탄소세 부과 시 건물용도별 운영에너지비용 영향에 관한 연구

다국어 초록 (Multilingual Abstract)

The member nations of European Union and some states levy the CT(Carbon tax) which approximately 3～150 US dollar per ton of CO2. A few years after, South Korea government will have to levy the CT to the fossil energy consumption fields for reduction of GHG because South Korea will not evade the Annex-Ⅰlevel at 2013. For the reduction of CO2 in the building, this paper were a preliminary study which the estimation on the CT influence of the energy cost in the use groups of building. It was using by the IPCC GHG estimation rule, the modification data of 2005 Energy Census in South Korea, and the consideration of the CT levy level of other nations. The influence of CT on the building energy cost was different level through the building use groups because each building use group consumes different level of the running energy and different energies as petroleum, city gas, electric power. In conclusion, if CT will be levied 10,000～15,000 won per ton of CO2 in South Korea, the annual building energy cost(Won/㎡year) will rise up as the follows; the average of all buildings is 841～12,622; the private office is 763～11,450; the public office is 816～12,242; the department is 1,965～29,469; the store is 1,806～27,090; the school is 592～8,876; the institute is 1,807～27,106; the hotel is 1,808～27,127; the hospital is 1,675～25,124; the telephone office is 2,102～31,532; the apartment is 437～6,558; the others building is 1,463～21,941.

목차 (Table of Contents)

• Abstract
• 1. 서 론
• 1.1 연구 배경 및 목적
• 1.2 연구의 방법
• 1.3 연구의 범위
• 2. 해외 탄소세 현황 및 국내수준 추정
• 2.1 해외 국가별 탄소세 부과현황
• 2.2 국내 탄소세 수준 추정
• 3. 건물용도별 이산화탄소배출원단위
• 3.1 건물용도별 연간에너지원단위 특성
• 3.2 에너지원단위 단위환산
• 3.3 건물용도별 이산화탄소배출원단위
• 3.4 건물용도별 에너지비용원단위
• 4. 건물용도별 탄소세의 에너지비용 영향분석
• 4.1 건물용도별 탄소세 추산 함수식
• 4.2 건물용도별 에너지비용 탄소세 영향
• 5. 결 론
• 참고문헌

참고문헌 (Reference)

1 에너지경제연구원, "통계 DB, 부문별최종에너지소비"

2 정근주, "탄소세 적용에 따른 공동주택 공사원가 및 운영에너지비용의 영향 분석" 대한건축학회지회연합회 10 (10): 231-238, 2008

3 황인성, "최근현황 및 2009년 경제전망, SERI Economic Outlook" 삼성경제연구소 19-, 2008

4 조선일보,뉴스,경제면,http://www.chosun.com/, "조선일보, 뉴스, 경제면"

5 고대성, "아파트 건물의 공종별 하자특성과 보수비용 분석" 대한건축학회지회연합회 8 (8): 75-82, 2006

6 정근주, "네트워크다이아그램기법을 이용한 프로토타입 그린빌딩 환경성능 평가 프로그램 구축연구" 대한건축학회 20 (20): 265-276, 2004

7 에너지관리공단, "기후변화협약, 진행상황"

8 김주형, "국내 건축주 분류 및 유형별 태도？행동 조사- 개인 건축주 대상 연구 보완 -" 대한건축학회지회연합회 8 (8): 123-130, 2006

9 A. Druckman, "Household energy consumption in the UK: A highly geographically and socio-economically disaggregated model" 36 : 3177-3192, 2008

10 Global Carbon Tax Urged at UN Climate Conference,Canada Free Press,Global Policy Forum,http://www.globalpolicy.org/, "Global Carbon Tax Urged at UN Climate Conference, Canada Free Press, Global Policy Forum"

11 Randall Thomas, "Environmental Design, 2nd" E&FN Spon 68-, 1996

12 Vlasis Oikonomou, "Catrinus Jepma, Franco Becchis, Daniele Russolillo, White Certificates for energy efficiency improvement with energy taxes: A theoretical economic model" 30 : 3044-3062, 2008

13 에너지경제연구원, "2005년도에너지총조사보고서" 지식경제부 896-897, 2006