RISS 검색 - 단행본 상세보기

부가정보

목차 (Table of Contents)

CONTENTS
Prologue = xi
PART I THE COMMON-LAW TRADITION = 1
1 A Bulwark Against Arbitrary Legislation = 3
2 Liberty And Economic Ideology = 33

CONTENTS
Prologue = xi
PART I THE COMMON-LAW TRADITION = 1
1 A Bulwark Against Arbitrary Legislation = 3
2 Liberty And Economic Ideology = 33
3 Philosophy, Incorporation, And Natural Law = 49
4 A Reasonable And Sensitive Judgment = 63
5 A Zone Of Substantive Rights = 79
PART II FUNDAMENTAL RIGHTS AND MODERN CONSERVATISM = 89
6 Procedural And Substantive Due Process = 91
7 Deeply Rooted In History And Tradition = 101
8 A Different Description Of Fundamental Liberties = 109
9 The Inquiry Thus Reduces = 115
PART III THE MODERN JUSTIFICATION FOR ARBITRARINESS REVIEW = 125
10 The Dimension Of Personal Liberty = 127
11 The Guideposts Of History, Tradition, And Practice = 139
12 The Tradition Is A Living Thing = 145
PART IV A MORE TRANSCENDENT LIBERTY = 167
13 Certain Actions Are Prohibited = 169
14 A Prudential Exercise Of The Judicial Power = 193
15 What Freedom Must Become = 217
Epilogue = 241
Bibliography = 249
List of Cases = 251
Index = 257
About the Author = 267

온라인 도서 정보

온라인 서점 구매

온라인 서점 구매 정보
서점명	서명	판매현황	종이책			전자책 구매링크
서점명	서명	판매현황	정가	판매가(할인율)	포인트(포인트몰)	전자책 구매링크
	The Concept of Ordered Liberty and the Common-Law Due-Process Tradition: Slaughterhouse Cases Through Obergefell V. Hodges (1872-2015) (Hardcover)	판매중	193,870원	174,480원 (10%)	8,730포인트
	The Concept of Ordered Liberty and the Common-Law Due-Process Tradition: Slaughterhouse Cases through Obergefell v. Hodges (1872-2015)	판매중	193,870원	184,170원 (5%)	5,530포인트 (3%)

포인트 적립은 해당 온라인 서점 회원인 경우만 해당됩니다.
상기 할인율 및 적립포인트는 온라인 서점에서 제공하는 정보와 일치하지 않을 수 있습니다.
RISS 서비스에서는 해당 온라인 서점에서 구매한 상품에 대하여 보증하거나 별도의 책임을 지지 않습니다.

책소개

자료제공 :

The Concept of Ordered Liberty and the Common-Law Due-Process Tradition: Slaughterhouse Cases through Obergefell v. Hodges (1872-2015) (Slaughterhouse Cases through Obergefell v. Hodges (1872-2015))

The Concept of Ordered Liberty is a story of due process from the common-law tradition. Told through Supreme Court cases against a backdrop of political theory, legal philosophy and history, it illuminates a mid-twentieth-century dialectic between theories-liberal and conservative-for resolving controversies about state interference with personal liberties.