RISS 학술연구정보서비스

검색
다국어 입력

http://chineseinput.net/에서 pinyin(병음)방식으로 중국어를 변환할 수 있습니다.

변환된 중국어를 복사하여 사용하시면 됩니다.

예시)
  • 中文 을 입력하시려면 zhongwen을 입력하시고 space를누르시면됩니다.
  • 北京 을 입력하시려면 beijing을 입력하시고 space를 누르시면 됩니다.
닫기
    인기검색어 순위 펼치기

    RISS 인기검색어

      신규 serum-based 항진균제 MIC 측정법에 관한 연구 = A study on new serum-based antifungal agents MIC assay

      한글로보기

      https://www.riss.kr/link?id=T13616832

      • 0

        상세조회
      • 0

        다운로드
      서지정보 열기
      • 내보내기
      • 내책장담기
      • 공유하기
      • 오류접수

      부가정보

      다국어 초록 (Multilingual Abstract)

      In this study, serum based MIC testing was developed and optimized
      to solve the limitations of the conventional CLSI-based MIC test and the
      usefulness of this testing for clinical application was determined. Candida
      albicans reference strain (ATCC 10231) and a total of 105 clinical
      isolates and anti-fungal agents caspofugin were used for the study.
      Results showed that growth characteristics were different according to
      types of serum and the mouse serum was the most suitable for study.
      In order to measure the optimal concentration of serum, 0% to 100%
      mouse serum were added. The optimal concentration of serum was 50%
      when consideration of antifungal agents administration and inoculum size,
      serum components and ease of hyphae separated, and the consideration
      of the degree of growth. In comparison of the usefulness between the
      conventional standard CLSI-based MIC and 50% mouse serum-based
      MIC testing, the range of MIC 80 of the CLSI-based MIC was 0.13 ~2.0 ㎍/mL (SD ± 0.42 ㎍/mL) and that of the serum-based MIC assay
      was 1.0 ~ 16.0 ㎍/mL (SD ± 2.36 ㎍/mL). The MIC 80 of serum-based
      MIC testing was increased by up to 4 to 64 times. The MICs of clinical
      isolate NO, 28 in both MIC assays were 2.0 ㎍/mL and 32.0 ㎍/mL and
      those of clinical isolate NO. 78 in both MIC assays were 0.50 ㎍/mL and
      32.0 ㎍/mL. In conclusion, the 50% mouse serum-based MIC testing was
      more useful for clinical application than conventional MIC assay.
      번역하기

      In this study, serum based MIC testing was developed and optimized to solve the limitations of the conventional CLSI-based MIC test and the usefulness of this testing for clinical application was determined. Candida albicans reference strain (ATCC ...

      In this study, serum based MIC testing was developed and optimized
      to solve the limitations of the conventional CLSI-based MIC test and the
      usefulness of this testing for clinical application was determined. Candida
      albicans reference strain (ATCC 10231) and a total of 105 clinical
      isolates and anti-fungal agents caspofugin were used for the study.
      Results showed that growth characteristics were different according to
      types of serum and the mouse serum was the most suitable for study.
      In order to measure the optimal concentration of serum, 0% to 100%
      mouse serum were added. The optimal concentration of serum was 50%
      when consideration of antifungal agents administration and inoculum size,
      serum components and ease of hyphae separated, and the consideration
      of the degree of growth. In comparison of the usefulness between the
      conventional standard CLSI-based MIC and 50% mouse serum-based
      MIC testing, the range of MIC 80 of the CLSI-based MIC was 0.13 ~2.0 ㎍/mL (SD ± 0.42 ㎍/mL) and that of the serum-based MIC assay
      was 1.0 ~ 16.0 ㎍/mL (SD ± 2.36 ㎍/mL). The MIC 80 of serum-based
      MIC testing was increased by up to 4 to 64 times. The MICs of clinical
      isolate NO, 28 in both MIC assays were 2.0 ㎍/mL and 32.0 ㎍/mL and
      those of clinical isolate NO. 78 in both MIC assays were 0.50 ㎍/mL and
      32.0 ㎍/mL. In conclusion, the 50% mouse serum-based MIC testing was
      more useful for clinical application than conventional MIC assay.

      더보기

      목차 (Table of Contents)

      • 제1장 서 론 ···················································································································· 1
      • 제2장 연구 대상 및 방법 ···························································································· 9
      • 제1절 연구 대상 ········································································································ 9
      • 1. 대상 균주 ··········································································································· 9
      • 제2절 연구 방법 ······································································································ 15
      • 제1장 서 론 ···················································································································· 1
      • 제2장 연구 대상 및 방법 ···························································································· 9
      • 제1절 연구 대상 ········································································································ 9
      • 1. 대상 균주 ··········································································································· 9
      • 제2절 연구 방법 ······································································································ 15
      • 1. CLSI-based MIC 측정법 ············································································ 15
      • 1) 배지 및 항진균제 준비 ············································································ 15
      • 2) 실험균주 준비 ···························································································· 15
      • 3) 결과 관찰 및 분석 ···················································································· 16
      • 2. serum-based MIC 측정법 ········································································· 17
      • 1) 배지 및 항진균제 준비 ············································································ 17
      • 2) 실험균주 준비 ···························································································· 17
      • 3) 결과 관찰 및 분석 ···················································································· 17
      • 제3장 결 과 ·················································································································· 18
      • 제1절 serum 종류에 따른 효과 분석 ································································ 18
      • 제2절 최적 serum 농도 분석 ·············································································· 20
      • 제3절 항진균제 감수성 측정 최적 조건 및 유효성 분석 ······························ 27
      • 1. 항진균제 감수성 측정 최적 조건 ······························································· 27
      • 2. 임상분리균주를 이용한 유효성 분석 ························································· 29
      • 제4장 고 찰 ·················································································································· 35
      • 제5장 결 론 ·················································································································· 37
      • 참고문헌 ·························································································································· 39
      • 요약문 ······························································································································ 43
      • 감사의 글 ······················································································································ 45
      더보기

      분석정보

      View

      상세정보조회

      0

      Usage

      원문다운로드

      0

      대출신청

      0

      복사신청

      0

      EDDS신청

      0

      동일 주제 내 활용도 TOP

      더보기

      주제

      연도별 연구동향

      연도별 활용동향

      연관논문

      연구자 네트워크맵

      공동연구자 (7)

      유사연구자 (20) 활용도상위20명

      이 자료와 함께 이용한 RISS 자료

      나만을 위한 추천자료

      해외이동버튼