RISS 학술연구정보서비스

검색

인기 검색어

    다국어 입력

    http://chineseinput.net/에서 pinyin(병음)방식으로 중국어를 변환할 수 있습니다.

    변환된 중국어를 복사하여 사용하시면 됩니다.

    예시)
    • 中文 을 입력하시려면 zhongwen을 입력하시고 space를누르시면됩니다.
    • 北京 을 입력하시려면 beijing을 입력하시고 space를 누르시면 됩니다.
    닫기
    KCI등재

    연관지식의 효율적인 표현 및 추론이 가능한 지식그래프 기반 지식지도

    한글로보기

    https://www.riss.kr/link?id=A108005098

    • 0

      상세조회
    • 0

      다운로드
    서지정보 열기
    • 내보내기
    • 내책장담기
    • 공유하기
    • 오류접수

    부가정보

    다국어 초록 (Multilingual Abstract) kakao i 다국어 번역

    Users who intend to utilize knowledge to actively solve given problems proceed their jobs with cross- and sequential exploration of associated knowledge related each other in terms of certain criteria, such as content relevance. A knowledge map is the diagram or taxonomy overviewing status of currently managed knowledge in a knowledge-base, and supports users knowledge exploration based on certain relationships between knowledge. A knowledge map, therefore, must be expressed in a networked form by linking related knowledge based on certain types of relationships, and should be implemented by deploying proper technologies or tools specialized in defining and inferring them.
    To meet this end, this study suggests a methodology for developing the knowledge graph-based knowledge map using the Graph DB known to exhibit proper functionality in expressing and inferring relationships between entities and their relationships stored in a knowledge-base. Procedures of the proposed methodology are modeling graph data, creating nodes, properties, relationships, and composing knowledge networks by combining identified links between knowledge. Among various Graph DBs, the Neo4j is used in this study for its high credibility and applicability through wide and various application cases.
    To examine the validity of the proposed methodology, a knowledge graph-based knowledge map is implemented deploying the Graph DB, and a performance comparison test is performed, by applying previous researchs data to check whether this study’s knowledge map can yield the same level of performance as the previous one did. Previous research’s case is concerned with building a process-based knowledge map using the ontology technology, which identifies links between related knowledge based on the sequences of tasks producing or being activated by knowledge. In other words, since a task not only is activated by knowledge as an input but also produces knowledge as an output, input and output knowledge are linked as a flow by the task. Also since a business process is composed of affiliated tasks to fulfill the purpose of the process, the knowledge networks within a business process can be concluded by the sequences of the tasks composing the process. Therefore, using the Neo4j, considered process, task, and knowledge as well as the relationships among them are defined as nodes and relationships so that knowledge links can be identified based on the sequences of tasks. The resultant knowledge network by aggregating identified knowledge links is the knowledge map equipping functionality as a knowledge graph, and therefore its performance needs to be tested whether it meets the level of previous research’s validation results. The performance test examines two aspects, the correctness of knowledge links and the possibility of inferring new types of knowledge: the former is examined using 7 questions, and the latter is checked by extracting two new-typed knowledge.
    As a result, the knowledge map constructed through the proposed methodology has showed the same level of performance as the previous one, and processed knowledge definition as well as knowledge relationship inference in a more efficient manner. Furthermore, comparing to the previous research’s ontology-based approach, this studys Graph DB-based approach has also showed more beneficial functionality in intensively managing only the knowledge of interest, dynamically defining knowledge and relationships by reflecting various meanings from situations to purposes, agilely inferring knowledge and relationships through Cypher-based query, and easily creating a new relationship by aggregating existing ones, etc.
    This studys artifacts can be applied to implement the user-friendly function of knowledge exploration reflecting users cognitive process toward associated knowledge, and can further underpin the development of an intelligent knowledge-base expanding autonomously through the discovery of
    번역하기

    Users who intend to utilize knowledge to actively solve given problems proceed their jobs with cross- and sequential exploration of associated knowledge related each other in terms of certain criteria, such as content relevance. A knowledge map is the...

    Users who intend to utilize knowledge to actively solve given problems proceed their jobs with cross- and sequential exploration of associated knowledge related each other in terms of certain criteria, such as content relevance. A knowledge map is the diagram or taxonomy overviewing status of currently managed knowledge in a knowledge-base, and supports users knowledge exploration based on certain relationships between knowledge. A knowledge map, therefore, must be expressed in a networked form by linking related knowledge based on certain types of relationships, and should be implemented by deploying proper technologies or tools specialized in defining and inferring them.
    To meet this end, this study suggests a methodology for developing the knowledge graph-based knowledge map using the Graph DB known to exhibit proper functionality in expressing and inferring relationships between entities and their relationships stored in a knowledge-base. Procedures of the proposed methodology are modeling graph data, creating nodes, properties, relationships, and composing knowledge networks by combining identified links between knowledge. Among various Graph DBs, the Neo4j is used in this study for its high credibility and applicability through wide and various application cases.
    To examine the validity of the proposed methodology, a knowledge graph-based knowledge map is implemented deploying the Graph DB, and a performance comparison test is performed, by applying previous researchs data to check whether this study’s knowledge map can yield the same level of performance as the previous one did. Previous research’s case is concerned with building a process-based knowledge map using the ontology technology, which identifies links between related knowledge based on the sequences of tasks producing or being activated by knowledge. In other words, since a task not only is activated by knowledge as an input but also produces knowledge as an output, input and output knowledge are linked as a flow by the task. Also since a business process is composed of affiliated tasks to fulfill the purpose of the process, the knowledge networks within a business process can be concluded by the sequences of the tasks composing the process. Therefore, using the Neo4j, considered process, task, and knowledge as well as the relationships among them are defined as nodes and relationships so that knowledge links can be identified based on the sequences of tasks. The resultant knowledge network by aggregating identified knowledge links is the knowledge map equipping functionality as a knowledge graph, and therefore its performance needs to be tested whether it meets the level of previous research’s validation results. The performance test examines two aspects, the correctness of knowledge links and the possibility of inferring new types of knowledge: the former is examined using 7 questions, and the latter is checked by extracting two new-typed knowledge.
    As a result, the knowledge map constructed through the proposed methodology has showed the same level of performance as the previous one, and processed knowledge definition as well as knowledge relationship inference in a more efficient manner. Furthermore, comparing to the previous research’s ontology-based approach, this studys Graph DB-based approach has also showed more beneficial functionality in intensively managing only the knowledge of interest, dynamically defining knowledge and relationships by reflecting various meanings from situations to purposes, agilely inferring knowledge and relationships through Cypher-based query, and easily creating a new relationship by aggregating existing ones, etc.
    This studys artifacts can be applied to implement the user-friendly function of knowledge exploration reflecting users cognitive process toward associated knowledge, and can further underpin the development of an intelligent knowledge-base expanding autonomously through the discovery of

    더보기

    참고문헌 (Reference)

    1 유기동, "지식 간 상호참조적 네비게이션이 가능한 온톨로지 기반 프로세스 중심 지식지도" 한국지능정보시스템학회 18 (18): 61-83, 2012

    2 장기태, "계층형 및 네트워크형 지식지도의 사용자 관점 성능 비교" 한국지식경영학회 22 (22): 75-89, 2021

    3 Lin, F., "Visualized cognitive knowledge map integration for P2P networks" 46 (46): 774-785, 2009

    4 Aasman, J., "Transmuting Information to Knowledge with an Enterprise Knowledge Graph" 19 (19): 44-51, 2017

    5 Ehrlinger, L., "Towards a Definition of Knowledge Graphs" 48 (48): 2016

    6 Suh, J., "Technology trends and application cases of graph DB" Institute of Information and Communications Technology Planning and Evaluation 2020

    7 Fathy, N., "ProGOMap: Automatic Generation of Mappings From Property Graphs to Ontologies" 9 : 113100-113116, 2021

    8 Martinez-Rodriguez, J.L., "OpenIE-based approach for Knowledge Graph construction from text" 113 : 339-355, 2018

    9 Jiang, Z., "Let Knowledge Make Recommendations for You" 9 : 118194-118204, 2021

    10 Yoo, K., "Knowledge flow-based business process redesign: applying a knowledge map to redesign a business process" 11 : 104-125, 2007

    1 유기동, "지식 간 상호참조적 네비게이션이 가능한 온톨로지 기반 프로세스 중심 지식지도" 한국지능정보시스템학회 18 (18): 61-83, 2012

    2 장기태, "계층형 및 네트워크형 지식지도의 사용자 관점 성능 비교" 한국지식경영학회 22 (22): 75-89, 2021

    3 Lin, F., "Visualized cognitive knowledge map integration for P2P networks" 46 (46): 774-785, 2009

    4 Aasman, J., "Transmuting Information to Knowledge with an Enterprise Knowledge Graph" 19 (19): 44-51, 2017

    5 Ehrlinger, L., "Towards a Definition of Knowledge Graphs" 48 (48): 2016

    6 Suh, J., "Technology trends and application cases of graph DB" Institute of Information and Communications Technology Planning and Evaluation 2020

    7 Fathy, N., "ProGOMap: Automatic Generation of Mappings From Property Graphs to Ontologies" 9 : 113100-113116, 2021

    8 Martinez-Rodriguez, J.L., "OpenIE-based approach for Knowledge Graph construction from text" 113 : 339-355, 2018

    9 Jiang, Z., "Let Knowledge Make Recommendations for You" 9 : 118194-118204, 2021

    10 Yoo, K., "Knowledge flow-based business process redesign: applying a knowledge map to redesign a business process" 11 : 104-125, 2007

    11 O’Donnell, A.M., "Knowledge Maps as Scaffolds for Cognitive Processing" 14 (14): 71-86, 2002

    12 Hogan, A., "Knowledge Graphs" 54 (54): 1-37, 2021

    13 Paulheim, H., "Knowledge Graph Refinement: A Survey of Approaches and Evaluation Methods" 8 (8): 489-508, 2017

    14 Wang, Q., "Knowledge Graph Embedding: A Survey of Approaches and Applications" 29 (29): 2724-2743, 2017

    15 Yan, H., "KnowIME: A system to construct a knowledge graph for intelligent manufacturing equipment" 8 : 41805-41813, 2020

    16 유기동, "Keyword-based networked knowledge map expressing content relevance between knowledge" 한국지능정보시스템학회 24 (24): 119-134, 2018

    17 Ait-Mlouk, A., "KBot: A Knowledge Graph Based ChatBot for Natural Language Understanding Over Linked Data" 8 : 149220-149230, 2020

    18 Toms, E.G., "Information interaction: Providing a framework for information architecture" 53 (53): 855-862, 2002

    19 Latham, D., "Information architecture: Notes toward a new curriculum" 53 (53): 824-830, 2002

    20 Jacob, E. K., "Information architecture" 43 (43): 3.1-3.64, 2009

    21 Lai, J.-Y., "How knowledge map fit and personalization affect success of KMS in high-tech firms" 29 : 313-324, 2009

    22 Zheng L., "Diversity-Aware Entity Exploration on Knowledge Graph" 9 : 118782-118793, 2021

    23 Chai, X., "Diagnosis Method of Thyroid Disease Combining Knowledge Graph and Deep Learning" 8 : 149787-149795, 2020

    24 Kim, S., "Building the knowledge map: an industrial case study" 7 : 34-45, 2003

    25 Rao, L., "Building ontology based knowledge maps to assist business process re-engineering" 52 (52): 577-589, 2012

    26 Novak, J.D., "A twelve-year longitudinal study of science concept learning" 28 (28): 117-153, 1991

    27 Hitzler, P., "A review of the semantic web field" 64 (64): 76-83, 2021

    28 Burford, S., "A grounded theory of the practice of web information architecture in large organizations" 65 (65): 2017-2034, 2014

    29 Vicknair, C., "A comparison of a graph database and a relational database : A data provenance perspective" 10 (10): 2010

    30 Shaoxiong Ji, "A Survey on Knowledge Graphs: Representation, Acquisition, and Applications" Institute of Electrical and Electronics Engineers (IEEE) 33 (33): 494-514, 2022

    31 Zhu, H., "A Cross-Curriculum Video Recommendation Algorithm Based on a Video-Associated Knowledge Map" 6 : 57562-57571, 2018

    더보기

    분석정보

    View

    상세정보조회

    0

    Usage

    원문다운로드

    0

    대출신청

    0

    복사신청

    0

    EDDS신청

    0

    동일 주제 내 활용도 TOP

    더보기

    주제

    연도별 연구동향

    연도별 활용동향

    연관논문

    연구자 네트워크맵

    공동연구자 (7)

    유사연구자 (20) 활용도상위20명

    인용정보 인용지수 설명보기

    학술지 이력

    학술지 이력
    연월일 이력구분 이력상세 등재구분
    2027 평가 재인증평가 신청대상 (재인증)
    2021-01-01 등재 등재학술지 유지 (재인증) KCI등재
    2018-01-01 등재 등재학술지 유지 (등재유지) KCI등재
    2015-03-25 학회명변경 영문명 : 미등록 -> Korea Intelligent Information Systems Society KCI등재
    2015-03-17 학술지명변경 외국어명 : 미등록 -> Journal of Intelligence and Information Systems KCI등재
    2015-01-01 등재 등재학술지 유지 (등재유지) KCI등재
    2011-01-01 등재 등재학술지 유지 (등재유지) KCI등재
    2009-01-01 등재 등재학술지 유지 (등재유지) KCI등재
    2008-02-11 학술지명변경 한글명 : 한국지능정보시스템학회 논문지 -> 지능정보연구 KCI등재
    2007-01-01 등재 등재학술지 유지 (등재유지) KCI등재
    2004-01-01 등재 등재학술지 선정 (등재후보2차) KCI등재
    2003-01-01 등재 등재후보 1차 PASS (등재후보1차) KCI등재후보
    2001-07-01 등재 등재후보학술지 선정 (신규평가) KCI등재후보
    더보기

    학술지 인용정보

    학술지 인용정보
    기준연도 WOS-KCI 통합IF(2년) KCIF(2년) KCIF(3년)
    2016 1.51 1.51 1.99
    KCIF(4년) KCIF(5년) 중심성지수(3년) 즉시성지수
    1.78 1.54 2.674 0.38
    더보기

    이 자료와 함께 이용한 RISS 자료

    나만을 위한 추천자료

    해외이동버튼