RISS 학술연구정보서비스

검색
다국어 입력

http://chineseinput.net/에서 pinyin(병음)방식으로 중국어를 변환할 수 있습니다.

변환된 중국어를 복사하여 사용하시면 됩니다.

예시)
  • 中文 을 입력하시려면 zhongwen을 입력하시고 space를누르시면됩니다.
  • 北京 을 입력하시려면 beijing을 입력하시고 space를 누르시면 됩니다.
닫기
    인기검색어 순위 펼치기

    RISS 인기검색어

      KCI등재

      중세 중기의 보편사에 나타나는 비잔티움 제국 인식 = Historical Perspectives of Sigebert of Gembloux and Vincent of Beauvais on the Byzantine Empire

      한글로보기

      https://www.riss.kr/link?id=A109067033

      • 0

        상세조회
      • 0

        다운로드
      서지정보 열기
      • 내보내기
      • 내책장담기
      • 공유하기
      • 오류접수

      부가정보

      다국어 초록 (Multilingual Abstract)

      This paper analyzes the historical perspectives of Western European historians on the Byzantine Empire during the High Middle Ages, with a particular focus on the universal historical writings of Sigebert of Gembloux (Chronica) and Vincent of Beauvais (Speculum historiale). It underlines the concept of the translatio imperii, which is explicitly presented in the tables of dynastic reigns presented in Sigebert’s Chronica and also in a relatively overlooked passage within Vincent’s Speculum historiale. Sigebert of Gembloux emphasizes, in his tables of regna, the integration of the Roman Empire and the Frankish Kingdom concurrently with Charlemagne’s imperial coronation. Meanwhile, a lesser-known passage of the Speculum argues that because Charlemagne was a descendant of Heraclius, there was a convergence of Greek, Roman, and Germanic lineage within him, and thus the imperium was rightfully transferred to him. On the other hand, these authors disparaged the Byzantine emperors as being “the emperors of Constantinople” after the coronation of Charlemagne.
      Regarding the Crusade periods, the extent of historical narratives of Sigebert and Vincent varies following the temporal contexts in which these authors were active. Particularly, the account concerning Byzantium during the Crusades in Vincent’s Speculum, compiled between the 1240s and 1250s, reflects the contemporary preoccupations of Louis IX’s crusades, with its emphasis on the conquest and the matrimonial alliances.
      In conclusion, the universal histories of Sigebert and Vincent exhibit a narrowed perspective typical of medieval Western Europeans’ understanding of universal history. Nonetheless, behind their biased historical portrayals of the Byzantine Empire and selective historical narrative choices, it is still possible to find underlying political and ideological ideas and the contextual concerns of their time.
      번역하기

      This paper analyzes the historical perspectives of Western European historians on the Byzantine Empire during the High Middle Ages, with a particular focus on the universal historical writings of Sigebert of Gembloux (Chronica) and Vincent of Beauvais...

      This paper analyzes the historical perspectives of Western European historians on the Byzantine Empire during the High Middle Ages, with a particular focus on the universal historical writings of Sigebert of Gembloux (Chronica) and Vincent of Beauvais (Speculum historiale). It underlines the concept of the translatio imperii, which is explicitly presented in the tables of dynastic reigns presented in Sigebert’s Chronica and also in a relatively overlooked passage within Vincent’s Speculum historiale. Sigebert of Gembloux emphasizes, in his tables of regna, the integration of the Roman Empire and the Frankish Kingdom concurrently with Charlemagne’s imperial coronation. Meanwhile, a lesser-known passage of the Speculum argues that because Charlemagne was a descendant of Heraclius, there was a convergence of Greek, Roman, and Germanic lineage within him, and thus the imperium was rightfully transferred to him. On the other hand, these authors disparaged the Byzantine emperors as being “the emperors of Constantinople” after the coronation of Charlemagne.
      Regarding the Crusade periods, the extent of historical narratives of Sigebert and Vincent varies following the temporal contexts in which these authors were active. Particularly, the account concerning Byzantium during the Crusades in Vincent’s Speculum, compiled between the 1240s and 1250s, reflects the contemporary preoccupations of Louis IX’s crusades, with its emphasis on the conquest and the matrimonial alliances.
      In conclusion, the universal histories of Sigebert and Vincent exhibit a narrowed perspective typical of medieval Western Europeans’ understanding of universal history. Nonetheless, behind their biased historical portrayals of the Byzantine Empire and selective historical narrative choices, it is still possible to find underlying political and ideological ideas and the contextual concerns of their time.

      더보기

      분석정보

      View

      상세정보조회

      0

      Usage

      원문다운로드

      0

      대출신청

      0

      복사신청

      0

      EDDS신청

      0

      동일 주제 내 활용도 TOP

      더보기

      주제

      연도별 연구동향

      연도별 활용동향

      연관논문

      연구자 네트워크맵

      공동연구자 (7)

      유사연구자 (20) 활용도상위20명

      이 자료와 함께 이용한 RISS 자료

      나만을 위한 추천자료

      해외이동버튼