RISS 학술연구정보서비스

검색

인기 검색어

    다국어 입력

    http://chineseinput.net/에서 pinyin(병음)방식으로 중국어를 변환할 수 있습니다.

    변환된 중국어를 복사하여 사용하시면 됩니다.

    예시)
    • 中文 을 입력하시려면 zhongwen을 입력하시고 space를누르시면됩니다.
    • 北京 을 입력하시려면 beijing을 입력하시고 space를 누르시면 됩니다.
    닫기
    KCI등재후보

    조선 전기 비공식적 제도의 변화와 류성룡의 리더십 = Transitions of The Informal Institutions in The Early Joseon Dynasty and Leadership of Ryu Seong-ryong

    한글로보기

    https://www.riss.kr/link?id=A109433809

    • 0

      상세조회
    • 0

      다운로드
    서지정보 열기
    • 내보내기
    • 내책장담기
    • 공유하기
      • URL 복사
    • 오류접수
    인용문이 복사되었습니다.

    부가정보

    다국어 초록 (Multilingual Abstract) kakao i 다국어 번역

    This paper analyzes the transition process of the informal institutions in the early Joseon dynasty, from the perspective of Institutionalism. Since its establishment, Joseon dynasty pushed the whole society toward the confucian transformation under the government initiative not only in the formal instituions (legal system) but also in the informal institutions (social norms, culture). By the 16th century, Joseon had become a confucian country far different from the past.
    Although the informal institutions and social culture of Joseon after the confucian transformation had some positive aspects, mostly it turned into a very closed and extractive nature, due to the persistent and collective efforts over the long time period of the ruling class Yangban to protect and strengthen their vested interests and privileges.
    During the national crisis incurred by the Imjin War, Ryu Seong-ryong adopted very reformative policies of open and integrated nature, quite different from those of the early Joseon when closed and extrative tendencies were intensified.
    This was possible due to his patriotism and his eagerness to save the nation and the people, combined with his open-minded leadership.
    However, when Ryu stepped down from the government after the war was over, most of such inclusive policies were abolished, and closed and extractive tendency of the society was intensified again, due to strong repulsion of the ruling class. It is regrettable that Joseon could not keep Ryu’s open and integrative policies.
    Ryu’s patriotism and integrative leadership provides an important lesson to modern Korea, where some of the closed and extractive aspects still remain. Ruling elite group of Korea, to ensure continued development of the country, should try to improve the informal institutions of our country toward more open and inclusive ones.
    The Institutionalism that is getting more attention in the academia implies that it can be a useful tool for analyzing main characteristics of the informal institutions of early Joseon and also re-interpreting Ryu’s leadership.
    번역하기

    This paper analyzes the transition process of the informal institutions in the early Joseon dynasty, from the perspective of Institutionalism. Since its establishment, Joseon dynasty pushed the whole society toward the confucian transformation under t...

    This paper analyzes the transition process of the informal institutions in the early Joseon dynasty, from the perspective of Institutionalism. Since its establishment, Joseon dynasty pushed the whole society toward the confucian transformation under the government initiative not only in the formal instituions (legal system) but also in the informal institutions (social norms, culture). By the 16th century, Joseon had become a confucian country far different from the past.
    Although the informal institutions and social culture of Joseon after the confucian transformation had some positive aspects, mostly it turned into a very closed and extractive nature, due to the persistent and collective efforts over the long time period of the ruling class Yangban to protect and strengthen their vested interests and privileges.
    During the national crisis incurred by the Imjin War, Ryu Seong-ryong adopted very reformative policies of open and integrated nature, quite different from those of the early Joseon when closed and extrative tendencies were intensified.
    This was possible due to his patriotism and his eagerness to save the nation and the people, combined with his open-minded leadership.
    However, when Ryu stepped down from the government after the war was over, most of such inclusive policies were abolished, and closed and extractive tendency of the society was intensified again, due to strong repulsion of the ruling class. It is regrettable that Joseon could not keep Ryu’s open and integrative policies.
    Ryu’s patriotism and integrative leadership provides an important lesson to modern Korea, where some of the closed and extractive aspects still remain. Ruling elite group of Korea, to ensure continued development of the country, should try to improve the informal institutions of our country toward more open and inclusive ones.
    The Institutionalism that is getting more attention in the academia implies that it can be a useful tool for analyzing main characteristics of the informal institutions of early Joseon and also re-interpreting Ryu’s leadership.

    더보기

    참고문헌 (Reference)

    1 한국교회사연구소, "한국천주교회사 1" 2009

    2 도이힐러, 마르티나, "한국의 유교화과정" 너머북스 2013

    3 한국학중앙연구원, "한국민족문화대백과"

    4 수암 류진, "징비의 삶, 임진왜란을 이기다: 서애 류성룡 연보" 박영사 2023

    5 베버, 막스, "직업으로서의 정치" 문예출판사 2017

    6 계승범, "중종의 시대" 역사비평사 2014

    7 이준영, "주례" 자유문고 2002

    8 김성우, "조선중기 국가와 사족" 역사비평사 2001

    9 정병석, "조선은 왜 무너졌는가" 시공사 2016

    10 도이힐러, 마르티나, "조상의 눈 아래에서-한국의 친족, 신분 그리고 지역성" 너머북스 2015

    1 한국교회사연구소, "한국천주교회사 1" 2009

    2 도이힐러, 마르티나, "한국의 유교화과정" 너머북스 2013

    3 한국학중앙연구원, "한국민족문화대백과"

    4 수암 류진, "징비의 삶, 임진왜란을 이기다: 서애 류성룡 연보" 박영사 2023

    5 베버, 막스, "직업으로서의 정치" 문예출판사 2017

    6 계승범, "중종의 시대" 역사비평사 2014

    7 이준영, "주례" 자유문고 2002

    8 김성우, "조선중기 국가와 사족" 역사비평사 2001

    9 정병석, "조선은 왜 무너졌는가" 시공사 2016

    10 도이힐러, 마르티나, "조상의 눈 아래에서-한국의 친족, 신분 그리고 지역성" 너머북스 2015

    11 노스, 더글라스, "제도⋅제도변화⋅경제적 성과" 자유기업센터 1996

    12 후쿠야마, 프랜시스, "정치 질서의 기원" 웅진지식하우스 2012

    13 팔레, 제임스, "유교적 경세론과 조선의 제도들 1, 2-유형원과 조선후기" 산처럼 2008

    14 송복, "위대한 만남 : 서애 류성룡" 지식마당 2007

    15 유수원, "우서" 민족문화추진회 1981

    16 계승범, "우리가 아는 선비는 없다" 역사의아침 2011

    17 국사편찬위원회, "신편한국사"

    18 존 페어뱅크, "신중국사" 까치 2005

    19 이익, "성호사설" 한길사 1999

    20 송복, "서애정신이란 무엇인가" (창간) : 2020

    21 송복, "서애 류성룡의 리더십" 법문사 2019

    22 서재진, "서애 류성룡의 리더십" 법문사 2019

    23 아사오 나오히로, "새로쓴 일본사" 창비 2003

    24 박종기, "새로 쓴 오백년 고려사" 푸른역사 2008

    25 정도전, "삼봉집" 지식을만드는지식 2011

    26 파월슨, 존, "부와 빈곤의 역사" 나남출판 2007-,

    27 김태영, "반계 유형원 연구" 사람의무늬 2013

    28 오종록, "류성룡의 학술과 경륜" 태학사 2007

    29 이헌창, "류성룡의 학술과 경륜" 태학사 2007

    30 정만조, "류성룡의 학술과 경륜" 태학사 2007

    31 권오영, "류성룡의 학술과 경륜" 태학사 2007

    32 최연식, "류성룡의 신념윤리와 책임윤리" (창간) : 2020

    33 이정철, "대동법 : 조선 최고의 개혁" 역사비평사 2010

    34 송복, "닫힌 제국의 닫힘과 류성룡의 열림 정책" 6 : 2022

    35 "다산시문집 12권, 속유론"

    36 박석무, "다산 정약용 평전" 민음사 2014

    37 박석무, "다산 정약용 평전" 민음사 2014

    38 류성룡, "국역 진사록1, 2" 서애선생기념사업회 2001

    39 류성룡, "국역 잡저" 서애선생기념사업회 2001

    40 류성룡, "국역 근폭집" 서애선생기념사업회 2001

    41 류성룡, "국역 군문등록" 서애선생기념사업회 2001

    42 스미스, 아담, "국부론(상)" 비봉출판사 2007

    43 애쓰모글루, "국가는 왜 실패하는가" 시공사 2012

    44 박종기, "고려사의 재발견" 휴머니스트 2015

    45 정약용, "경세유표 III" 한길사 1997

    46 후쿠야마, 프랜시스, "강한 국가의 조건" 황금가지 2005

    47 Douglass North, "Institutions, Institutional Change and Economic Performance" Cambridge University Press 1977

    48 Douglass North, "Institutions, Ideology, and Economic Performance" 11 (11): 1992

    49 Helmke, G., "Informal Institutions and Comparative Politics: A Research Agenda" 2 (2): 725-740, 2004

    50 정기훈, "How Do Informal & Formal Institutions Affect Economic Development in East Asia and West?" 29 (29): 61-84, 2022

    51 Daron Acemoglu, "Handbooks in Economics Vol.1A, No.22" 386-472, 2005

    더보기

    동일학술지(권/호) 다른 논문

    분석정보

    View

    상세정보조회

    0

    Usage

    원문다운로드

    0

    대출신청

    0

    복사신청

    0

    EDDS신청

    0

    동일 주제 내 활용도 TOP

    더보기

    주제

    연도별 연구동향

    연도별 활용동향

    연관논문

    연구자 네트워크맵

    공동연구자 (7)

    유사연구자 (20) 활용도상위20명

    이 자료와 함께 이용한 RISS 자료

    나만을 위한 추천자료

    해외이동버튼