The purpose of this study was to investigate Technology Education teachers’beliefs about the “purposes” and “content” of Technology Education instruction in the U.S. In addition, this study provided a longitudinal record of the Technology Ed...
http://chineseinput.net/에서 pinyin(병음)방식으로 중국어를 변환할 수 있습니다.
변환된 중국어를 복사하여 사용하시면 됩니다.
https://www.riss.kr/link?id=A103797386
2011
English
KCI등재
학술저널
228-245(18쪽)
3
0
상세조회0
다운로드다국어 초록 (Multilingual Abstract)
The purpose of this study was to investigate Technology Education teachers’beliefs about the “purposes” and “content” of Technology Education instruction in the U.S. In addition, this study provided a longitudinal record of the Technology Ed...
The purpose of this study was to investigate Technology Education teachers’beliefs about the “purposes” and “content” of Technology Education instruction in the U.S. In addition, this study provided a longitudinal record of the Technology Education profession over 40 years. An on-line survey was developed and sent separately to middle school and high school Technology Education teachers, who (1) taught within seven selected states in three regions (eastern,mid-west, and western) of the United States; and (2) were members of the International Technology and Engineering Educators’ Association. We developed the instrument items based on previous national surveys and emerging issues in the profession. Findings from this survey were put into historical context by comparing results with the four national surveys covering over 40 years to identify changes in teachers’ beliefs about the purposes, and content of Technology Education as well as to document demographic changes. A number of findings were pertinent to this paper. First, Technology Education is the most frequently used program name followed by a variety of alternate program names;some form of “engineering” appears to be an emerging trend for naming Technology Education programs. Second, the composition of Technology Education teachers and students has become more diverse over time with substantial increases in diversity for the past 10 years. Third, general education purposes such as “develop problem solving skills” are the most frequent purposes teachers identified while vocational type purposes such as “develop skills in using tools and machines” were prominent in previous studies.
Finally, Technology Education teachers reported that they believe Technology Education should address “core concepts of technology” taught in the context of design and problem solving. These and other findings are discussed in terms of their impact on Technology Education programs and implications for future development in the profession.
참고문헌 (Reference)
1 Sanders, M, "Technology education teaching and learning project: Preliminary research report" SanAntonio, TX 2007
2 Sanders, M, "Technology Education Teachers’ Beliefs and Practices" Louisville, KY 2009
3 Sanders, M, "Technology Education Teachers’ Beliefs and Practices" 2009
4 Sherman, T, "Teaching in middle school Technology Education: A review of recent practices" 20 : 367-379, 2010
5 International Technology Education Association, "Standards for Technological Literacy: Content for the study of technology" Author 2000
6 Dugger, W. E, "Reported of the survey data. Blacksburg, VA: Standards for Industrial Arts Programs Project" Virginia Polytechnic Institute and State University. 1980
7 Sanders,M.E, "New paradigm or old wine: The status of technology education practice in the U.S" 12 (12): 35-55, 2001
8 Sherman, T, "Middle school children’s thinking in Technology Education: A review of literature" 21 (21): 60-71, 2009
9 Schmitt, M. L, "Industrial arts education: A survey of programs, teachers, students, and curriculum. U. S. Department of Health, Education, and Welfare. OE33038" Office of U.S. Government Printing Office 1966
10 Stotter,D.E, "Assessment of the learning and attitude motivation of technology education students who complete an instructional unit on Agriculture and Biotechnology" North Carolina State University 2004
1 Sanders, M, "Technology education teaching and learning project: Preliminary research report" SanAntonio, TX 2007
2 Sanders, M, "Technology Education Teachers’ Beliefs and Practices" Louisville, KY 2009
3 Sanders, M, "Technology Education Teachers’ Beliefs and Practices" 2009
4 Sherman, T, "Teaching in middle school Technology Education: A review of recent practices" 20 : 367-379, 2010
5 International Technology Education Association, "Standards for Technological Literacy: Content for the study of technology" Author 2000
6 Dugger, W. E, "Reported of the survey data. Blacksburg, VA: Standards for Industrial Arts Programs Project" Virginia Polytechnic Institute and State University. 1980
7 Sanders,M.E, "New paradigm or old wine: The status of technology education practice in the U.S" 12 (12): 35-55, 2001
8 Sherman, T, "Middle school children’s thinking in Technology Education: A review of literature" 21 (21): 60-71, 2009
9 Schmitt, M. L, "Industrial arts education: A survey of programs, teachers, students, and curriculum. U. S. Department of Health, Education, and Welfare. OE33038" Office of U.S. Government Printing Office 1966
10 Stotter,D.E, "Assessment of the learning and attitude motivation of technology education students who complete an instructional unit on Agriculture and Biotechnology" North Carolina State University 2004
11 International Technology, "About the ITEEA. Retrieved from"
논문 : 기술교사들의 생각: 미국에서 40년 간의 변화
인지적 도제학습 기반 ICT 콘텐츠 스캐폴드 개발 모형 연구
학술지 이력
연월일 | 이력구분 | 이력상세 | 등재구분 |
---|---|---|---|
2026 | 평가예정 | 재인증평가 신청대상 (재인증) | |
2020-01-01 | 평가 | 등재학술지 유지 (재인증) | |
2017-01-01 | 평가 | 등재학술지 유지 (계속평가) | |
2014-01-08 | 학술지명변경 | 외국어명 : 미등록 -> THE KOREAN JOURNAL OF TECHNOLOGY EDUCATION | |
2013-01-01 | 평가 | 등재학술지 유지 (등재유지) | |
2010-01-01 | 평가 | 등재학술지 유지 (등재유지) | |
2007-01-01 | 평가 | 등재학술지 선정 (등재후보2차) | |
2006-01-01 | 평가 | 등재후보 1차 PASS (등재후보1차) | |
2004-01-01 | 평가 | 등재후보학술지 선정 (신규평가) |
학술지 인용정보
기준연도 | WOS-KCI 통합IF(2년) | KCIF(2년) | KCIF(3년) |
---|---|---|---|
2016 | 1.52 | 1.52 | 1.72 |
KCIF(4년) | KCIF(5년) | 중심성지수(3년) | 즉시성지수 |
1.66 | 1.72 | 2.247 | 0.44 |