RISS 학술연구정보서비스

검색
다국어 입력

http://chineseinput.net/에서 pinyin(병음)방식으로 중국어를 변환할 수 있습니다.

변환된 중국어를 복사하여 사용하시면 됩니다.

예시)
  • 中文 을 입력하시려면 zhongwen을 입력하시고 space를누르시면됩니다.
  • 北京 을 입력하시려면 beijing을 입력하시고 space를 누르시면 됩니다.
닫기
    인기검색어 순위 펼치기

    RISS 인기검색어

      KCI등재 SCIE

      Comparison of procedural sequence in same-day bidirectional endoscopy: a systematic review and meta-analysis = Comparison of procedural sequence in same-day bidirectional endoscopy: a systematic review and meta-analysis

      한글로보기

      https://www.riss.kr/link?id=A106604400

      • 0

        상세조회
      • 0

        다운로드
      서지정보 열기
      • 내보내기
      • 내책장담기
      • 공유하기
      • 오류접수

      부가정보

      다국어 초록 (Multilingual Abstract)

      Background/Aims: To compare the efficacy and safety of procedural sequence in same-day bidirectional endoscopy. Methods: We searched OVID-MEDLINE, EMBASE, Cochrane Central Register of Controlled Trials, and Google Scholar to identify randomized contro...

      Background/Aims: To compare the efficacy and safety of procedural sequence in same-day bidirectional endoscopy.
      Methods: We searched OVID-MEDLINE, EMBASE, Cochrane Central Register of Controlled Trials, and Google Scholar to identify randomized controlled trials that compared the procedural sequences in same-day bidirectional endoscopy, including esophagogastroduodenoscopy (EGD) and colonoscopy. The sedative and analgesic doses required, discomfort and satisfaction scores, procedure time, recovery time, adenoma detection rate, and failed cecal intubation were evaluated. Adverse effects, including respiratory and cardiovascular complications, were also assessed.
      Results: We included six studies, with 1,848 patients in total. The requirement for sedative treatment was significantly lesser in the EGD-colonoscopy sequence than in the colonoscopy-EGD sequence (standardized mean difference [SMD], -0.39; 95% confidence interval [CI], -0.54 to -0.24; p = 0.12; I2 = 49%). Discomfort, scored by patients during the EGD procedure, was significantly lesser in the EGD-colonoscopy sequence than in the colonoscopy-EGD sequence (SMD, -0.45; 95% CI, -0.80 to -0.09; p = 0.02; I2 = 73%), while it was comparable during colonoscopy between the two sequences. Recovery time was significantly shorter in the EGD-colonoscopy sequence than in the colonoscopy-EGD sequence (SMD, -0.47; 95% CI, -0.65 to -0.30; p = 0.28; I2 = 21%). Total procedure duration, EGD, colonoscopy, cecal intubation time and incidence, incidences of pathologic findings, and adenoma detection were comparable between the two sequences. There was no significant difference in the incidences of desaturation, hypotension, hypertension, bradycardia, and tachycardia between the two sequences.
      Conclusions: When conducting same-day bidirectional endoscopy, EGD followed by colonoscopy is the most beneficial sequence to be used because patients require lower sedative doses, recover faster, and report lesser discomfort.

      더보기

      참고문헌 (Reference)

      1 Choi JS, "Which should go first during same-day upper and lower gastrointestinal endoscopy?:a randomized prospective study focusing on colonoscopy performance" 27 : 2209-2215, 2013

      2 Hsieh YH, "Which should go first during same-day bidirectional endosocopy with propofol sedation" 26 : 1559-1564, 2011

      3 Liberati A, "The PRISMA statement for reporting systematic reviews and meta-analyses of studies that evaluate health care interventions : explanation and elaboration" 62 : e1-e34, 2009

      4 IntHout J, "The Hartung-Knapp-Sidik-Jonkman method for random effects meta-analysis is straightforward and considerably outperforms the standard DerSimonian-Laird method" 14 : 25-, 2014

      5 Lucendo AJ, "Sameday bidirectional endoscopy with nonanesthesiologist administration of propofol: safety and cost-effectiveness compared with separated exams" 26 : 301-308, 2014

      6 Kurien M, "Same day bidirectional endoscopy : does the procedural order matter" 21 : 328-, 2012

      7 Naing C, "Reporting ‘number needed to treat’ in meta-analyses : a cross-sectional study" 5 : 232-237, 2012

      8 Lin JA, "Procedural sequence of bidirectional gastrointestinal endoscopy from the anaesthesiologist’s viewpoint" 113 (113): el11898-, 2014

      9 Oner OZ, "Prior esophagogastroduodenoscopy does not affect the cecal intubation time at bidirectional endoscopies" 6 : 599-602, 2013

      10 Tang JH, "Paired comparison of procedural sequence in same-day bidirectional endoscopy with moderate sedation and carbon dioxide insufflation: a prospective observational study" 22 : 360-365, 2016

      1 Choi JS, "Which should go first during same-day upper and lower gastrointestinal endoscopy?:a randomized prospective study focusing on colonoscopy performance" 27 : 2209-2215, 2013

      2 Hsieh YH, "Which should go first during same-day bidirectional endosocopy with propofol sedation" 26 : 1559-1564, 2011

      3 Liberati A, "The PRISMA statement for reporting systematic reviews and meta-analyses of studies that evaluate health care interventions : explanation and elaboration" 62 : e1-e34, 2009

      4 IntHout J, "The Hartung-Knapp-Sidik-Jonkman method for random effects meta-analysis is straightforward and considerably outperforms the standard DerSimonian-Laird method" 14 : 25-, 2014

      5 Lucendo AJ, "Sameday bidirectional endoscopy with nonanesthesiologist administration of propofol: safety and cost-effectiveness compared with separated exams" 26 : 301-308, 2014

      6 Kurien M, "Same day bidirectional endoscopy : does the procedural order matter" 21 : 328-, 2012

      7 Naing C, "Reporting ‘number needed to treat’ in meta-analyses : a cross-sectional study" 5 : 232-237, 2012

      8 Lin JA, "Procedural sequence of bidirectional gastrointestinal endoscopy from the anaesthesiologist’s viewpoint" 113 (113): el11898-, 2014

      9 Oner OZ, "Prior esophagogastroduodenoscopy does not affect the cecal intubation time at bidirectional endoscopies" 6 : 599-602, 2013

      10 Tang JH, "Paired comparison of procedural sequence in same-day bidirectional endoscopy with moderate sedation and carbon dioxide insufflation: a prospective observational study" 22 : 360-365, 2016

      11 Kazama T, "Optimal propofol plasma concentration during upper gastrointestinal endoscopy in young, middle-aged, and elderly patients" 93 : 662-669, 2000

      12 Chen SW, "Optimal procedural sequence for same-day bidirectional endoscopy with moderate sedation : a prospective randomized study" 33 : 689-695, 2018

      13 Higgins JP, "Measuring inconsistency in meta-analyses" 327 : 557-560, 2003

      14 Hozo SP, "Estimating the mean and variance from the median, range, and the size of a sample" 5 : 13-, 2005

      15 Cao Y, "Comparison of procedural sequences in same-day painless bidirectional endoscopy : single-center, prospective, randomized study" 29 : 330-337, 2017

      16 Cho JH, "Comparison of procedural sequences in same-day bidirectional endoscopy without benzodiazepine and propofol sedation:starting at the bottom or the top" 25 : 899-904, 2010

      17 Carter D, "Comparison of procedural sequence in same-day consecutive bidirectional endoscopy using moderate sedation: a prospective randomized study" 48 : 236-240, 2014

      18 Higgins JPT, "Cochrane Handbook for Systematic Reviews of Interventions Version 5.1.0" Cochrane Collaboration 2011

      19 Higgins JPT, "A revised tool for assessing risk of bias in randomized trials" 10 (10): 29-31, 2016

      20 Hohl CM, "A cost-effectiveness analysis of propofol versus midazolam for procedural sedation in the emergency department" 15 : 32-39, 2008

      21 Urquhart J, "A closer look at same-day bidirectional endoscopy" 69 : 271-277, 2009

      더보기

      동일학술지(권/호) 다른 논문

      분석정보

      View

      상세정보조회

      0

      Usage

      원문다운로드

      0

      대출신청

      0

      복사신청

      0

      EDDS신청

      0

      동일 주제 내 활용도 TOP

      더보기

      주제

      연도별 연구동향

      연도별 활용동향

      연관논문

      연구자 네트워크맵

      공동연구자 (7)

      유사연구자 (20) 활용도상위20명

      인용정보 인용지수 설명보기

      학술지 이력

      학술지 이력
      연월일 이력구분 이력상세 등재구분
      2023 평가예정 해외DB학술지평가 신청대상 (해외등재 학술지 평가)
      2020-01-01 평가 등재학술지 유지 (해외등재 학술지 평가) KCI등재
      2011-01-01 평가 등재학술지 유지 (등재유지) KCI등재
      2008-01-01 평가 등재학술지 선정 (등재후보2차) KCI등재
      2007-01-01 평가 등재후보 1차 PASS (등재후보1차) KCI등재후보
      2005-01-01 평가 등재후보학술지 선정 (신규평가) KCI등재후보
      더보기

      학술지 인용정보

      학술지 인용정보
      기준연도 WOS-KCI 통합IF(2년) KCIF(2년) KCIF(3년)
      2016 1.37 0.26 1.02
      KCIF(4년) KCIF(5년) 중심성지수(3년) 즉시성지수
      0.83 0.73 0.566 0.13
      더보기

      이 자료와 함께 이용한 RISS 자료

      나만을 위한 추천자료

      해외이동버튼