The victory of Ming army in the Pyeongyang(平壤) battle in January 1593 turned the tide of the Imjin war. However after the defeat of the following Byeokje(碧蹄) battle, Ming army adopted reconciliation strategy. Since then, the talks between Ming...
http://chineseinput.net/에서 pinyin(병음)방식으로 중국어를 변환할 수 있습니다.
변환된 중국어를 복사하여 사용하시면 됩니다.
https://www.riss.kr/link?id=A107798872
2017
-
900
KCI등재
학술저널
453-483(31쪽)
0
상세조회0
다운로드다국어 초록 (Multilingual Abstract)
The victory of Ming army in the Pyeongyang(平壤) battle in January 1593 turned the tide of the Imjin war. However after the defeat of the following Byeokje(碧蹄) battle, Ming army adopted reconciliation strategy. Since then, the talks between Ming...
The victory of Ming army in the Pyeongyang(平壤) battle in January 1593 turned the tide of the Imjin war. However after the defeat of the following Byeokje(碧蹄) battle, Ming army adopted reconciliation strategy. Since then, the talks between Ming China and Japan with the exclusion of Choson headed for the deadlock. It was at this point that Chinese decampment soldier became a problem. A lack of supplies and a prolongation of stay in Choson after the crushing defeat in the battle compromised the strength and morale of the fighting force, but fueled an aspiration of returning home and an aversion of war.
The Ming army deserters remaining in Choson became a major pending issue from the 1600s, where the withdrawal of Ming army started. Those who had injury or disease, those who owed a load of debt to the army, those who committed a crime in the army, or those who have no future back in their hometown were susceptible to abandon their post and run away. In this context, many of the deserters had remained in Choson.
Many of them earned a living through agriculture, commerce and the art of acupuncture. The demand of repatriation of the deserters by the Ming military command was not easy. Arresting them was a challenging task, and the Ming officers who came to Choson to take them back home were willing to set them free in exchange of bribes, or the officers just hired the deserters as their subordinates. There was even an accident caused by a conflict of interests between a Ming officer and deserters in 1601, Seoul.
Choson deliberately refused to repatriate some of the deserters and used their talents to make weapons, gunpowder and poison. Choson was eager to keep geomancers since King Seonjo(宣祖) became highly interested in fortune and geomancy. However, the one who were employed by King Seonjo, ended up causing some troubles by recruiting more deserters.
Also, Choson used the deserters to prepare for Japan’s demand of reconciliation and menace of reinvasion. Its intension was to deploy troops composed of deserters to Busan(釜山) and to take advantage of them as means of “an ass in lion’s skin”. Choson maintained the troops until 1606 and tried to exclude them on the list of repatriation back to Ming.
In short, the appearance of Ming deserters with Ming’s entry into the Imjin war had led to a very delicate and unique situation at the time.
여행하는 자와 세 개의 지도 : 오다 마코토의 아시아·아프리카 그리고 한국과 북한
주변을 포섭하는 국가의 논리-시마오 도시오(島尾敏雄)의 ‘야포네시아(Japonesia)론’-
1900년대 근대(近代) 도시(都市)의 주변과 거주민의 삶-광무(光武) 7년(1903) 한성부(漢城府) 성외(城外) 호적(戶籍)을 중심으로-
『극동의 열쇠 한국』(1905)과 쉐로셰프스키의 한국 인식