RISS 학술연구정보서비스

검색
다국어 입력

http://chineseinput.net/에서 pinyin(병음)방식으로 중국어를 변환할 수 있습니다.

변환된 중국어를 복사하여 사용하시면 됩니다.

예시)
  • 中文 을 입력하시려면 zhongwen을 입력하시고 space를누르시면됩니다.
  • 北京 을 입력하시려면 beijing을 입력하시고 space를 누르시면 됩니다.
닫기
    인기검색어 순위 펼치기

    RISS 인기검색어

      KCI등재후보

      IPTV between Competition and Regulation in Korea

      한글로보기

      https://www.riss.kr/link?id=A104158451

      • 0

        상세조회
      • 0

        다운로드
      서지정보 열기
      • 내보내기
      • 내책장담기
      • 공유하기
      • 오류접수

      부가정보

      다국어 초록 (Multilingual Abstract)

      Technological convergence in the fields of telecommunications and broadcasting needs regulatory convergence, which requires as its prerequisite overarching regulatory principles between different regulatory authorities. The integration of separate regulatory regimes for telecommunications, broadcasting and IPTV entails a complicated process of balancing between market principle and public interest.


      In this context, the current regulatory framework of IPTV seems to be far away from such a balanced perspective in that the new hybrid service is regulated much stricter than traditional telecommunications or broadcasting services. Key issues concerning access to premium network and killer contents have just begun.


      In order to set up sound competition policy concerning IPTV, the KCC as a relevant sectoral regulator, should focus its interest and resources on the establishment of level playing field between telecommunications and broadcasting companies regardless of technologies or networks.
      It is the very reason why intermodal competition should be given priority practicing sectoral competition policy.
      번역하기

      Technological convergence in the fields of telecommunications and broadcasting needs regulatory convergence, which requires as its prerequisite overarching regulatory principles between different regulatory authorities. The integration of separate reg...

      Technological convergence in the fields of telecommunications and broadcasting needs regulatory convergence, which requires as its prerequisite overarching regulatory principles between different regulatory authorities. The integration of separate regulatory regimes for telecommunications, broadcasting and IPTV entails a complicated process of balancing between market principle and public interest.


      In this context, the current regulatory framework of IPTV seems to be far away from such a balanced perspective in that the new hybrid service is regulated much stricter than traditional telecommunications or broadcasting services. Key issues concerning access to premium network and killer contents have just begun.


      In order to set up sound competition policy concerning IPTV, the KCC as a relevant sectoral regulator, should focus its interest and resources on the establishment of level playing field between telecommunications and broadcasting companies regardless of technologies or networks.
      It is the very reason why intermodal competition should be given priority practicing sectoral competition policy.

      더보기

      참고문헌 (Reference)

      1 William E. Kennard, "what we need to remember now is that no one could have predicted these innovations. We cannot regulate against problems that have not yet to materialize in a market that has to develop"

      2 Hee-Soo Kim, "Unified Protection of User of Convergent Services" KISDI 76-, 2009

      3 Won-Woo Lee, "Problems and Suggestions of Regulatory System with Regard to Convergence in Korea" Studies on Communications Law IV 220-, 2008

      4 Yong-Seop Yum, "Policy Review of the IP-TV in the Digital Convergence" 1 (1): 72-74, 2008

      5 Bong-Eui Lee, "On the Reform of Retail Regulations in Telecommunications Act" 1 (1): 19-, 2008

      6 Sang-Shik Lee, "Major Issues in Pay-TV Markets regarding Legislation to Integrate the Broadcasting and Telecommunications Related Acts" 2 (2): 2009

      7 Kuhn Hwang, "Law and Regulatory Policy Implementation for Revitalization of IP-TV" 1 (1): 95-, 2008

      8 Bong-Eui Lee, "Competition Issues and Policy Implications after IPTV" 2010

      9 Bong-Eui Lee, "Application of Competition Law in Telecommunications Industry" 58 : 2004

      1 William E. Kennard, "what we need to remember now is that no one could have predicted these innovations. We cannot regulate against problems that have not yet to materialize in a market that has to develop"

      2 Hee-Soo Kim, "Unified Protection of User of Convergent Services" KISDI 76-, 2009

      3 Won-Woo Lee, "Problems and Suggestions of Regulatory System with Regard to Convergence in Korea" Studies on Communications Law IV 220-, 2008

      4 Yong-Seop Yum, "Policy Review of the IP-TV in the Digital Convergence" 1 (1): 72-74, 2008

      5 Bong-Eui Lee, "On the Reform of Retail Regulations in Telecommunications Act" 1 (1): 19-, 2008

      6 Sang-Shik Lee, "Major Issues in Pay-TV Markets regarding Legislation to Integrate the Broadcasting and Telecommunications Related Acts" 2 (2): 2009

      7 Kuhn Hwang, "Law and Regulatory Policy Implementation for Revitalization of IP-TV" 1 (1): 95-, 2008

      8 Bong-Eui Lee, "Competition Issues and Policy Implications after IPTV" 2010

      9 Bong-Eui Lee, "Application of Competition Law in Telecommunications Industry" 58 : 2004

      더보기

      동일학술지(권/호) 다른 논문

      동일학술지 더보기

      더보기

      분석정보

      View

      상세정보조회

      0

      Usage

      원문다운로드

      0

      대출신청

      0

      복사신청

      0

      EDDS신청

      0

      동일 주제 내 활용도 TOP

      더보기

      주제

      연도별 연구동향

      연도별 활용동향

      연관논문

      연구자 네트워크맵

      공동연구자 (7)

      유사연구자 (20) 활용도상위20명

      인용정보 인용지수 설명보기

      학술지 이력

      학술지 이력
      연월일 이력구분 이력상세 등재구분
      2025 평가예정 재인증평가 신청대상 (재인증)
      2022-01-01 평가 등재학술지 선정 (계속평가) KCI등재
      2021-12-01 평가 등재후보로 하락 (재인증) KCI등재후보
      2018-01-01 평가 등재학술지 유지 (계속평가) KCI등재
      2015-01-01 평가 등재학술지 선정 (계속평가) KCI등재
      2013-01-01 평가 등재후보학술지 유지 (기타) KCI등재후보
      2012-01-01 평가 등재후보학술지 유지 (기타) KCI등재후보
      2011-01-01 평가 등재후보학술지 유지 (등재후보1차) KCI등재후보
      2009-01-01 평가 등재후보학술지 선정 (신규평가) KCI등재후보
      더보기

      학술지 인용정보

      학술지 인용정보
      기준연도 WOS-KCI 통합IF(2년) KCIF(2년) KCIF(3년)
      2016 0.04 0.04 0.12
      KCIF(4년) KCIF(5년) 중심성지수(3년) 즉시성지수
      0.1 0.08 0.407 0
      더보기

      이 자료와 함께 이용한 RISS 자료

      나만을 위한 추천자료

      해외이동버튼