RISS 학술연구정보서비스

검색
다국어 입력

http://chineseinput.net/에서 pinyin(병음)방식으로 중국어를 변환할 수 있습니다.

변환된 중국어를 복사하여 사용하시면 됩니다.

예시)
  • 中文 을 입력하시려면 zhongwen을 입력하시고 space를누르시면됩니다.
  • 北京 을 입력하시려면 beijing을 입력하시고 space를 누르시면 됩니다.
닫기
    인기검색어 순위 펼치기

    RISS 인기검색어

      KCI등재

      Technology Education Teachers' Beliefs: Transition across 40 Years in the United States

      한글로보기

      https://www.riss.kr/link?id=A103797386

      • 0

        상세조회
      • 0

        다운로드
      서지정보 열기
      • 내보내기
      • 내책장담기
      • 공유하기
      • 오류접수

      부가정보

      다국어 초록 (Multilingual Abstract)

      The purpose of this study was to investigate Technology Education teachers’beliefs about the “purposes” and “content” of Technology Education instruction in the U.S. In addition, this study provided a longitudinal record of the Technology Ed...

      The purpose of this study was to investigate Technology Education teachers’beliefs about the “purposes” and “content” of Technology Education instruction in the U.S. In addition, this study provided a longitudinal record of the Technology Education profession over 40 years. An on-line survey was developed and sent separately to middle school and high school Technology Education teachers, who (1) taught within seven selected states in three regions (eastern,mid-west, and western) of the United States; and (2) were members of the International Technology and Engineering Educators’ Association. We developed the instrument items based on previous national surveys and emerging issues in the profession. Findings from this survey were put into historical context by comparing results with the four national surveys covering over 40 years to identify changes in teachers’ beliefs about the purposes, and content of Technology Education as well as to document demographic changes. A number of findings were pertinent to this paper. First, Technology Education is the most frequently used program name followed by a variety of alternate program names;some form of “engineering” appears to be an emerging trend for naming Technology Education programs. Second, the composition of Technology Education teachers and students has become more diverse over time with substantial increases in diversity for the past 10 years. Third, general education purposes such as “develop problem solving skills” are the most frequent purposes teachers identified while vocational type purposes such as “develop skills in using tools and machines” were prominent in previous studies.
      Finally, Technology Education teachers reported that they believe Technology Education should address “core concepts of technology” taught in the context of design and problem solving. These and other findings are discussed in terms of their impact on Technology Education programs and implications for future development in the profession.

      더보기

      참고문헌 (Reference)

      1 Sanders, M, "Technology education teaching and learning project: Preliminary research report" SanAntonio, TX 2007

      2 Sanders, M, "Technology Education Teachers’ Beliefs and Practices" Louisville, KY 2009

      3 Sanders, M, "Technology Education Teachers’ Beliefs and Practices" 2009

      4 Sherman, T, "Teaching in middle school Technology Education: A review of recent practices" 20 : 367-379, 2010

      5 International Technology Education Association, "Standards for Technological Literacy: Content for the study of technology" Author 2000

      6 Dugger, W. E, "Reported of the survey data. Blacksburg, VA: Standards for Industrial Arts Programs Project" Virginia Polytechnic Institute and State University. 1980

      7 Sanders,M.E, "New paradigm or old wine: The status of technology education practice in the U.S" 12 (12): 35-55, 2001

      8 Sherman, T, "Middle school children’s thinking in Technology Education: A review of literature" 21 (21): 60-71, 2009

      9 Schmitt, M. L, "Industrial arts education: A survey of programs, teachers, students, and curriculum. U. S. Department of Health, Education, and Welfare. OE33038" Office of U.S. Government Printing Office 1966

      10 Stotter,D.E, "Assessment of the learning and attitude motivation of technology education students who complete an instructional unit on Agriculture and Biotechnology" North Carolina State University 2004

      1 Sanders, M, "Technology education teaching and learning project: Preliminary research report" SanAntonio, TX 2007

      2 Sanders, M, "Technology Education Teachers’ Beliefs and Practices" Louisville, KY 2009

      3 Sanders, M, "Technology Education Teachers’ Beliefs and Practices" 2009

      4 Sherman, T, "Teaching in middle school Technology Education: A review of recent practices" 20 : 367-379, 2010

      5 International Technology Education Association, "Standards for Technological Literacy: Content for the study of technology" Author 2000

      6 Dugger, W. E, "Reported of the survey data. Blacksburg, VA: Standards for Industrial Arts Programs Project" Virginia Polytechnic Institute and State University. 1980

      7 Sanders,M.E, "New paradigm or old wine: The status of technology education practice in the U.S" 12 (12): 35-55, 2001

      8 Sherman, T, "Middle school children’s thinking in Technology Education: A review of literature" 21 (21): 60-71, 2009

      9 Schmitt, M. L, "Industrial arts education: A survey of programs, teachers, students, and curriculum. U. S. Department of Health, Education, and Welfare. OE33038" Office of U.S. Government Printing Office 1966

      10 Stotter,D.E, "Assessment of the learning and attitude motivation of technology education students who complete an instructional unit on Agriculture and Biotechnology" North Carolina State University 2004

      11 International Technology, "About the ITEEA. Retrieved from"

      더보기

      동일학술지(권/호) 다른 논문

      동일학술지 더보기

      더보기

      분석정보

      View

      상세정보조회

      0

      Usage

      원문다운로드

      0

      대출신청

      0

      복사신청

      0

      EDDS신청

      0

      동일 주제 내 활용도 TOP

      더보기

      주제

      연도별 연구동향

      연도별 활용동향

      연관논문

      연구자 네트워크맵

      공동연구자 (7)

      유사연구자 (20) 활용도상위20명

      인용정보 인용지수 설명보기

      학술지 이력

      학술지 이력
      연월일 이력구분 이력상세 등재구분
      2026 평가예정 재인증평가 신청대상 (재인증)
      2020-01-01 평가 등재학술지 유지 (재인증) KCI등재
      2017-01-01 평가 등재학술지 유지 (계속평가) KCI등재
      2014-01-08 학술지명변경 외국어명 : 미등록 -> THE KOREAN JOURNAL OF TECHNOLOGY EDUCATION KCI등재
      2013-01-01 평가 등재학술지 유지 (등재유지) KCI등재
      2010-01-01 평가 등재학술지 유지 (등재유지) KCI등재
      2007-01-01 평가 등재학술지 선정 (등재후보2차) KCI등재
      2006-01-01 평가 등재후보 1차 PASS (등재후보1차) KCI등재후보
      2004-01-01 평가 등재후보학술지 선정 (신규평가) KCI등재후보
      더보기

      학술지 인용정보

      학술지 인용정보
      기준연도 WOS-KCI 통합IF(2년) KCIF(2년) KCIF(3년)
      2016 1.52 1.52 1.72
      KCIF(4년) KCIF(5년) 중심성지수(3년) 즉시성지수
      1.66 1.72 2.247 0.44
      더보기

      이 자료와 함께 이용한 RISS 자료

      나만을 위한 추천자료

      해외이동버튼