이 없는 경우, 불완전 Ψ-자질, 의미효과가 없는 연속 순환적 인상의 경우들을 만족시키는 EPP를 다룬다. 또한 Fox(1998)의 의미해석에 민감한 경제성에 의해서 C나 υ가 정보구조에서 변화를 야기시킬 때에만 수의적으로 EPP 자질을 지니는 문제를 해결한다. 출력 경제성은 수의적 운용들이 출력에 영향을 끼쳐야 한다는 조건이므로 LF에서 민감한 작용역 경제성이 언어능력 전 과정을 통해 확대되는 출력에 민감한 경제성을 제안하면서 모든 운용은 접합점에서 출력 효과를 나타낼 때에만 민감하게 발생한다고 주장한다. 결과적으로 EPP 선택 자질들에 대한 수의성은 의미해석 과정에서 출력 경제성인 정보구조 효과를 예견할 수 있을 때에만 작용된다는 일반화를 포착한다. (한국과학기술원/단국대학교)

P-값을 이해하기 위한 멀티미디어 프로그램의 개발

최숙희 한국통계학회 1997 Communications for statistical applications and me Vol.4 No.3

통계학의 개념들을 직관적으로 이해시키기 위해 기존의 교재중심 강의교육에서 탈피하여 실제적인 실험을 중시하고 컴퓨터를 교육에 활용하는 방안에 국내외적으로 많은 관심이 쏠리고 있다. 본 연구에서는 통계학의 기초개념들을 쉽게 배울 수 있는 통계교육용 멀티미디어 프로그램개발의 한 단계로서 유의성검증시 필요한 p-값(유의확률)의 의미를 정확히 이해하고 적용할 수 있도록 하는 프로그램을 개발하였다. 다양한 상황을 소리, 컴퓨터그래픽, 애니메이션, 텍스트와 동영상을 통합한 멀티미디어 환경하에서 구현하여 피교육자가 흥미를 가지고 학습함으로써 단순한 계산결과가 아니라 원리와 과정을 알 수 있도록 구성하였다. 이 프로그램은 한글 windows 95가 설치된 개인용컴퓨터에서 사용할 수 있으며 internet을 통하여 web browser에서 직접 실행할 수 있다.

교양 통계학 교재: 위기인가? 기회인가?

최숙희,한경수 한국통계학회 2022 응용통계연구 Vol.35 No.1

Recently, the number of students taking basic statistics in liberal arts courses at universities nationwide has been increasing significantly. Students who learn statistics only for one semester are more likely to live as consumers than producers of statistical analysis in the future. What consumers need is statistical literacy and thinking skills rather than statistical methods. This paper deals with what points should be considered in order to develop textbooks that improve statistical thinking. 최근 전국 대학에서 교양 통계학을 배우는 학생이 크게 늘고 있다. 2022년 대학수능에서 수학영역의 선택과목으로 확률과 통계를 선택한 학생은 53.2\%를 차지했다. 통계를 한 학기만 배우고 졸업하는 통계 비전공 학생들은 미래에 데이터를 통계적으로 분석하는 생산자보다 소비자로 살아갈 가능성이 높다. 통계 소비자가 배워야 할 것은 요리법처럼 각종의 통계 분석 기법이 아닌 통계적 문해력과 사고력이다. 이 논문은 통계적 사고력을 함양하는 교양 통계학 교재를 개발하기 위해 고려해야 할 사항들을 논의한다.

On Coreference

최숙희 한국현대영어영문학회 1987 현대영어영문학 Vol.29 No.1

Coreferential relations between antecedent and anaphor have been a source of controversy in linguistic research. Many linguists have centered their interests on the coreferential theory and the coreferential conditions in English pronominalization transformation, and they have tried to establish more general and simpler theory for coreference. This study examines pronominalization transformation in part Ⅱ and deals with noncoreference rule which solves some problems of pronominalization transformation in part Ⅲ. In part Ⅳ, the coreferential theory is discussed with the binding theory suggested by Chomsky, in order to pursue more a general explanatory adequacy. In part Ⅱ, the coreferential theory in pronominalization transformation is examined. Consider the following examples: (1) a. Schwartz claims that he is sick. b. He claims that Schwartz is sick. (1 a) shows ambiguity because the relation between Schwartz and he is interpreted either coreferentially or noncoreferentially by pronominalization transformation. However, the relation between Schwartz and he in (1 b) is disjoint in reference. Because identical conditions must be represented as coreference, Chomsky suggested indexing rule which assigns every NP in a sentence an index. However, the pronominalization transformation can't restrain its overgeneration. In part Ⅲ, noncoreference rule is dealt with. This section shows that there is no need to consider coreferential theory as a rule, for pronominalization is restricted by recoverability condition and is not derived in order to delete some NP. Therefore, noncoreference rule is illustrated in the following examples: (2) a. ?His mother loves John. b. *He loves John's mothor. In (2 a), the relation between His and John is coreferential because His precedes and does not kommand John. However, in (2 b), the relation between he and John's is noncoreferential because He precedes and kommands John's. Although the noncoreference rule solves some problems of pronominalization, it can't be accepted as a general theory. In part Ⅳ, the binding theory is discussed. To propose the indexing condition, Chomsky suggested the binding theory; an anaphor must be bound in its governing category and a pronominal NP must be free in its governing category if it has one. (3) a. *Wei thought [s COMP [s* each otheri gave the books to Bill]]. b. Maryi thought [s COMP [s* shei gave the books to Bill]]. Because the anaphor each other must be bound in its governing category S*, (3a) is ungrammatical. In (3b), pronoun she must be free in its governing category S*, she can be coindexed with Mary. Consider the followiog examples whose governing categories are NPs: (4) a. *We heard [NP* their stories about each other]. b. John saw [NP* my picture of him]. In (4a), the governing category which anaphor must be bound is NP*. If there is a subject in the governing category NP* like (4a), the result of binding theory in (4a) is acceptable because the anaphor can't be bound in its governing category. On the other hand, a pronominal must be free in its governing category; the sentence (4b) is grammatical if him is coindexed with John. Because binding theory in GB framework has some problems in explaining the arguments which appear in NPs, it is revised with the concept of SUBJECT. The governing category for a is the minimal category containing a SUBJECT accessible to a. In the revised binding theory, an anaphor is bound in a local domain and a pronominal is free in a local domain. Therefore, (4 a) is ungrammatical because an anaphor can't be bound in a local domain, and (4 b) is grammatical because a pronoun is free in a local domain. Although the binding theory explains complementary distribution between an anaphor and a pronominal in most cases, it can't explain the following examples: (5) a. They read [each other's books]. b. John read [his book]. To explain this, the minimal governing category in (5 a) is considered as S, whereas the minimal governing category in (5 b) is considered as NP. These explanations are so complicated that the binding theory is revised again. Therefore, Indexing is BT-compatible with (α, β) if a is an anaphor and is bound in β under Ⅰ, and α is a pronominal and is free in β under I. The revised binding theory solves many problems of transformations and explains the grammaticality of many sentences with BT-compatibility under indexing. However, it seems that the revised binding theory recedes from the binding theory which shows complementary distribution between an anaphor and a pronominal. Therefore, the binding theory can't be a perfect solution to the coreferential theory, and it leaves us many interesting research questions into the relationship between coreference and noncoreference.

인터넷쇼핑몰의 쿠폰판촉이 소비자의 구매행동에 미치는 영향

최숙희,김홍,Choi, Sook-Hee,Kim, Hong 한국벤처창업학회 2006 벤처창업연구 Vol.1 No.2

This study is conducted to examine how purchase behaviors of consumers have affected by the promotion of coupons in internet shopping mall. This study was conducted with the purpose of identifying the differences In purchase behavior based on consumer's perception and experience of internet shopping mall coupons, and based on consumers' perception of cost and value of coupons, using a theoretic framework presented in previously conducted studies. The results of this study can be summarized as follows. First, based on the perception of coupons, there were significant differences in intent to use and intent to re-use at the time when coupons are offered, and at the time when coupons are offered, no significant differences were found between the level of interest and the importance of coupon at the time of visiting the shopping mall; however, significant differences were found in the overall purchase behavior based on perception of coupons. Second, when overall differences In purchase behavior based on experience in coupon use was observed, having experience in using coupons showed a higher average than did having no experience in using coupons, showing a significant difference. It was found that compared to those without experience in using coupons, those with experience with coupons had higher intent to use at the time when coupon is offered, intent to re-use at the time when coupon is offered, and higher level of purchase behavior In the importance of coupons at the time of visiting the shopping mall. Third, when relationship between purchase behaviors, cost of coupon, and perception of convenience was observed, a clear static relationship was found. This suggests that as the cost and perception of convenience of coupon increases, purchase behavior also increases. Such result suggests that there is a difference in purchase behavior based on experience in coupon use. When relationship of purchase behavior by variables of cost of coupon and perception of convenience is observed, it has a positive relationship with the perception that the use of coupon includes saving money, financial help, enjoyment of use, habitual use, has a short effective date, and has a negative relationship with the perception that it saves little money and is a waste of time. Therefore, it can be seen that purchase behavior has the highest relationship with enjoyment of coupon use and habitual coupon use. Such results suggest that purchase behavior will be significantly influenced based on cost of coupon and perception of convenience.

T.S. Eliot의 批評 小考

崔淑姬 효성여자대학교 영문학회 1973 Muse Vol.3 No.-

T.S ELIOT의 THE CONFIDENTIAL CLERK 硏究

崔淑姬 효성여자대학교 영문학회 1974 Muse Vol.4 No.-

On Reflexive Pronoun

최숙희 한국외국어대학교 외국어 종합연구센터 언어연구소 1985 언어와 언어학 Vol.11 No.-

An important task for interpretive semantic theory is to determine whether a given NP can be interpreted as being coreferential to another. There are three types of NP; anaphors, pronominals and lexical NPs. This study reviews how the reflexive pronoun, one kind of anaphors, appears properly in a sentence. In part, Ⅱ, reflexive pronoun is dealt with concerning the derivation of reflexive pronoun and its coreferential relation. In part III and IV, conditions related to the construal and the Binding Theory, respectively are discussed. The competing theories proposed so far do not seem to be adequate for the coreferential relations of the reflexive pronoun in a sentence. The more general interpretive approach in the surface structure has to be taken for sentences such as I. kept it near me so that the pronoun me refers to the antecedent I. Also, in the picture reflexive pronoun shown in (1), we find that the Binding Theory does not explain its coreferntial relations. (1) a. John collects pictures of himself b. Photos of himself never flatter Fred. It is suggested that himself is well bound by the antecedent John, when the governing category of himself in (la) is not NP, but S containing SUBJECT assuming AGR as SUBJECT. When the governing category of himself in (1b) is not NP but S containing SUBJECT, himself is bound by antecedent Fred and Fred can serve as A-binder. Although the binding relation of the reflexive pronoun in English can be explained in many cases by the Binding Theory, the problem still remains as to how we adjust the proper governing category, containing reflexive pronouns. This problem, I believe, will make the research on the coreferential relationship of anaphors more stimulating.

『등대로』에 나타난 時間硏究

최숙희 長安大學 1993 長安論叢 Vol.13 No.1

생성문법에서 도출적 접근과 표시적 접근

최숙희 한국영어어문교육학회 2004 영어어문교육 Vol.10 No.1

The purpose of this study is to investigate the adequacy of derivational approach and representational approach to syntactic theories in generative grammar. As the generative grammar is based on the derivational process of syntactic theories, it is suggested that derivational approach is more valid than representational approach. Move, Economy Principle, Local Economy and Label-free Phrase Structure in Minimalist framework support the preference of derivational approach to representational approach with the elimination of computational complexity, minimalist, and label-free phrase structure. Syntactic structure is considered as the result of the interaction of the properties of lexical items containing probe and economy conditions constrained by bare output conditions. On the other hand, Pseudogapping in Lasnik(1999) is analyzed in terms of Object Shift, that is, overt raising to Spec of Agr, and the PF deletion of VP in representational approach. Hence, it is suggested that the combination of derivational and representational approaches to syntactic theories can be admitted in generative grammar.