율곡 대동사회론의 철학적 지향과 해석의 전환 = A Change in the Philosophical Orientation and Interpretation of Yulgok`s Daedong Ideal Society Theory

다국어 초록 (Multilingual Abstract)

Yulgok Yi I, who lived during the mid-Joseon Dynasty, extended the philosophical discourse of the Daedong Ideal Society Theory. He suggests a new social standing, “Sogang (少康 ),” in addition to “Daedong” and “Sogang (小康).” In particular, Yulgok articulates his view on the need for “Sogang (少康)” before realizing “Sogang (小康),” which the monarch demands. Jeong-In Kang is the first to give attention to this matter, and this paper focuses on extending his perspective on this issue by affirming the roots and the changes in the discussion. Yulgok’s Daedong Ideal Society Theory stems from Yulgok’s perspective on history as the situation of the era belongs to the “Period of Growing Influence.” His belief that every political system and its laws must eventually undergo restoration, even if now is not the time, serves as the basis of the Daedong Ideal Society Theory. Accordingly, Yulgok proposes the political achievements of Emperor Gaozu of Han who led the “Period of Growing Influence” during the Han Dynasty, or Emperor Taizong of Tang, as a guideline. He believed there was no reason to realize compatible politics. His standing was to realize ‘Sogang (少康)’ prior to fulfilling the goals of “Daedong” and “Sogang (小康).” However, Yulgok also believes that the ideology of “Daedong” must not be neglected when the need for the realization of “Sogang (少康)” is desperate. Sogang’s (少康) maxim is “Sogang (小康)” and Sogang’s (小康) maxim is “Daedong”; nonetheless, “Sogang (少康)” and “Sogang (小康)” must have “Daedong” as their ultimate ideological goal. I believe the root of Yulgok’s Daedong Ideal Society Theory comes from Yangchon Gwon Geun. Furthermore, I think Yulgok changes his view on discourse on Daedong society to a realization of Royal politics because of his desperation to realize “Sogang.” I see Yulgok as a Confucian scholar who tried to dilute possible conflicts that can arise between the monarch and his vassals in the views on “Daedong” and “Sogang (小康)” in order to retain the core of his administrative ideology. To realize Daedong society, efforts are needed to secure public awareness. To this end, securing the public support of the people, the press, and those who support the politics of the monarchy is expected. This support is related to various fields such as society, politics, economy, culture, religion, and ethics because Daedong’s goal is omnidirectional. Nonetheless, this paper focuses only on the representativeness of ideology related to administration.

참고문헌 (Reference)

1 崔導榮, "栗谷 大同思想에 관한 연구" 東國大學校 大學院 1993

2 고운기, "한국의 고전을 읽는다(4)" 휴머니스트 2006

3 철학사전편찬위원회, "철학사전" 도서출판중원문화 2009

4 장대년, "중국철학대강(상)" 까치 1998

5 황의동, "율곡철학연구" 경문사 1987

6 황의동, "율곡사상의 체계적 이해(2)" 서광사 1998

7 강정인, "율곡 이이(굃珥)의 정치사상에 나타난 대동(大同)·소강(小康)·소강(少康): 시론적 개념 분석" 한국정치학회 44 (44): 5-29, 2010

8 이영경, "율곡 대동사회론의 윤리적 성격" 한국유교학회 9 : 1997

9 이두찬, "율곡 대동사회론에 나타나는 사회철학적 의의" 율곡학회 10 : 2005

10 박원재, "유학은 어떻게 현실을 만났는가" 예문서원 2001

11 "유교대사전(상)" 유교사전편찬위원회 1990

12 이종성, "믿음이란 무엇인가" 글항아리 2014

13 강정인, "넘나듦의 정치사상" 후마니타스 2013

14 "국역 율곡전서" 한국정신문화연구원 1996

15 "陽村集"

16 "醇言"

17 "論語"

18 "詩經"

19 "禮記"

20 "栗谷全書"

21 "朝鮮王朝實錄"

22 "書經"

23 "春秋左氏傳"

24 "日省錄"

25 "弘齋全書"

26 "弘齋全書"

27 "孟子"

28 "大學"

29 권재현, "大同과 小康과 少康, 그 차이를 아시나요"

30 "同春堂集"

31 "中庸"

32 정치학대사전편찬위원회, "21세기 정치학대사전(상)" 아카데미리서치 2002

33 이동준, "16세기 한국 성리학파의 역사의식에 관한 연구" 성균관대 1975