RISS 학술연구정보서비스

검색
다국어 입력

http://chineseinput.net/에서 pinyin(병음)방식으로 중국어를 변환할 수 있습니다.

변환된 중국어를 복사하여 사용하시면 됩니다.

예시)
  • 中文 을 입력하시려면 zhongwen을 입력하시고 space를누르시면됩니다.
  • 北京 을 입력하시려면 beijing을 입력하시고 space를 누르시면 됩니다.
닫기
    인기검색어 순위 펼치기

    RISS 인기검색어

      KCI등재

      Work Group Diversity and Social Cohesion: Exploring the Curvilinear Effects

      한글로보기

      https://www.riss.kr/link?id=A104833677

      • 0

        상세조회
      • 0

        다운로드
      서지정보 열기
      • 내보내기
      • 내책장담기
      • 공유하기
      • 오류접수

      부가정보

      다국어 초록 (Multilingual Abstract)

      This study extends and enhances explanations of how work group diversity is associated with social cohesion in teams. This study developed a framework to predict social cohesion as viewed from social categorization and information-decision making perspectives, and proposes that work group diversity influences important team outcomes. The study examined the effect of three dimensions of diversity― age, gender and rank (hierarchical status)―on social cohesion in 27 teams of a marine transport company in South Korea. Previous research on the relationship between work group diversity and group outcomes has produced inconsistent results. This study addresses this issue by examining the relationship between work group diversity and social cohesion that is particularly relevant when considering group composition. It examined the possibility that the relationship between work group diversity and social cohesion is curvilinear in nature.
      The results showed that there exists an inverted U-shaped curvilinear relationship between rank diversity and group social cohesion. As rank diversity increases, the intensity of social cohesion at the group level is raised, but only up to a certain point and beyond that, social cohesion is expected to reduce. This result implies that a high level of rank diversity does not necessarily guarantee a high level of group social cohesion. As to the effect of age diversity and gender diversity on group social cohesion, no significant curvilinear relationship was found between both age and gender diversity and social cohesion.
      The interaction effect of age diversity and gender diversity on group social cohesion was found significant. Age diversity and gender diversity interacted to affect group social cohesion in such a way that the effect of age diversity on group social cohesion was stronger when gender diversity is low than when gender diversity is high. However, the interaction effect of gender diversity and rank diversity on group social cohesion was only marginally significant, and the interaction effect of age diversity and rank diversity was statistically insignificant. The effect of gender diversity on group social cohesion is much greater when age diversity is high than when age diversity is low. In other words, when gender diversity is low, groups with higher age diversity show much lower level of group social cohesion than the groups with lower age diversity. But when gender diversity is high, little difference was found between low and high age diversity groups in their social cohesion.
      In sum, this study reported an inverted U-shaped relationship between work group diversity and social cohesion. After passing that peak of rank diversity, higher rank diversity does not enhance, but hampers, the degree of group social cohesion. This study also attempted to examine whether sub-dimensions of socio-demographic diversity interactively affect group outcomes. The results indicated that age diversity and gender diversity interact to affect group social cohesion. The interaction effect of age diversity and gender diversity on group social cohesion needs more explanation.
      The results of this study rendered interesting implications for future research into the effects of demographic diversity on group outcomes. It provided an alternative way of explaining the effect of diversity in work teams on group social cohesion. In the context of work group diversity, this study focused on the interaction of different dimensions of diversity. It contributes to the literature on both diversity and group cohesion. Theoretically, this study combined the information/decision-making and social categorization perspectives into the categorization-elaboration model (CEM). With respect to diversity, demographic diversity constitutes a valuable source of variability. The synergistic effect of sub-dimensions of demographic diversity catalyzes group social cohesion. To extend these results further, it would be of grea...
      번역하기

      This study extends and enhances explanations of how work group diversity is associated with social cohesion in teams. This study developed a framework to predict social cohesion as viewed from social categorization and information-decision making pers...

      This study extends and enhances explanations of how work group diversity is associated with social cohesion in teams. This study developed a framework to predict social cohesion as viewed from social categorization and information-decision making perspectives, and proposes that work group diversity influences important team outcomes. The study examined the effect of three dimensions of diversity― age, gender and rank (hierarchical status)―on social cohesion in 27 teams of a marine transport company in South Korea. Previous research on the relationship between work group diversity and group outcomes has produced inconsistent results. This study addresses this issue by examining the relationship between work group diversity and social cohesion that is particularly relevant when considering group composition. It examined the possibility that the relationship between work group diversity and social cohesion is curvilinear in nature.
      The results showed that there exists an inverted U-shaped curvilinear relationship between rank diversity and group social cohesion. As rank diversity increases, the intensity of social cohesion at the group level is raised, but only up to a certain point and beyond that, social cohesion is expected to reduce. This result implies that a high level of rank diversity does not necessarily guarantee a high level of group social cohesion. As to the effect of age diversity and gender diversity on group social cohesion, no significant curvilinear relationship was found between both age and gender diversity and social cohesion.
      The interaction effect of age diversity and gender diversity on group social cohesion was found significant. Age diversity and gender diversity interacted to affect group social cohesion in such a way that the effect of age diversity on group social cohesion was stronger when gender diversity is low than when gender diversity is high. However, the interaction effect of gender diversity and rank diversity on group social cohesion was only marginally significant, and the interaction effect of age diversity and rank diversity was statistically insignificant. The effect of gender diversity on group social cohesion is much greater when age diversity is high than when age diversity is low. In other words, when gender diversity is low, groups with higher age diversity show much lower level of group social cohesion than the groups with lower age diversity. But when gender diversity is high, little difference was found between low and high age diversity groups in their social cohesion.
      In sum, this study reported an inverted U-shaped relationship between work group diversity and social cohesion. After passing that peak of rank diversity, higher rank diversity does not enhance, but hampers, the degree of group social cohesion. This study also attempted to examine whether sub-dimensions of socio-demographic diversity interactively affect group outcomes. The results indicated that age diversity and gender diversity interact to affect group social cohesion. The interaction effect of age diversity and gender diversity on group social cohesion needs more explanation.
      The results of this study rendered interesting implications for future research into the effects of demographic diversity on group outcomes. It provided an alternative way of explaining the effect of diversity in work teams on group social cohesion. In the context of work group diversity, this study focused on the interaction of different dimensions of diversity. It contributes to the literature on both diversity and group cohesion. Theoretically, this study combined the information/decision-making and social categorization perspectives into the categorization-elaboration model (CEM). With respect to diversity, demographic diversity constitutes a valuable source of variability. The synergistic effect of sub-dimensions of demographic diversity catalyzes group social cohesion. To extend these results further, it would be of grea...

      더보기

      참고문헌 (Reference)

      1 Gijsberts, M., "‘Hunkering down’ in Multi-Ethnic Neighborhoods? The Effects of Ethnic Diversity on Dimensions of Social Cohesion" 28 : 527-537, 2012

      2 van Knippenberg, D., "Work Group Diversity and Group Performance : An Integrative Model and Research Agenda" 89 : 1008-1022, 2004

      3 van Knippenberg, D., "Work Group Diversity" 58 : 515-541, 2007

      4 O’Reilly, C. A., "Work Group Demography, Social Integration, and Turnover" 34 : 21-37, 1989

      5 Harrison, D. A., "What’s the Difference? Diversity Constructs as Separation, Variety, or Disparity in Organizations" 32 : 1199-1228, 2007

      6 Hausknecht, J. P., "Unit-Level Voluntary Turnover Rates and Customer Service Quality : Implications of Group Cohesiveness, Newcomer Concentration, and Size" 94 : 1068-1075, 2009

      7 Harrison, D. A., "Time, Teams, and Task Performance : Changing Effects of Surface-and Deep-Level Diversity on Group Functioning" 45 : 1029-1045, 2002

      8 Hogg, M. A., "The Social Psychology of Group Cohesiveness" New York University Press 1992

      9 Carless, S. A., "The Measurement of Cohesion in Work Teams" 31 : 71-88, 2000

      10 Richard, O. C., "The Impact of Racial Diversity on Intermediate and Long-Term Performance : The Moderating Role of Environmental Context" 28 : 1213-1233, 2007

      1 Gijsberts, M., "‘Hunkering down’ in Multi-Ethnic Neighborhoods? The Effects of Ethnic Diversity on Dimensions of Social Cohesion" 28 : 527-537, 2012

      2 van Knippenberg, D., "Work Group Diversity and Group Performance : An Integrative Model and Research Agenda" 89 : 1008-1022, 2004

      3 van Knippenberg, D., "Work Group Diversity" 58 : 515-541, 2007

      4 O’Reilly, C. A., "Work Group Demography, Social Integration, and Turnover" 34 : 21-37, 1989

      5 Harrison, D. A., "What’s the Difference? Diversity Constructs as Separation, Variety, or Disparity in Organizations" 32 : 1199-1228, 2007

      6 Hausknecht, J. P., "Unit-Level Voluntary Turnover Rates and Customer Service Quality : Implications of Group Cohesiveness, Newcomer Concentration, and Size" 94 : 1068-1075, 2009

      7 Harrison, D. A., "Time, Teams, and Task Performance : Changing Effects of Surface-and Deep-Level Diversity on Group Functioning" 45 : 1029-1045, 2002

      8 Hogg, M. A., "The Social Psychology of Group Cohesiveness" New York University Press 1992

      9 Carless, S. A., "The Measurement of Cohesion in Work Teams" 31 : 71-88, 2000

      10 Richard, O. C., "The Impact of Racial Diversity on Intermediate and Long-Term Performance : The Moderating Role of Environmental Context" 28 : 1213-1233, 2007

      11 Tolsma, J., "The Impact of Neighborhood and Municipality Characteristics on Social Cohesion in the Netherlands" 44 : 286-313, 2009

      12 Carter, D. A., "The Gender and Ethnic Diversity of US Boards and Board Committees and Firm Financial Performance" 18 : 396-414, 2010

      13 Ali, M., "The Gender Diversity-Performance Relationship in Services and Manufacturing Organizations" 22 : 1464-1485, 2011

      14 Horwitz, S. K., "The Effects of Team Diversity on Team Outcomes : A Meta-Analytic Review of Team Demography" 33 : 987-1015, 2007

      15 Dobbins, G. H., "The Effects of Group Cohesion and Leader Behavior on Subordinate Satisfaction" 11 : 203-219, 1986

      16 Shaw, J. B., "The Effects of Diversity on Small Work Group Processes and Performance" 51 : 1307-1325, 1998

      17 Rico, R., "The Effects of Diversity Faultlines and Team Autonomy on Decision Quality and Social Integration" 33 : 111-132, 2007

      18 Dahlin, K. B., "Team Diversity and Information Use" 48 : 1107-1123, 2005

      19 Friedkin, N. E., "Social Cohesion" 30 : 409-425, 2004

      20 Turner, J., "Rediscovering the Social Group: A Social Categorization Theory" Blackwell 1987

      21 van Vianen, A. E.M., "Personality in Teams : Its Relationships to Social Cohesion, Task Cohesion, and Team Performance" 10 : 97-120, 2001

      22 Bedeian, A. G., "On the Use of the Coefficient of Variations as a Measure of Diversity" 3 : 285-297, 2000

      23 Bliese, P. D., "Multilevel Theory, Research, and Methods in Organizations:Foundations, Extensions, and New Directions" Jossey-Bass/ Pfeiffer 305-327, 2000

      24 Shapcott, K. M., "Member Diversity and Cohesion and Performance in Walking Groups" 37 : 701-720, 2006

      25 van der Vegt, G. S., "Learning and Performance in Multidisciplinary Teams : The Importance of Collective Team Identification" 32 : 402-423, 2005

      26 Blau, P. M., "Inequality and Heterogeneity" Free Press 1977

      27 Webber, S. S., "Impact of Highly and Less Job-related Diversity on Work Group Cohesion and Performance : A Meta-Analysis" 27 : 141-162, 2001

      28 Lott, A. J., "Group Cohesiveness as Interpersonal Attraction : A Review of Relationship with Antecedent and Consequent Variables" 64 : 259-309, 1965

      29 Evans, C. R., "Group Cohesion and Performance : A Meta-analysis" 22 : 175-186, 1991

      30 Greer, L. L., "Group Cohesion : Then and Now" 43 : 655-661, 2012

      31 Pelled, L. H., "Exploring the Black Box : An Analysis of Work Group Diversity, Conflict, and Performance" 44 : 1-28, 1999

      32 Schaeffer, M., "Ethnic Diversity and Social Cohesion:Immigration, Ethnic Fractionalization and Potentials for Civic Action" Ashgate 2014

      33 van der Meer, "Ethnic Diversity and Its Effects on Social Cohesion" 40 : 459-478, 2014

      34 Cox, T., "Effects of Ethnic Group Cultural Differences on Cooperative and Competitive Behavior on a group task" 4 : 827-847, 1991

      35 Letki, N., "Does Diversity Erode Social Cohesion? Social Capital and Race in British Neighborhoods" 56 : 99-126, 2008

      36 Jackson, S. E., "Diversity in Social Context : A Multi-Attribute, Multi-Level Analysis of Team Diversity and Sales Performance" 25 : 675-702, 2004

      37 Williams, K. Y., "Demography and Diversity in Organizations : A Review of 40Years of Research" 20 : 77-140, 1998

      38 Lau, D. C., "Demographic Diversity and Faultlines : The Compositional Dynamics of Organizational Groups" 23 : 325-340, 1998

      39 van Dijk, H., "Defying Conventional Wisdom: A Meta-Analytical Examination of the Differences between Demographic and Job-related Diversity Relationships with Performance" 119 : 38-53, 2012

      40 Watson, W. E., "Cultural Diversity’s Impact on Interaction and Diverse Task Groups" 36 : 590-602, 1993

      41 Richard, O. C., "Cultural Diversity in Management, Firm Performance, and the Moderating Role of Entrepreneurial Orientation Dimensions" 47 : 255-266, 2004

      42 Pieterse, A. N., "Cultural Diversity and Team Performance : The Role of Team Member Goal Orientation" 56 : 782-804, 2013

      43 Chung, Y., "Cracking but not Breaking : Joint Effects of Faultline Strength and Diversity Climate on Loyal Behavior" 58 : 1495-1515, 2015

      44 Brodbeck, F., "Contradiction as an Inhibitor and Facilitator of Group Performance" 2003

      45 Beal, D. J., "Cohesion and Performance in Groups: A Meta-Analytic Clarification of Construct Relations" 88 : 989-1004, 2003

      46 Chiocchio, F., "Cohesion and Performance : A Meta-Analytic Review of Disparities between Project Teams, Production Teams, and Service Teams" 40 : 382-400, 2009

      47 Ali, M., "Board Age and Gender Diversity: A Test of Competing Linear and Curvilinear Predictions" 125 : 497-512, 2014

      48 Harrison, D. A., "Beyond Relational Demography : Time and the Effects of Surface-and Deep-level Diversity on Work Group Cohesion" 41 : 96-107, 1998

      49 Tsui, A., "Being Different : Relational Demography and Organizational Attachment" 37 : 549-579, 1992

      50 van Dijk, H., "A Status Perspective on the Consequences of Work Group Diversity" 86 : 223-241, 2013

      51 Gully, S. M., "A Meta-Analysis of Cohesion and Performance : Effects of Level of Analysis and Task Interdependence" 26 : 497-521, 1995

      52 Ely, R., "A Field of Group Diversity, Participation in Diversity, Education Programs, and Performance" 25 : 755-789, 2004

      더보기

      분석정보

      View

      상세정보조회

      0

      Usage

      원문다운로드

      0

      대출신청

      0

      복사신청

      0

      EDDS신청

      0

      동일 주제 내 활용도 TOP

      더보기

      주제

      연도별 연구동향

      연도별 활용동향

      연관논문

      연구자 네트워크맵

      공동연구자 (7)

      유사연구자 (20) 활용도상위20명

      인용정보 인용지수 설명보기

      학술지 이력

      학술지 이력
      연월일 이력구분 이력상세 등재구분
      2022 평가예정 재인증평가 신청대상 (재인증)
      2019-01-01 평가 등재학술지 유지 (계속평가) KCI등재
      2016-01-01 평가 등재학술지 유지 (계속평가) KCI등재
      2012-01-01 평가 등재학술지 선정 (등재후보2차) KCI등재
      2011-01-01 평가 등재후보 1차 PASS (등재후보1차) KCI등재후보
      2009-01-01 평가 등재후보학술지 선정 (신규평가) KCI등재후보
      더보기

      학술지 인용정보

      학술지 인용정보
      기준연도 WOS-KCI 통합IF(2년) KCIF(2년) KCIF(3년)
      2016 0.55 0.55 0.47
      KCIF(4년) KCIF(5년) 중심성지수(3년) 즉시성지수
      0.47 0.46 0.727 0.13
      더보기

      이 자료와 함께 이용한 RISS 자료

      나만을 위한 추천자료

      해외이동버튼