RISS 학술연구정보서비스

검색
다국어 입력

http://chineseinput.net/에서 pinyin(병음)방식으로 중국어를 변환할 수 있습니다.

변환된 중국어를 복사하여 사용하시면 됩니다.

예시)
  • 中文 을 입력하시려면 zhongwen을 입력하시고 space를누르시면됩니다.
  • 北京 을 입력하시려면 beijing을 입력하시고 space를 누르시면 됩니다.
닫기
    인기검색어 순위 펼치기

    RISS 인기검색어

      KCI우수등재

      주민소송의 대상 - 대법원 2020. 7. 29. 선고 2017두63467 판결 - = Subjects of residents’ lawsuits

      한글로보기
      • 내보내기
      • 내책장담기
      • 공유하기
      • 오류접수

      부가정보

      다국어 초록 (Multilingual Abstract)

      The purpose of this paper is to analyze the Supreme Court's judgment 2017DU63467 made on July 29, 2020. The above judgment judged that the relevance between the claim of residents’ audits and the claim of residents’ lawsuits depends on whether it is the same as the social facts, which are the basis of the claim of residents’ audit, and that the acts or facts derived from or subsequently occurred from it are also recognized to be related to the claim of residents’ audits. It was also noted that whether the actions claimed by the plaintiff were financial accounting actions subject to residents’ lawsuits should be based on whether the actions constituted a single illegal financial accounting action as a whole.
      It is difficult to derive specific criteria for judgment on the relevance between the claim of residents’ audits and the claim of residents’ lawsuits by interpretation the word of Article 17 (1) of the Local Autonomy Act. In addition, it is practically difficult to clearly distinguish between financial accounting actions and non-financial actions of local governments. Therefore, in deriving the criteria for determining subjects of residents’ lawsuits, judgment on the purpose and function of residents’ lawsuits system must be involved.
      Residents' lawsuits have the characteristics of enhancing accountability for the local administration and as a means of democratic participation of residents, and residents' lawsuits correspond to the public interest litigation and the public litigation. However, the utilization of residents’ lawsuits is low. Considering this, there is significance of the said judgment on the fact that it developed the legal principles that fit the function and character of the residents' lawsuit by respecting the legislative purpose of the residents' lawsuits system to ensure the proper operation of local finances, but not interpreting the object of the residents' lawsuits too strict.
      번역하기

      The purpose of this paper is to analyze the Supreme Court's judgment 2017DU63467 made on July 29, 2020. The above judgment judged that the relevance between the claim of residents’ audits and the claim of residents’ lawsuits depends on whether it ...

      The purpose of this paper is to analyze the Supreme Court's judgment 2017DU63467 made on July 29, 2020. The above judgment judged that the relevance between the claim of residents’ audits and the claim of residents’ lawsuits depends on whether it is the same as the social facts, which are the basis of the claim of residents’ audit, and that the acts or facts derived from or subsequently occurred from it are also recognized to be related to the claim of residents’ audits. It was also noted that whether the actions claimed by the plaintiff were financial accounting actions subject to residents’ lawsuits should be based on whether the actions constituted a single illegal financial accounting action as a whole.
      It is difficult to derive specific criteria for judgment on the relevance between the claim of residents’ audits and the claim of residents’ lawsuits by interpretation the word of Article 17 (1) of the Local Autonomy Act. In addition, it is practically difficult to clearly distinguish between financial accounting actions and non-financial actions of local governments. Therefore, in deriving the criteria for determining subjects of residents’ lawsuits, judgment on the purpose and function of residents’ lawsuits system must be involved.
      Residents' lawsuits have the characteristics of enhancing accountability for the local administration and as a means of democratic participation of residents, and residents' lawsuits correspond to the public interest litigation and the public litigation. However, the utilization of residents’ lawsuits is low. Considering this, there is significance of the said judgment on the fact that it developed the legal principles that fit the function and character of the residents' lawsuit by respecting the legislative purpose of the residents' lawsuits system to ensure the proper operation of local finances, but not interpreting the object of the residents' lawsuits too strict.

      더보기

      동일학술지(권/호) 다른 논문

      동일학술지 더보기

      더보기

      분석정보

      View

      상세정보조회

      0

      Usage

      원문다운로드

      0

      대출신청

      0

      복사신청

      0

      EDDS신청

      0

      동일 주제 내 활용도 TOP

      더보기

      주제

      연도별 연구동향

      연도별 활용동향

      연관논문

      연구자 네트워크맵

      공동연구자 (7)

      유사연구자 (20) 활용도상위20명

      이 자료와 함께 이용한 RISS 자료

      나만을 위한 추천자료

      해외이동버튼