The aim of this study is to analyze the inventories of phonemic consonants in the three periods of English under the model of dispersion theory (Flemming, 1995) formalized in terms of Optimality Theory (Prince & Smolensky, 1993) and to show how a cons...
The aim of this study is to analyze the inventories of phonemic consonants in the three periods of English under the model of dispersion theory (Flemming, 1995) formalized in terms of Optimality Theory (Prince & Smolensky, 1993) and to show how a constraint-based approach can account for inventory structure and its historical change in a more comprehensive and coherent way. In this study, I focus on the inventory of English fricatives and nasals because historical change has occurred only to them. I attempt to explore why the inventories of the three periods were as they were and to find a pattern which dominates historical change. As predicted by Flemming's dispersion theory, the inventory structure of English is also described mainly in terms of three kinds of constraints, "Maintain contrasts," "Mindist" and "LAZY." It is shown in this study that a balance among them, which is different depending on the periods of history, shapes the inventory structure of each period. In this analysis, it is also clearly noted that English consonants had moved toward the inventory structure which prefers multiple contrasts over a large auditory distance and/or effort minimization.