Determining via the Kano Model the Importance of Quality Characteristics in Construction Management

다국어 초록 (Multilingual Abstract)

Given the recent changes in the construction environment, construction management (CM) companies have used various methods to recognize, measure, and improve the importance of quality for customer satisfaction to ensure competitiveness in attracting customers. The present study examined the validity of the evaluation rule and determined the weight and weighting factor of each quality characteristic in the Kano model regarding CM. The quality characteristics and customer satisfaction level of the Kano model were utilized to assess the importance of each item, and the results were used to derive the CM work guidelines quality that can maximize customer satisfaction. Besides, based on previous studies, the validity of the determined CM work quality was evaluated through a questionnaire, which modifies the Kano model via the Delphi technique, and interviews with practitioners. This process determined the CM work quality that requires intensive management by selecting the one with high importance, depending on recognition by the project owner. The results of this study demonstrated that the proposed Kano model is effective in determining the importance of CM work quality for assessing the satisfaction level of the owner.

참고문헌 (Reference)

1 노부호, "한미글로벌의 성공요소: 우수기업 경영모델을 중심으로" 한국경영학회 17 (17): 89-132, 2013

2 리우쥔난 ; 차오러 ; 박진영 ; 김병수, "카노모델을 활용한 VE대안 검증방법" 대한토목학회 39 (39): 923-932, 2019

3 조진호, "최고경영자의 리더십이 건설품질경영활동과 건설품질경영성과에 관한 실증연구" 한국품질경영학회 45 (45): 403-426, 2017

4 김현정 ; 김수욱 ; 안진예, "서비스 실패 관리를 위한 FMEA 이용 방안" 한국품질경영학회 42 (42): 43-62, 2014

5 민광호 ; 차용운 ; 한상원 ; 현창택, "건설사고 예방을 위한 근로자의 불안전한 행동과 휴먼에러와의 관계 분석" 대한건축학회 35 (35): 161-168, 2019

6 Fong D, "Using the self-stated importance questionnaire to interpretKano questionnaire results" 5 (5): 21-23, 1996

7 Fong D, "Using the self-stated importance questionnaire to interpretKano questionnaire results" 5 (5): 21-23, 1996

8 Kano N, "Total quality management" Springer 1995

9 Herzberg F, "The motivation to work" Wiley 1959

10 Huiskonen J, "Sharpening logistics customer service strategy planning by applying Kano’s quality element classification" 56 : 253-260, 1998

11 Herzberg F, "Organizational behavior I: Essential theories of motivation and leadership" 61-74, 2005

12 황보윤 ; 이도연 ; 이신홍, "Kano모델을 이용한 프랜차이즈 레스토랑 재방문 의도에 미치는 요인 분석" 한국유통경영학회 16 (16): 5-15, 2013

13 윤재욱 ; 이희영, "Kano 품질속성 평가방법론들의 실증적 비교분석" 한국품질경영학회 37 (37): 31-42, 2009

14 이승호 ; 장석주, "Kano 모델을 이용한 설비시공회사의 CRM이 고객만족도에 미치는 영향" 한국품질경영학회 45 (45): 547-560, 2017

15 Hashim AM, "Kano model and QFD integration approach for ergonomic design improvement" 57 : 22-32, 2012

16 Tan KC, "Integrating Kano’s model in the planning matrix of quality function deployment" 11 (11): 1141-1151, 2000

17 Kametani T, "Attractive quality and must-be quality from the viewpoint of environmental lifestyle in Japan" 9 : 315-327, 2010

18 Kano N, "Attractive quality and must be quality" 14 (14): 39-48, 1984

19 Timko M, "An experiment in continuous analysis" 2 (2): 17-20, 1993

20 Franceschini F, "An application of quality function deployment to industrial training courses" 15 : 753-768, 1998

21 장흥엽 ; 송해근 ; 박영택, "ASC를 이용한 품질특성의 중요도 결정" 한국품질경영학회 40 (40): 589-598, 2012

22 Berger C, "A special issues on Kano’s methods for understanding customer-defined quality" 2 (2): 3-35, 1993