RISS 학술연구정보서비스

검색
다국어 입력

http://chineseinput.net/에서 pinyin(병음)방식으로 중국어를 변환할 수 있습니다.

변환된 중국어를 복사하여 사용하시면 됩니다.

예시)
  • 中文 을 입력하시려면 zhongwen을 입력하시고 space를누르시면됩니다.
  • 北京 을 입력하시려면 beijing을 입력하시고 space를 누르시면 됩니다.
닫기
    인기검색어 순위 펼치기

    RISS 인기검색어

      Commerce in the shadow of conflict: Domestic politics and the relationship between international conflict and economic interdependence.

      한글로보기

      https://www.riss.kr/link?id=T10586681

      • 0

        상세조회
      • 0

        다운로드
      서지정보 열기
      • 내보내기
      • 내책장담기
      • 공유하기
      • 오류접수

      부가정보

      다국어 초록 (Multilingual Abstract)

      Limited commercial integration between India and Pakistan, or within much of the Middle East, suggests that conflict between countries can have a detrimental effect on their economic relations. Indeed, a number of studies in the international relations literature have shown that, in fact, tension or conflict between countries tends to be correlated with lower levels of economic exchange. Yet rapidly growing economic integration between Mainland China and Taiwan suggests that economic interdependence can also flourish in the presence of severe political tension and a potential for military conflict. Clearly, the relationship between political conflict and economic interdependence is one that varies considerably across cases, and in this dissertation I develop an argument that seeks to account for such variation. I argue that conflict can have a negative impact on commerce for a number of reasons, but that these effects are contingent on the political strength of internationalist economic interests within domestic polities. When these interests are strong, leaders try to keep conflict from affecting their foreign commercial relations, and as such the independent effects of conflict are limited. When internationalist economic interests are weak, international conflict has a strong and independent negative effect on cross-border commerce. To test my argument, I conduct statistical analyses of international trade and investment flows for a large sample of countries over an extended period of time. Using UN voting patterns as a proxy for conflict, and overall trade openness as a proxy for the political strength of internationalist economic interests, I find that conflict has much stronger independent effects when internationalist economic interests are weak. I also examine the relationship between conflict and commerce within two cases: Mainland China-Taiwan relations, and India-Pakistan relations. I show that the growing political clout of internationalist economic interests in both Mainland China and Taiwan has been a key reason why commerce has flourished in that case despite serious political rivalry. In the India-Pakistan case, by contrast, internationalist economic interests have held relatively limited political influence, and as a result, leaders have not paid high costs for allowing bilateral political conflict to undermine the bilateral economic relationship.
      번역하기

      Limited commercial integration between India and Pakistan, or within much of the Middle East, suggests that conflict between countries can have a detrimental effect on their economic relations. Indeed, a number of studies in the international relatio...

      Limited commercial integration between India and Pakistan, or within much of the Middle East, suggests that conflict between countries can have a detrimental effect on their economic relations. Indeed, a number of studies in the international relations literature have shown that, in fact, tension or conflict between countries tends to be correlated with lower levels of economic exchange. Yet rapidly growing economic integration between Mainland China and Taiwan suggests that economic interdependence can also flourish in the presence of severe political tension and a potential for military conflict. Clearly, the relationship between political conflict and economic interdependence is one that varies considerably across cases, and in this dissertation I develop an argument that seeks to account for such variation. I argue that conflict can have a negative impact on commerce for a number of reasons, but that these effects are contingent on the political strength of internationalist economic interests within domestic polities. When these interests are strong, leaders try to keep conflict from affecting their foreign commercial relations, and as such the independent effects of conflict are limited. When internationalist economic interests are weak, international conflict has a strong and independent negative effect on cross-border commerce. To test my argument, I conduct statistical analyses of international trade and investment flows for a large sample of countries over an extended period of time. Using UN voting patterns as a proxy for conflict, and overall trade openness as a proxy for the political strength of internationalist economic interests, I find that conflict has much stronger independent effects when internationalist economic interests are weak. I also examine the relationship between conflict and commerce within two cases: Mainland China-Taiwan relations, and India-Pakistan relations. I show that the growing political clout of internationalist economic interests in both Mainland China and Taiwan has been a key reason why commerce has flourished in that case despite serious political rivalry. In the India-Pakistan case, by contrast, internationalist economic interests have held relatively limited political influence, and as a result, leaders have not paid high costs for allowing bilateral political conflict to undermine the bilateral economic relationship.

      더보기

      분석정보

      View

      상세정보조회

      0

      Usage

      원문다운로드

      0

      대출신청

      0

      복사신청

      0

      EDDS신청

      0

      동일 주제 내 활용도 TOP

      더보기

      주제

      연도별 연구동향

      연도별 활용동향

      연관논문

      연구자 네트워크맵

      공동연구자 (7)

      유사연구자 (20) 활용도상위20명

      이 자료와 함께 이용한 RISS 자료

      나만을 위한 추천자료

      해외이동버튼