Something seems fishy: mainstream consumer response to drag queen imagery

다국어 초록 (Multilingual Abstract)

This study investigates how drag queen imagery in advertising and mainstream consumers’ tolerance towards homosexuality (i.e., drag queens) affect their attitudes towards the advertisement and brand in the context of beauty brand advertising. Based on the social identity theory, this study posits that implicit (vs. explicit) drag queen-themed imagery and consumers holding high tolerance as an in-group of LGBTQ+ cultures (vs. out-group of lower tolerance individuals) would have greater impact on ad attitude and brand attitude independently and together. A web-based experiment reveals that while different imagery types (implicit vs. explicit) in ads do not differentiate attitudes toward ad and brand, consumers’ individual tolerance of the drag queen culture positively affects such responses. Additionally, the ad imagery and consumer tolerance toward drag queens have an interaction effect on brand attitude via ad attitude in the explicit drag queen-themed imagery condition but not in implicit imagery. The results add insight to a growing body of literature on the LGBTQ+ and social identity theory research and benefit marketers with a better understanding of how to manage drag queen-themed advertisements within mainstream media.

참고문헌 (Reference)

1 Hopkins, S. J., "“Let the drag race begin” the rewards of becoming a drag queen" 46 (46): 135-149, 2004

2 Newport, F., "U.S., estimate of LGBT population rises to 4.5%"

3 Turner, J. C., "The social identity theory of intergroup behavior" 5 : 7-24, 1986

4 Daems, J., "The makeup of RuPaul’s drag race : essays on the queen of reality shows" McFarland and Company 2014

5 Balzer, C., "The great drag queen hype : Thoughts on cultural globalisation and autochthony" 51 : 111-131, 2005

6 Bhat, S., "The effect of homosexual imagery in advertising on attitude toward the ad" 31 (31): 161-176, 1996

7 Tuten, T. L., "The effect of gay-friendly and non-gay-friendly cues on brand attitudes: A comparison of heterosexual and gay/lesbian reactions" 21 (21): 441-461, 2005

8 Bhat, S., "The effect of consumer prejudices on ad processing : Heterosexual consumers responses to homosexual imagery in ads" 27 (27): 9-28, 1998

9 Sloan, L., "The SAGE handbook of social media research methods" Sage Publishing 2017

10 Fleisher, J., "The Drag Queens of New York: An Illustrated Field Guide" Riverhead Books 1996

11 Oakenfull, G. K., "Targeting a minority without alienating the majority : Advertising to gays and lesbians in mainstream media" 48 (48): 191-198, 2008

12 Ashforth, B. E., "Social identity theory and the organization" 14 (14): 20-39, 1989

13 Preacher, K. J., "SPSS and SAS procedures for estimating indirect effectsin simple mediation models" 36 (36): 717-731, 2004

14 Brennan, N., "RuPaul’s drag race and the shifting visibility of drag culture: the boundaries of reality TV" Palgrave Macmillan 231-243, 2017

15 Gudelunas, D., "RuPaul’s Drag race and the shifting visibility of drag culture: the boundaries of reality TV" Palgrave Macmillan 231-243, 2017

16 Hayes, A. F., "Regression-based statistical mediation and moderation analysis in clinical research : Observations, recommendations, and implementation" 98 : 39-57, 2017

17 Oakenfull, G. K., "Queer eye for a gay guy : using market specific symbols in advertising to attract gay consumers without alienating the mainstream" 22 (22): 421-439, 2005

18 Geczy, A., "Queer Style" Bloomsbury 2013

19 Lutz, R. J., "Psychological processes and advertising effects: theory, research and application" Erlbaum 45-63, 1985

20 Stevenson, M. R., "Promoting tolerance for homosexuality : An evaluation of intervention strategies" 25 (25): 500-511, 1988

21 El Hazzouri, M., "Out of the closet : When moral identity and protestant work ethic improves attitudes toward advertising featuring same-sex couples" 48 (48): 1-16, 2019

22 Kates, S. M., "Making the ad perfectly queer : Marketing"normality"to the gay men’s community" 28 (28): 25-37, 1999

23 Nölke, A. I., "Making diversity conform? An intersectional, longitudinal analysis of GBT-specific mainstream media advertisements" 65 (65): 224-255, 2018

24 McCarthy, J., "Majority remains satisfied with acceptance of gays in U.S"

25 Descubes, I., "Lesbians’ assessments of gay advertising in France: not necessarily a case of ‘La Vie en Rose?’" 34 (34): 639-663, 2018

26 Green, J., "LGBT purchasing power near $1 trillion rivals other minorities"

27 Hayes, A. F., "Introduction to mediation, moderation, and conditional process analysis : a regression-based approach" Guilford Press 2013

28 Angelini, J. R., "Homosexual imagery in print advertisements : Attended, remembered, but disliked" 57 (57): 485-502, 2010

29 Eisend, M., "Gender roles" 48 (48): 72-80, 2019

30 Schacht, S. P., "Feminism and men: reconstructing gender relations" NYU Press 202-224, 1998

31 Vicdan, H., "Evolving desire to experience the social ‘other’ : insights from the high-society bazaar" 15 (15): 248-276, 2015

32 Um, N. H., "Does gay-themed advertising haunt your brand? The impact of gay themed advertising on young heterosexual consumers" 33 (33): 811-832, 2014

33 Tajfel, H., "Differentiation Between Social Groups" Academic Press 1978

34 Rhodes, C. D., "Debating LGBT workplace protections in the bible belt : social identities in legislative and media discourse" 63 (63): 904-924, 2016

35 Gong, Z. H., "Crafting mixed sexual advertisements for mainstream media : examining the impact of homosexual and heterosexual imagery inclusion on advertising effectiveness" 11 : 1-24, 2019

36 Um, N. H., "Consumers’ responses to implicit and explicit gay-themed advertising in gay vs mainstream media" 22 (22): 461-477, 2016

37 Hester, J. B., "Consumer responses to gay-themed imagery in advertising" 8 (8): 2007

38 Papaoikonomou, E., "Constructing and communicating an ethical consumer identity : a social identity approach" 16 (16): 209-231, 2016

39 Bellis, R., "Brands still haven’t figured out how to talk to LGBTQ consumers"

40 Kite, M. E., "Attitudes toward homosexuality : assessment and behavioral consequences" 7 (7): 137-162, 1986

41 Andrews, J. C., "Advertising, promotion, and other aspects of integrated marketing communications" Cengage Learning 2018

42 Åkestam, N., "Advertising “like a girl”: Toward a better understanding of “femvertising”and its effects" 34 (34): 795-806, 2017

43 Preacher, K. J., "Addressing moderated mediation hypotheses : theory, methods, and prescriptions" 42 (42): 185-227, 2007

44 CMI Community Marketing and Insight, "13th annual LGBTQ community survey"