RISS 학술연구정보서비스

검색

인기 검색어

    다국어 입력

    http://chineseinput.net/에서 pinyin(병음)방식으로 중국어를 변환할 수 있습니다.

    변환된 중국어를 복사하여 사용하시면 됩니다.

    예시)
    • 中文 을 입력하시려면 zhongwen을 입력하시고 space를누르시면됩니다.
    • 北京 을 입력하시려면 beijing을 입력하시고 space를 누르시면 됩니다.
    닫기

    GCB/NH2 이중층고체상추출을 이용한 농약잔류 다성분동시분석법의 정제 효율 평가

    한글로보기

    https://www.riss.kr/link?id=T11609163

    • 저자
    • 발행사항

      대전 : 忠南大學校 大學院, 2009

    • 학위논문사항
    • 발행연도

      2009

    • 작성언어

      한국어

    • DDC

      631.8 판사항(22)

    • 발행국(도시)

      대전

    • 기타서명

      Evaluation of clean-up efficiency using GCB/NH2 dual-layer solid-phase extraction in multiresidue pesticide analysis

    • 형태사항

      v, 55p : 도표 ; 26cm.

    • 일반주기명

      충남대학교 논문은 저작권에 의해 보호받습니다.
      지도교수:李奎承
      참고문헌: p.48-51

    • 소장기관
      • 충남대학교 도서관 소장기관정보
    • 0

      상세조회
    • 0

      다운로드
    서지정보 열기
    • 내보내기
    • 내책장담기
    • 공유하기
    • 오류접수

    부가정보

    다국어 초록 (Multilingual Abstract) kakao i 다국어 번역

    The efficiency of dual-layer solid-phase extraction(graphitized carbon/NH2 SPE), sorbents characterized by different mechanisms of sorption, was evaluated in view of sample clean-up procedure of multiresidue method(MRM).
    Individually graphitized carbon block(GCB) and aminopropyl(NH2) SPE were evaluated with several clean-up solvent systems. Suitable elution solvents were selected toluene for GCB SPE and acetone, ethylacetate for NH2 SPE. Then selected solvents were mixed to various ratio and tested as a GCB/NH2 dual-layer SPE eluent.
    Suitable elution solvents for 40 pesticides with a wide range of polarity were studied 65% ethyl acetate/toluene, 70% acetone/toluene. Two solvents were compared in clean-up for lettuce. As a result, 65% ethyl acetate/toluene was showed more efficiency to remove sample matrix and selected most appropriate elution solvent for clean-up of GCB/NH2 dual-layer SPE.
    The solvent of 65% ethyl acetate/toluene was showed over 90% of recovery in almost pesticides, but some polar pesticides such as clothianidin, thiamethoxam, and carbendazim were eluted insufficiently.
    And cymoxanil, pyroquilon, thiacloprid and boscalid were affected by matrix co-extractives in low level test. Nevertheless, these pesticides also showed 90~110% recovery reducing the affection of co-extractives of sample matrix by HPLC/MS analysis.
    번역하기

    The efficiency of dual-layer solid-phase extraction(graphitized carbon/NH2 SPE), sorbents characterized by different mechanisms of sorption, was evaluated in view of sample clean-up procedure of multiresidue method(MRM). Individually graphitized car...

    The efficiency of dual-layer solid-phase extraction(graphitized carbon/NH2 SPE), sorbents characterized by different mechanisms of sorption, was evaluated in view of sample clean-up procedure of multiresidue method(MRM).
    Individually graphitized carbon block(GCB) and aminopropyl(NH2) SPE were evaluated with several clean-up solvent systems. Suitable elution solvents were selected toluene for GCB SPE and acetone, ethylacetate for NH2 SPE. Then selected solvents were mixed to various ratio and tested as a GCB/NH2 dual-layer SPE eluent.
    Suitable elution solvents for 40 pesticides with a wide range of polarity were studied 65% ethyl acetate/toluene, 70% acetone/toluene. Two solvents were compared in clean-up for lettuce. As a result, 65% ethyl acetate/toluene was showed more efficiency to remove sample matrix and selected most appropriate elution solvent for clean-up of GCB/NH2 dual-layer SPE.
    The solvent of 65% ethyl acetate/toluene was showed over 90% of recovery in almost pesticides, but some polar pesticides such as clothianidin, thiamethoxam, and carbendazim were eluted insufficiently.
    And cymoxanil, pyroquilon, thiacloprid and boscalid were affected by matrix co-extractives in low level test. Nevertheless, these pesticides also showed 90~110% recovery reducing the affection of co-extractives of sample matrix by HPLC/MS analysis.

    더보기

    목차 (Table of Contents)

    • Ⅰ. 서론 1
    • Ⅱ. 재료 및 방법 7
    • 1. 실험재료 7
    • 1.1 대상 시료 및 조제 7
    • 1.2 시약 7
    • Ⅰ. 서론 1
    • Ⅱ. 재료 및 방법 7
    • 1. 실험재료 7
    • 1.1 대상 시료 및 조제 7
    • 1.2 시약 7
    • 1.2.1 실험 대상 농약 성분 7
    • 1.2.2 시약 13
    • 1.3 고체상추출 및 기기분석 13
    • 1.3.1 고체상추출(SPE) 13
    • 1.3.2 분석장비 13
    • 1.3.2.1 HPLC/UVD 분석조건 13
    • 1.3.2.2 HPLC/FLD 분석조건 14
    • 1.3.2.3 HPLC/MSD 분석조건 15
    • 2. 실험방법 17
    • 2.1 전처리분석법 정립 17
    • 2.1.1 시료 전처리 방법 17
    • 2.1.2 이중층고체상추출 정제방법 17
    • 2.1.2.1 GCB, NH₂ SPE 단일 용출용매 17
    • 2.1.2.2 GCB/NH₂ 이중층고체상 혼합용출용매 18
    • 2.1.2.3. GCB/NH₂ 이중층고체상 혼합용출용매의 정제효율 비교 18
    • 2.1.3 다양한 시료 별 GCB/NH₂ 이중층고체상 정제효율 18
    • 2.1.4 GCB/NH₂ 이중층고체상의 정제 회수율 19
    • 2.2 HPLC/MS를 이용한 matrix effect 제거 19
    • 2.2.1 개별 농약 성분의 이온 선정 19
    • 2.2.2 선택이온(SIM) 분석법을 이용한 시료 불순물 제거 20
    • Ⅲ. 결과 및 고찰 21
    • 1. 전처리 분석법 정립 21
    • 1.1 GCB/NH₂ 이중층고체상 용출용매 선발 21
    • 1.1.1 GCB, NH₂ SPE 단일 용출용매 선발 21
    • 1.1.2 GCB/NH₂ 이중층고체상 혼합 용출용매 선발 26
    • 1.1.3 GCB/NH₂ 이중층고체상 혼합 용출용매의 정제효율 비교 31
    • 1.2 시료에 따른 GCB/NH₂ 이중층고체상 정제효율 34
    • 1.3 GCB/NH₂ 이중층고체상의 정제 회수율 37
    • 2. HPLC/MS를 이용한 matrix effect 감소 42
    • 2.1 개별 농약 성분의 이온 선정 42
    • 2.2 HPLC/MS를 이용한 matrix effect 감소 44
    • Ⅳ. 결론 46
    • Ⅴ. 참고문헌 48
    • ABSTRACT 52
    더보기

    분석정보

    View

    상세정보조회

    0

    Usage

    원문다운로드

    0

    대출신청

    0

    복사신청

    0

    EDDS신청

    0

    동일 주제 내 활용도 TOP

    더보기

    주제

    연도별 연구동향

    연도별 활용동향

    연관논문

    연구자 네트워크맵

    공동연구자 (7)

    유사연구자 (20) 활용도상위20명

    이 자료와 함께 이용한 RISS 자료

    나만을 위한 추천자료

    해외이동버튼