RISS 학술연구정보서비스

검색
다국어 입력

http://chineseinput.net/에서 pinyin(병음)방식으로 중국어를 변환할 수 있습니다.

변환된 중국어를 복사하여 사용하시면 됩니다.

예시)
  • 中文 을 입력하시려면 zhongwen을 입력하시고 space를누르시면됩니다.
  • 北京 을 입력하시려면 beijing을 입력하시고 space를 누르시면 됩니다.
닫기
    인기검색어 순위 펼치기

    RISS 인기검색어

      KCI등재후보

      동아시아 군사분쟁에 따른 우리의 대응방향 고찰 = South Korea's response to the East Asian military conflict

      한글로보기

      https://www.riss.kr/link?id=A109644839

      • 0

        상세조회
      • 0

        다운로드
      서지정보 열기
      • 내보내기
      • 내책장담기
      • 공유하기
      • 오류접수

      부가정보

      다국어 초록 (Multilingual Abstract)

      The purpose of this study is to analyze the impact of military conflicts in East Asia on the Korean Peninsula, to seek response directions, and to present policy developments. In developing this thesis, we analyzed the reality of the Chinese threat and the US's strategy toward China to reveal our response direction, and through analysis of the possibility of conflict in the Taiwan region, which has a relatively high possibility of conflict in East Asia, and further, the case of the South China Sea conflict, we derived our realistic security and economic orientation points. Looking at the conflict and war situations around the world that are changing rapidly day by day, it is predicted that the aftereffects of military conflict due to the sharp confrontation between the US and China will be fully transmitted to the Korean Peninsula no matter when or where it occurs. A conflict that exceeds the critical point between the US and China will be forced as our strategic choice in the future, so we must devise detailed strategic options (countermeasures) in advance. The main research contents proposed for this purpose are as follows.
      First, from the perspective of ‘strategic clarity,’ we can build security infrastructure by distancing ourselves from China and Russia and leading cooperation between Korea, the US, and Japan, but we must approach this very cautiously because it is expected to have a negative impact on the economy, which is directly related to the lives of our people. Considering friction with China and Russia as a cost that must be paid anyway and focusing only on the US and Japan could be a fatal and dangerous idea.
      Second, from the perspective of ‘strategic choice by issue (ambiguity),’ it is also very important to use strategic flexibility to improve the quality of life of our people and not create hostility toward countries surrounding the Korean Peninsula. In other words, it means directly contributing to the lives of our people by using a diplomatic strategy called ‘strategic choice that fits the national interest by issue.’
      번역하기

      The purpose of this study is to analyze the impact of military conflicts in East Asia on the Korean Peninsula, to seek response directions, and to present policy developments. In developing this thesis, we analyzed the reality of the Chinese threat an...

      The purpose of this study is to analyze the impact of military conflicts in East Asia on the Korean Peninsula, to seek response directions, and to present policy developments. In developing this thesis, we analyzed the reality of the Chinese threat and the US's strategy toward China to reveal our response direction, and through analysis of the possibility of conflict in the Taiwan region, which has a relatively high possibility of conflict in East Asia, and further, the case of the South China Sea conflict, we derived our realistic security and economic orientation points. Looking at the conflict and war situations around the world that are changing rapidly day by day, it is predicted that the aftereffects of military conflict due to the sharp confrontation between the US and China will be fully transmitted to the Korean Peninsula no matter when or where it occurs. A conflict that exceeds the critical point between the US and China will be forced as our strategic choice in the future, so we must devise detailed strategic options (countermeasures) in advance. The main research contents proposed for this purpose are as follows.
      First, from the perspective of ‘strategic clarity,’ we can build security infrastructure by distancing ourselves from China and Russia and leading cooperation between Korea, the US, and Japan, but we must approach this very cautiously because it is expected to have a negative impact on the economy, which is directly related to the lives of our people. Considering friction with China and Russia as a cost that must be paid anyway and focusing only on the US and Japan could be a fatal and dangerous idea.
      Second, from the perspective of ‘strategic choice by issue (ambiguity),’ it is also very important to use strategic flexibility to improve the quality of life of our people and not create hostility toward countries surrounding the Korean Peninsula. In other words, it means directly contributing to the lives of our people by using a diplomatic strategy called ‘strategic choice that fits the national interest by issue.’

      더보기

      동일학술지(권/호) 다른 논문

      동일학술지 더보기

      더보기

      분석정보

      View

      상세정보조회

      0

      Usage

      원문다운로드

      0

      대출신청

      0

      복사신청

      0

      EDDS신청

      0

      동일 주제 내 활용도 TOP

      더보기

      주제

      연도별 연구동향

      연도별 활용동향

      연관논문

      연구자 네트워크맵

      공동연구자 (7)

      유사연구자 (20) 활용도상위20명

      이 자료와 함께 이용한 RISS 자료

      나만을 위한 추천자료

      해외이동버튼