RISS 학술연구정보서비스

검색
다국어 입력

http://chineseinput.net/에서 pinyin(병음)방식으로 중국어를 변환할 수 있습니다.

변환된 중국어를 복사하여 사용하시면 됩니다.

예시)
  • 中文 을 입력하시려면 zhongwen을 입력하시고 space를누르시면됩니다.
  • 北京 을 입력하시려면 beijing을 입력하시고 space를 누르시면 됩니다.
닫기
    인기검색어 순위 펼치기

    RISS 인기검색어

      KCI등재

      응급실에 급성 복통으로 방문한 가임기 여성의 골반염과 급성 충수돌기염의 감별을 위한 점수 체계의 외부적 타당화 연구 = External Validation of Scoring Systems for Pelvic Inflammatory Disease and Acute Appendicitis for Acute Abdominal Pain of Reproductive-aged Women in Emergency Department

      한글로보기

      https://www.riss.kr/link?id=A104608547

      • 0

        상세조회
      • 0

        다운로드
      서지정보 열기
      • 내보내기
      • 내책장담기
      • 공유하기
      • 오류접수

      부가정보

      다국어 초록 (Multilingual Abstract)

      Purpose: Differential diagnosis of acute abdominal pain of the childbearing age woman is a difficult challenge to the emergency physician. Clinical scoring systems for pelvic inflammatory disease (PID) and acute appendicitis have already been introduced. We want to validate these scoring systems externally.
      Methods: This study was conducted at a single urban teaching hospital emergency department from May 2011 to September 2013. Retrospective analysis of a prospectively collected registry for reproductive-aged women was performed.
      Results: A total of 1432 patients were registered. Among them, 322 patients diagnosed as PID (177 patients) or acute appendicitis (145 patients) were finally analyzed in this study. Among the PID and acute appendicitis scored, lower and higher cut-off points were 3 and 8 for PID risk score, and 6 and 10 for appendicitis risk score. PID risk score of PID patients was 7.0 (±1.9), acute appendicitis patients was 4.3 (±2.1), and other patients was 4.0 (±2.2) (p<0.001). Appendicitis risk score of PID patients was 5.7 (±1.9), acute appendicitis patients was 9.0 (±2.1), and other patients was 5 (±1.6) (p<0.001). The areas under the receiver operating characteristic curves were 0,832 and 0,950?for diagnosis of PID with PID risk score and acute appendicitis with appendicitis risk score, respectively.
      Conclusion: These scoring systems have appropriate diagnostic power for diagnosis of PID and acute appendicitis.
      번역하기

      Purpose: Differential diagnosis of acute abdominal pain of the childbearing age woman is a difficult challenge to the emergency physician. Clinical scoring systems for pelvic inflammatory disease (PID) and acute appendicitis have already been introduc...

      Purpose: Differential diagnosis of acute abdominal pain of the childbearing age woman is a difficult challenge to the emergency physician. Clinical scoring systems for pelvic inflammatory disease (PID) and acute appendicitis have already been introduced. We want to validate these scoring systems externally.
      Methods: This study was conducted at a single urban teaching hospital emergency department from May 2011 to September 2013. Retrospective analysis of a prospectively collected registry for reproductive-aged women was performed.
      Results: A total of 1432 patients were registered. Among them, 322 patients diagnosed as PID (177 patients) or acute appendicitis (145 patients) were finally analyzed in this study. Among the PID and acute appendicitis scored, lower and higher cut-off points were 3 and 8 for PID risk score, and 6 and 10 for appendicitis risk score. PID risk score of PID patients was 7.0 (±1.9), acute appendicitis patients was 4.3 (±2.1), and other patients was 4.0 (±2.2) (p<0.001). Appendicitis risk score of PID patients was 5.7 (±1.9), acute appendicitis patients was 9.0 (±2.1), and other patients was 5 (±1.6) (p<0.001). The areas under the receiver operating characteristic curves were 0,832 and 0,950?for diagnosis of PID with PID risk score and acute appendicitis with appendicitis risk score, respectively.
      Conclusion: These scoring systems have appropriate diagnostic power for diagnosis of PID and acute appendicitis.

      더보기

      참고문헌 (Reference)

      1 박용주, "The Usefulness of Tablet Computer for Self-surveys of Child-bearing Aged Women Who Visit the Emergency Department with Abdominal Pain" 대한응급의학회 25 (25): 103-108, 2014

      2 Paulson EK, "Suspected Appendicitis" 348 : 236-242, 2003

      3 CDC, "Sexually transmitted diseases treatment guidelines, 2010" 59 : 1-110, 2010

      4 Drake FT, "Improvement in the diagnosis of appendicitis" 47 : 299-328, 2013

      5 Bhuiya FA, "Emergency department visits for chest pain and abdominal pain: United States, 1999-2008" 43 : 1-8, 2010

      6 Webster DP, "Differentiating acute appendicitis from pelvic inflammatory disease in women of childbearing age" 11 : 569-572, 1993

      7 Bongard F, "Differential diagnosis of appendicitis and pelvic inflammatory disease A prospective analysis" 150 : 90-96, 1985

      8 Dahlberg DL, "Differential diagnosis of abdominal pain in women of childbearing age. Appendicitis or pelvic inflammatory disease?" 12 : 40-45, 2004

      9 Morishita K, "Clinical prediction rule to distinguish pelvic inflammatory disease from acute appendicitis in women ofchildbearing age" 25 : 152-157, 2007

      10 Najem AZ, "Appendicitis versus pelvic inflammatory disease : A diagnostic dilemma" 51 : 217-222, 1985

      1 박용주, "The Usefulness of Tablet Computer for Self-surveys of Child-bearing Aged Women Who Visit the Emergency Department with Abdominal Pain" 대한응급의학회 25 (25): 103-108, 2014

      2 Paulson EK, "Suspected Appendicitis" 348 : 236-242, 2003

      3 CDC, "Sexually transmitted diseases treatment guidelines, 2010" 59 : 1-110, 2010

      4 Drake FT, "Improvement in the diagnosis of appendicitis" 47 : 299-328, 2013

      5 Bhuiya FA, "Emergency department visits for chest pain and abdominal pain: United States, 1999-2008" 43 : 1-8, 2010

      6 Webster DP, "Differentiating acute appendicitis from pelvic inflammatory disease in women of childbearing age" 11 : 569-572, 1993

      7 Bongard F, "Differential diagnosis of appendicitis and pelvic inflammatory disease A prospective analysis" 150 : 90-96, 1985

      8 Dahlberg DL, "Differential diagnosis of abdominal pain in women of childbearing age. Appendicitis or pelvic inflammatory disease?" 12 : 40-45, 2004

      9 Morishita K, "Clinical prediction rule to distinguish pelvic inflammatory disease from acute appendicitis in women ofchildbearing age" 25 : 152-157, 2007

      10 Najem AZ, "Appendicitis versus pelvic inflammatory disease : A diagnostic dilemma" 51 : 217-222, 1985

      11 Brown HF, "Abdominal pain : an approach to a challenging diagnosis" 25 : 266-278, 2014

      12 박중완, "A Model for Prediction of Pelvic Inflammatory Disease and Acute Appendicitis in Childbearing-aged Women who Visit the Emergency Department with Abdominal Pain" 대한응급의학회 23 (23): 649-656, 2012

      더보기

      분석정보

      View

      상세정보조회

      0

      Usage

      원문다운로드

      0

      대출신청

      0

      복사신청

      0

      EDDS신청

      0

      동일 주제 내 활용도 TOP

      더보기

      주제

      연도별 연구동향

      연도별 활용동향

      연관논문

      연구자 네트워크맵

      공동연구자 (7)

      유사연구자 (20) 활용도상위20명

      인용정보 인용지수 설명보기

      학술지 이력

      학술지 이력
      연월일 이력구분 이력상세 등재구분
      2027 평가예정 재인증평가 신청대상 (재인증)
      2021-01-01 평가 등재학술지 유지 (재인증) KCI등재
      2020-05-08 학회명변경 영문명 : The Korean Society Of Emergency Medicine -> The Korean Society of Emergency Medicine KCI등재
      2018-01-01 평가 등재학술지 유지 (등재유지) KCI등재
      2015-01-01 평가 등재학술지 유지 (등재유지) KCI등재
      2011-01-01 평가 등재학술지 유지 (등재유지) KCI등재
      2009-01-01 평가 등재학술지 유지 (등재유지) KCI등재
      2006-01-01 평가 등재학술지 선정 (등재후보2차) KCI등재
      2005-01-01 평가 등재후보 1차 PASS (등재후보1차) KCI등재후보
      2003-01-01 평가 등재후보학술지 선정 (신규평가) KCI등재후보
      더보기

      학술지 인용정보

      학술지 인용정보
      기준연도 WOS-KCI 통합IF(2년) KCIF(2년) KCIF(3년)
      2016 0.23 0.23 0.22
      KCIF(4년) KCIF(5년) 중심성지수(3년) 즉시성지수
      0.22 0.22 0.339 0.06
      더보기

      이 자료와 함께 이용한 RISS 자료

      나만을 위한 추천자료

      해외이동버튼