차용미술과 저작권의 충돌의 해결방안에 관한 재고 = The Study on Resolving the Collision of Appropriation Art and Copyright

국문 초록 (Abstract)

대중영화에서부터 광고에 이르는 다양한 분야에서 타인의 저작물의 일부 또는 전부를 이용하는 차용미술의 경우 ‘복제’와 ‘차용’이라는 예술계의 오랜 전통과 관습에 따라 정당성을 부여받고 있다 하더라도 독창적인 저작물에 대하여 저작권자에게 배 타적인 권리를 허여하는 저작권법과 필연적으로 충돌할 수밖에 없다. 본고는 타인의 저작물의 일부 또는 전부를 사용함으로써 저작권 침해의 가능성을 필연적으로 포함하고 있는 차용미술이 저작권법과의 관계에서 야기하는 충돌과 해결방안을 논의하고자 한다. 이를 위하여 우선 차용미술에 관한 역사적 배경과 미국 저 작권법의 공정이용 조항을 중심으로 차용미술과 저작권의 충돌을 검토하고자 하며 이어서 차용미술과 관련하여 리차드 프린스(Richard Prince)와 패트릭 카리우(Patrick Cariou) 사이의 저작권 침해소송을 중심으로 미국에서의 주요 저작권 침해소송 사례들을 살펴보고자 한다. 마지막으로 차용미술과 관련된 우리 저작권법상 쟁점을 살펴보고 그 법제적 대안을 마련하고자 한다.

다국어 초록 (Multilingual Abstract)

Although appropriation has been a leading artistic feature since the modern era, appropriation art is not a new movement and there has been a time-honored tradition of copying and tradition in art community. For centuries, artists ranging Renaissance painter Raphael to Édouard Manet have embraced and employed the concept of originality through imitation, drawing from presidents to create new art works. However, appropriaton art that borrows or even directly copies other artists’ copyrighted works or other cultural materials is more likely to be in conflict with a current copyright system protecting exclusive rights of a copyright owners. Especially appropriation artists do not hide the fact that they appropriate images from other artists and challenge viewers to recognize the “genesis” of their works. Following the decisions against in Rogers v. Koons, Balnch v. Koons and Cariou v. Prince, the future of appropriation practices in art community is increasingly unclear. This article addresses an inevitable conflict of appropriation art embracing portion of other’s copyrighted works and copyright law protecting copyrighted works and offers potential mechanisms for solving this conflict. Part II provides a brief overview of appropriation art and fair use doctrine under the U.S. copyright act. Part III analyzes key appropriation art cases addressing fair use doctrine, focusing on Cariou v. Prince that brought about heated discussions among legal field as well as art communities. Part IV discusses issues involving appropriation art under the current Korean Copyright Act and proposes legal alternative to solve potential conflict.

목차 (Table of Contents)

• Ⅰ. 서론
• Ⅱ. 차용미술과 저작권 : 미국에서의 논의
• 1. 차용미술의 의의
• 2. 차용미술과 저작권의 충돌
• Ⅲ. 차용미술의 공정이용 관련 사례
• 1. 제프 쿤스(Jeff Koons)관련 주요 사례
• 2. Cariou
• V. Prince
• Ⅳ. 차용미술에 대한 우리 저작권법상 법적 쟁점
• 1. 차용미술과 저작권의 충돌
• 2. 차용미술과 저작권의 충돌 해결방안
• Ⅴ. 결론

참고문헌 (Reference)

1 이상정, "차용미술(appropriation art)과 저작권" 서울시립대학교 법학연구소 18 (18): 319-352, 2010

2 송영식, "저작권법 개설(제８판)" 세창출판사 2012

3 이영록, "저작권 분쟁조정제도 운영현황과 문제점 및 개선방안" 한국지식재산연구원 2013

4 최경수, "저작권 분쟁조정제도" 한국정보법학회 8 (8): 2004

5 이주연, "변모된 재현개념이 미술사 서술에 끼친 영향" 서울大學校 大學院 1998

6 한국문화관광연구원, "문화예술분야 저작권 관련 주요 쟁점과 정책개선방안 연구" 2014

7 E. H. Gombrich, "The Sense of Order: A Study in the Psy-chology of Decorative Art" Cornell 1980

8 Geri J. Yonover, "The Precarious Balance: Moral Rights, Parody, and Fair Use" 14 : 1996

9 Madhavi Sunder, "The Invention of Traditional Knowledge" 70 : 2007

10 Olufunmilayo B. Arewa, "The Freedom to Copy: Copyright, Creation, and Context" 41 : 2007

11 Palette, "The Dilemmas of Digital Sound, Sampling and a Proposed Compulsory License Solution" 11 : 1993

12 H. Brian Holland, "Social Semiotics in the Fair Use Analysis" 24 : 2011

13 Michael C. Donaldson, "Refuge from the Storm: A Fair Use Safe Harbor for Non-fiction Works" 59 : 2012

14 Richard Schiff, "Originality, in CRITICAL TERMS FOR ART HISTORY" 2003

15 Michael A. Einhorn, "Miss Scarlett’s License Done Gone!: Parody, Satire, and Markets" 20 : 2002

16 David E. Sorkin, "Judicial Review of ICANN Domain Name Dispute Decisions" 18 : 2001

17 Walter Benjamin, "Illuminations" Harcourt, Brace & World, Inc 1968

18 Hannah Arendt, "Illuminations" Harcourt, Brace & World, Inc 1968

19 WIPO ARBITRATION AND MEDIATION CENTER, "GUIDE TO WIPO DOMAIN NAME DISPUTE RESOLUTION"

20 William W. Fisher III, "Frank Cost, Shepard Fairey, Meir Feder, Edwin Fountain, Geoffrey Stewart & Marita Sturken, REFLECTIONS ON THE HOPE POSTER CASE" 25 : 2012

21 Erving Goffman, "Frame Analysis: An Essay on the Organization of Experience" Northeastern 1974

22 Dan L. Burk, "Feminism and Dualism in Intellectual Property" 15 : 2006

23 Andrew Gilden, "Fair Use for the Rich and Fabulous" 80 : 2013

24 Laura A. Heymann, "Everything Is Transformative: Fair Use and Reader Response" 31 : 2007

25 Patricia Search, "Electronic Art and the Law: Intellectual Property Rights in Cyberspace" 32 (32): 1999

26 Liz McKenzie, "Drawing Lines: Addressing Cognitive Bias in Art Appropriation Cases" 20 : 2013

27 Julie Cohen, "Creativity and Culture in Copyright Theory" 40 : 2007

28 WILLIAM M. LANDES, "Copyright, Borrowed Images and Appropriation Art: An Economic Approach" 9 : 2000

29 Rebecca Tushnet, "Copy This Essay: How Fair Use Doctrine Harms Free Speech and How Copying Serves It" 114 : 2004

30 Bryan Bergman, "Comment, Into the Grey: The Unclear Laws of Digital Sampling" 27 : 2005

31 Robert S. Nelson, "CRITICAL TERMS FOR ART HISTORY" University of Chicago Press 2003

32 "COPYRIGHT LAW-FAIR USE-SECOND CIRCUIT HOLDS THAT APPROPRIATION ARTWORK NEED NOT COMMENT ON THE ORIGINAL TO BE TRANSFORMATIVE.-Cariou v. Prince" 127 : 2014

33 E. Kenly Ames, "Beyond Rogers v. Koons: A Fair Use Standard For Appropriation" 93 : 1473-, 1993

34 Ralph E. Lerner, "Art Law(vol 2)" Practising Law Institute 2005

35 RACHEL ISABELLE BUTT, "Appropriation Art and Fair Use" 25 : 2010

36 Jackson Mathews, "Aesthetics" Pantheon Books 1964

37 JEAN LIPMAN, "ART ABOUT ART" E.P. Dutton 1978

38 JEAN LIPMAN, "ART ABOUT ART" E.P. Dutton 1978

39 ERIC D. GORMAN, "APPROPRIATE TESTING AND RESOLUTION: How To DETERMINE WHETHER APPROPRIATION ART is TRANSFORMATIVE “FAIR USE” OR MERELY AN UNAUTHORIZED DERIVATIVE?" 43 : 2012

40 David Nimmer, "A Modest Proposal to Streamline Fair Use Determinations" 24 : 2006

41 Elizabeth Winkowski, "A Context-Sensitive Inquiry: The Interpretation of Meaning in Cases of Visual Appropriation Art" 12 : 2013

42 Arun Gupta, "'I’LL BE YOUR MIRROR' - CONTEMPORARY ART AND THE ROLE OF STYLE IN COPYRIGHT INFRINGEMENT ANALYSIS" 31 : 2006