RISS 학술연구정보서비스

검색
다국어 입력

http://chineseinput.net/에서 pinyin(병음)방식으로 중국어를 변환할 수 있습니다.

변환된 중국어를 복사하여 사용하시면 됩니다.

예시)
  • 中文 을 입력하시려면 zhongwen을 입력하시고 space를누르시면됩니다.
  • 北京 을 입력하시려면 beijing을 입력하시고 space를 누르시면 됩니다.
닫기
    인기검색어 순위 펼치기

    RISS 인기검색어

      KCI등재

      인공지능 윤리에 대한 예비 도덕 교사의 인식 유형 연구 - Q 방법론 접근 - = A study on pre-service ethics teachers’ perception types of AI ethics

      한글로보기

      https://www.riss.kr/link?id=A108729755

      • 0

        상세조회
      • 0

        다운로드
      서지정보 열기
      • 내보내기
      • 내책장담기
      • 공유하기
      • 오류접수

      부가정보

      다국어 초록 (Multilingual Abstract)

      Once the 2022 revision of ethics curriculum is introduced to school, pre-service ethics teachers are expected to play an important role for AI ethics education through school curriculum. Thus, this study investigates pre-service ethics teachers’ per...

      Once the 2022 revision of ethics curriculum is introduced to school, pre-service ethics teachers are expected to play an important role for AI ethics education through school curriculum. Thus, this study investigates pre-service ethics teachers’ perception about AI ethics by applying Q-methodology which has an advantage in understanding the types of subjective perceptions. During the data collection, 30 participants were asked to sort the Q sample cards (with 30 sentences on AI ethics) according to normal distribution on a 9 point scale based on the degrees of agreement of disagreement. As a result of Q-sorting, participants’ perceptions were categorized into four distinct types: ‘Type 1: Warning against the dangers of AI’, ‘Type 2: Emphasizing prerequisites for AI ethics’, ‘Type 3: Focusing on privacy protection’, ‘Type 4: Seeking for coexistence with AI’. These four types revealed differences in the prospects for the future of AI society, awareness of the possibility of cooperation and coexistence with AI, and macro/micro perspectives on AI ethics. After considering the pros and cons of each type, we discuss scholarly and educational implications of the findings.

      더보기

      동일학술지(권/호) 다른 논문

      분석정보

      View

      상세정보조회

      0

      Usage

      원문다운로드

      0

      대출신청

      0

      복사신청

      0

      EDDS신청

      0

      동일 주제 내 활용도 TOP

      더보기

      주제

      연도별 연구동향

      연도별 활용동향

      연관논문

      연구자 네트워크맵

      공동연구자 (7)

      유사연구자 (20) 활용도상위20명

      이 자료와 함께 이용한 RISS 자료

      나만을 위한 추천자료

      해외이동버튼